Although the Alt Right accepts many of the taboo ideas that citizens steeped in modernism are both oblivious to and will deny if mentioned, it still faces a few taboos of its own, one being the destructive consequences of racial separation without attention to ethnic and caste differences, leading to a cultureless group where traces of other races obliterate its Western European traits.
Trace admixture gradually reduces people from distinctive, “old school” looking Western Europeans to moon-faced people of generic white ancestry and no class distinction, creating a white drone/prole/pleb race which has none of the greatness of the original. This is most distinctive in Americans, where some are mixes of Southern, Eastern, and Western European, resulting in what is technically white but without any particular cultural connection or depth of understanding.
Genetics codes for individual traits, and in sub-species which were isolated, these traits form networks where each part supports the others because together all of these traits collaborate to form the physical and intellectual makeup of the group, including their aesthetic tendencies, moral outlooks, and cognitive processing skills. When groups are mixed, these networks are disrupted, and so traits are passed on partially without the integration into the whole, producing people without the consciousness of the original but with some of its abilities, though not the wisdom to use them well. This is why trace admixed formerly Western European populations in Eastern and Southern Europe — including Ireland, since they are Mediterranean/Semitic mixes — have historically underperformed compared to the West and have followed third world voting patterns, choosing the more individualistic path of “free stuff” and a nanny state over a culture-driven traditional-style civilization.
People have begun to refer to these generic, cultureless, deracinated, and generally low-performing individuals as bugmen, since they often have a sometimes comical facial structure and zero connection to any roots, since when your heritage consists solely of a government racial category, there is no embedded genetic memory of the past and so none of the consciousness required for identity and culture. Bugmen are soulless creatures that Nietzsche described as “last men,” driven only by material desires and a search for power through peer pressure. Everything that we find odious about modern society is designed for bugmen, and to cultivate more bugmen, since they exist easily in it and are oblivious to its downsides, so have a massive evolutionary advantage in it but nowhere else.
The soulless bugman can be described as a hollow but controlling and yet subservient person who is comfortable only among the meaningless:
Youâ€™re more than likely surrounded by hoards of these bovine-esque people in day-to-day life. Culturally of course theyâ€™re near impossible to pin down for they cut all cultural roots at the base in fear of representation with the past. Politically many say bugmen are â€˜left-leaningâ€™ yet Iâ€™d argue the case that any affiliation with politics is entirely with the curve of the populous and thus the Bugmen â€“ at present â€“ inject themselves routinely with viral strains of progressivism, neoliberalism and (especially) democracy. Projected from this ambivalent attitude towards history and politics comes anti-empathetical extroversions with regard to tradition, myth, folklore, spirituality and interest, all of which, when positioned in relation to a bugman are used only alongside heavy doses of postmodernist irony. The simple matter of fact is they have zero respect or tolerance for anything antiquated or traditional, the most minor of historic morsels that doesnâ€™t actively sell itself to them or project their personal vision of infantile-tech-utopia is cast aside. Philosophically the bugman is relatively confused, often mistaking logic, reason and rationale with one another, and replacing the idea of basic causality with their own drawn-out narcissistic assessment attempts: â€œLook at me, Iâ€™ve got it all figured out.â€ the bugman says internally.
Before you sits the social nervous system of the bugman true, a sordid mixture of fad-reverence and capitalist-lite binging. On closer inspection of the day to day life of a bugman one finds at its core the implementation of social erosion, everything that is taken from its origin is likewise bastardized into a regressive, virtual, stir-crazy version of its former self: eSports, Fantasy Football, Copy â€˜n Paste Vidya (Ã la Bethesda/Ubisoft), New Atheism, Beards-as-personality, etc. each of these characteristics is of course filtered through the latest piece of cutting-edge high-brand technology the bugman can afford. One may have noticed already that bugmenâ€™s â€˜personalitiesâ€™ are nothing more than the accumulation and composition of various popular brand names, technologies, TV shows, bands etc. The bugman is entirely defined by that which they consume. Thus the bugmen easily assimilate into their own groups, for their archetypes and traits are based off material possessions, as such grouping is quick, painless and has the added benefit of instantaneous conversation: â€œSweet mechanical keyboard dude!â€
There is of course a difference between a regular consumer and a bugman, there has to be, for everyone consumes. Whereas a consumer will buy a basket of groceries which they plan on eating, the bugman will purchase retro foods, meme-drinks and ironic status-tokens as a means to display the fact that they are indeed â€˜in-on-itâ€™. A consumer will buy the box-set of their favourite TV show because they genuinely enjoyed the viewing, perhaps theyâ€™ll watch 3-4 episodes a week around other commitments, a bugman on the other hand subscribes to multiple streaming services and binges series after series in the ever expanding quest for acceptance, when asked how they found Stranger Things, Rick & Morty, Bojack Horseman, Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones etc. the bugman does not offer insight into their personal opinion, only regurgitates a titbit or quote from the series as a means to display their virtue of consumption. â€œI too have seen the thing you have!â€ A network of insects whose lives are routinely controlled by ratings: theirs and others. They must advance their rating by subsuming the other which is rated highly. “Everyone liked this, so if I like this, everyone will like me!â€
We can see this trend in our society already through the fusion of social prominence and peer pressure. As detailed in the book BOBOS in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There, social respectability has been taken over by Leftist values, and has created a culture of “preciousness,” in which each person strives to be unique in their combination of possessions and activities, and to demonstrate altruistic and “meaningful” activity in their lives, something the Neoreactionaries referred to as “virtue signaling.”
This culminated in the precursor to and an ingredient of the Social Justice Warrior (SJW) type, the hipster. Hipsters are individualists who use fragments of culture to advertise their own uniqueness and coolness, leading to a type of fatalism about meaning because it seen as useful only as a means to the end of the individual:
Ever since the Allies bombed the Axis into submission, Western civilization has had a succession of counter-culture movements that have energetically challenged the status quo. Each successive decade of the post-war era has seen it smash social standards, riot and fight to revolutionize every aspect of music, art, government and civil society.
But after punk was plasticized and hip hop lost its impetus for social change, all of the formerly dominant streams of â€œcounter-cultureâ€ have merged together. Now, one mutating, trans-Atlantic melting pot of styles, tastes and behavior has come to define the generally indefinable idea of the â€œHipster.â€
An artificial appropriation of different styles from different eras, the hipster represents the end of Western civilization â€“ a culture lost in the superficiality of its past and unable to create any new meaning. Not only is it unsustainable, it is suicidal. While previous youth movements have challenged the dysfunction and decadence of their elders, today we have the â€œhipsterâ€ â€“ a youth subculture that mirrors the doomed shallowness of mainstream society.
Culture has been replaced with the cult of the individual and former cultural objects are now re-arranged the way a hermit crab makes his shell, both as camouflage and a method of showing off for members of the opposite sex or social activity partners. The end goal of this socializing is to be important as a means to having material power, comfort, convenience, and prestige.
In this sense, the hipster and the bugman are both members of an archetype which Nietzsche described as the last man, or the man who cares about nothing, the opposite of thymos which Nietzsche and later Francis Fukuyama saw as the goal of people in the ancient world, which was a desire to be recognized as having risen above material convenience:
The Last Man is primarily characterized as the type of individual that is fat, lazy and falls asleep watching TV after over indulging in junk food. This clearly denotes the type of man that is content with living a life whose primary and only purpose is to exist in a perpetual state of comfort, security and pleasure. This is a value system that does not idealize or extol higher values, challenging circumstances or hard work.
Zarathustra after descending the mountains is trying to deliver a sermon to a crowd of people that are hanging around the marketplace. Individuals that normally hang around a marketplace are typically known as commoners â€“ especially in Nietzscheâ€™s time â€“ and their primary concern is grotesque entertainment, gossip, manners and commerce.
After delivering his sermon about the Overman/Superman (or Ubersmensch) Nietzsche receives an apathetic and mocking response. One must imagine how extremely jarring this was for Zarathustra considering he has just descended from his sojourn in the mountains to proclaim this message.
We know this archetype — Homer Simpson may be its most articulate exposition — because we have lived it. White culture in America and Europe hates itself because we see ourselves as entirely last men, people who have become servants of the system they created and in doing so, displaced all higher values for the practicality and compromise of “getting along with everyone else.” We destroyed our sense of purpose in order to keep the group together.
One of the reasons for this displacement is our loss, especially after WW2, of a sense of group identity. Identity requires people who look similar, have similar inherent tendencies for their values systems, and want to work together for a purpose, sort of like an extended family. You need to feel that your group is in control of its own lands, ruled by good people, and has intelligent enough people among it that there are things worth believing in. Since democracy, we have had none of those.
As it always does, democracy also got to work in our ethnic replacement because foreigners are easier to control, since they can be counted on to act against the former majority and therefore, are a way for a leader to stay in power. Resentment is a powerful motivation, and any group displaced from its own identity and imported as labor is going to resent those who are doing the importing. Tyrants always want to replace their populations with foreigners, but the populations will vote for it if it is presented as something personally advantageous to them, which is easy enough to set up. Like taking candy from a baby.
This replacement displaces culture and produces people with no sense of identity, which means they have no idea of their origins, future, or values. They are merely atomized individuals existing for their own pleasure and when this bores them or they outgrow it, they have nothing but to adapt to the system as best they can in order to avoid its negative effects. Loss of ethnic solidarity — being 100% of the same background — leads to the creation of what T.S. Eliot described in his poem “The Hollow Men”:
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar
Shape without form, shade without colour,
Paralysed force, gesture without motion;
He describes face value without meaning, aesthetic without underlying structure, and activity without intention, all of which are symptoms not causes of a society which has lost its center, namely its identity and the ensuing sense of purpose that comes with it. That purpose can be as simple as the identity itself, meaning that people would act so that they could be the best possible form of what they are; this is similar to how children want to grow up and adults want to always improve at what they do, without losing the sense of who they have been and who they are destined to be. In the West, we aimed for all of those plus the idea of excellence, or striving for greatness to the level that we became significant in terms of the order of nature all around us, rising above mere materiality for an informational and metaphysical importance. We are wired for this, and we need it, but we cannot have it in society with any diversity, even one drop, whether ethnic or racial or — as inevitably and invariably arises from ethnic — both.
Bugmen appear when people lose shape and form because their heritage becomes a broken line. When you mix a German with an Irishman, meld a Slav or an Italian with an English person, or cross caste lines to produce caste-mixed people like Prince William and Kate Middleton have done, or even merge with a “white-presenting” miscegenated person as Price Harry and Meghan Markle have done, you produce bugmen. They have no particular distinction in their faces and bodies because they have no genetic consistency, and this is what makes them bugmen, not the specific races that are mixed into the muck. Breeding Western Europeans into Eastern or Southern Europeans, thanks to trace admixture, or breeding natural Brahmins into natural Vaisya, produces bugmen just as surely as mating a Norwegian with an African or Mongolian. Bugmen are defined by having no consistency and thus no identity, and that is what produces their slightly weird and amorphous visages and outlooks, much like the people who replaced the great empires of Athens and Rome resembled the Asian cultures around them and no longer had in them the capacity for greatness that their ancestors possessed.
White Nationalism 1.0 failed in part because it refused to address issues of trace admixture and caste. Your people who have ethnic identity have no interest in joining with a mixed-ethnic group, as it would destroy what they are; those who are higher castes have no interest in a “classless society” as Hitler wanted, because it will abolish what they are. No one wants to be a bugman, even a 100% “white” one.
The Alt Right took a sane course of action when it endorsed nationalism instead of racial nationalism, which like “civic nationalism” is a bastardization of the idea of nationalism. In this platform, the identity of “European” becomes more important than forming generic whites; if you are German, you get to remain German, even if your family has lived in America for five generations; if you are a natural Brahmin or natural Kshatriya, you get to remain at that rank, instead of being bred into white drones for the sake of a Utopian racial ideal (which is itself a form of egalitarian thinking).
In the West, we are just now emerging from a slump that began when our mercantile castes (Vasiya) joined with our drones (Thralls) to overthrow our natural aristocracy, replace our natural cultures, and obliterate the differences between people so that a new generation of the useless could feast on the wealth of the past without being attacked for their obvious treachery. Their method is the notion of egalitarianism or abolishing of the caste and aristocratic hierarchy, which rapidly blooms into political equality (democracy), sexual equality (feminism), economic equality (socialism) and other attempts to blur the line between good, bad, and mediocre so that no one can suffer a loss of social status for being unrealistic, crazy, or bad. With globalism, they attained their modified goal, which was a system with the attributes of Communism but applied indirectly so that it could have a thriving capitalist economy and not be observable as the tyranny that it is. With their victory, came their defeat, because as happened after the French and Bolshevik revolutions, it became clear that the Utopian promises delivered only an existentially-defeating dystopian wasteland disguised as a paradise of consumer delights!
What comes next will delight some and dismay most: a purge. This will probably not involve murder, but instead relocations. Since diversity does not work, we will likely ethnically sort ourselves through reparations-with-repatriation, such that Irish people and Negroes will receive a stipend to fund the return to their homelands and compensation for their time lost, in exchange for a non-optional deletion of their citizenship. Leftists, who are civilization-wreckers, will likely be exiled to the third world where they will find a society that already has all of the “reforms” they wanted for us to make in the first world. The insane, neurotic, sociopathic, and perverse will likely also be relocated or incarcerated. A caste system will reward the good by pushing them upward and demote the bad by pushing them downward — the antithesis of egalitarianism — such that competence will be rewarded and soon, proliferate. The West will heal itself. This is not as difficult as it sounds.
Before this can happen, however, we need to remove democracy from our souls. We can no longer rely on symbolic crutches like racial nationalism, or believe in ideologies that address some but not all of the vital issues. There is only one path to traditional civilization, and that is by recreating the whole thing, taking advantage of the technology we have (which was created based on the research that occurred under traditional civilization) in order to make the transition as smooth as possible. In the end, we may have only twenty percent of our people, but they will be the right twenty percent, and with them, we can build a civilization greater than any preceding it.