World democracy — the driving force behind globalism — has run out of juice. It depends on a system where the third world makes everything, the first world shuffles paper, governments tax the inflated “profits” then borrow money, and we dump that money onto third world immigrants so they can buy more of our overpriced stuff.
Technology is stagnant. Sure, we saw machine learning take new steps, but ultimately you have what is basically a really complex regex engine that finds matches and recites them in recombined form. This takes over many of the jobs that people still do, but since it is not a thinking engine, it is just another technique not a game-changer.
Our leaders are trapped on the runaway train of democracy. They know that it is out of money and, thanks to precedent and millions of lines of laws and legal decisions, tied down like Gulliver by the Lilliputians. They cannot change course; the train will smash into the wall. They only want to keep it going as fast and long as possible.
Most likely, they will choose the easy option and kick off a war. When you destroy the economies of every other nation, your own economy becomes more valuable, and you can more easily pay off the debt for your bad decisions. N.B.: third world immigrants were imported to pay the taxes that were already exceeding income.
Every now and then some poor honest man like Trump comes along and tells them the brutal truths, or at least as much as he can get away with, and they decide to destroy him. Across the globe, however, Trump like moderate Right movements that want radical action are rising. Democracy Inc fears this and cannot allow it.
Conjectural systems cannot tolerate competition because over time the conjectures are proven to be false. The idea behind democracy, that if we gave every person power there would be less conflict, has turned out to be completely wrong. Not only is there more conflict than ever, but we have not made solid decisions for centuries.
At the top of this stack is the Clinton Tammany Hall style political machine. There are others in Europe as well, all of them “internationalist” or more committed to humanism than to their host nations. Democracy has gamed itself.
If we look at history, we see a pattern of flight from things that were perceived as the cause of our problems. A famine? Eject the kings. Diversity implodes? Eject Hitler. Central control failing? Crush the CSA. We fled from what worked because someone was upset over some problem that was unrelated to the cause.
For example, Hitler got proven right about diversity: in any form it destroys civilization. The CSA got proven right about centralization and diversity. Lo and behold, the kings were right in that we cannot rule ourselves and need a hierarchy that promotes our upper layer by awareness and understanding into leadership roles.
We are dying from too many rules, precedents, conventions, procedures, methods, technologies, and scientific conclusions which have become goals in themselves; the parallel goal of sane civilization and sane individuals has been forgotten, as well as the reason why (we must adapt to our environment with quality solutions).
As a result of all of this flight, we have ended up with an aggregate of what did not become controversial over the years, hence our current mixed-economy socialist-consumerist Utopia. It is the triumph of the bourgeois idea of selling junk to morons with a smile and leaving maintaining civilization to someone else.
The bourgeois mentality follows the cities, which themselves follow wealth and success for a civilization. In these arrangements, and arises from situations where people do not directly produce their own food, tools, shelter, and clothing. The challenge of civilization is limiting it.
It is individualism in its most convenient form: do what is necessary for me-first advances in career, since in cities you make money by flattering and pandering to customers and bosses, and ignore all problems on a personal level. You pay taxes for that; you already gave at the office.
Consequently, urbanized societies — this is the downfall, not industrialization or technology — tend toward bourgeois propositions, with liberalism and later Leftism in the center. This is the philosophy that shies away from what must be done in favor of current methods that pretend to fix the problem.
In that way, the people wielding these methods appear to be “doing something,” like our democratic leaders, but are actually just writing checks to control optics so that the group feels a sense of unity and well-being in the short term, even if this is as it usually is toxic to the long-term.
We might see the Left as the compromise position between doing nothing and doing what must be done to address actual problems. Consequently they pursue easy problems with lazy thinking, but this is popular because it does not require anyone to think critically or change their own behavior. Propaganda does the rest.
The reason the New Normal authorities have been able to gaslight the masses so effectively is that most of the masses do need something from them … a job, food, shelter, money, security, status, their friends, a relationship, or whatever it is they’re not willing to risk by challenging those in power and their lies.
Which would be more popular, option (a) which involves all of us disciplining ourselves, or option (b) where we pay taxes to someone else who pretends to take care of the problem? It is like hiring a maid: you write the check, they clean the mess, your conscience is clean.
At the root of bourgeois thinking is a love of pacifism, or avoiding goals in order to avoid conflict so that the group can stay together and make money, which manifests in all forms of demotism, utilitarianism, individualism, pluralism, equality, and democracy.
These thinkers, from libertarian through Communist, do not believe in a world beyond the individual. They want to address the needs of the individual but ignore the needs of civilization, history, culture, genetics, and logic, since those require continuity between past and future that forces the individual to adapt to it.
The Left are unwilling to do what is necessary, so instead they apply band-aids, and this wins out because it enables the Greatest Mental Laziness of all participants. People hate risk, adore recognition, and fear ambiguity, so a non-solution that disturbs the fewest seems like the best answer to most people.
“Most people” and their thinking is the reason why we need kings. Most people do not think critically because they cannot think critically owing to the limitations of their intelligence, experience, and moral gumption to ignore fear of methods and press on to the goal.
Means-over-ends is popular with the bourgeois and the bureaucracy because it seems to control problems. Make murder illegal and everyone feels safer, even if murders still occur. However, like pacifism, means-over-ends means forgetting the “why” behind what we do because the goal has become secondary to using the “correct” methods.
Any parent recognizes ends-over-means thinking: the goal is more important than the methods. If you need to defend your child, you will do so no matter who dies. If you need to find a way to feed your child, you will do whatever is required, no matter how dangerous or disgusting. This is reality.
The Bell Curve rules us all. Most people lack the genetic/biological ability to think, act decisively, or understand goals. That is why the mediocre many seek to eliminate the fortunate few: the fortunate few are going to impose, like nature, goals and standards, which means the mediocre many will have to adapt and change their thinking, which they fear.
The Left and its pet system, democracy which is egalitarianism in political form, seek to pander to the herd by offeirng pacifism instead of goals. They look for approval because they are dead inside. Most people are soulless automatons wearing meat suits, seeking only comfort, convenience, wealth, and recognition for their drama.
Stacia Cardille, a senior Twitter legal executive, made the link explicit.
“I invited the FBI and the CIA virtually will attend too,” Cardille wrote to her colleague — and former FBI chief counsel — James Baker on July 8, 2020. “No need for you to attend.”
From that point, Taibbi writes that “regular meeting[s] of the multi-agency Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF)” — attended by Twitter and “virtually every major tech firm [including] Facebook, Microsoft, Verizon, Reddit, even Pinterest, and many others” — had “FBI personnel, and – nearly always – one or two attendees marked ‘OGA’.”
When government becomes a career for people, they modify government so that it suits their needs and those of their social group. Consequently, they become determined to keep out anyone who is going to end the scam, namely the political machine that trades favors for support and therefore grows like a slime mold within the bureaucracy. Eventually they start engineering outcomes because they can and they will profit from it. The Dr Faucis of the world want their $600k/yr salaries, the contractors want their nice fat fees, the media wants to keep reporting drama unrelated to big issues, and the bourgeois normies of the world simply want to believe the system is doing well so they can go back to sleep. By law, the CIA is not supposed to be active inside the US. This, like RussiaGate and ObamaGate, is a bigger scandal than Watergate.
But, the other leading expense item is “$773 billion for domestic programs,” including education programs, according to a TIMES article.
They are spending money on organizations that already support DIE/ESG, which is the new New Deal and neocommunist manifesto all in one. The big point: those who support diversity win big bucks.
Net international migration — the number of people moving to the U.S. minus those leaving the country — was the “primary driver of growth” for the population this year, according to the census. Net migration was positive at more than one million people, a 169% leap over the 376,000 population increase due to migration in 2021.
Entitlements, which fund anti-poverty and anti-racism programs, bankrupted the native population and convinced it to stop having big families. Now the democratic leadership wants to import lots of third world people to tax, which is why back in 1965 they dropped in the Hart-Celler Act because they already knew that New Deal programs were going to be impossible to fund, even before LBJ doubled the load with his Great Society programs.
Luckily for us we are about to get a wave of new teen mothers:
Teen birth rates in the US have declined in the last three decades, but among young Hispanic women, it remains much more common than for the rest of the population.
So much for the “natural conservatives” they keep talking about at the National Review.
“Many of the conversations we have about ‘diverse Santa’ relate to Black Santa, but this is a common rhetorical problem with issues of ‘diversity’ and ‘race’ — that we interpret that to mean the representation of a specific marginalized group,” Corsbie-Massay explains. “Asian Santa ensures that we are breaking out of a narrow discussion to a greater understanding of racial representation globally. People of Asian descent constitute more than 60% of the global population, so it is good to have a Santa that represents a global citizenry. It is important for Asian kids as well as kids who are not Asian.”
They want to indoctrine you into diversity so that they can replace you. Your leaders see world domination as a question of population, and if Asians grow the best, they want to rule Asians not tricky and often critical Caucasians.
We cannot have a truly free community of expression if some perspectives can be heard and others cannot. Learning from a diversity of viewpoints, and from the deliberation, debate, and dissent that accompany them, are essential ingredients of academic excellence.
We cannot prohibit speech that some experience as offensive or injurious. At the same time, MIT deeply values civility, mutual respect, and uninhibited, wide-open debate. In fostering such debate, we have a responsibility to express ourselves in ways that consider the prospect of offense and injury and the risk of discouraging others from expressing their own views. This responsibility complements, and does not conflict with, the right to free expression. Even robust disagreements shall not be liable to official censure or disciplinary action.
A commitment to free expression includes hearing and hosting speakers, including those whose views or opinions may not be shared by many members of the MIT community and may be harmful to some. This commitment includes the freedom to criticize and peacefully protest speakers to whom one may object, but it does not extend to suppressing or restricting such speakers from expressing their views.
MIT figured out that if they justify free speech with DEI, they can avoid this whole debacle by creating a campus culture of debate. As it stands now, free speech and diversity are in conflict; by siding with free speech, campuses are opening up the path for the next generation of dissidents, all of whom are going to oppose diversity, equality, and socialism because those are now tenets of the Regime. You are by definition not a dissident if you agree with those in power and the path on which they are taking your civilization.
An FBI criminal complaint accused Goltz of making online threats against federal officials and election workers – especially those associated with Maricopa County, Arizona.
“Hypothetically, a mass shooting of poll workers and election officials in these highly suspect precincts might be the way to go,” Goltz wrote, according to the FBI complaint.
“Execute him and everyone that helped him,” another post said. “I’m even in favor of going after his children and grandchildren.”
“I want to throw that Jew in an oven so badly, I can taste it,” Goltz once said, according to the FBI complaint.
While distasteful, none of these are threats. The FBI indicted to try him by media. The case will have to pass the Brandenburg test:
He made anti-Semitic and anti-black statements and alluded to the possibility of “revengeance” (sic) in the event that the federal government and Court continued to “suppress the white, Caucasian race.” He also announced that the Klan members were planning to march on Washington, D.C., on Independence Day.
Henceforth, advocacy could be punished only “where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”
In other words, for something to be a legal threat it must have the following characteristics:
In other words, screaming “let’s kill that transsexual” while pointing to a specific person and speaking to a crowd of armed and out of control people would be a threat, but “transsexuals should be killed” posted on a message board is not. The FBI knows this but since the Trump impeachment their strategy has been to arrested people, indict them, and parade them before the media knowing that most voters will not read beyond the headlines.
“We aim to strengthen cooperation between the armed forces of Russia and China,” Putin told Xi, calling the Chinese leader a “dear friend.”
The Kremlin chief also praised Moscow and Beijing’s efforts to counter “unprecedented Western pressure and provocations.”
“In the context of growing geopolitical tensions, the importance is growing of the Russian-Chinese strategic partnership as a stabilizing factor,” Putin said.
The Western press and Useful Idiots like to style this as a clash of ideologies: the fascist-ish Russia-China axis versus the Freedom Fighters® in the West. However, this is a clash of civilizations as Huntington described. They do not want to take over the world for their political system, but dominate us so that their people are in power and ours can be destroyed.
In the face of mounting volatility, “Commanders for Israel’s Security” maintains that Israel’s informal policy of having no policy in Judea and Samaria must end. Security imperatives for the preservation of Israel as a Jewish, free, and democratic state, the organization argues, require prompt action to reduce Israeli responsibility for governing West Bank Palestinians.
A non-partisan organization founded in 2014, CIS’ more than 400 members include retired senior officials of Israel’s defense establishment – the military (IDF), the national intelligence agency (Mossad), internal security (Shin Bet), and the Israel Police – as well as of Israel’s diplomatic corps. The retired officials “are united in the conviction that a two-state agreement with the Palestinians, as part of a regional security framework, is essential for Israel’s security as well as for its future as the democratic home of the Jewish People.” But CIS recognizes that “current conditions are not conducive” to attaining a two-state agreement.
Diversity proves to be fatal. The only way out seems to be to set minority groups up on their own and to stop funding them. Doing so gives them an incentive to work on their internal affairs instead of using your money to attack you. Other nations should follow the Israeli lead on this one and escape from diversity.
If a white candidate is chosen, the panel chairman must write a report explaining why they were ‘more suitable’ for the role. It does not apply the other way around.
They must also provide ‘justification’ as to why any ethnic minority candidate was not chosen and provide detailed ‘scoring notes’ as evidence. Alongside this, they are required to suggest how the failed applicants can ‘develop their experience, skills, or amplitude’ for a better chance next time.
All quota problems work this way: if you hire from the protected group, you have no liability, but if you hire a White person, you are open to critique. Not surprisingly, most people simply hire a minority who seems to come within a few miles of the required abilities rather than risk their own jobs by hiring White. This will force an exodus from the corporate-government system of White people, which may lead to more small businesses. Having a local doctor and staff who are like you has its benefits, as long as you can escape the ruinous taxation forcing you to buy into the insane and minority-favoring national socialized medicine system.
Santos’ professional biography was called into question earlier this month after the New York Times reported that he misrepresented a number of claims, including where he attended college and his alleged employment history with high-profile Wall Street firms.
He also admitted that he never graduated from any college, despite previously claiming to have received a degree from Baruch in 2010.
Santos, elected to Congress on Nov. 8 to represent the Long Island- and Queens-based 3rd District, was also accused of lying about his family history, saying on his campaign website that his mother was Jewish and his grandparents escaped the Nazis during World War II.
Yet another diversity candidate. The GOP, following “conventional knowledge” of all the other people following current trends instead of trying to think of realistic solutions, wants to make inroads with minorities by using tokens. However minority groups will never vote more than 25% for a majority party.
Brownlee was initially only charged in the deaths of three victims in Stockton: Jonathan Rodriguez Hernandez, 21, who died Aug. 30; Juan Cruz, 52, who died Sept. 21; and Lawrence Lopez Sr., 54, who died Sept. 27.
The amended complaint, filed Tuesday, additionally charges Brownlee with the killings of Paul Yaw, 35, who died July 8, and Salvador Debudey Jr., 43, who died Aug. 11, in Stockton, as well as the Alameda County fatal shootings of Juan Vasquez Serrano, 39, on April 10, 2021, and Mervin Harmon on April 16, 2021.
If a White guy did this, it would be a “hate crime” simply based on the race of the victims.
As nonprofits, these regional and national giants reap $8.8 billion from tax breaks annually, by one Johns Hopkins University researcher’s estimate. Among their obligations, they are expected to provide free medical care to those least able to afford it.
Many top nonprofits, however, avoid communities where more people are likely to need that aid, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of nearly 470 transactions. As these systems grew, many were more likely to divest or close hospitals in low-income communities than to add them.
No one can afford the flood of illegal aliens and underclass people wanting free medical care. Instead of stopping the free care, they move away from where it is needed. And no one will mention how EMTALA has trashed American hospitals:
In 1986, Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure public access to emergency services regardless of ability to pay. Section 1867 of the Social Security Act imposes specific obligations on Medicare-participating hospitals that offer emergency services to provide a medical screening examination (MSE) when a request is made for examination or treatment for an emergency medical condition (EMC), including active labor, regardless of an individual’s ability to pay. Hospitals are then required to provide stabilizing treatment for patients with EMCs. If a hospital is unable to stabilize a patient within its capability, or if the patient requests, an appropriate transfer should be implemented.
In other words, anyone who shows up and claims an emergency will get treatment until it is stabilized, which because lawyers are sensitive means keeping them around for full treatment. These costs then get passed on to the hospital and then the consumer. If the consumer balks at the prices, then the hospital moves in order to reduce costs. It is now cheaper to run a hospital in a wealthy area than it is to run one in a poorzone.
Serbia and Kosovo have been at loggerheads once again after Kosovo moved to ban Serbian license plates last month. Pristina ultimately backed down, but the decision led to protests in the north of Kosovo, which has an ethnic Serb majority.
Diversity does not work. Even worse, it keeps failing for as long as it is sustained, ruining the ambitions of any society. Until you separate the populations by a geographic barrier, the conflict continues, and it does not matter which groups are involved, only that more than one group is involved.
Lt. Gen. Steven W. Gilland said the academy will undergo a “multi-phased process” during the holiday break to remove references and installations honoring the Confederacy.
The scrub will include taking down a portrait of Lee dressed in his Confederate uniform from the West Point library, where it’s hung since the 1950s — along with removing the stone bust of the Civil War’s top southern general at Reconciliation Plaza, and his quote about honor from the academy’s Honor Plaza.
The purge is part of a Department of Defense October directive ordering the academy to address racial injustice and do away with installations that “commemorate or memorialize the Confederacy.”
They want to erase any mementos of pre-diversity America. They know that WASP America was non-functional, and that race divided this country since diversity began. They hide their actions behind the guise of avoiding offense, but really they want to erase you and replace you with Hispanics and Asians.
The new federal rules, executive orders and pending legislation aimed at China’s high-tech sectors, which began this fall and will continue in 2023, are the culmination of years of debate spanning three administrations. Taken together, they represent an escalation of former President Donald Trump’s tariffs and trade disputes against Beijing that could ultimately do more to slow Chinese technological and economic development — and divide the two economies — than anything the 45th president did while in office.
History repeats itself. The China-funded candidates want war with China, intending to let the US lose so that China becomes the shepherd of our New World Order based on Eurasian heritage, or maybe they are just reacting to China not having paid enough by seizing more power for themselves. We can recall how such embargoes worked in the past:
In the late nineteenth century, Japan’s economy began to grow and to industrialize rapidly. Because Japan has few natural resources, many of its burgeoning industries had to rely on imported raw materials, such as coal, iron ore or steel scrap, tin, copper, bauxite, rubber, and petroleum. Without access to such imports, many of which came from the United States or from European colonies in Southeast Asia, Japan’s industrial economy would have ground to a halt. By engaging in international trade, however, the Japanese had built a moderately advanced industrial economy by 1941.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt became president in 1933, the U.S. government fell under the control of a man who disliked the Japanese and harbored a romantic affection for the Chinese because, some writers have speculated, Roosevelt’s ancestors had made money in the China trade.7 Roosevelt also disliked the Germans in general and Adolf Hitler in particular, and he tended to favor the British in his personal relations and in world affairs. He did not pay much attention to foreign policy, however, until his New Deal began to peter out in 1937. Thereafter he relied heavily on foreign policy to fulfill his political ambitions, including his desire for reelection to an unprecedented third term.
The Roosevelt administration, while curtly dismissing Japanese diplomatic overtures to harmonize relations, accordingly imposed a series of increasingly stringent economic sanctions on Japan. In 1939, the United States terminated the 1911 commercial treaty with Japan. “On July 2, 1940, Roosevelt signed the Export Control Act, authorizing the President to license or prohibit the export of essential defense materials.” Under this authority, “[o]n July 31, exports of aviation motor fuels and lubricants and No. 1 heavy melting iron and steel scrap were restricted.” Next, in a move aimed at Japan, Roosevelt slapped an embargo, effective October 16, “on all exports of scrap iron and steel to destinations other than Britain and the nations of the Western Hemisphere.” Finally, on July 26, 1941, Roosevelt “froze Japanese assets in the United States, thus bringing commercial relations between the nations to an effective end.
Because American cryptographers had also broken the Japanese naval code, the leaders in Washington also knew that Japan’s “measures” would include an attack on Pearl Harbor.10 Yet they withheld this critical information from the commanders in Hawaii, who might have headed off the attack or prepared themselves to defend against it. That Roosevelt and his chieftains did not ring the tocsin makes perfect sense: after all, the impending attack constituted precisely what they had been seeking for a long time. As Stimson confided to his diary after a meeting of the War Cabinet on November 25, “The question was how we should maneuver them [the Japanese] into firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves.” After the attack, Stimson confessed that “my first feeling was of relief . . . that a crisis had come in a way which would unite all our people.”
If he manages to provoke the world into war, Biden will use our military to lay waste to their economies, leaving the US (again, as in the days after both world wars) the only man standing; this multiples the value of our economy because no one else has any wealth. If the provocation fails, cutting China out of the technology sector will cause their economy to implode, also increasing the wealth of the US economy. This is how Leftists think of winning: boxing in their opponents so that their only options are murder or defeat. Either outcome is fine with the Leftists because either way the US, its government, and the Leftist establishment become more powerful.
Plastic contamination also comes through in recycled paper shipments sent from North America to other Asian countries, where dirty diapers, hazardous waste and batteries have all turned up. The amount of plastic trash coming into India in waste paper now is almost double the 264,000 metric tons that was legally imported in 2019 to the country before it imposed the ban in August of that year, according to figures from the United Nations Comtrade database. Since the ban, the government has allowed a small number of companies to import recyclable water bottles.
The first world makes the money while the third world gets the waste. Do not trust diversity. If the group is Other to your group, they are acting in their interests not your self-interest (although they will insist otherwise). Every Other group wants to conquer you and take your stuff; this is the Iron Rule of nature.
On Tuesday, Volker Turk, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, issued a dire warning about the “terrible” effects such policies would have.
“No country can develop — indeed survive — socially and economically with half its population excluded,” his statement said.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres also took to Twitter on Tuesday and asked for the revocation of the “unjustifiable human rights violations” saying these policies cause “major setbacks to the potential of the Afghan people.”
The Left specializes in coming up with things that you cannot oppose without appearing anti-social. Free markets, human rights, diversity, and transgenderism form a big ball of miscellaneous demands that they use to control the world. If you do not agree to these things, the bombers may arrive at any moment and Regime Change will be forced on you. They do not believe in these things in themselves, but that these things are needed for their system to perpetuate itself and therefore, for their power to remain intact. At the end of the day, democracy merely promotes careerists who then do whatever makes them more important at the expense of the rest of us. We cannot rule ourselves; we need the kings back. They alone were content to let the world go its own diverse directions without trying to force it to obey means-over-ends systems like human rights.
A readout from the Ukrainian president’s official website said Zelenskyy and Fink had “agreed to focus in the near term on coordinating the efforts of all potential investors and participants in the reconstruction of our country, channelling investment into the most relevant and impactful sectors of the Ukrainian economy.”
Ukraine will now have access to unlimited money to borrow in exchange for selling off its natural resources and agricultural products. Notice this article is almost entirely buzzwords, a cue to those in the know to read between the lines and see that it is the usual deal offered in such circumstances. With NATO/US weapons backing Ukraine, the West will prevail here at the cost of Ukrainian lives, and with that guarantee in place, business has moved in to make some fat profits.
Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, says as much in his book, “The Great Narrative”: we should dispense with economic measures like gross domestic product (GDP) in favor of “what matters most: climate action, sustainability, inclusivity, global cooperation, health and well-being.” In fact, says Schwab, “We might even find we can live with such a scenario quite happily!” The end goal will be ending “inequality and the unfairness that underpins it” by enshrining “universal provision of social assistance,” which will require that governments “rewrite some of the rules of the game and permanently increase their roles.”
Governments know that the market is eventually going to punish their reckless spending, so they want to suspend markets and use global control of the economy directly, like the Soviets did. They are doing this because they are out of options; world democracy is broke.
It was super interesting reading the reflections of fitness enthusiasts in the early 20th century. They said we should get rid of corsets, corsets are an assault on women’s form, and that women should be lifting weights and gaining strength. At first, you feel like this is so progressive.
Then you keep reading, and they’re saying white women should start building up their strength because we need more white babies. They’re writing during an incredible amount of immigration, soon after enslaved people have been emancipated. This is totally part of a white supremacy project.
Resisting ethnic replacement is “racist.” White people have cultural leanings of their own, so are imperfect tools for the system, which is why machine politicians have imported foreigners to be loyal servants of the regime since the early days of Irish importation.
A year ago, the asset class (if you want to call it that) was worth more than $3 trillion. Today, it’s just over $806 billion. So between the stock market and crypto, we’ve lost more than $12 trillion of wealth in about twelve months’ time.
This is just what happens when the government and the central bank inject $10 trillion of stimulus to help the economy through the pandemic, and then have to basically suck it back out after realizing that it was way, way too much. It wasn’t just asset prices; the entire economy swelled in size. Nominal GDP soared by 10% last year! The price of everything reset higher. How could it not have with a tidal wave like that behind it?
ow, the script is playing in reverse. Price inflation in goods is also receding from its highs as the Fed tightens. The economy is slowing substantially. The money supply, which soared when the Fed expanded its balance sheet, has now shrunk by nearly 2% since the spring, an almost-unheard-of kind of decline. This will likely be the first annual drop in at least sixty years.
Socialism makes poor economies. The circular Ponzi scheme works by dumping money on citizens through anti-poverty and anti-racism programs, knowing they will spend it on high-markup consumer junk, then taxing the resulting “growth” and injecting more money into the system. This same approach caused the 2008 crash and the Carter recession:
The deepest and longest‐lasting recession the United States has experienced since then began in 1980, when Jimmy Carter was president (the gross domestic product dropped 9.6 percent in the second quarter of that year) and did not end until fourth‐quarter 1982, almost two years into the Reagan presidency.
In fact, the Reagan tax cuts were not fully phased in until 1983, more than two years after he assumed office. Reagan, hobbled by an opposition Congress, was not able to get the spending‐growth restraint he wanted, so substantial budget deficits occurred early in his administration, at one point reaching 6 percent of GDP.
Once Reagan’s tax cuts were largely phased in, the economy took off — it grew by 7.6 percent in 1984 alone.
Taxes sabotage the economy and make socialism necessary in order to maintain control. By using the well-known strategy of importing foreigners, the socialists will keep control via the ballot box and make conservatives start preaching socialism again just like they did after the 1960s.
A researcher from The Pennsylvania State University published a commentary in the Journal of Public Policy and Marketing that examines four key contemporary “drivers” of political violence in the United States: “toxic” political polarization; “toxic” identity-based ideologies; assaults on democratic norms; and disinformation and conspiracy theories.
In other words, diversity causes all of our conflict, manifesting in polarization, resistance to assimilation, rejection of the system, and rejection of the Narrative, respectively.
Of course, the long history of racist gun laws does not suggest that governments today can limit guns in racially discriminatory ways. The Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection prohibits racially discriminatory gun laws just as it bars other types of racially discriminatory laws. Yet there will arise situations in which even a racially discriminatory gun law of the past might provide some basis for recognizing that lawmakers have a degree of regulatory authority over guns.
They will argue anything to disarm people in order to make them need the state. At this point, restricting gun ownership would mostly weaken Whites and hwites, showing that history repeats just from different angles.
The BBC supposedly gives ‘a voice only to one side of a disputed past, even presenting false history as uncontested fact’, most commonly in relation to the transatlantic slave trade.
The group writes the BBC is using individual programmes to foster ‘a negative view of British history, and especially of its relations with the non-European world from which British citizens of ethnic minority backgrounds and their ancestors originally came.’
Government wants obedience. To that end, it wishes to replace White people like it will replace anyone with an IQ over a hundred if it can. Stupid people can be easily bought, riled up, or cowed. That is perfect for the percent of a percent who want to rule us in perpetuity with Leftist products, international markets, and race guilt.