Amerika

Average humans live in a world of effects. They do not understand the causes of things, but they feel that if enough goodwill is generated, everyone will get along and that is enough. This is why we needed kings instead of commoners, because commoners understand very little.

They are barely able to parse basic concepts like “equality.” To their minds, it means that everyone is treated the same way, but that makes no sense because it does not arrive at a state of equality. Equality is both a method and goal, like all ideologies, and it does not stop until everyone is equal in power, wealth, and status.

It was originally designed to remove the kings. Aristocrats, descended from the founding population of a society, have a vested interest in making it succeed; everyone else simply wants to take from it and do as little as possible. If you let the latter group lead, your civilization declines, but they will claim they are acting to achieve “equality.”

Equality means that no one can have more power simply by virtue of being correct, more intelligent, more experienced, or wiser. Only those who are vested in the state system are viewed as having the right qualifications, and this is because the system itself has vetted them.

Equality therefore does a few things: first, it takes from the strong, because the weaker have a claim to whatever the strong have; second, it creates an inner party elite who because they memorized things in school, were obedient at work, and made the right social connections, are presumed to have godlike wisdom.

As part of taking from the strong to give to the weak, it destroys the founding population in order to subsidize newcomers. Apparently every civilization does this once it is sufficiently bloated and disorganized to require foreign labor.

In America, we see this because the founding majority of Whites are paying the taxes to subsidize the diversity, as they do in Europe, while bearing the brunt of the crime and disorder. Whites have stopped reproducing at replacement levels because they believe their society to be hostile and too expensive to raise children in.

This process, called de-ethnicization, is a type of slow genocide designed to remove an undesirable population by destroying their culture, future, hopes, and behaviors, so that they can be replaced with another. We see de-ethnicization at work in China:

The Chinese government recently renamed “Tibet” as “Xizang” in official diplomatic documents. The move was the latest in a series of measures that critics of China say are aimed at erasing Tibetan national identity and culture.

“These are political actions of ‘de-ethnicization,’” Yang Haiying, a Mongolian-born humanities professor at Shizuoka University in Japan, told Radio Free Asia. “‘De-ethnicization’ is equivalent to the idea of resolving ethnic issues. It is an approach to deny ethnicity by emphasizing ‘de-ethnicization’ of regions.”

Others, like Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin, likened these policies to “cultural genocide.”

This “cultural genocide” begins with the renaming of everything sacred to a group, then the destruction of their history and monuments, and finally the erasure of their identity, followed by their ethnic absorption by another group. You do not want this to happen to your group; it will cease to exist very rapidly.

However, because of the notion of equality, people in America see this as not just normal and natural, but good. They want to replace those nasty genocidal Whites with enlightened third world people, much as how every “intellectual” in postwar Europe found profundity in far-off places without plumbing or literacy.

The de-ethnicization of actual Whites — ethnic Western Europeans of the Nordid/Cro-Magnid variety — has been going on for some time, as we can see from how the population responded to the rising tide of ethnic competitors:

The rise of industrial white bread mirrored World War II-era fears of immigrants, many of whom owned small bakeries at the time.

The goal of the egalitarians is always to blame whoever is on top for the problems of those who have difficulties, then to remove that group and take what they have, which restarts the cycle as the new top group gets blamed and then removed over time.

First they came for the Kings. Then they came for the Anglo-Saxons. Now they are coming for all people who are whitish or White. Next they will come for the rich. It only ends when everyone is equally impoverished, and White de-ethnicization is the most important tool of achieving this egalitarian paradise.

Tags: cultural genocide, de-ethnicization, democide, equality, french revolution, genocide