This is a response to Brettâ€™s piece entitled, â€œBugman Meme Attacks Consequences of Trace Admixture and Miscegenationâ€ in which he wrote:
Trace admixtureÂ gradually reduces people from distinctive, â€œold schoolâ€ looking Western Europeans to moon-faced people of generic white ancestry and no class distinction, creating a white drone/prole/pleb race which has none of the greatness of the original. This is most distinctiveÂ in Americans, where some are mixes of Southern,Â Eastern,Â andÂ WesternÂ European, resulting in what isÂ technically whiteÂ but without any particularÂ cultural connectionÂ orÂ depth of understanding.
There is truth to what he says, but I disagree with the article on one count. Europeans are of a common descent anyway. Modern Englishmen are a combination of Celtic Briton, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon and Norman. Czechs often display Germanic influences as do some Poles, and even Hungarians now have more in common with Germanics than with the Asiatic tribesmen who sacked Rome.
This discussion is divisive and I would like to address it.
Iâ€™ve recently seen a lot of sperging from the left in relation to the idea of whiteness. Iâ€™ve even seen some of this â€˜tism from the real right on Discord servers about who gets to live in our hypothetical ethnostate.
I expect this from the left. They hate white people because they know whites donâ€™t support them and their policies. Thatâ€™s why they bring in non-whites to America and Europe. Itâ€™s the only way they can really implement their policies. In the United States, Democrats havenâ€™t won the white male vote since Lyndon B. Johnson, in 1964.
As whites began to push back, and not only change the culture and shift the Overton Window, albeit slightly, the pop culture left began pushing an explicitly anti-white narrative.
In 2014 author Walter Mosley said â€œwhite people donâ€™t existâ€:
[Mosley] challenged our collective societal construction of race, specifically our acceptance and use of â€œwhiteâ€ to identify a culturally diverse group of people.
â€œIâ€™ve been giving this talk a lot lately that the big issue about race in America is that there really is no such thing as white people,â€ Mosley said. â€œAnd, you know, in order to end race in America, all we have to do is recognize that the notion a white person doesnâ€™t really exist on any term and in any way.â€
Mosley, of a mixed background, responds that he is half Jewish [edit: Every. Damn. Time.] and half Black when confronted with suggestions that he is half white and half Black.
No word as to whether he has ever had a â€œmy fellow white peopleâ€¦â€ moment. But Mosley isnâ€™t the only one pretending white people donâ€™t exist. In 2010 (((Jeffrey Kluger)) of Time wrote the article â€œWhoâ€™s White, Whoâ€™s Black, Who Knows?â€ The essence of the article is based on the notion of an authoritative â€œstudyâ€ by Harvard professors into racial discrimination and (((Kluger))) extrapolates that to mean itâ€™s impossible to have any racial identity in a multi-cultural and multi-racial country.
The left might want to muddy the waters when talking about whites as it minimizes racial identity, and thus maximizes other potential identities such as consumer identity. In a multi-racial society one is not defined by their history or heritage, but by the shit you buy. But when it comes time to scapegoat someone for the failures of a particular group, rarely will one turn to empirical data such as IQ tests, or genetic analysis of violence and addiction. Rather, it becomes time to just make shit-tier videos asking white people stupid rhetorical questions designed to make high empathy whites feel guilty for the poor condition of minorities. This sets refuels the white guilt pushed on white kids in school and through entertainment. Buzzfeed is probably the worst about this. They use gossipy Daily Mail entertainment to bring in SPWLs and then bait-and-switch them into watching some outrage porn such as:
21 Things White People Ruined in 2015 â€œbesides everythingâ€ â€“ black guy who wrote the article
17 Foods that White People Have Ruined including one of our own
19 School Powerpoint Presentations that Give Zero Fucks which is an article about how mostly white people are a plague to the planet, are crazy, dangerous, oh and a (brief) list of the crimes of Europe. This was an article written by two non-whites living in London. Because whites are so bad everyone wants to live with us and we have no say in the matter or weâ€™re rayciss.
And then we have 2015â€™s shitshow YouTube video â€œ24 Questions Black People Have for White Peopleâ€
This is a video with such retardation as â€œwhy do you care if Idris Elba plays James Bond?â€ Answer, because James Bond is white and Idris Elba isnâ€™t. Why do you care if whites play non-whites? Oh right, because race doesnâ€™t exist when itâ€™s white people, unless weâ€™re talking about white privilege or white crimes against non-whites.
And of course there was the obligatory bitching about whites appropriating black culture, yet no mention of non-whites appropriating white things like: Christmas, Halloween, European style clothing, shoes, glasses, oh and the English fucking language they are all speaking. If theyâ€™re really concerned about cultural appropriation why not bitch about it in clicks and fart noises?
And then there was this little gem, â€œwhy does talking about race make you so uncomfortable?â€ asks one black, to be followed up by another with â€œis it because youâ€™re afraid youâ€™ll be perceived as racist?â€ Well, whites have been talking about race for years. The Bell Curve was published in 1995. Yes letâ€™s talk about race. Wait, you donâ€™t want to. You just want to call white people who talk about race or human biodiversity rayciss.
Despite the cognitive dissonance necessary to both believe white people donâ€™t exist, but white privilege does, and that we ruin things we made that you like enough to want credit for, there is a little bit of honesty here. It involves the differences between race and ethnicity.
“People of common descent,” a word from the 16th century, from Middle FrenchÂ race, earlierÂ razza“race, breed, lineage, family” (16c.), possibly from ItalianÂ razza, of unknown origin (cognate with Spanish and PortugueseÂ raza). Etymologists say no connection with LatinÂ radixÂ “root,” though they admit this might have influenced the “tribe, nation” sense.
At least now I know where Radix Journal comes from.
Late 15c. (earlierÂ ethnical, early 15c.) “pagan, heathen,” from Late LatinÂ ethnicus, from GreekÂ ethnikos” of or for a nation, national,” by some writers (Polybius, etc.) “adopted to the genius or customs of a people, peculiar to a people,” and among the grammarians “suited to the manners or language of foreigners,” fromÂ ethnosÂ “band of people living together, nation, people, tribe, caste,” also used of swarms or flocks of animals, properly “people of one’s own kind,” from PIEÂ *swedh-no-, suffixed form of rootÂ *s(w)e-, third person pronoun and reflexive, also forming words referring to the social group
Pagan? Was Varg right? Okay, Iâ€™m Asatru now. Anyway. Look at the link, it also indicates that â€œethnicâ€ implies a gentile or a goy.
In Septuagint, GreekÂ ta ethneÂ translates HebrewÂ goyim, plural ofÂ goyÂ “nation,” especially of non-Israelites, hence especially “gentile nation, foreign nation not worshipping the true God” (seeÂ goy), andÂ ethnikosÂ is used by ecclesiastical writers in a sense of “savoring of the nature of pagans, alien to the worship of the true God,” and as a noun “the pagan, the gentile.”
I canâ€™t help but wonder whether the reason so many Jews play the â€œfellow white peopleâ€ card then tell us â€œwhites donâ€™t existâ€ is because on some level, they see our existence as fundamentally hostile to their own?
But back to the subject, race and ethnicity. Though both words share a similar meaning, â€œnationâ€ or â€œa peopleâ€ we have been led to believe there is no such thing as white. And unfortunately, many Europeans do believe this. Go to Europe, most will identify as Hungarian, Polish, Italian, Spanish, Russian or something regional. They have lost sight of the fact that at the end of the day, our ethnicity and race are intertwined. In the modern sense, we are entitled to ethnic identity, but we should not forget that we have a common racial and historical identity. We are the European people. And to be European is to be white, no matter what National Geographic says.
Iâ€™m sick of all the talk on the real Right about who is and isnâ€™t allowed in the ethnostate as well. We have too many enemies to fight among ourselves. Iâ€™ve recently had to explain to people that Spanish, Portuguese, Italians and Slavs specifically Russians, are on Team White.™ To me, and I think to most people, you know what white is. You can see it when you look in the mirror. The one-drop rule was wrong.
I take a broad view of who is white. Brett doesnâ€™t. Itâ€™s okay to disagree. I consider him a great friend and I want there to be as little division among whites as possible, especially in this dark hour. 2017 was a really black pill year. Letâ€™s stop arguing about who is and isnâ€™t white okay? You know it when you see it.
We may be different, but we are one. And I love that about Europeans. Letâ€™s live that way.