Finally some sanity. Send the diversity away and keep it separated from you. Then it will have to solve its own problems instead of blaming you. Send no aid, make no further demands, and if any of your young people pull a Romeo & Juliet with some member of the Other tribe, trebuchet them over the barrier and make it not your problem.
They project the opposite of reality because they hate reality; contrarians seek to deny whatever is real so that they can replace it with their own programming of others. In reality, diversity is not a strength for anyone. It is an occupation and conquest by the weak of the strong, but that idea delights contrarians, so they preach a worldview where diversity is working great except for the scapegoat, “racists,” who are holding everyone back from Equality-Utopia.
Sort of like Tex-Mex, this is a case where White people took bits and pieces from third world food culture, improved the result, and now will be accused of stealing it.
We are back in the early 1800s when the states opposed a federal government that wanted to engineer a future where Washington had total control. Their method back then was Irish immigration, now it is Mexican immigration with lots of others tagging along as well. This will force a meeting engagement where people will either become advocates for mono-ethnic states, or will side with the government and its internationalist allies.
“Racism” (including White Supremacy) is the scapegoat used to explain the failure of diversity everywhere it is tried, everytime it is tried, with varied ingredient groups and laws. Diversity does not work. You are now seeing a vast bureaucracy built up around this failed program — paradoxical, illogical, and hopeless programs which cannot succeed are the best way to ask for more money in budget season — defending itself while trying to get more dosh and vig to keep the scam going.
Our moronic laws make it our duty to provide for their every need, even though they came into the country illegally. This is peak democracy, and it will go a long way toward explaining the coming regime change.
Mitch McConnell (McFailure) wants to support the Biden budget which will deliver billions to sanctuary cities under the guise of strengthening the border. The government that diversity elected is thoroughly dishonest.
Just like in South Africa, diversity prosecutors re-interpret the law outside of its original purpose and scope to try to remove their political competition. They will do the same to all laws, effectively nullifying the legal system as anything but a means of repression.
In a desperate attempt to keep diversity from exploding into chaos, Republicans pursue the path of censorship, which will only weaponize the extremism by validating its paranoia.
More fuel for the fire labeled with the notion that the third world simply wants revenge on the first world, and identifies Israel more with the first world than with the third world origins of the middle east. For seventy-five years, the world identified Jews as the underdogs because of what the Nazis did; in egalitarian systems, which always and without exception take from the strong to give to the weak, the underdog is always favored, but what if you find a more marginalized and excluded underdog? Then that underdog moves up the victimhood rankings, and the former underdog is displaced. When the diversity took over after the Clinton years, Jews moved out of the top victim rank and were replaced by the third world. “The Holocaust? We suffered colonialism!” Now the third world sees only revenge.
Even Canada got the memo that diversity, immigration, and globalism are failing. The slow march back to ethnonationalism continues.
The word has gone out from Leftist HQ — probably in China — that the new democratic illegal alien voter surge must be accommodated, so the local Leftists have decided to shake down Washington DC for more cash.
When diversity underperforms, they always scapegoat “racism” of some form, and now have extended this generally to the “far-Right” (read: farther right than economic liberalism) as a precursor to banning them.
Essentially, firms with global supply chains remain resilient to local shocks, but it exposes firms to global shocks.
In other words, about what we would expect. The difference is that local shocks tend to also depress demand, making the resulting shortages less catastrophic. In addition, local shocks do not cause worldwide consequences including instability that may have accelerated the wars we are now seeing break out a year later.
If you declare that you are willing to break taboos, then taboo-breaking is no longer a death sentence for any user account or group.
Democrats depend on third-world voters to remain in power, so they are deliberately letting them in.
The great race guilt signaling competition continues, but with less enthusiasm than before. Colonialism has been over for some time now, and the third world is still a wasteland, sort of like it was before colonialism.
Our management structures were designed by White guys to work with White guys. Other groups have other approaches. Whether the White guy approach is better, or the White guys plus the White guy approach works best, seems to be up for debate, but it did beat out the other options.
When people believe promotions occur for reasons other than competence, they assume that their future is in the hands of chance and stop trying to prove themselves. Obviously affirmative action and diversity quotas do the same thing, and minority groups perceive discrimination whenever the boss is from a different group, which means that there is no way for diverse workforces to be functional.
Diversity seems to be a constant riot.
Government writes grants and guarantees loans; colleges need those students, many of whom are going to flunk out of regular coursework, so they have invented a new industry within education devoted to diversity, and if it goes away, they are going to have to fire tens of thousands of staff because they will be receiving a lot less government dosh.
“In theory” diversity reduces racial resentment. In reality, it throws open the doors to all forces of racial, ethnic, cultural, and religious hatreds.
Seems like the diversity experiment is producing an army of poor and disaffected people who can be instigated at any time to cause social chaos, as if someone stationed an invading army in the West. Why would China do this? Again, WW3 will be third world versus first world. The third world wants Communism, paid for by the first world. In other words, the people who live in societies that are poor because they are autoparasitizing also want to parasitize the only parts of humanity that are not totally failing.
What do you do when some of your diversity attacks some of the other diversity?
The third world wants to destroy the first world because with the first world gone, the third world does not feel any pressure to improve itself.
They cannot give up the easy money, or can they afford to pay settlements for all the staff they will need to let go if the scam collapses.
“He said that programmes designed to eradicate racial bias were ‘futile’ as, in his view, humans were hardwired to be biased, citing a body of neuroscientific research.” Looks like the world is finally catching up with the Human Biodiversity folks.
In the age of genetic technology, race warfare may take on a final worldwide solution dimension.
The great migration was not all it was cracked up to be.
Revenge was always the point, and they faked the facts to fit the narrative. All diversity programs do this because diversity is unnatural, illogical, artificial, and paradoxical.