Posts Tagged ‘white people’

Diversity Advocates Reveal Their Actual Goal: Remove Whites

Friday, May 19th, 2017

The American Mathematical Society decided to publish this rant which reveals the intent behind diversity programs of removing the white majority entirely from power:

I have this talk that I give and afterwards, I will often get concerned white men asking me what they can do to fight sexism. But they’re not really thinking about ending sexism. They’re thinking about progress. They want to know which benefits the cis male hoarders-of-power can offer to women so that we don’t feel so bad and complain so much and contribute to such dismal numbers. This is natural, reasonable even, but sexist all the same.

…What can universities do? Well, that’s easier. Stop hiring white cis men (except as needed to get/retain people who are not white cis men) until the problem goes away. If you think this is a bad or un-serious idea, your sexism/racism/transphobia is showing.

…If you are on a hiring committee, and you are looking at applicants and you see a stellar white male applicant, think long and hard about whether your department needs another white man. You are not hiring a researching robot who will output papers from a dark closet. You are hiring an educator, a role model, a spokesperson, an advisor, a committee person. When you hire a non-marginalized person, you are not just supporting this one applicant whom you like, you are rewarding a person who has been rewarded his whole life. You are justifying the system that makes his application look so good. You are not innocent. You are perpetuating a system that requires your participation if not your consent. When your female students of color have no role models in your department, that’s not “meritocracy”; that’s on you. Again, if you think the “great mathematicians” are disproportionately male because of meritocracy, then your sexism is showing.

Diversity and feminism are subsets of egalitarianism; if all people are equal, we cannot admit that some are unequal because of race or sex. For this reason, the inequality of results must be fixed by filtering out the whites, which is what affirmative action was designed to do. No matter how often diversity is represented as the following:

They want to know which benefits the cis male hoarders-of-power can offer to women so that we don’t feel so bad and complain so much and contribute to such dismal numbers.

The actual agenda is:

Stop hiring white cis men (except as needed to get/retain people who are not white cis men) until the problem goes away.

Since the problem with never go away because individuals and groups are inherently diverse, or varied in ability most of which is inherited, then this becomes a permanent crusade against white people, much as affirmative action has.

If They Can Have It, We Should Have It Too

Tuesday, November 29th, 2016


In this election, the central question involved whether America would continue down the path of Leftism. The trigger to this question, or the issue that raised it in the minds of voters, concerned double standards.

Leftism claims to protect the less-equal by transferring wealth from the more-equal, with a hefty percentage deducted as a fee paid to our brave Leftist politicians, all of whom seem to act like career criminals.

Since the second World War, Leftism has found itself with a guaranteed argument in the Hitler/not-Hitler dichotomy. If the Leftists find a brown victim, they can demand anything they want by calling any opposition “Hitler” (or some equivalent).

This means that in the hands of government, whites become kulaks and non-whites become deserving comrade peasants. The goal is to destroy the kulaks and give their wealth to the peasants, at which point civilization collapses because we destroyed the more competent people.

As a means to implementing this, the Left created the double standard. In this view, it is good for the putative victims (non-whites) to express self-interest at the expense of others, but the kulaks must never express any self-interest.

With election 2016, people are questioning this double-standard. “If they can have ethnic self-interest, why can’t we?” people asked. This applies to the white, the rich, the smarter, the healthier and other categories.

In short, the momentum favored reversing the direction of Leftism, which is always to take from the higher and give to the lower, while enriching the parasites who work in government. Every Leftist state goes down this path.

But it starts with this simple question: why can’t we have what the ideologues have gifted to others? The Leftists will give lies in response, but there are two actual reasons.

1. Diversity Does Not Work Because It Is Paradoxical.

The relationship between homogeneity and diversity is much like that between capitalism and socialism: the former are practical, and the latter ideological, or figurative arguments taken literally that history has proven to fail because they are not just unrealistic but reality-denying.

The main argument for homogeneity is simply that diversity does not work. Each group has self-interest, and when you combine them, you get either clashing self-interests or a lowest common denominator so low that it leads to breakdown of all social order.

This is why throughout history, diversity has been a harbinger of doom:

Never in recorded history has diversity been anything but a problem. Look at Ireland with its Protestant and Catholic populations, Canada with its French and English populations, Israel with its Jewish and Palestinian populations.

Or consider the warring factions in India, Sri Lanka, China, Iraq, Czechoslovakia (until it happily split up), the Balkans and Chechnya. Also look at the festering hotbeds of tribal warfare — I mean the “beautiful mosaic” — in Third World hellholes like Afghanistan, Rwanda and South Central, L.A.

“Diversity” is a difficulty to be overcome, not an advantage to be sought.

Coulter says it as well as anyone, but she is focusing on history, which shows us zero record of successful diversity. In fact, it shows that diversity or a program very like it is generally what dying societies adopt before becoming third-world wastelands.

We could instead use logical fact and look at it this way: every ethnic group has its own self-interest in mind, namely that it wants its own standards, rules, customs, image and beliefs to be the ones under which it lives.

When you put multiple ethnic groups together, these self-interests clash. The only solutions are either (a) one group rules the rest or (b) you boil those conflicting interests down to a lowest common denominator, at which point no one gets what they want, and social order is diluted to the point of being inconsequential. We are in that latter state now.

This is why diversity always fails, and it is not the fault of the ethnic groups that comprise the diverse state, i.e. there is nothing “wrong” with them — they are merely asserting self-interest. But diversity negates self-interest and causes endless conflict, ending in either tyranny or low standards.

2. Cause And Effect Are (Visually) Different

Every week, your field of wheat seems to burst into flame at about the same time the noon train passes by. That train uses coal, and so you assume that a burning cinder has hit the field.

The train guys deny it. You say to yourself, of course these evil corporate money-grubbers want to ignore this problem! They are just greedy. And then, you find out the truth because you dig deeper.

Two fields over from yours, there is a church with a steeple. In the steeple is stained glass. Pigeons hide out in the steeple, and when they defecate, the guano builds up on the shelf above the glass, and the acidic nature of the guano causes that shelf to warp. This bends the glass slightly so that it is convex, and the sun shining through it is focused on any number of spots two fields away, where it starts fires at roughly noon.

Cause and effect do not visually resemble one another.

Leftism can be viewed as a systematic denial of cause and effect. For example, they are fond of saying that you are more likely to die of a snakebite than a terrorist attack, but that is only part of the story. You can avoid both snakebite and terrorist attack, but only the terrorist attack needs to be avoided at the policy level because it is not, like the snakebite, the result of individual choices.

When we talk about the haves and have-nots, we have to face an ugly fact that most of us got over in kindergarten but Leftists resisted: people are not equal, nor are most of them any damn good.

There, I said it. This is the greatest taboo in the world and I fully expect to get droned within the next few minutes for having done so. Better type fast and hit publish, because surely the missile is not far behind…

People are not equal and most of them are not much good. Even more, intelligence is a gradient, like every other ability, with only a few at the far right end. This does not mean that people who are not super-smart are bad, only that because they are not super-smart, there are (a) some things they will be biologically unable to understand and (b) they are biologically compelled to reject the understanding of others of these things.

This means that those who are competent at some task will forever be misunderstood by those without that competence. This means you have two options: either (a) put the competent in charge and have them restrain the incompetent or (b) by default, put the incompetent, who are more numerous, in charge through mob rule and have them restrain the competent from doing what is necessary.

Path B leads to poverty and the third world; Path A is what made the West great.

How does this apply to haves and have-nots, you might ask? Wealth generation is a task for which some are more competent than others. This means that there will always be poor people. In fact, poverty is how they are kept from influencing society, because they are not competent at making the decisions that society needs.

Feel the weight of that other taboo. But it is true: poverty is as much a necessary part of human life as natural selection is of nature. It is the only way to ensure competence, and without competence we get the opposite, like our leaders.

Leftism has one idea, which is that it wants to create “equality.” At first this meant equal legal representation for career criminals as well as normal citizens, which put the normal citizens at a disadvantage. Eventually it came to mean wealth transfer so we could subsidize the poor.

Not surprisingly that brought about a wave of incompetence and increased poverty. That is why the double standard exists: we must deny the competent a voice over the incompetent, or we will see that Leftism itself is a lie.


In this election, the double standard was rejected in favor of a libertarian view that competition is good because it enables the competent to rise. Since Leftism is conjectural, or “ideological,” it is an opposite to any real-world based viewpoint like libertarianism. This election was thus a refutation of Leftism by reaching beyond it toward something better.

Part of that means that the competent must no longer have an obligation to save the incompetent from themselves. This is achieved by making no group obligated to help another group. In reality, this translates to the ability for white people to have self-interest advocacy groups just like have been historically active for African, Asian and Aboriginal peoples. Black Power = White Power.

Leftist critiques of the alt-right boil down to this: you’re racist! Our answer should be short and sweet. If they can have it, we can have it too, even when “it” is the right to act in our ethnic self-interest for ourselves alone, a.k.a. nationalism, and if Leftism opposes that, we will just have to remove them.

Make America WASP Again

Friday, August 26th, 2016


Back in the 1980s, the heavy metal band Slayer wrote perhaps some of the most profound lyrics about the feeling of the time with “Hardening Of The Arteries” from Hell Awaits (1985):

Fear runs wild in the veins of the world
The hate turns the skies jet black
Death is assured in future plans
Why live if there’s nothing there

Spectors of doom await the moment
The mallet is sure and precise
Cover the crypts of all mankind
With cloven hoove begone

Sadistic minds
Delay the death
Of twisted life
Malicious world

The crippled youth try in dismay
To sabotage the carcass Earth
All new life must perish below
Existence now is futile

Decrepit breath, vile in its stench
A world in decay
Transgressor is as one


[Lead – King, Hanneman]

Convulsions take the world in hand
Paralysis destroys
Nobody’s out there to save us
Brutal seizure now we die

The point of posting this is not simply that Slayer rules (they do) but that this band nailed a metaphor that most could not express: there was no hope for the future because civilization was obviously moribund.

In 1968, the hippies took over, but in 1965, our immigration laws were changed to favor people from non-European countries. Then again, in the 1930s we had creeping socialism in government, and in the 1920s, an explosion of jazz-fueled flapper vapidity.

The roots of this problem then go very deep, showing us that shortly after the turn of the century, things started to go very wrong down America way. The old America was becoming Amerika, or the new third-world style state.

To find out why, we have to look at the end result: in 1968, the hippies ousted the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) ruling class and replaced it with a new, egalitarian, Leftist one. It took a century for this to happen, and it was most likely the result of the most profound demographic change ever: the 1820s-1880s immigrant wave of non-WASP new citizens.

America was founded by WASPs — WASP is a shorthand for Western Europeans, as they are German-descended for the most part and tend to be Protestant or at least fake it — of the types Scandinavian, Dutch, English, German and Scots. A smattering of others were present but most looked Western European and behaved like them.

Starting with the Irish, new citizens came in droves. They were a cheaper variety of labor for the existing citizens, and as soon as one group got established, it brought over another group to work cheaply for it. The new citizens were of Irish, Slavic, Italian, Greek, and Jewish heritage.

These new citizens experienced the first diversity clash: having left their home countries and come to a new one, they felt like failures, because they had to leave home for a reason and they were now of lower rank. They channeled this feeling into a scapegoating of the majority, who they saw as discriminating against them, and couched this revenge sentiment as class warfare when in fact it was a diversity conflict.

As soon as they gained political power, they began re-making society in the image of their origin nations because they had to keep up the fiction that asserted the opposite of reality: it was not that the old countries failed them, but that the old countries were better, and this new country needed enlightenment.

This is the same formula that non-white populations use today, because psychologically, it is the only game they can play. They either have to repudiate their origins, or must find a reason that the new country is bad. If you wonder why diversity is fatal no matter how nice or smart the groups are, here is the reason.

The governments and institutions created by these new groups were overwhelmingly Leftist because that was the type of order familiar to them from their home countries: strong warlords, class warfare, individualist philosophy and anarchic social order.

In the race for civilization attainment that is history, these Eastern/Southern/Mediterranean Europeans came from the loser states and not the winners, as in the West. The lower a population is, the more Leftist it votes, because Leftism is the philosophy of decay and compensatory behavior that amounts to neurosis and altruism.

It took these groups several generations to gain power, but when they finally did — after the interruptions of the World Wars — they offed the WASP establishment in the 1960s.

For those who want to fix America, a good place to start is to separate the population. Your ancestors were either Western European, or you belong elsewhere. This is not because you are bad — it would be hard to argue that Italians, for example, are bad — but that diversity does not work.

The only way to save America, and Europe, is to undo diversity and send those who do not fit the founding population profile back to their homelands. While this is taboo today, it is losing that edge, because as diversity falls, and class warfare/Leftism implodes, it becomes clear that white diversity will fall as well.

Much as it makes sense to repatriate Africans, Asians and mixed-race people to their homelands, it makes sense to repatriate whites who are of these non-Western European populations. This will revitalize their home countries with new talent and knowledge, as well as fix the flagging populations in those countries.

In turn, America and Europe can achieve homogeneity of population and therefore restore culture, doing away with the need for government and endless increasing police power. Everyone wins. But we must first overcome our pretense of caste, class and ethnic equality, starting among white people.

White riot

Monday, August 31st, 2015


Diversity creates racism. It does so by forcing groups into competition when they would rather live among their own and have self-determination, or the ability to rule themselves and choose their own future. Racism creates rancor, and if there is a perceived economic or power imbalance, it creates race warfare.

That is what is happening on the streets of America today. Currently, it is white-vs-black drama, but this will soon expand to include other groups, even those that like Hispanic indios and Asians tend to use more indirect methods. Speaking of indirect methods, check out the response. After years of being silenced by accusations of “racism,” white people are mobilizing in protest.

One night after Deputy Darren Goforth was executed at the Chevron station in Houston, over a thousand people gathered at the site to memorialize the man who was apparently murdered simply because he wore a police uniform, as reported by Breitbart Texas. Thousands more gathered on Sunday night to walk the streets in the suburban neighborhood where he was killed.

As reported by Breitbart Texas, the escalation of anti-white and anti-cop rhetoric has been building since militant black activists began marching in support of #BlackLivesMatter after the suicide of Sandra Bland. At protests at the jail where Bland killed herself, a radical activist called for all white people to be killed, and heavily armed members of the New Black Panther Party chanted “the revolution has started … off the pigs.” A Texas-based internet radio show called for the lynching of whites and the killing of police officers. Last week, two white journalists and a white deputy sheriff have been assassinated by blacks who appear to be carrying out the message of hate.

White people favor indirect methods. They prefer to march, sing bad folk songs on acoustic guitar, wave signs and write letters. They show up for midnight vigils. They produce (endless) blogs and editorials. And let us not forget the first-person novels. This is how someone accustomed to a European-style society registers displeasure. They do not achieve displeasure without first having doubts and fears, and when all of those come together, an emotional wave sweeps the population. (Then they usually choose the wrong option based on other fears and that dreaded hallmark of all failure, moral laziness).

For a population that only a decade ago was afraid to discuss race at all, this is a big shift, even a sea change, if you will. The cat is out of the bag and the dissent is spreading. We all want to believe the Benetton ads and political speeches on our televisions, but experience shows us that “birds of a feather flock together” and that difference breeds disagreement. Having uneasily held their tongues for decades, the Caucasians are on the march. Slowly. Indirectly. But discontented nonetheless.


Thursday, June 11th, 2015


Many times, when I have wished to discuss the problems of my own people, I have found others who proclaim that they are of a similar bent. Discussion inevitably turns toward niggers, which I thoroughly endorse, but halfway through, it becomes clear to me that we are not using the word in the same way.

“You mean,” I say, pipe halfway out of my mouth, “You’re speaking of African-Americans?”

The fact is that — to a student of language — the unfortunate word nigger has connotations beyond “black.” It means a slave, one who must be managed because he will be destructive if he manages himself. It also means someone that is tolerated in society only if he keeps within a lower role, because there is well-justified fear of what he will do if not oppressed.

As such, I find it useless to apply the word to other races. I would like to talk about the white degenerates among us, and why I fear them more than anything else.

Growing up in the South, I was exposed to the great secret of the South, which is that they love their black people. The Southerners are in fact an affectionate group, and they will take you in if you show up lost in a storm and will mend you with affection and grease-laden, vegetable-heavy cooking. Somehow it works. But in the South, black people are viewed as parishioners or constituents; members of the family who need someone to speak up for them. Of course, for a Southerner, many such things fall into this category. Dogs, for one. Forests, for another, and hummingbirds and cottonmouths and eagles and rivers. They love just about everything, each in its place, knowing that putting it above that place will only force it to confront its own inadequacies and make it hate life.

In the South, people have their place. White people have their places… and white people have many divisions. If you are WASP, you are at the top, as these are the people who tamed the wilderness and founded the new nation. Next up are the Catholics, who are viewed similar to cousins obsessed with conspiracies, “well-intentioned” but perhaps a bit lost. At the bottom are the near-whites, the Italians, Irish, Greeks, Slavs and Jews, seen as the remnants of formerly white empires that collapsed and thus always enraged by their fallen status and sometimes prone to clawing their way back up through physical means, only to find out they could not change the beast within.

What the South does is grant self-respect to every group. White people have their half of the city, blacks have their half. There are “quarters” for Mexicans, Arabs, homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, stoners and smugglers. Each does what it must, but with a crucial distinction: no one else subsidizes what it does. If the African half runs out of money, the white quarter says #yolo and goes on with its business… and vice-versa. Similarly if there’s a gunfight in the smuggler realm and 30 bodies are left behind, they all get stamped VAGRANT and society moves on.

Modern society has none of this. The group I want to talk about — white people, a.k.a. “niggers” until they improve their behavior — have no self-respect and no space of their own. Neither does anyone else, but that is a consequence of the white people having flaked out. When white people gave up on their role as founders and leaders of this society, chaos rushed into the void (nature abhors a vacuum, after all). The result has been dispossession for all despite many public statements about how empowered we are all now, with no evidence to suggest that is actually true.

White people are niggers. They need to stop their slave-like wailing, pick up the reins they have inherited, and set this society back on course. We cannot “help” any other group but we can give them self-respect, which comes through self-rule and an end to cloying white paternalism. We are all familiar with the standard white liberal whose personal life is a mess, whose family is in ruins and whose mind is perpetually confused, but who “finds meaning” by helping the third-worlders. But helping in this case means condescension, and no amount of foreign aid and hand-dug latrines can compensate for the smug superiority implied to these neurotic whites. They are in fact more racist than any racist group has ever managed to be, but they hide it behind a heavy layer of neurosis and posturing.

Other groups know, just as we know, that white people are merely projecting. What was that the Bible said about the mote in the eye of another, and the beam in one’s own eye? It is always easier to critique the problems of another group, because they appear simpler and easier than our own. This plays into our myth — with some basis in reality — that other groups are simpler and face simpler challenges. However, the real challenge they face is having self-rule and self-respect, and that is universal to all groups. Even buzzards are happiest when they feel that they are captains of their own futures, of their own souls… and so it is with the many human groups. Diversity does not work because it either puts one group on top, and makes everyone else feel like niggers, or puts no one on top and then everyone else feels impotent. This is what white pretense has brought us, and it is why I consider white people the biggest group of niggers on this planet today.

Dear fellow trailer-dwellers, crackers, honkeys, pig people and cheese-eaters, the fact is this: it is only your pretense that causes you to indulge in fanatical anti-racism, pro-transgenderism, anti-sexism, class warfare and other diversity jihads. You are simply transferring the weight of your own problems to others, where because “the grass is greener” everything seems simpler and easier. You are such adorable little individualists that you insist on iconoclasm, which makes it impossible to agree on anything. For every thousand white people, there will be a thousand opinions, guaranteeing that nothing will get done. You are so focused on “keeping up with the Joneses” not just with the junk that you buy but your political opinions that you become utterly “useful idiots” for whatever leftist government is in charge. Not only that, but your resentment for anyone better than you has you constantly penalizing successful communities so you can “lift up” people who have no interest or ability to be lifted up. You are nothing but pretense, white niggers, and you destroy everything you touch for your own grand drama.

Many of the worst white niggers are the ones who speak on behalf of their race. Their goal is always to separate white people, and just like their Bolshevik inspiration, to create a hierarchy of people based on allegiance to race. This will replace the natural hierarchy of ability and create an ideology as toxic as liberalism. It is no wonder that these people, like the neurotic leftists, also project onto minorities and Jews, scapegoating them for white failures. They tend to frequently mention other races with scorn, cruelty and hatred, and they drive any sane white people away from their viewpoint. These people are the nigger-hating white niggers who, as many have observed, would most likely be beheaded and cast into large boiling vats marked UNTERMENSCHENFETT from which soap will be made.

My advice for anyone who wants us to have white people in fifty years — assuming that we forgive whites for their reckless individualism, rampant fatuous narcissism and utter ignorance of nature — is to find the 5% of white people who are not insane and egomaniacally individualist, put them in charge, and enslave the rest of the white people. Put them in cabins and make them pick cotton. Whip them when they misbehave, and if they are unable to do the task with minimal efficiency, sell them at a discount and split up their families. Most white people are utterly useless and toxic in their pretense and resentment. It is time to stop pretending that the term “niggers” refers to anyone but these white people, and for all of us who want humanity to have a future, it makes sense to agree these people are too foolish to be in charge of their own lives, to enslave them and remove them from public discourse to eliminate the danger they present.