Amerika

Posts Tagged ‘segregation’

White Racism Is Disguised As Anti-Racism, And Anti-White Racism Does Not Help

Wednesday, May 24th, 2017

After the last election, the ripple wave passing through the Black community is notice of what has been obvious but forbidden because of a perceived need to ally with the Left.

African-Americans are recognizing that white SWPLs are anti-racist in theory, but discriminatory in action:

It got so bad in 2014 – 2015 that I stopped renting farmland on estates where I could be easily seen from the road, and I stopped making food deliveries into wealthier neighborhoods because of how often police would “happen by” and sometimes even question me five or ten minutes after I got a strange look from a passerby (usually someone jogging, but occasionally someone in a car). I’m not a paranoid kinda guy, but this happened way too often to be a coincidence.

It isn’t Richard Spencer calling the cops on me for farming while Black. It’s nervous White women in yoga pants with “I’m with Her” and “Coexist” stickers on their German SUVs.

Second is the sheer degree of cultural appropriation going on with businesses in the city proper. It’s little things – e.g. shops and other businesses incorporating wide swaths of hiphop culture into their branding while having not a single Black owner, partner, employee, or vendor. And those businesses are KILLING IT here. This is a town where Blackness advances White-owned brands and subjects Black-owned businesses to inspection by law enforcement.

Do you really think that problem comes from people like Richard Spencer?

White anti-racism is often designed to mask a Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) attitude to diversity. There is no better way to hide sins than to virtue signal the opposite, so that if someone calls you a racist you can point to your Black Lives Matter participation, Bob Marley posters, membership in the Diversity Council and massive collection of old school hip-hop on vinyl.

Richard Spencer is not the problem the black community faces; it struggles with the fact that white America wants to be white America, and this requires excluding everyone else but a few token minorities. At the same time, it will gladly appropriate the massive perceived authenticity of black culture and use it to sell more worthless consumer products.

On the flip side of this, anti-white racism (also called “anti-racism”) is not helping the black community either. It shields the guilty and exacerbates the problem by making white people afraid to interact with or speak truthfully to minorities. Only recognizing that every group wants to live with and interact with only its own leads out of this puzzle.

American Re-Segregation: The Shadow News Story Of The New Millennium

Sunday, May 14th, 2017

Politics reminds me of bullfighting: the matador waves a cape, the bull charges, and the matador steps aside, sticking a little spear in the bull each time, eventually bleeding him into weakness, then killing him.

For a bonus to the analogy, people are usually screaming in Spanish there, too.

In American politics, they wave the flag of ideology and promise benefits. The voters — people in groups are dunces — rush forward at whatever target is offered. While the herd is congratulating itself, politicians help themselves to more of the wealth. Most will not object until too much is taken, and by that point it is too late. To mix metaphors: boiling a frog.

Right now the Left is bandying about numerous variations of their one and only theme, “equality,” especially on the topic of Civil Rights which is their get-out-of-jail-free card because no one wants to be styled as Hitler in the media. They have a golden ticket and they use it like a lance.

In the meantime, they are hiding from us the real story: America, like Europe, is re-segregating.

For those who remember history, which is like 500 people in North America at this point, segregation was what happened after the Civil War. The slaves were freed, and each ethnic group went its own way. This “worked,” like most bad ideas seem to succeed at first, for a time. There were thriving black communities, but when they got powerful enough to challenge the white minority, the usual diversity story played out through ethnic conflict and amusingly horrible race riots.

In the 1950s, people — still drugged on a moral superiority high after WWII — decided that segregation was wrong and that we should force people to live together. Nothing says fair and balanced quite like forcing people who resent each other to interact, right? Billions were wasted on forced school busing, redistricting and other attempts to make unequal schools (as all schools are) “equal.”

The desegregation effort hit its peak in 2016 when Barack Obama order the relocation of “the diversity” to the white suburbs, presumably to reinforce the Leftist motto of “there is no escape.”

Despite this action, and perhaps prompting it, the hardline reality is that Americans of all races have been re-segregating because all people like to live near people like them. This enables high-trust communities where you know how to behave in public, socializing is easy, and the constant background hum of low-grade inter-ethnic crime and violence diminishes, except for those pesky dudes who steal your Amazon package off your front porch during the workday.

Resegregation takes many forms, since there are now many ethnic groups (temporarily) living here, and it shocked the media who refused to recognize that, for the most part, this resegregation was voluntary and encouraged by all races, religions and ethnic groups:

More than a half century after the civil rights era, many urban neighborhoods and institutions in American life remain unintegrated and, experts say, segregation is a primary driver in creating economic and social disparities and straining relations between police and the communities they serve.

The enduring forms of segregation – and in the case of many schools, resegregation – contribute to mistrust between the races and a lack of understanding and empathy, and can lead to violent encounters between law enforcement authorities and residents.

The writer failed to notice the hilarious coincidence in this sentence:

“You’re kind of looking at the greatest hits of segregation: Baltimore, Chicago, Minneapolis,” says Myron Orfield, director of the University of Minnesota Law School’s Institute on Metropolitan Opportunity, referring to the police killings of Freddie Gray, Laquan McDonald, and Castile.

The places that integrated first, and were most diverse, are the ones now heading in separate directions. He forgot to mention Los Angeles, home of the Rodney King PCP-fueled rampage and ensuing beatdown and riots, and Houston, which is basically a collection of ethnic camps where different groups live apart from one another.

But across the country, different groups are separating in part because, now that race is not a matter of black and white but hundreds of different groups, each group is seeking a community where its standards, aesthetics, values and leadership can prevail:

In research I conducted with Siri Warkentien, another sociologist, we used a statistical model and census data to identify the most common changes in racial composition in 10,681 neighborhoods in metropolitan L.A., Houston, Chicago and New York, beginning as far back as 1970 in some areas. That starting point corresponds with the implementation of the 1968 federal Fair Housing Act, which protects buyers and renters from discrimination in choosing where to live.

…The data show that vast portions of south and east Los Angeles are slipping from mixed populations toward single race populations. And the change has not just occurred in formerly white areas. One of the trajectories that we identified followed a similar pattern in neighborhoods that were once black. Compton residents were nearly three-quarters black in 1980; by 1990, the mix was about 52% black and 43% Latino; in 2014, two-thirds Latino. Such slow but steadily increasing Latino growth can be found in 46% of the neighborhoods we studied in the Los Angeles metropolitan region.

…Our research found that this process is occurring again in Southern California, but this time among immigrants from Asia, the source of the largest number of U.S. newcomers now. For example, the Asian proportion of the population in Cerritos increased from 44% in 1990 to 58% in 2000 to 62% in 2014. It appears to be following a path toward Asian segregation much like Covina is on the path to Latino segregation.

Some media sources quietly acknowledged the role of “white flight” in the resegregation of the suburbs:

Our research finds that neighborhoods that are more than about 30 percent non-white, within a couple of decades, two-thirds of them will become predominantly non-white.

One of the biggest reasons for this is that people realize that racially mixed schools tend to be less effective and more violent and so they are moving to places with people like them:

Following Brown v Board of Education and some subsequent Supreme Court rulings, we had a pretty rapid period of de-segregation, particularly in the South. But it came because of court orders and starting in the 1980s you began to see court orders being lifted, and as communities were no longer forced to integrate, they’ve started to do things that re-segregate students.

Outside of the South we’ve never seen any real effort to integrate schools and so in places like Chicago, New York City, Boston, Newark, where you saw white parents pulling out of the public school system and moving to the suburbs, this has led to increasing segregation in those cities as well.

The same is true of other races, even though the media focuses on white flight from the mixed-race suburb. However, results vary by race, and this includes what people put their energy into in each community. What people value, they work on achieving. This is called “social investment” and different groups care about different things, leading to unequal priorities in different communities.

A side effect of the “new” post-desegregation white flight is the creation of whitopias, or places that are majority white and have more of a traditional American social fabric and framework of social investment:

Imagine moving to a place where you can leave your front door unlocked as you run your errands, where the community enjoys a winning ratio of playgrounds to potholes, where you can turn your kids loose at 3 p.m., not to worry, then see them in time for supper, where the neighbors greet those children by name, where your trouble-free high school feels like a de facto private school, where if you decide to play hooky from work, you can drive just twenty minutes and put your sailboat on the water, where the outdoor serenity is shattered only by each seagull’s cry, where you can joyride your off-road vehicles (Snowmobiles! ATVs! Mountain bikes! Rock crawlers!) on Nature’s bold terrain, where your family and abundant friends feel close to the soil, and where suburban blight has yet to spoil your vistas. Just imagine.

If you could move to such a place, would you?

If so, you would join a growing number of white Americans homesteading in a constellation of small towns and so-called “exurbs” that are extremely white. They are creating communal pods that cannily preserve a white-bread world, a throwback to an imagined past with “authentic” 1950s values and the nifty suburban amenities available today.

Instead of focusing on the negative, let us flip this around: do all races want the same thing? What is a white utopia to some will be a cultural wasteland to others, focused on insipid Mayberry style goofy American Caucasian living. This is why people are breaking apart, and the big story that the media is dodging is the re-segregation of America.

Balkanization Is Our Future, Not “Ethnic Liberalism”

Saturday, May 6th, 2017

Billy Roper points out that the future of the West is Balkanization, or retreat into separate enclaves per ethnic group, because the policy of diversity has failed and as a result, people have fallen back on what “freedom of association” remains to withdraw from the disaster of mixed-ethnic society and produce their own communities mirroring European countries:

And on this year’s edition, out this week, they say natural geographic sorting has taken place over the past couple of decades. Liberals have moved next to liberals, conservatives next to conservatives. It used to be the rule just not to bring up politics in polite company. Now imagine a real estate ad – two-bedroom, one-and-a-half-bath, cul-de-sac, good schools, nice neighbors, no people of the other party need apply.

Of course, the recent media coverage about racial gerrymandering also supports the observation I made in my book The Balk, as does this NPR program: people are moving to segregate themselves politically and racially, to live among their own kind ethnically and culturally, voting with their feet, as America separates itself out through internal immigration on the road to balkanization. The black areas are becoming blacker, the Hispanic areas browner, and the White areas Whiter. What we are witnessing is the emergence of new ethnostates, which will become new nations when America goes down.

The people who really lost out here were the people who gambled on miscegenation. Their kids will have to pick one tribe or the other, and because the closer the tribe is to human origins, the more it influences appearance, this means they will have bred toward the more original group. If you had a white parent, no one cares anymore.

In the meantime, people are sorting not just according to race, but by ethnicity, with groups such as the founding group of the United States, the Western Europeans (WASPs) finding their own space apart from the mixed-ethnic Europeans (South, Irish, East) and third-world immigrant flood. Again, people do not care how well-behaved or intelligent these immigrants are, or what their SAT scores are. They just want to live with people like themselves, which means that Everyone Else need not apply.

This contrasts the “magic dirt”/proposition nation/Leftist view of society, which is that we can combine all different genetic strains of people and then indoctrinate them in Leftist ideology and forge a nation out of those robotic, obedient, and conformist beige people.

Conservatives in name tend to adopt this view as well. Witness Breitbart editor Ben Shapiro assert multiculturalism as a goal of “conservatism”:

The alt-right are people like Richard Spencer who think that Western civilization and Western culture are inseparable from ethnicity. In other words, European ethnicity is the dominant force behind Western culture and Western civilization biologically.

…I think the alt-right doesn’t want immigration, legal or illegal, because they oppose immigration on the basis that it endangers Western civilization or European ethnicity. People that I’m aware of on the mainstream conservative side, if they have objections to immigration, it’s on the basis of costs or culture, not on the basis of race.

I don’t care if someone immigrates here so long as they’re willing to imbibe the principles of Western civilization. I don’t care what someone’s race happens to be. This is consistent with the founding vision of the country. But the alt-right doesn’t accept that.

Shapiro is wrong, of course; the founding fathers specified that they wanted Western European people only and were quite vocal about race and inherent inequality. But current American conservatives, who have been selected for their ability to work with the post-1968 Leftist Establishment, see it differently.

Even more, it is nonsense to assume that culture is independent from race, just like it is insane to separate sex and love. You can force it to appear as if this is true, but then, a conspiracy of details over time destroys you, much as it has destroyed our society for pursuing these illusions.

All general tendencies — “traits” — are heritable. Cultures are composed of traits, if not explicitly, in orientation. This is why human differentiation happened. This means that the hardware required to run culture, at least without it being enforced temporarily at gunpoint, is limited to the group that invented that culture.

Shapiro may not like this, but he is out of luck because it is uncontroversial by itself. If someone argued that we should replace the Maori or Zulu with legions of Fred from Accounting and his lovely wife Mabel from Cleveland, OH, then they would be uniformly seen as genocidal racists. When the inverse is argued, people shrug it off, because it fits within the Leftist wealth transfer narrative.

Shapiro also fits within that narrative, which is unfortunate given his entertaining insight in many other matters.

The grim fact is that Balkanization is happening because Western people, steeped in egalitarianism and universalism, cannot accept that there are different groups because they have different genetics. At least, they cannot accept it in public. When you deny this impulse, it comes out in the form of groups withdrawing from the ruined false center of society, and retreating to be with their own.

As usual, diversity fails. It is attempted genocide that will benefit no groups, although some members of each will be peeled off and mixed into the new beige master race of perfect Leftist supporters. Instead, it will create a collapse where different ethnic, ethnic-religious and ethnic-cultural groups. With that, superpower status goes away forever.

Balkanization offers us a view of the civilization cycle. Civilizations rise, invert their thinking, become individualistic, and then extinguish themselves through equality including democracy and diversity. Within them, the former active and productive agents pack their bags and go elsewhere, producing a new civilization, while the miscegenated remnants writhe in third world status.

Desperate Leftists Create Segregation To Avoid White Exodus

Tuesday, September 13th, 2016

bob_marley_and_the_wailers_-_exodus

Diversity fails because it combines groups with conflicting directions of self-interest. Each group needs its own standards, culture and pride, which is formed of knowledge that their civilization was created by them and designed for them and will always be controlled by them.

However, the liberal ideology of egalitarianism requires proof because it is conjectural, which means that any working example of non-egalitarian social organization is a threat which must be destroyed. For this reason, Leftists cram together different groups whenever possible to try to “prove” that diversity works.

While those in power can force this to happen, the inevitable occurs: members of these different groups have different opinions, and start to find the other groups offensive because they act in ways that contradict or offend the values of one or more groups. At that point, the diversity acolytes must turn to segregation.

The quest to avoid the inherent conflict of diversity has begun in schools, where ethnic groups are self-segregating to avoid diversity:

At Cal State Los Angeles, a new housing program opens up dorms for black students who want to be separated from the rest of the campus.

The housing option is generating criticism on social media. The campus is setting aside 20 spots in their 192 unit dorm complex for African-American students and others who share similar interests or concerns.

A similar housing option is available at UC Davis…[where] the program has proved to be successful. Graduation rates are high among black students who live in the African-American theme program.

In other words, not only was segregation chosen by minority groups, but it is working better than diversity.

In Denmark, public schools are endorsing segregation for a similar reason, which is that it may help retain native Danish people and presumably, this will improve results for the immigrant students:

The Langkær upper secondary school outside the city of Aarhus said its first-year students had been divided into seven different classes, out of which three classes had a 50 percent limit on the number of ethnic minority students.

The remaining four classes consisted only of students from an immigrant background.

The school’s headmaster, Yago Bundgaard, denied allegations that the practice amounted to discrimination and said that the aim was to encourage integration by preventing a dwindling number of ethnic Danes from leaving the school.

In both cases, ethnic groups are self-segregating not to avoid the other, specifically, because multiple groups are involved. They are removing themselves from diversity because diversity does not work, owing to its paradoxical design that creates inherent conflicts of interest between the groups involved.

As some have noted, this self-segregation is an extension of the idea of “safe spaces,” which were created because student bodies are now so internally different that many of the views of other students are shocking, offensive and disturbing to some students:

She’s not entirely wrong, and as she points out, there have essentially become two types of safe spaces on college campuses in recent years. One is perfectly acceptable — groups of students with similar interests or backgrounds joining together to share experiences and ideas. These are otherwise known as friend groups.

The other is clearly designed to exclude, and that’s the kind that turns adult students into toddlers.

This division posited by the university President paraphrased above is inaccurate. All safe spaces are designed to exclude those whose ideas are offensive to the people in the safe space. The difference is that we accept anti-diversity safe spaces, where ideological safe spaces are contradictory to the goals of a university.

This shows us a more accurate division:

  • Anti-diversity safe spaces (ADSS) are designed to protect the culture, values and people of an ethnic group. They do this by excluding all other groups because their values are competing. These have a long history, dating back to Lapp settlements and Indian reservations, and continue with protection of ethnic groups like remote Amazonian tribes who wish to maintain their mostly “uncontacted” status.

  • Ideological safe spaces (ISS) on the other hand are designed to protect a dogmatic viewpoint by excluding other ideas. Those ideas can be similar to cultural ideals, but part of the goal of a university is to expose students to a wide range of ideas so they understand the breadth of the fields in which they will write and think. This is why “survey courses” exist in almost all disciplines.

Exclusion is one of the fundamental rights of territory, which is property owned or controlled by a group. For an ethnic group to have its own standards and values, it must exclude all others.

While the special snowflakes in their ISSs are mostly hoping to avoid ideas, ADSSs are succeeding by protecting each group and giving it a sense of pride in its own identity. This threatens the goal of globalism, which is to abolish borders so that it can unite the world into a single ideological and economic space.

After Brexit and the rise of Donald Trump, the notion of globalism has died, and with it the perception that the Leftist agenda leads to a more Utopian society. Instead, we see that it leads toward a dystopian society like that of the third world, where a few rich elites rule a crime-ridden, corrupt, filthy and violent mixed-race group.

These ideas will take time to settle in. But in the meantime, expect more ethnic groups to join the exodus from diversity. They must do so, in order to preserve themselves, and regardless of whether they are minority or majority groups, results will be better for them.

The Dilemma of Fixing Diversity

Friday, July 15th, 2016

diversity_event

So Terrance Williams isn’t going back to Africa. I still don’t know what in the heck that has to do with being afraid of dogs, but the clip was hilarious. It also raised a nettlesome issue that needs to be addressed to properly plan for and execute a nationalistic set of politics. You see Terrance Williams is probably as suburban ‘Murikan Peebles as I am. Put either one of our butts in the Serengeti wilds and the hyenas would chewing big holes in our corpses. Forcing him out into Zululand, against his will and against his nature, would be an unjust and immoral death sentence.

However,1 there is an increasingly unchurched, unschooled, and flat-out uncivilized group of African Americans in large Amerikan cities. I’ll let Chris Rock say what I’m socially enjoined not to when it comes to describing these people. I personally and professionally blame President Lyndon Baines Johnson. This Great Society looks like the ruins of Detroit’s municipal culture. The Great Society is found where residents of Birmingham, Alabama scream because non-African American people move into neighborhoods, clean up all the garbage and raise the property values.

This, they argue, forces them out. If you’re talking the sort of people who are realistically described by TV shows like The Wire, I’m failing to see the problem here. If you don’t want Harm City, you get rid of the people that make your urban areas Bodymore, Murderland. We are going to get what we tolerate. God pretty much thinks you have it coming to you if you are stupid enough to put up with it.

There is going to be some sort of nationalistic sorting. The people who are good, decent, and do what people are supposed do will take out the damn, stinking garbage. It may well be significantly based upon race, nationality or religion. We will do it, or our great nation is going to die in the ditch.

After Nice, France, this will be condign instead of lamentable. People who come into a society and refuse to make the effort to sublimate their individualism on the behalf of everyone else’s commonweal are a gallimaufry of solipsistic, fvcked-up @$$holes. My philosophical and political home is on the Alt-Right because the traditional, Cuckboy Right from whence I migrated doesn’t have the guts, piss or vinegar to get this necessary job done. They won’t. Ever.

And that brings me to a conundrum. We face a fundamental dilemma. There are good and intelligent people that come from backgrounds not generally conducive to what we see as proper American Nationalism. There are three options of handling this.

  1. The old Field Artillery Maxim “Fvck ‘em if they can’t take a joke.” Just let intelligent, worthwhile members of generally dysgenic and uncivil communities go down the gutter along with the trash. This has the advantage of being cheap and easy. It gets the necessary clean-up done a whole lot faster. It makes it easier to draw a line between good and evil. None of this fifty shades of grey crap. Put the leather disco armor and the whips away. Just separate and kick those not to the benefit of traditional Eurocentric society out.

  2. Establish a standard and a maximum level of exceptions willingly made. Implicit in this option is that we go ahead and let The New Black Panthers take over and run someplace else. Just let them try and run it and send packing those who deserve to live there. This is a lot more difficult and leaves you prone to infiltration. It’s a fine line between decency and Cucktitude. It’s like art vs. porn – you’ll know it when you see it on your teenager’s cell phone.

  3. Freedom of Association. Allow people to decide who they let in the spaces they own. Allow them to decide who they include and, more importantly, who they exclude. Separate isn’t ever equal. Separate by choice is actually free. It’s amazing how frequently equality and freedom are antithetical. Giving people the space to escape from diversity when it is not beneficial would make it less of a curse. It would allow people to live in the America of their choice instead of the Amerika that gets stomped into their faces by the jack-booted Regressive Left.

So those are the options going forward. Forcibly separate everyone, forcibly separate out as much deadwood as possible or pursue ordered classical liberty that allows men and women of good will to separate on their own initiative. This is what is surreptitiously happening anyway and will continue to happen every time either blacks or whites get that sliver of daylight and a vision of the end zone. Bring back freedom of association, and nationalism can flourish within a democratic republic. The current Progressive race relations policies are literally making Reconquista 2.0 a coming reality.


1 Five Dallas police officers agree with JPW on this one but are unavailable for comment.

Re-Segregation

Wednesday, July 13th, 2016

After seventy years of government propaganda about the benefits of the multicultural state, calls for re-segregation are ringing out from all quarters:

The end game is land ownership. The endgame is our own government in a nation within a nation. Okay. So we claim the states of Louisiana, we claim the states of Mississippi, we claim the states of South Carolina, we claim the states of Alabama, and we claim the states of Georgia.

We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.

…We want to control the politics in our community. If a politician is not bringing anything to the table for the betterment of that community, we are not going to vote for these particular people. And we most definitely want to control the education.

The above comes from a New Black Panther leader who has realized that on a practical level, nationalism cannot exist without the exclusion of other races. He wants to recapture part of North America, but fails to take into account what will happen when the demographically-like Asiatic majority is making the rules. A more sensible idea is reparations with mandatory repatriation for all non-Western Europeans, but it will take people a long time to reach that obvious conclusion. Under that rule, each ethnic group gets self-determination in its own isolated states, and also brings expertise from a modernized America back to its homelands.

He also expands on what is already happening, which is a process of re-segregation as diversity makes groups wary of one another, especially in light of lowered social trust in diverse communities. Communities are already re-segregating through voluntary action:

Data compiled by American University professors Michael Bader and Siri Warkentien finds that New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston are experiencing a slower, steadier version of “white flight” that could produce re-segregation over time. In fact, 35 percent of the neighborhoods surveyed will likely re-segregate within the next 20 years. And this change is part of a trend happening in cities nationwide.

According to the study, cities are undergoing a process called gradual succession. It’s the idea is that “neighborhoods will change from one group to another group over many, many years and not so much whites fleeing neighborhoods rapidly,” said Bader, who is the lead researcher. “It will appear integrated for some time but will eventually transition to all one group, essentially re-segregating.” This results in blacks becoming concentrated into small areas of cities and inner suburbs. Latinos and Asians are segregating into neighborhood clusters throughout metropolitan areas.

This process began in the public schools, which owing to high local taxes prohibit most citizens from sending their children to private schools, where re-segregation has occurred in response to ethnic friction in the schools:

Poor, black and Hispanic children are becoming increasingly isolated from their white, affluent peers in the nation’s public schools, according to new federal data showing that the number of high-poverty schools serving primarily black and brown students more than doubled between 2001 and 2014.

The data was released by the Government Accountability Office on Tuesday, 62 years to the day after the Supreme Court decided that segregated schools are “inherently unequal” and therefore unconstitutional.

A major factor in this re-segregation is the rise of non-black minority groups. As Latinos and Asians move in, the balance of neighborhoods is altered, and people tend to leave in order to be with those like them:

The data show that vast portions of south and east Los Angeles are slipping from mixed populations toward single race populations. And the change has not just occurred in formerly white areas. One of the trajectories that we identified followed a similar pattern in neighborhoods that were once black. Compton residents were nearly three-quarters black in 1980; by 1990, the mix was about 52% black and 43% Latino; in 2014, two-thirds Latino. Such slow but steadily increasing Latino growth can be found in 46% of the neighborhoods we studied in the Los Angeles metropolitan region.

Immigration is one obvious factor. The Latino population increased in Los Angeles after immigration laws were changed in 1965 to encourage family reunification.

As history shows us, the more Leftist policies are tried, the more a backlash arises not from ideological disagreement, but from the real-world problems unleashed by approaching a complexity reality with a one-size-fits-all ideological abstraction. This in turn reinforces Nationalist ideas not just among Caucasians, but every ethnic population, starting with groups conventionally discriminated against such as African-Americans and Jews.

Ethnic Self-Rule And Secession Gain Prominence In Houston, Texas

Tuesday, July 12th, 2016

dwight_boykins_-_houston_texas

As has been mentioned on this blog for many years, Nationalism is a goal that can be achieved collaboratively by members of different ethnic groups. We all want the same end-state, which is that each group has independence and self-determination, and so even if that state appears adversarial we can work amicably toward it because it is in each of our groups’ self-interest.

In fact, nationalism is merely the recognition that (1) diversity does not work because it removes the ability to have a culture and (2) each group acts in self-interest, and those self-interests naturally and inevitably clash. With nationalism, we stop the kumbaya pretense and opt for a gentle Machiavellianism.

Dwight Boykins, African-American Houston City Councilman, spoke a truth that all Red Pill and Black Pill people know:

Speaking to Fox 26 in Houston, City Councilman Dwight Boykins (District D), “I think at this point, because of the crisis situation, not in Houston but throughout the country, we need to have officers patrolling areas that reflect the ethnicity [of that community].”

The councilman continued, “Because that will eliminate second-guessing. People know their community; they know their culture; and I think that can make a difference.”

…Tritico said, “Well, if that doesn’t work, I guess we could have separate schools and maybe separate people in the restaurants … just keep the races separate so we won’t have to have these problems anymore.”

The idea shocks people because in a time where every notion must be supported by lies and therefore is a lie, common sense is like an alien language, and threatens to pull back the curtain and reveal the utter emptiness of all of the lies we live by every day and upon which we base our political system.

Nationalism recognizes that people are not equal, but its basis is that groups have different needs because they are trying to maintain their culture, which — not police — is the basis of stability in their community and what enables it to function.

Modern policing has effectively failed in large cities like Houston, where most crime goes unreported and highly-mobile criminals cannot be stopped. What keeps people in line, besides individuals with guns, is culture: the idea of right and wrong, and how people should organize themselves as a group to live for the best.

In addition, as Robert Putnam‘s research revealed, diversity creates distrust in a community. That and higher levels of crime in impoverished and minority communities creates a perfect storm of nervous cops and angry citizens, exploding in gunfire and riots.

If we are honest like Dwight Boykins, we say what we mean: each ethnic group should have its own communities, and its own rules, standards, institutions, judges, lawyers, police and politicians. The great diversity experiment has failed, as Europeans worldwide are recognizing, and it is time to find a peaceful solution instead of continuing the failure and violence.

The virtue signaling outrage followed quickly:

Houston Police Officers’ Union 2nd Vice President Joseph Gamaldi responded that the idea was ludicrous and wouldn’t work.

Fox 26 Senior Legal Analyst Chris Tritico led off the weekend panel’s discussion saying, “I’m shocked at the suggestion.”

… “He is saying you have to look like the community. I am saying you understand the community by getting involved with the leaders, getting involved with community itself… so that the people in the community can feel comfortable with you.” [said Jacquie Baly, a black Republican from Fort Bend County]

…Former Harris County Democrat Chairman Gerald Birnberg [said] “For one thing, we don’t have an equal number of African-American police officers as we do African-American members of the community. For another, what does that say about an African-American who dares to venture outside of ‘their neighborhood’ where they’re not predominantly there. What about the Latino community which is dispersed throughout the entirety of Harris County?”

…Mayor Sylvester Turner’s office contacted Breitbart Texas shortly after this article was published. Communications Director Janice Evans said Mayor Turner never took the council member’s comments seriously.

These are all good objections, but they are tangential, not to the point. The point is that we keep having “diversity incidents” every month and they are getting worse. No one is benefiting from this arrangement, as the ghettos keep getting poorer as business flees after the riots, and government welfare while generous limits options to a fairly basic existence for most people.

Boykins stepped ahead of the game by acknowledging the reality of the situation, and while he may or may not have retracted the statement, the ripples it has created are only beginning.

Why segregation is natural and happens time and again

Wednesday, March 16th, 2016

Your grandmother may have told you that “birds of a feather flock together.” You probably ignored it. Folk wisdom was for old people, you thought, perhaps, and it was not very clear. What do these gnomic, naturalistic-metaphor sayings mean anyway? You moved off to the city.

Fifteen years later, you’re noticing that your neighbors look like you, earn like you and have similar tastes. How did that happen? You wanted to escape your white-bread, one-note suburb or small town. As it turns out, people naturally segregate without meaning to:

In Schelling’s model, individuals prefer to have some similar neighbours, but they do not discriminate against different neighbours – in short, they are tolerant. If individuals are unhappy with their neighbourhood, they can freely move to a neighbourhood with a more preferable composition.

In the example below, the yellow individual is unhappy about her assigned location because she does not have enough yellow neighbours, so she decides to move to a new neighbourhood. But when she moves, the composition of both her old and new neighbourhoods change. As a result, an old yellow neighbour and a new blue neighbour also decide to move.

This causes a domino effect that leads neighbourhoods to separate into yellow and blue ghettos. In the end, although no single individual prefers it, everyone ends up in segregated neighbourhoods.

What you are seeing is evolution in action. Within a group, different subgroups form; each of those has its own way of doing things. Those then separate and isolate so that they can improve those methods of doing things without interference by other groups. They are not acting against the others; they are acting in self-interest, and for the best interests of future generations. And so, in an inverse of the Tragedy of the Commons, the groups separate as if by a saltation process like sorts the stones in the river. A new order prevails, despite the human desire for power that makes us wish otherwise.

The ridiculous world of forced desegregation

Thursday, October 29th, 2015

the_ku_klux_klan_as_immanuel_goldstein

The local internet propaganda source where I live, Al.com, seems to inhabit a journalistic world akin to Sports Illustrated or Spin Magazine. They cheer loudly for the Home Team, boo the enemies and pump out all the disingenuous advertising a lousy pop band could ever desire. There are subtle differences within the genre. To make Sports Illustrated, you need to throw a 95 MPH fastball, mow down the middle of the Yankees batting order like a lawnmower or be a good enough professional football player to get admitted on scholarship to The University of Alabama. To get in Spin Magazine, you need to at least avoid musical atonality long enough to convince a record company talent scout you should be signed by the label. Get a load of the useless tossers Al.com chooses to pimp out to the Progressive fan base.

The judge ruled late today in Huntsville’s months-long desegregation dispute, clearing the way for federal attorneys to roll up their sleeves, dig deeper and stay longer.

This brings up an unpleasant question. Who in the heck actually cheerleads for federal attorneys* to “roll up their sleeves, dig deeper and stay longer?” Here we have a supposedly journalistic enterprise composing a front page article with all of the objectivity and fairness you would read in Go Set A Watchman. This is pretty much where the establishment is at on forced desegregation. The article was entitled “Desegregation judge drops hammer on Huntsville schools, ‘Court cannot find conclusively that the Board does not operate a dual system.” Roll Damn Tide!

We start with the “decision” U.S. District Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala handed down.

U.S. District Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala didn’t approve the city’s plan to redraw school zones. And she didn’t approve the Justice Department’s plan. Instead, she appointed Chief Magistrate Judge John Ott to oversee months of mediation between the two as they examine all aspects of racial disparities across Huntsville City Schools. She also called for appointment of a Special Master to oversee the court’s ongoing fact-finding in the case.

It reminds me of a recent NFL game between the Patriots and the Colts. The Colts didn’t want to punt on fourth down. They also didn’t want to run a play against the Patriots’ defense. So instead, they, like U.S. District Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala didn’t bother making a decision. They managed a play call that successfully did neither. What resulted has been hailed as one of the worst play-calling decisions in NFL history. The Head Coach at Indy wasn’t fired. Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala won’t be either. She’s provided months of additional government employment at taxpayer expense.

Then we get to the logical premises underlying her non-decision. It seems that some schools in the City of Huntsville, like some residential areas near these schools, are majority African American. It seems these schools don’t have a proportionally equal number of students in AP classes to other local high schools that are not predominantly African American. This, according to Her Judicial Majesty, has nothing to do with either the students or their parents. She “reasons” below.

The district administrator who determines which courses will be taught at the district’s schools each year testified that all of the courses listed in the district’s course catalogue, including all of the 27 AP courses, are offered to all of the students at all of the high schools in the district, but the district only teaches a handful of AP courses at Butler and Johnson because students at those schools have not requested other AP courses … The uncomfortable truth is that in a high school in which only 33% of the students read at or above grade level, many students probably are not prepared for the rigor of college level AP courses. Students who do not read at grade level need not only encouragement but also remedial help to take an AP course.”

Huntsville, you see, has that magical formula for chicken salad that works no matter what substance you provide them that came out of the chicken. They just keep it locked in a safe along with Colonel Sanders’ secret recipe because they’re all Southern-Fried Racists. A teacher wrote the following about the delusions posited as reasoning by people such as Judge Hughes Haikala.

There is an unutterable secret among teachers: Almost all realize that blacks do not respond to traditional white instruction. Does that put the lie to environmentalism? Not at all. It is what brings about endless, pointless innovation that is supposed to bring blacks up to the white level. The solution is more diversity–or put more generally, the solution is change. Change is an almost holy word in education, and you can fail a million times as long as you keep changing. That is why liberals keep revamping the curriculum and the way it is taught. For example, teachers are told that blacks need hands-on instruction and more group work.

This would imply Huntsville almost has to operate a dual school system. At least if they aren’t in league with the Grand Wizard of The North Alabama Klan Kleagle. And not only will a segregationist’s dream not work here, the African-Americans don’t want it. The reason that they tend to beat your adorable White Honor Student’s sorry butt every day is that they truly hate having white people around. White culture is something that grosses them out and royally pisses them off.

We see this resentment towards oversaturation and forced “Whitification” in the Pilsen neighborhood of Chicago. The people in minority neighborhoods not only don’t oppose racial segregation; they seemingly demand it.

Anti-gentrification signs have again popped up at Bow Truss coffee shop in 18th Street, this time reading: ‘White people out of Pilsen!” The coffee shop, at 1641 W. 18th St., has been vandalized five times in the last two or three weeks, Bow Truss owner Phil Tadros confirmed Monday.

These people don’t even want too much cream in their coffee. There is no way they want to have their kids taught by Whitey. They want whites to leave their bankrolls and take their Ofay butts back down the interstate to the burbs. The conflict and forced desegregation only occurs because Whitey won’t leave behind enough of his money. Now if there weren’t a basically powerless pool of taxpayers to bankroll all the “federal attorneys to roll up their sleeves, dig deeper and stay longer,” this is exactly what the Special Master would conclude in about five minutes. The only real issue these carpetbaggers would have left is when the next plane left from HSA.

* – Now I’ve met Federal attorneys that biologists would classify as both vertebrates and mammals. I haven’t met too many who I wished would roll-up their sleeves, dig deeper and stay longer. I guess I’m just weird in that respect.

Akon: This is not your country

Wednesday, July 17th, 2013

akon-this_is_not_your_countryI know zero about rap music, but I think I like this Akon fellow. Apparently he said some things which have shocked — shocked, I tell you! — those who believe that our happy little pluralistic, diverse and relativistic Soviet-cum-commercial paradise is actually Utopian.

His statements alienated them because he affirmed in short order that we can’t all get along, and the solution is not to try to force each other to share toys and be nice, but to take a commander’s view of the situation and to self-segregate. Stop pounding square pegs in round holes.

As part of reminding us not to try second-guess God(s) and nature alike and assume that we, because we can think and have desires, know more than all of reality around us — an attitude the Greeks called hubris — Akon pointed out the wisdom of nature’s order.

To his statements, I add the following: I have heard people of the African-American persuasion use the phrase “We were kings, once, in Africa.” That’s a paraphrase but you get the idea. To this I add: AND YOU SHALL BE AGAIN!

The modern time was a detour from sanity brought on by the egomania of certain people who, taking advantage of the rapid growth of society, used the implicit social contract and passive-aggression to manipulate others into supporting absolute and total egoism, a/k/a radical individualism.

Because it requires social force to convince others to suspend reality so the individual can be absolutely autonomous, this “individualism” became the most collectivist and dogmatic force in history. However, it has been seen before.

Specifically, when any society is going to disintegrate, hubris-related concepts become popular. Such: that we’re all equal, we’re all equally able to think and feel, and that the judgment of any individual is as good as any other. This is a sign of the end.

What Akon is seen is what others are starting to see too: equality doesn’t work. The things it requires, like pluralism and diversity and relativism, don’t work either. It’s all a dead-end scam that leads to a collapsed nation where no one wins.

“Every African American in the United States need to move their money, family, knowledge back to Africa were u will be treated like the royalty you are,” Akon captioned the below photo. “You don’t deserve this treatment. This is not your country!!” – “Akon suggests that blacks move to Africa following George Zimmerman acquittal” via Instagram

Africa is a wide-open continent. If it is not ruled by its people, the ongoing Arab, Indian, Chinese and multi-national colonialism will take over and alter it forever. The continent needs her people back to defend it.

I suggest that Americans recognize that the United States was and will be happiest as a Western European nation only, with its population composed of people from England, Scotland, Germany, The Netherlands, Austria and other nations of Western European heritage. It has less luck with Southern Europeans and the Irish, and even less luck with Eastern Europeans, so we’d want only the best of those groups in small numbers.

In the meantime, where should Africans be? Where they are kings. Where they once were kings, and shall be again. A continent of their own to shape their own destiny.

If it takes a rap musician to tell us these things, we should be thankful that someone finally said them in a public setting. I’ll probably never listen to his music, but this Akon guy is on the top of my good-guy list today.

Recommended Reading