The End of the World Anthem

After a long, intensive, exhausting survey of history, politics and philosophy, I have finally figured out how civilization will end. I could have used a wide array of quotes to pump this article up, but I have decided not to, so that this message could be as simple, concise and accessible as possible.

Everywhere around us we see the rise of technology. Already our communication goes largely through text messages, emails and various forms of social media, rather than face to face. There is no reason to suppose this steady trend will not continue in the future – since we can order everything we require by means of the internet, from clothes to foods to entertainments.

It might not be long before we will be carrying around with us a small microchip implanted in our underarm. This is of course very convenient, because it triggers the lights when we step into our house, it acts as a credit card and as our public transportation permit. It might even record various medical data to tell us and our doctors when we are sick.

However, what if you do an action that goes against the government? Supposedly, Julian Assange of Wikileaks has been cleared of all charges but has been suspended to stay in his house. Isn’t this a strange idea, that someone is placed under house arrest, in a Western society? Previously, it were usually party-leaders or nuclear scientists that somehow fell out of the regime’s favour. And then not in Occidental countries but in China or Russia. In the future, this might very well mean that as soon as you do something that the government could interpret as a violation against itself, or as a violation of the rules, that the information in your microchip is suspended. This will effectually mean that you will be unable to use public transportation, log in to the internet (since your chip will send out a disturbing frequency) or purchase articles.

In the Netherlands, government officials had already played around with the idea of installing a black box in every car, that would monitor the data of that car’s travels. This black box would be linked to a satellite. With other words; anyone with access to that data could immediately see wherever you are at precisely which time. However this proposition received a lot of negative press, so the government called it off. But I suspect this was just for testing. And, I have grounds to think, if in a few more years consumerism will have completely infatuated society, the common man will have lost feeling with what it means to fight for ‘self-sovereignty’, and such microchips might steadily become part of our daily lives.

As soon as anyone violates the rules – bang – that’s it; you’re out. Effectually stateless and cut off from all forms of digital communication, or at least forced to camp inside your house. And, when the time comes, don’t object: “I violated this rule, but who is to say this rule was just to begin with? I question the justness of this rule.” Because this is no longer a matter of the morality, ethics or standards beneath a given rule, that you can call into question. It will simply be: “This is what the majority decided; this is democracy. This is law.”

These rules won’t have anything to do with a vision (like in the past, a Liberal governments wanted to bring their citizens to live in self-interest properly understood, Socialist governments aimed to educate their citizens into acting for the good of the whole, and Conservative governments expected their citizens to live devoutly) these will be the rules, simply because a majority said so.

If you try to speak out and raise questions about the moral foundations of the procedures, your questions will fall upon deaf ears. Because you are trying to express yourself in a language that no longer applies to the government of the future. The government of the future won’t have anything to do with morality, ethics or enlightened judgement. It will be one big bureaucratic machinery of official regulations – in which the individual citizen is reduced to a single atom – but he does not object to this because all he asks for is a little innocent pleasure and private vice, every now and then.

And you would be wise to remember that all of this will not be brought upon you in the name of Communism. It will not be brought upon you in the name of Fascism. It will be brought upon you in the name of Capitalist Democracy.

Perhaps you are right, and have I not described the end of the world properly, and will it instead continue to last. But it will do so for no higher reason than the simple fact it happens to exist.

12 Comments

  1. J says:

    This is so true. Everything is turning into a big machine were conformism is expected if not enforced through technology. The worst part is that the machine is not achieving anything worthwhile. It just works in circles. There are no grand objectives for humankind or nations just live to work and work to live. Economy to create wealth, wealth to create economy in a vicious circle without end. And a big smoking screen of vapidity to make people dormant.

    1. It just works in circles. There are no grand objectives for humankind or nations just live to work and work to live.

      This is very true. There’s no forward-goal; only more keeping each other happy with pandering.

  2. crow says:

    That’s fine stuff, Nick.
    Quotations may be the norm, but a valid message is only hindered by the excess.

  3. Dack Thrombosis says:

    Well, I’ve often said if you’re breathing, you’re conforming. Let me know if the bureaucracy looks anything like the film Brazil.

  4. Drew says:

    RFID chip. Our government is directionless right now, which makes it hard to believe they will actually implement this. Maybe a private company will come out with the convenient chip.

    1. Nicholas Marville says:

      The point is not direction. The point is directionlessness. Which demands perpetual stabilization. Random whims need to be funnelled, our civilization decrees, so that people have an occupation. The State finds its duty in the need to hold these whims in check before they endanger the whim-pursuits of others. No qualities are ascribed to these whims other than ‘lawful’ and ‘unlawful’.

  5. J.Spagnola says:

    I really don’t like giving the New Testament any credit as far as predicting societal degradation, but in this case there seems to be a slight convergence of thought.

    [Edit: WHAT PRECISELY IS THIS CONVERGENCE OF THOUGHT, ACCORDING TO YOU, THEN?]

    Most of the time it’s simply drawing the target around the arrow and saying AH HA!

    1. J.Spagnola says:

      I was referring to how certain technological preconditions will need to be met before one is allowed to conduct any commerce. How at the push of a keystroke, one could be rendered a non-citizen.

      “He required everyone-small and great, rich and poor, free and slave-to be given a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. And no one could buy or sell anything without that mark which was either the name of the beast or the number representing his name.” Rev 13:16-17

      Revelations and the rest of the bible for that matter, is full of vague abstractions. The reader can interpret meaning and substance and attach it to whatever it is they’re hoping to find.

      1. Nicholas Marville says:

        This is indeed a good find! It matches perfectly with the article.

  6. [...] time (The End of the World Anthem) I discussed about the future of the State, and how this State relates itself to whims. For the [...]

  7. Sardonic_sob says:

    Repent, Harlequin!

    (If you don’t get it, Google it. Add “cardioplates” for the specific quote.)

    1. This refers to a book of some sort? You are refering to using fitness devices as part of the march of technology?

Leave a Reply

43 queries. 0.885 seconds