Amerika

History will probably record that Jews, as the first visible diversity in Europe, came to symbolize not just diversity in general, but the third-world system and the concept of race-mixing itself. Jews represent the Other to Europeans.

Hopefully we can acknowledge that without taking it to a bad place. Discarding the Soviet “Holocaust” narrative, placing Jews in slave labor work camps — analogous to Soviet “gulags” — during WW2 was a stupid idea because the camps concentrate germs as well as people.

Therefore, concentration camps going back to the Civil War prisons in America have had higher than normal death rates. This was not a hidden historical fact, nor was the use of concentration camps to thin out the Boers, so the pogrom lies in that choice.

In my view, the stupidity of the Germans is matched by the stupidity of the British, who did not want to allow Jewish settlers in Israel because of Jewish terrorism of the 1920s and 1930s against Britain, which may make the Jews the dumbest party in this whole clusterfluck.

A sane person would have simply repatriated the Jewish people to their ethnic home in Israel. They were formed there from the hybridization of Syrians and Aryans (ancient Italian and Greek women).

Basically, the old story is true: wandering lonely blue-eyed blondes got bought or seduced by rich Arabic princes, and this produced a population which was both nicer and smarter than Arabs, so immediately the other Arabs fell to hating them.

Ancient Syrians were formed of many layers of Europeans hybridizing with Asians, then mixing with some North African elements. This means that your average Jewish person is like a Swede with a Korean grandfather and Ethiopian great-grandfather.

No wonder our ancestors saw them as “Asiatics” and used them as a symbol for all race-mixing and foreign people. To them, Jews were what happened to fallen Aryans who bred outside of our Tribe. Their history shows struggle arising from confused, part-Asiatic origins.

Jews are similar to Italians and Mongols because they have the same ingredients in their racial profile.

Italians, comprised of the implosion of the Roman Empire, consisted of Romans and their people, who were gradually brought in long before the fall of the Empire, and in fact precipitating it. Proto-Arabs, north Africans, Phoenicians, and Semites flowed into the Empire.

Not surprisingly, Italians today do not look “White.” They look, in fact, like the sons and daughters of Arabs who took White wives. Since Arabs are a fusion of all three races, even if African is in the minority, it makes sense that any majority-Europid fusion will look “Arab.”

Similarly, the Semitic Irish (the “Black Irish” are just regular Irish who express more of the middle eastern side) have Arabic or Jewish features, despite the much lighter skin.

And if you go into Eastern Europe, you will find Asiatic mixture throughout the Slavs, who were escaped serfs from France and Germany who took Turkic, Asian, Jewish, and Arabic wives. They are genetically close to Jews like Italians are.

Our ancestors did not view these people as White, but as miscegenated half-breeds, and they saw them as Asiatics just like the Jews, Gypsies, and Mongols.

Despite these groups wanting to be “White,” they are playing a silly game where they insist that one ingredient in their heritage cancels out everything else. No, Jews, Slavs, Greeks, Italians, and Indians are not fully White, just White mixed with Asian and north African (as well as, for Indians, Australids).

What this means is that if you combine SEMI people — that stands for: Southern, Eastern, Mediterranean, and Irish europids — all together, even if you leave the Mediterranean Jews out, you are going to get the same formula that produces Jews.

Races are recipes. There are four root ingredients (Caucasians, Orientals, Africans, Australids) and the percentage of those determines what comes out of the mix. Every group on Earth is comprised of some formula involving those four groups, and Western Europeans have the most unmixed Caucasian of any group.

The other day someone asked if I was “pro-White.” The honest to Satan answer is that I detest politics and embrace philosophy, which for me is more like what Davy Crockett did than these bloated academics do: you explore reality, and come back with insights.

My insights, which I fought kicking and screaming because they upset me and still do, include the realization that diversity of any form is doomed, and diversity is an ethnic not a racial delimiter. That is: you want one and only one ethnic group in your society, and any foreign DNA gone immediately.

Did this come from hating other groups? No, because coming from Houston, Detroit, and Los Angeles, I am fond of many members of Other groups and know good people from all groups. You will not unseat that castle for me or the average White American.

However, I have also seen in all of these places that diversity produces chaos. Which groups does not matter, only that you have more than one ethnic group, and miscegenation makes it worse, not better.

People like me are not interested in “racism.” We are bored by mention of Black fatigue, naming the Jew, or talking about Muslim crime. Unlike you, we recognize that there is no “good” form of diversity, and it is no one’s fault.

Blacks are not subhumans. Muslims are not animals. Jews are not Satanic. This is just silly stuff from people who cannot simply face the fact that diversity in any form destroys civilization and dooms all of your best efforts to destruction.

You say some groups are better than others. I say: so what? The same ultimate problem will present itself, which is that a minority group must either accept being conquered, or take steps to conquer, and anyone sane does the latter.

Oh, so you want Orientals or Hispanics instead of those “evil” Black people? This sounds to me like you want slow decay instead of fast decay, but it is still inevitable decay. The problem is the diversity itself.

When you have one ethnic group, you can have culture and therefore, a high-trust society because everyone knows what is “right” and “good” and therefore they do it, or decide to become outlaws or bums or whatever.

Once you introduce another ethnic group, every question becomes a conflict and every answer is a compromise. Your culture goes away. Your ability to rule yourself goes away. Eventually, your genetics goes away.

I am never going to embrace “if it’s White, it’s right” because natural selection is needed to refine the White ethnicities, and removing it makes us weaker not stronger.

But even more, I find “White” itself questionable. To me, in my Anglo-Saxon culture, the term “White” means people of unbroken ethnic Nordic-German Western European ancestry, which signifies English, Scots, Dutch, northern German, Scandinavians, and northern French.

No wops need apply. No hibes either. Sorry boigs, you’re out too. Spanes? LOL. Maybe some Belgians can apply, but unless you look Western European, think Western European, and act Western European, we are putting you on the banana boat out of here.

We need to preserve a genetic root. We cannot do that with trace admixture. The “pro-White” people who want you to accept the miscegenated as if they were an unbroken line are in fact trying to genocide what is left of the ethnic Western Civilization people.

We do not need a pro-White movement. We need an anti-diversity movement which wants mono-ethnic societies. We do not need to harm or scorn other groups. We need to finally understand our own, and cut out the miscegenated imitators who would doom us with trace admixture.

Tags: IPJI, irish, italian, jewish, miscegenation, SEMI, spaniards, trace admixture, WHITE POWER 14/88