Archive for May, 2010
Sunday, May 30th, 2010
When elections are near, and at other times, there is much discussion of politics. There are various political views that people adhere to, yet deeper reflection reveals that what it means to hold a political view is not as simple as it may seem.
A simple answer to this question would be that each political view is a preference for a certain form of society. But under this system, a self-styled “social democrat” has two political views, at two different levels. They support a system of democracy, yet moreover they hope that “socialism” will be voted for within this system. Most discussion of politics takes democracy for granted, but democracy is indisputably a part of the way that society operates.
An individual’s political view may be expressed in several ways. They may join a political party, encourage others to vote for it, or most straightforwardly vote for it themselves. They may have several motives for doing any of these. Petty reasons are to belong to a group or to make themselves look good. Otherwise, there is also the expectation of the good that would come from the policies of their party of choice being implemented. It is not certain that this will happen, but they think that the possibility makes their actions worthwhile.
This demonstrates that a political view is, at the most basic level, a part of someone’s understanding of the world, which motivates them to act in certain ways that they perceive will increase good in the world. It is ethics on the society-wide scale. (Of course, what is seen as good may differ from person to person.) There are, therefore, many more ways of acting on one’s political views than a voting preference within a democratic social system.
There are many beliefs and preferences that people may hold, and some of these are given labels like “capitalism” or “communism.” The way that ideologies are viewed is an important part of how society operates. (Distinguishing opinions from the labels given to them is worthwhile because there can be many different policies under the same label. “Liberalism” is a good example of this.) Individuals and organizations claim to support particular ideologies, and have varying grades of success in gaining political power. Some ideologies are overall plans for society, but others cover only a few issues that are likely to be popular with the general public.
Let us briefly describe various tendencies, “flavours” perhaps, in political campaigning. The names themselves are somewhat arbitrary. It is interesting to think about which ethical imperatives might be the motivating factors in each case:
- Liberalism – A belief in individual liberty. All popular political movements today are ideological offshoots of liberalism. Sometimes it is claimed that the original tenets of liberalism have been perverted, and subverted by socialists, but in reality it is very easy to go from supporting individual liberty to supporting individual empowerment.
- Victimhood – Campaigning technique, trying to gain the support of a group who can be portrayed as oppressed.
- Communism – Also called socialism, an ideology that there should be an equal or “fair” distribution of wealth.
- Libertarianism – A more precise form of liberalism, which excludes wealth distribution and coercion.
- Capitalism – A belief in commercial competition. We might add that it is somewhat paradoxical to advocate a system where everyone pursues their own good, as sometimes happens with capitalism and libertarianism – because doing so suggests that a common good does exist, one that is better served by this system being in place!
- Fascism – Like capitalism, but the scope of competition is wider, with an emphasis on a common rather than an individual good.
- Environmentalism – We should protect the system of living things on this planet. It has been given lip service by many, but has had limited success.
New political systems, hopefully incorporating some of the good aspects of the above and avoiding the bad, may be yet to come. By clarifying what people really mean when they debate political issues, we can gain a better understanding of the situation of society and what our options are. It is common to imagine that one state is “good,” and another state is “bad.” The truth is, we are creatures that exist within the flow of time, and as long as we are alive the state of things is changing. Rather than concentrating on dichotomies like these, perhaps it is better to ask ourselves what we can do to incrementally make things better.
Monday, May 24th, 2010
In response to a comment from a reader regarding dark matter here’s an extended comment replying to it as well as some interesting points unrelated, but as a consequence of it.
Our civilization having sprung from a nature that introduced no written language or symbolization toward everyday life meant that we didn’t need symbols to represent our reality, we had our biological senses to receive information accurately enough to adapt toward it. Noticing this, our symbols are socialized, they are an extention of our senses beyond ourselves individually – they could mean anything to anyone. Some of the symbols we take for granted, like arrows, to any extraterrestrial would seem absurd, what do we mean by arrow? Is this able to represent our reality?
The answer is of course, yes, but that would require knowing the intuition of certain species, the host species, who have developed these symbols in reflection to their genetics toward their localization in reality. Different languages sound and symbolize differently, but the process of understanding is similar enough for them to socialize with each other, trade, and what not.
We didn’t evolve from symbols, they evolved from us – symbols are socialized and can mean anything. You must observe first and then correlate observation with these second rate symbols, prefering to maintain our first rate as a balancing between all things (a consensus between senses and symbols). ‘Maths’ isn’t the natural language of the universe, it’s artificial and is created through civilization, it’s a symbolic language and not the physical thing in itself – it’s idealism of the most practical type and we use this to wrap around as much symbolism as we can so that we can use the mass of it to crush others arguments that have ‘little evidence’, less symbolic mass.
Toward people in general; most of our angry athiests arn’t that bright, they are still modern regardless of how much they hate modern religion, they will utilize empiricism like a chimp ‘big stone = crush enemy HAHAHA’ ‘where iz yer big stone? you haz no big stone – I crush YOU!’
All in all this is what many people do to deny the possibility that x will evolve into z – they say ‘z doesn’t exist! Where is your evidence?!’ without realising that through a process y, z can be evolved from x.
It’s like saying a oak seedling can’t grow into a mighty oak, because it doesn’t have enough mass in it, because it isn’t as big as the mighty oak, because the ‘here and now’ doesn’t represent to our little earthling minds the obliterating potential of evolution and growth.
The most controversial and best example of this is God – God can be evolved – God as a superorganism and conscience that uses the entire universe as a foundation to higher universes that are beyond it, a pinnacle of evolution. Many people hate God (due to christianity, equality and everything else modern) and anything mentioning this causes irritation, they lack the potential of the impossible. So they say: ‘God doesn’t exist! where is your evidence?!’ And the evidence.. isn’t, it isn’t a big rock that you can smash people with to make your authority unchallenged.
It is an understanding through a process of evolution, of combining all of the forces in our universe into a compound, an organism, a machine that then transfers information between the organism across differing time dimensions. If we study the evolution of life thusfar we see that from a single cellular organism, we see that it hosts the potential to evolve into a multicellular organism, and from this into species of animal; into societies, into civilizations, into technology, spreading through interplanetary space, interstellar space, intergalactic space, cultivating all kinds of matter dark and light.
Having achieved that much, then possibilities toward mastering time travel open, and then when the organism is saturated, or is aging and nearly dead it disperses seeds like a tree, the ‘wind’ carries them and the nano-organism seed into every possibility it can – it will reach the beginning of time and re-write the past into a parallel universe, dispersing seeds uniformly throughout all mass – and there, like in a desert, the eggs of marine creatures will sit and wait, perhaps for ‘hundreds’ of years until the rain comes – from there the desert blooms into life – An evolutionary cycle of everything.
Dark Matter problems
When we look at the distribution of dark matter we can see that they ‘web’ toward each other, they have a bridge between them. All things that touch share information transfer, such as gravity. Dark matter exists in the centres of galaxies predominantly (where it is brightest, where the gravity is greatest. The universe is webbed together through dark matter, through gravity – yet is expanding as it is stretched and bonds decay, as dark matter decays into dark energy, and that into nothingness.
When we say massless particles are relativistic, we mean they distribute ‘equally’, uniformly across the entire cosmos, but what is fascinating now is what happens when ‘equality’ breaks. There’s a singularity and the cosmic pressure within it is so great that it can fuse into another particle, a particle with MASS. We’ll say dark energy is like a lesser form of gravitons, and alone it has negative energy, it is the cosmological constant, it pushes away rather than together, now when the universe was younger, space was a lot more hemmed in then these negative massless particles are today. This quintessence would fuse, it would socialize to form a group of these things as waves and then compound into a higher particle, and that packet of energy would be the next particle on the evolutionary hierarchy.
The quintessence of negative energy is the food of mass, mass is the compound of negative energy – and that packet of quanta/ mass is called positive energy. It is buoyancy of the most universal form. Gravity is not massless, it is a phase of mass, much like gases, and the ‘mass’ we think of, as in the solid objects that sink, they are a solid – there is a greater quantity of mass within it. And with that bullet cluster – If you could measure the speed at which the stars orbit, they would slow down, the gravity would be reduced, would it not? because their is reduced dark matter there in the collision, it would be reduced in proportion to the dispersal.
The gravitons with collect together in the right conditions and fuse, it’s the best solution to ‘where’ all our matter came from, our atoms fused in our stars so why not quantum particles in singularities? Why are balckholes black? Maybe, just maybe, it could be the source of dark matter, or maybe a different phase of it alltogether, Gravity so dense that it solidifies, or turns into a plasma and time reaches ‘infinities’ and other ‘mathematical’ loopholes that they are completely obliterated by. The goal of science would be to explain in the most economical way as many observations as is possible.
Gravity is not massless in my sense, if I use ‘gravitons’ I mean mass – the base of ordinary mass, if they are massless (or anti-mass) then that is dark energy rather than dark matter. From dark matter evolving onwards, from there is the positive energy, beneath the hierarchy is the algae of the cosmos, the dark energy that it feeds on. The only reason we think gravity is massless is because we can’t weigh it as such, ‘because it passes right through us and is indifferent to mass’. Dark matter, also, is very similar and if it is not gravity in itself then it is a very close relative of it, a subtle difference.
If we had dark matter in our hands right now, we would expect that it would fade right through, just like gravity, so how do we measure it? ‘gravitational’ lensing, the same way we detect gravity, the curvature of light – the very same process, put an object over a light and just see how the light ‘curves’ around an ordinary matter body, light bends in relation to our mass, our gravity – our dark matter than sustains ordinary matter from decaying and ’sinking’. And gravity waves as well, what’s the solvent it is passing through? We can’t just say oh it’s a particle and a wave! (as most physicists do) That is creating more problems then it is solving.
Dark energy/ quintessence/ cosmological constant is the base, dark matter/ gravity/ positive energy/curvature is the next, it’s our middle caste of the cosmos and above that, on the pinnacle, the elite part is our very positive energy, our ordinary matter. And life does not form at the very peak, but revolving around that on cooler planets and such, life evolves downwards by creating structures that preserve form whereas before it would just not exist – by compounding the substance into higher forms, from atoms to compounds to life – that is what symmetry breaking is! cosmic evolution!
Non-renormalizability is the paradox that we hit when we cannot overcome different phase transitions that occur through space-time. Certain areas go from our ‘normalized’ liquid flow, our happy pleasant earth existence, toward the ‘non-renormalizable’ infinities of a void or of a singularity, solid and gas/plasma. Time would be effected accordingly, blackholes have infinitely slow time transfers as you approach the event horizon (Einstein and Hawking would agree) as to completely freeze and slow our perception of it completely – space-time solidifies.
Then as you go over the event horizon, you reach a certain ‘pressure’ a positive pressure in space so great that no negative pressure around it, no dark energy can escape, and so the solid space-time through the horizon begins to melt and the ‘laws’ of physics are scrambled, unsolified space-time – magma. Our perception of space-time is irrelevent inside the core of the cosmos, because the structures that have evolved to create our laws are at a temperature that breaks all bonds, all forces and gives us the ‘unification of all forces’, the ‘destruction’ of all forces.
Our forces will never be unified by maths alone, though it will conceive half of it and will never cease due to the fact that evolution is constant, the rest is for life to evolve with those laws and generate byproducts along the way, from which new laws emerge to shape and evolve those byproducts even further (ordinary matter).
Maths is great and in the future has the potential to become more interconnected with our languages, for now we must realize that symbolism comes second from observation, we observe a process in nature and try to represent this as best we can – if we start from symbols, sure it helps us with the maths in general, but we indirectly observe it, I like to see with my own eyes, to see it before we symbolize it. Reality with all its warped senses toward idealism. It also helps us intuit reality without the need for masses and masses of ‘evidence’ – we become more philosophical, more economical in our representations of reality.
Thursday, May 20th, 2010
Today it has just been announced that artificial life has been created and has been reproduced more than a billion times, sparking moral controversy:
Scientists have created artificial life. In a world-first, Craig Venter, a maverick biologist and billionaire entrepreneur, has made a designer microbe from scratch.
The creation of the new life form, nicknamed ‘Synthia’, paves the way for the way for customised bugs that could revolutionise healthcare and fuel production.
In future, bacterial ‘factories’ capable of pumping out vast quantities of vital medicines or producing clean fuels could be designed to order.
Synthetic biology could also be harnessed to create environmentally-friendly bugs, capable of mopping up carbon dioxide or toxic waste.
Dr Venter, a cowboy boot-wearing Vietnam War veteran known for his showman tendencies, proclaimed: ‘We are entering a new era where we’re limited mostly by our imaginations.’
‘limited by our imaginations’, yes, yes this species has proven that already with these eco surrogates and magic medicine to help retards control themselves from throwing poo at mental institute staff. Now man has the potential to, not only engineer viruses and plagues, but life itself. Amazing, let’s see what a couple of rich corporate oligarchs can do with this little nugget, those who want to socially engineer a money making utopia where they can control everything and tickle with the economy because they own everything anyway, so let’s see, what could happen with this then?
There are fears that the technology, detailed in the journal Science could be abused to create the ultimate biological weapon.
Or that one mistake in a lab could lead to millions being wiped out by a plague, in scenes reminiscent of the Will Smith film I Am Legend.
Dr Venter, who was instrumental in the sequencing of the human genome, had previously succeeded transplanting one bug’s genome – its entire cache of DNA – into another bacterium, effectively changing its species.
He said: ‘We have ended up with the first synthetic cell powered and controlled totally by a synthetic chromosome and made from four bottles of chemicals.
‘It is pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in a cell and the cell instantly starts reading that new software and starts making a whole new set of proteins and within a short while all the characteristics of the first species disappear and a new species emerges.
‘Scientists’ understanding of biology falls far short of their technical capabilities. We have already learnt to our cost the risks that gap brings, for the environment, animal welfare and human health.
Professor Julian Savulescu, an Oxford University ethicist, said: ‘Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity’s history, potentially peeking into its destiny.
‘He is not merely copying life artificially or modifying it radically by genetic engineering. He is going towards the role of God: creating artificial life that could never have existed naturally.’
Now we’re just that tiniest bit even closer to killing off the majority of our population, awesome. Some exotic consequences to our environment however, means that it is not such a brilliant idea. Given the growth of technology, our skills toward genetic engineering will only increase (unless the IQ of humanity permanently falls beneath 120) therefore having the potential to threaten and even completely overrun the biosphere.
Just remember how our ecosystem’s biodiversity has been almost completely destroyed by meagre little things as worms, rodents, squirrels and even insects, some insects can destroy entire forests. So if something biologically engineered is like a germ from another planet that is able and managed to tap into the genome – the consequences could be devastating, or very interesting, and are unknowable to modern man, it will only add more threats, and more competition to any organism alive causing natural selection as we know it to be poisoned yet again.
Things such as cyanobacteria are the basic building block of our ecosystem, if their genome was under threat by a similar but foreign bacteria, it could completely poison the atmosphere by converting it into an alien gas. The fact that we have cyanobacteria and not some of the thousands of other strand of bacteria means that our planet may have potentially given birth to ecosystems completely different in composition to ours.
But regardless of the consequences, possessed humanity continues to open pandora’s boxes and xboxes,we will find modern day humanity even more obsolete. Rapid changes can and will occur with the consequences of radical technology fiddling with biology and ecosystems – forget using it for ‘soaking up CO2’, we have trees for that, forget using it for magic ‘medicine’, whenever we overun a natural function we drown in excess of its ‘positive’ effect, we drown in people who really shoulden’t be alive and push the hierarchy of organization further inward on itself.
Although it isn’t just about whether a technology is ethical really, although restricting development will increase the lifespan of certain civilizations dramatically; the main problem is who gets to use them.
Monday, May 17th, 2010
Something small and scientific, well, big science – unified theory science, something the brain conjured up:
What goes bump in the night?
I can’t imagine nothingness in the dark anymore, It’s impossible – whilst i’m trying to think 0.4% of the whole magnificent universe is all you can barely see – even less nowadays with light pollution and other modern stupidities, but if you could see all of the galaxies, stars, planets you would only see 0.4% of the universe! The mind simply cannot comprehend that enormity of space and time, the amount of information residing within this universe is beyond anything of substance.
Who ate all the pie?
Think. If life can reside on a tiny fractual percentage, on a blissfull little island amidst a black sea of infinity. Alot goes on in the dark, you stare at darkness at night, what do you see? Nothing? or maybe the quanta of various photons hitting your eyes, like static on a screen, or maybe even, something so obscure, something taboo of all taboos, maybe there actually is life there – not made from light matter compounds, but from dark matter compounds.
When we think about how compounds are formed, are they formed in the place of their atomic fusion? No they are not, hot dark matter is what is generated within blackholes by the fusion of dark energy – can you think of a better solution? A star of dark matter, a mountain so high that darkness accumulates at the tip of the mountain.
Inversely, cold dark matter – like cold light matter, forms clouds of molecules for small accumulations. What if cold dark matter mountains form like inverse gravity wells, with the ice on the top, the ice of ordinary matter – this here, our Earth – freezing to all life, what could survive on such a hostile planet?
And think also, if humans have the possibility to create machines from metal, why not these machines create life from dark matter? why not dark energy? Why limit ourselves to 0.4% of the pie? Why not eat abit more of the pie?
Open your minds for a universe that thrives with life, be prepared to shit your pants at the almighty expanse, the twilight amidst darkness:
Warped light rays and distorted space-time, you’re seeing the rise and fall of billions of civilizations, perhaps every photon hitting the telescopes lense here can not only see more than a gazillion terrestrial planets, you’re seeing the darkness thriving with life, the vacuum of space – isn’t. This image is staring right through a dark mountain of cold dark matter. Cold dark matter accumulates between galaxies and allows them to ‘socialize’ between the void, solid dark rock at the land’s edge of the galaxies, right before the sea of dark energy – cosmic lava tubes of a long dead quasar, cave systems beneath our observable universe.
Like the Earth’s crust, it is a tiny slither, this observable universe where the life thrives, underneath, beneath where any photon dares tread, lies the behemoth, the hell beneath our cosmos – beyond space and time, a liquid phase of our universe beyond future or past, yet there it is, in the early cosmos spewing up all kinds of observable matter, seeding the galaxies with the intergalactic dust to generate stars from, from where? Conservation of energy? Creation of energy – or perhaps, our universe isn’t alone, perhaps our observable universe is just a continent, or maybe a tiny island next to billions of other continents and little islets apon the crust of our hyperverse, our megaverse.
Where the Gods live, where they evolved from, coming through to our universe through the timeless magma space-time beneath all of creation – when the collosal eruption occured! The big bang blew up this timeless quantum foam, with its own idealistic properties the Gods warped it into their own evolutionary creation, they formed themselves out of imaginary mass, uncreated mass, and then cooled and solidified into the abundant dark matter gravitons, and then from there evolved upon the other forces, slowly reaching over the boundary of reality, first there was light, the electromagnetic force, then the earth – the strong force, and finally life itself, the weak force – all to combined to create the four time dimensions in the residue of our universe.
Our Earth, the cold matter encircling a dim yellow sun – a combination of electromagnetism, strong and weak forces, all residing in matter. But where lies our gravitons? Our gravity force? If Earth, comprised of these ‘figured out’ forces numbering three and if the majority is that which we cannot see, then surely dark matter must be gravity and the fourth dimension, being the ‘time’ dimension, oh yeah, and.. coincidentally, space and time are very linked together, curved space-time? It’s the volume of gravitons, gravity wells are dense dark matter mounds which provide the support niche for our cosmos to even exist.
Just imagine an island in the south pacific, if we cannot see the sea bed, how do we know it is connected? We just see these little islands ignorance of the mound of mass beneath it as to raise it above that sea – that sea of dark energy. And where there are seas there are marine animals, space marine animals – These are your deities whom crawl onto the planetary islands, like crabs, and then evolve into land animals over aeons, light matter animals, constructed around their dark halo that they have forgotten, like our biosphere, ignorant of the gravosphere above it – the gravity beach.
Tell me what problem of gravitation doesn’t this solve?
All of modern physic’s problems for gravitation are on dark matter, all of dark matter’s problems are on gravitation – are we seeing double here? Or are they the same?
Dark Matter – a weak, barely interacting gravitational particle, doesn’t react with light except with curvature, makes up the majority of the universe and ‘holds it together’ – indifferent to mass and passes straight through it.
Gravity – the weakest force, barely interacting force, yet all pervasive and everywhere, where ever there is mass, there is gravity – but how can it interact between the observable matter? Gravity bends light, holds the universe together, is small, indifferent to mass and passes straight through the majority of the universe.
See the difference? – What difference! Gravity is Dark Matter!
The Wave-particle duality problem, isn’t
Electrons, less abundant then gravity, only effects known mass – ordinary mass, creates a wave through a particle slit experiment.
Photons, less abundant then gravity, only effects known mass – ordinary mass, creates a wave through a particle slit experiment.
Their just sailing particles across a dark sea, literally.
Is it an ether? like Newton’s and Aristotle’s, infact many more scientists so called ‘space ether’? YES, Gravity waves exist we can detect these from binary stars, pulsars, quasars and every other massive thing that smashes into the underlying rock as to create a quake across the cosmos – that is what these are, and even writ small in our relatively dense space-time well, we see the slit experiment here with relatively solid waves, like in a solid – like a transparent rock, beneath the dark mountain, here on our Earth.
And that’s all the science I can be bothered with today, stay tuned for my new thesis on civilizations. Little civilizations go out like planetary nebulas and create little heavy metal when they die, but heavy civilizations, like no others before them go out with a bang in the early cosmos – like supernovas creating all kinds of rare things, they create gold, platinum, silver – beyond an alchemists wildest dreams, up there floating in space.
Likewise mechanizations may not be all the fear, doom and gloom they are cranked out to be, they are the sublimation of life, the heavy nuclei kind, here on Earth, creating rare lifeforms that are more precious than gold – heralding the end of a first generation of civilizations and the beginning of a second generation of civilizations, the chemicals will mix with heavier nuclei thanks to the life giving supernova of the aging technophilia civilization.
Monday, May 17th, 2010
A key feature of any future successful government would be the replacement of the class system with a hereditary caste system.
A class system is a social hierarchy that groups individuals ascending by order of a social valuation and is only as effective as a civilization is at observing reality, as it is.
A caste system is a natural hierarchy that groups individuals ascending by order of natural, inherited ability and is the basis for creating and sustaining civilizations.
Class systems are therefore, socially geared toward a culture as the west has, where we determine the worth of individuals by their pay check rather than the nature of individuals, and of course it isn’t ‘racist’ either. Caste systems are geared toward natural ability and meritocracy, the best in ability will naturally rise, and the more stoney brains will sink the the base of the hierarchy.
On this blog we talk alot about how social reality pervades everything we do, it’s a part of being alive having to face the twisting and theorizing of relatively simple ideas that spin off into imaginary worlds whereby they cease to function effectively in the reality around us.
The social information we absorb everywhere and everyday will cause us to associate with certain socializations, creating an ‘us vs them’ mentality, an in group mentality toward everything we do, and so it is really difficult, so difficult that only a gifted few can rarely glimpse the cold, brutal truth out there. Tabula rasa, is something every generation should have a taste of.
The most refreshing truths are necessarily destructive and come to us through history, they flush the toilet that is our society with repeated verification and practical methods proved by people who have actually experienced the things we do in everyday society. Knowing that nature follows patterns we can make very accurate estimates toward certain actions, which is predominantly due to the subconscious, naturally following socialized preferences – something that must be overcome time and time again.
It’s time to throw out the class system
The class system has failed. At the beginning of the western regime that sprung out of europe before the colonization of north america. The aristocracy acting through the class system relied heavily on hereditary principles, it worked well for some time as all traditions succeed in doing. Slowly but surely, the decay has set in and the subconscious peasants began on their death march murmuring memes fed to them by parasites, the murmured memes promised them that they could have everything without the need to actually achieve something.
So the peasants marched under their memes and the ruling classes became more vicious in response to the rising tide of despotic labourers; and because labourers tend to be less intelligent, turnip pickers, then they will easily be fooled by anything with an above majority intelligence. Corporatism and consumerism rooted and started out modestly before the 1950’s, then turned whorish after the second world war as undefined-freedom was such a dream to die for, followed by the complete contrary, a cultural marxism – the flourishing of political correctness in the late 1970’s demanding a complete intertia on evolution by insisting that all competing organisms in civilization be equalized, therefore it is easier for them to begin devolving and do-away with that evil, oppressive force called nature. It inverted the natural residue of the class hierarchy into putting the least competent above the most competent.
This is where the social ideologies began to twist in on themselves and trapped minds of the subconscious masses causing them to revolve around it, it’s how they generate a mob, incessantly needing a revolution for whatever reason – they are the reactionaries to the viciousness of corrupted corporatism and polluted by inorganic surrogation.
We can’t just say cultural communism is bad without also addressing the opposite side of this, those who have managed to inherit wealth without the need to actually earn it, therefore unable to learn the consequences of their actions. Splitting the divide even further until a civilization completely tears itself into two leading to civil wars and ‘class’ wars, or in Britain’s case, a very very serious TV mass-debate about fairness.
Establishing the Caste Hierarchy
In the reorganization of our failing society we need to scrap this social class hierarchy and implement an idea inspired by only the best of ancient societies, many of them Indo-European and the more well known hindu caste systems – except we can do this with our own flavours as such.
To read about the Indo-European caste system, click here
To read about the Hindu caste system, click here
What I find so interesting is the idea of the ‘four levels of humans’. Let’s keep it simple and elaborate:
Here we have two sides of the scale, the productive (above 51% productive) and the counterproductive (below 50% productive). This caste does not include social factors such as ethnicity, and it simple and goes well with meritocracy, those who contribute the most to keeping civilization ruled by the best reach the top, those who want it all for nothing sink to the bottom.
Those above the 50% threshold allow civilization to evolve, those below it are necessarily slaves, they have a slave mentality and are the meat shield of social organisms when they fight. The proles are counterproductive decision makers, they will always include every human and not in the intelligent way of actually organising, but equalising. They will provide for ghouls – because they are ‘humans’ too! Therefore, even though they are abusing everyone else for their own game, the proles acting as a collective hive-mind will not speak out against them, because ‘they’re poor, it was their upbringing, it’s not their fault’ – yeah right, bullshit.
Proles should be mindless labourers and stick with that, ancient societies would trim them from time to time or just feed them to the lions. Their opinions are not their own, they are dumb and cannot make decisions, they are your everyday average joe and jill that tolerates stupidity. Anyone who speaks anything against their ‘individual’ decisions collectively implanted into their vacant heads, they auto-respond with ‘racist’ – they are mediocre.
Ghouls are the worst, they are subhumans – they are the result of failing societies that breed up a whole undercaste of parasites that catacomb the civilization into a third world slum run by selfish desires with no rationality behind them, they are the insects, outcastes. You can spot these mutants running around alleyways, looking at your children in the playground, spilling oil in the sea, in your law courts – they are the very meaning of parasites in our civilization.
Artisans are your ‘middle class’, they are what keeps civilization going forward and they operate more specified labour that is below the level of leadership yet above the mindlessness of proletariat ‘work’. They generate wealth and every sensible government would do everything they can to ensure they have what they need to help civilization by helping themselves, they don’t need nannying.
Elites in this sense are true elites, they are all round intellects, cyclic thinkers who think holistically and can adapt to different tasks as they happen. They are the leaders who drive civilization forward, and the sooner they take back their divine right of intelligence for leading our nations, the sooner we can dispose of mental pollution.
On determining a caste type
This bit is really simple, if you have a population:
- Introduce a communal culture – those who destroy it are ghouls, get rid of them. Those who go along with it regardless of how you treat them, are proles (will wave pieces of card angrily when offended), those who get bored with plain old labour are the artisans, they create the culture and something meaningful to make use of manpower, and the ones who are telling people to operate within limits and respect the surrounding entities, steering the ship, they are the elites and they make sure the whole actually has a true direction.
- Establish a meritocracy – reward good behaviour, punish the bad. Allow land and resources for the productive to produce wealth for your civilization, take away land and wealth from the counterproductive people who only want to leech the wealth off others to spend it on unnecessary public utilities, like ‘bread and cricuses’ and mass education that fails.
- Control population quality – do not let the least productive reproduce the most or else you will be surrounded in parasites, any problems will be ignored and you will end up with a liberal democracy that conceals the most ugly and oppressive regime in history. The elites and artisans must reproduce more than the proles and the ghouls, either by sterilizing the least productive and giving the most productive the resources to raise successful families.
- One caste system per ethnic group – if you include multiple ethnic groups in one caste hierarchy, they will be proportionaly inequal correlating to the common hereditary characteristics. Most africans in western countries do not work well with westernised ideals, they have adapted to their own ancestry and evolved by their own cultural customs – mixing them together is counterproductive and creates a parasite undercaste without initiative.
- Remove useless laws – in order for a hierarchy to work the best, it must operate in the most natural environment, the most realistic environment possible for it to organise individuals according to ability. Removing bubble padded laws design to protect the incompetent from themselves will soak up the residue of undercastes from the failures of the past, as dumb people do dumb things, let them do so in tipple zones where they can kill themselves legally.
So there we have just a few pointers, there is really nothing to it. Nature is always before nurture, for nurture is a secondary force that shapes nature by restricting certain mutations from reproducing and giving to those desired by the ideals. Only a great culture, shaped by caste hereditary is capable of fixing our civilization.