Furthest Right

Nature may be in our nature

One of the researchers, she says, was an epidemiologist who, in the process of trying to quantify his hunch, initiated a study in which social workers and police very, very intensively interviewed and background checked a long string of crib deaths that had been explained away as unexplained random respiratory failure. It turns out that his equation was able to predict, with high (but not absolute) reliability, which infants had actually been the victims of homicide or malign neglect. If the infant was a boy when the mother wanted a girl or vice versa, if the infant was born weighing less than 8 pounds, or if the mother was in any kind of economic or physical danger if this child survived, then the baby was doomed. His final estimate, from that initial study, was that seventy five percent of all SIDS cases are actually homicides. But, he admitted, just acknowledging this possibility puts us in an awful dilemma. To catch the 3 out of 4 women whose babies suddenly die that were actually murderers, we have to treat all SIDS cases as potential homicides, therefore piling yet more heartbreak and tragedy on the 1 out of 4 who just randomly went through the worst tragedy any family can know, the sudden and unexpected death of a beloved child.

Brad Hicks

Nature is inside of us.

Much like mice eat the babies that aren’t going to fit with their survival plan, we kill ours.

There’s a solid reason for this: we, the parents, need to be able to survive before we can take care of an infant.

So changing the plan — tail wagging dog, cart before horse — to accommodate a baby just because it’s there endangers the family as a whole.


Share on FacebookShare on RedditTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn