The bill, the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), would create a “duty of care” requiring social media apps and websites to “prevent and mitigate” harms to children, including not recommending content that could cause anxiety and depression or could lead to “sexual exploitation and abuse.” A huge problem is that the bill would allow state Attorneys General to sue apps and sites if they believe certain content is harmful to minors—meaning AGs could weaponize the law to attack content they simply disagree with. In response, platforms likely would preemptively block content they think could get them sued.
The Left finally discovers the disaster of civil rights style legislation: in order to protect a sacred group, you write rules that then become interpreted broadly, and soon a Tweet saying that Black people have an average IQ of 89, that 78% of the people arrested for having sex with horses are White women, or that Chinese-Americans do not pay their taxes becomes a “hate crime.” Our founding fathers/framers decided on absolute freedom of political, cultural, social, religious, and scientific speech for this reason; they probably would have not just banned pornography but indemnified people from shooting pornographers and killing prostitutes.
The legal contexts vary, but the charges – such as subversion, illicit association, terrorism and tax evasion – are often vague and time-consuming to disprove, while a growing number of countries, including the US and UK, have passed controversial anti-protest laws ostensibly intended to protect national security or so-called critical infrastructure such as fossil fuel pipelines.
Climate change is Abrahamic, and the real problem is The Ecocide which threatens all life on Earth because there are too many humans in too many cities, but finally the Left is also seeing the diversity monster. You cannot talk about limiting carbon while bringing in unlimited immigrants, receiving container ships from China, and spending trillions to subsidize your non-White underclasses. Consequently, Leftists are the ones doing this censorship. Someday they can proudly recite how “first they came for the White Nationalists, and I did not stand up, because I was not a White Nationalist… next they came for the Human Biodiversity scientists, and I did not stand up, because I was not a Human Biodiversity scientist… finally, they came for me, and they ate me because I was White and lived in the suburbs.”
The Irish, as a competing Semitic group, have a long hatred for the Jews. Here Biden mumbles his way through the bad side of American foreign policy, which is micromanaging other nations. Who cares what the Jews do, in Israel? They will fix their own problem and it is not our business on a “moral” level. The good side of American foreign policy occurs when America intervenes in conflicts like Ukraine and Georgia to stop incompetent larger bullies from beating up on smaller breakaway groups.
George Floyd died because he swallowed his stash and the ambulance did not get there in time. The original autopsy noted this, so it was sent back for editing. He is a propaganda symbol of what Democrats intend to do to take over America: use diversity to replace anyone who can stop them.
Irish guy forgets about the ADL and SPLC. The fact is that every diversity group has a political advocacy front, and the Jewish version is just lower-key than the Palestinian version, which tries for the “one world posse” sense of uniting all third world groups against the first world.
There they go again, with the Abrahamic universal morality instead of common sense, which says that all individuals and groups act in their self-interest. If you are being defended for a “hate crime,” you probably want some form of racially-aware lawyer, and if you are being defended on charges of terrorism, you probably want a jihadi or fellow traveler.
The Jewish presence in America was miniscule – no more than a tenth of a percent – but the fate of Jews nonetheless assumed outsize significance in the political debates of the early republic. For a new nation founded in the name of equality, the treatment of Jews was a test of whether Americans would realize or reject that animating creed.
The specter of religious equality alarmed many Gentiles. State after state decided to exclude Jews from the ballot box, the state house, and the legal guild. This type of prejudice was familiar to Jewish-Americans who had faced the same, or worse, back in Europe. What distinguished Jews in the United States from their Old World co-religionists was not the reality of antisemitism but rather their willingness to publicly challenge it.
The problem is not Jews but diversity. When you have more than one culture in a society, you have fatal division of your ruling apparatus and culture, which is soon replaced by garbage anti-culture like we see in our consumerist ruin today.
No one likes what the Nazis did, but no one likes living among foreign cultures either. The solution to antisemitism is to repatriate all Jews to Israel and to remove anyone else from Israel, including Christians.
Record numbers avoided a contentious diversity conflict because they did not want to get involved in a situation that always ends with the White people being called racists and having their lives destroyed.
In democracy, you always sacrifice tomorrow for the ability to signal hard support for egalitarianism today. Studying human remains was OK when it was only White people, but not OK when we rob graves of non-Whites, and still not OK if our datasets are entirely based on White people.
Diversity means that every ethnic and racial group becomes a politically protected special interest, and then they fight with each other for control on the national level just as they do on the international one.
In the future, we are going to find that Cro-Magnids were the original human, and most other groups consist of admixture between them and local parallel evolutions of the hominid or human form.
After years of turn-off-your-brain hippie nonsense, Europe is finally waking up to the threat of migration and diversity, including hostile agents slipping in from Eastern Europe. Democracy thinks very slowly because it is based on pretense and the manipulation of groups of people through symbols.
One has to admire the simplicity of the Netanyahu plan: if you take our people hostage, we will keep killing your people until you have had enough.
Instead of peace, diversity has brought us comical internal warfare where people repeat Soviet propaganda as a means of demoralizing each other.
We see the problem of evidenceless convictions in order to appease yet another diversity group, this time sexual (women) instead of ethnic.
The replacement of diversity labor with automation continues. Unions take note; technology is coming for you next, and no one will miss you.
Diversity means that foreign conflicts come to your happy corner of the world, all in the name of Abrahamic universal truths, morals, values, and communications.
“Experts” are always wrong in the post-diversity West because people ask the Leftists and diversity, who always give the opinion that is advantageous for them. Nine-tenths of the world is poor, and they see us giving out free socialist welfare state stuff in the West, so they are going to come here to take part.
Germans are realizing that you do not need to like National Socialism, “racism,” bigotry, cruelty, etc. to realize that diversity is fatal and must be eliminated.
Nothing can fix the wound in your soul; the Westerners built a civilization where you had none, and it is time to repatriate the Australids to Southern India where they originate.
When you moralize conflict by banning “racism,” people become polarized. We were told antisemitism was morally wrong and “racism” was morally wrong, but now those two prohibitions are in conflict, since Israel is fighting a race war against Palestine.
The UK has realized that the freeloaders are going to destroy its society even worse than British Socialism, and they want to remove as many of them as possible.
There was a time when Taipei had a military alliance with the United States and a seat on the UN security council. It was run as an anti-Communist dictatorship and could count on support from like-minded regimes from Seoul to Santo Domingo, Pretoria to Panama City.
Now those Cold War-era friends are almost all gone. The threat to Taiwan is more severe than ever and Taipei is in desperate need of new allies.
This is why China has funded pro-diversity Leftism in the West, peaking with the Clintons, who got their start thanks to suitcases of Chinese cash to fund their early campaigns. They are traitors who want to wreck White America so that China can rule the world.
In conflicts like this, most incidents are fake and designed to motivate people to support one side over the other, just like most “hate crimes” and many rape accusations are faking. Making one group a politically-protected special interest allows them to abuse that privilege for their own advantage, which they would be fools not to do, especially since fools created diversity and support it. It is a pro-fool movement.
Conservative parties thrive when they focus first on function and only second on symbolic activities. Religion often gets in the way, as does temptations toward censorship and anti-abortion activity, both of which polarize the electorate against them.
Minority communities tend not to collaborate with what they see as the host population police, and this leads to inaccuracy in convictions, since the police are trying to administrate through ambiguity.
After swinging the pendulum too hard to the third world side, people are realizing that even victim groups are biased and capable of atrocities, which means that the only happy people are those who live without diversity.
No group wants to live among others, so if possible they keep the other from moving into the neighborhood. We are supposed to weep over this when in fact preferences for racial and ethnic isolation are an irreducible biological fact.
Thanks to Democrat greed for diversity voters, jihad walks among you. So do the people who want to kill them, and the people who want to kill them. So do many others who do not care about your laws, Christianity, Constitution, values, or any of the other nonsense that assimilationist conservatives blather on about.
With diversity you do not get “peace” and “freedom,” but constant censorship and legal wrangling to keep the diversity mixture from detonating on too regular a basis.
More silly little rules by well-intentioned neurotics to tie our hands against stopping the tide. This can of course be resolved by legislation, but our leaders are cowards who avoid anything diversity-tinged if they can.
Lest the somnambulant voters go back to sleep, the border crisis in the UK, EU, and US continues apace. Nine-tenths of the world live in poverty and they all want to come here for the free stuff.
The country is broke and its infrastructure rotten, but diversity populations are still handing out free stuff to buy votes, even though this means even more third worlders will come here.
Let us translate from social-speak to biology-speak: “disadvantage” means lower IQ, and “entrench” means “demonstrate.” Diversity and class warfare make this worse not better because they compel people to try to rise above their stations in life, resulting in incompetence and resentment.
With diversity, society descends into censorship and propaganda. How is this “freedom”?