Posts Tagged ‘trace admixture’

Bugman Meme Attacks Consequences of Trace Admixture And Miscegenation

Thursday, December 14th, 2017

Although the Alt Right accepts many of the taboo ideas that citizens steeped in modernism are both oblivious to and will deny if mentioned, it still faces a few taboos of its own, one being the destructive consequences of racial separation without attention to ethnic and caste differences, leading to a cultureless group where traces of other races obliterate its Western European traits.

Trace admixture gradually reduces people from distinctive, “old school” looking Western Europeans to moon-faced people of generic white ancestry and no class distinction, creating a white drone/prole/pleb race which has none of the greatness of the original. This is most distinctive in Americans, where some are mixes of Southern, Eastern, and Western European, resulting in what is technically white but without any particular cultural connection or depth of understanding.

Genetics codes for individual traits, and in sub-species which were isolated, these traits form networks where each part supports the others because together all of these traits collaborate to form the physical and intellectual makeup of the group, including their aesthetic tendencies, moral outlooks, and cognitive processing skills. When groups are mixed, these networks are disrupted, and so traits are passed on partially without the integration into the whole, producing people without the consciousness of the original but with some of its abilities, though not the wisdom to use them well. This is why trace admixed formerly Western European populations in Eastern and Southern Europe — including Ireland, since they are Mediterranean/Semitic mixes — have historically underperformed compared to the West and have followed third world voting patterns, choosing the more individualistic path of “free stuff” and a nanny state over a culture-driven traditional-style civilization.

People have begun to refer to these generic, cultureless, deracinated, and generally low-performing individuals as bugmen, since they often have a sometimes comical facial structure and zero connection to any roots, since when your heritage consists solely of a government racial category, there is no embedded genetic memory of the past and so none of the consciousness required for identity and culture. Bugmen are soulless creatures that Nietzsche described as “last men,” driven only by material desires and a search for power through peer pressure. Everything that we find odious about modern society is designed for bugmen, and to cultivate more bugmen, since they exist easily in it and are oblivious to its downsides, so have a massive evolutionary advantage in it but nowhere else.

The soulless bugman can be described as a hollow but controlling and yet subservient person who is comfortable only among the meaningless:

You’re more than likely surrounded by hoards of these bovine-esque people in day-to-day life. Culturally of course they’re near impossible to pin down for they cut all cultural roots at the base in fear of representation with the past. Politically many say bugmen are ‘left-leaning’ yet I’d argue the case that any affiliation with politics is entirely with the curve of the populous and thus the Bugmen – at present – inject themselves routinely with viral strains of progressivism, neoliberalism and (especially) democracy. Projected from this ambivalent attitude towards history and politics comes anti-empathetical extroversions with regard to tradition, myth, folklore, spirituality and interest, all of which, when positioned in relation to a bugman are used only alongside heavy doses of postmodernist irony. The simple matter of fact is they have zero respect or tolerance for anything antiquated or traditional, the most minor of historic morsels that doesn’t actively sell itself to them or project their personal vision of infantile-tech-utopia is cast aside. Philosophically the bugman is relatively confused, often mistaking logic, reason and rationale with one another, and replacing the idea of basic causality with their own drawn-out narcissistic assessment attempts: “Look at me, I’ve got it all figured out.” the bugman says internally.

Before you sits the social nervous system of the bugman true, a sordid mixture of fad-reverence and capitalist-lite binging. On closer inspection of the day to day life of a bugman one finds at its core the implementation of social erosion, everything that is taken from its origin is likewise bastardized into a regressive, virtual, stir-crazy version of its former self: eSports, Fantasy Football, Copy ‘n Paste Vidya (à la Bethesda/Ubisoft), New Atheism, Beards-as-personality, etc. each of these characteristics is of course filtered through the latest piece of cutting-edge high-brand technology the bugman can afford. One may have noticed already that bugmen’s ‘personalities’ are nothing more than the accumulation and composition of various popular brand names, technologies, TV shows, bands etc. The bugman is entirely defined by that which they consume. Thus the bugmen easily assimilate into their own groups, for their archetypes and traits are based off material possessions, as such grouping is quick, painless and has the added benefit of instantaneous conversation: “Sweet mechanical keyboard dude!”

There is of course a difference between a regular consumer and a bugman, there has to be, for everyone consumes. Whereas a consumer will buy a basket of groceries which they plan on eating, the bugman will purchase retro foods, meme-drinks and ironic status-tokens as a means to display the fact that they are indeed ‘in-on-it’. A consumer will buy the box-set of their favourite TV show because they genuinely enjoyed the viewing, perhaps they’ll watch 3-4 episodes a week around other commitments, a bugman on the other hand subscribes to multiple streaming services and binges series after series in the ever expanding quest for acceptance, when asked how they found Stranger Things, Rick & Morty, Bojack Horseman, Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones etc. the bugman does not offer insight into their personal opinion, only regurgitates a titbit or quote from the series as a means to display their virtue of consumption. “I too have seen the thing you have!” A network of insects whose lives are routinely controlled by ratings: theirs and others. They must advance their rating by subsuming the other which is rated highly. “Everyone liked this, so if I like this, everyone will like me!

We can see this trend in our society already through the fusion of social prominence and peer pressure. As detailed in the book BOBOS in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There, social respectability has been taken over by Leftist values, and has created a culture of “preciousness,” in which each person strives to be unique in their combination of possessions and activities, and to demonstrate altruistic and “meaningful” activity in their lives, something the Neoreactionaries referred to as “virtue signaling.”

This culminated in the precursor to and an ingredient of the Social Justice Warrior (SJW) type, the hipster. Hipsters are individualists who use fragments of culture to advertise their own uniqueness and coolness, leading to a type of fatalism about meaning because it seen as useful only as a means to the end of the individual:

Ever since the Allies bombed the Axis into submission, Western civilization has had a succession of counter-culture movements that have energetically challenged the status quo. Each successive decade of the post-war era has seen it smash social standards, riot and fight to revolutionize every aspect of music, art, government and civil society.

But after punk was plasticized and hip hop lost its impetus for social change, all of the formerly dominant streams of “counter-culture” have merged together. Now, one mutating, trans-Atlantic melting pot of styles, tastes and behavior has come to define the generally indefinable idea of the “Hipster.”

An artificial appropriation of different styles from different eras, the hipster represents the end of Western civilization – a culture lost in the superficiality of its past and unable to create any new meaning. Not only is it unsustainable, it is suicidal. While previous youth movements have challenged the dysfunction and decadence of their elders, today we have the “hipster” – a youth subculture that mirrors the doomed shallowness of mainstream society.

Culture has been replaced with the cult of the individual and former cultural objects are now re-arranged the way a hermit crab makes his shell, both as camouflage and a method of showing off for members of the opposite sex or social activity partners. The end goal of this socializing is to be important as a means to having material power, comfort, convenience, and prestige.

In this sense, the hipster and the bugman are both members of an archetype which Nietzsche described as the last man, or the man who cares about nothing, the opposite of thymos which Nietzsche and later Francis Fukuyama saw as the goal of people in the ancient world, which was a desire to be recognized as having risen above material convenience:

The Last Man is primarily characterized as the type of individual that is fat, lazy and falls asleep watching TV after over indulging in junk food. This clearly denotes the type of man that is content with living a life whose primary and only purpose is to exist in a perpetual state of comfort, security and pleasure. This is a value system that does not idealize or extol higher values, challenging circumstances or hard work.

Zarathustra after descending the mountains is trying to deliver a sermon to a crowd of people that are hanging around the marketplace. Individuals that normally hang around a marketplace are typically known as commoners – especially in Nietzsche’s time – and their primary concern is grotesque entertainment, gossip, manners and commerce.

After delivering his sermon about the Overman/Superman (or Ubersmensch) Nietzsche receives an apathetic and mocking response. One must imagine how extremely jarring this was for Zarathustra considering he has just descended from his sojourn in the mountains to proclaim this message.

We know this archetype — Homer Simpson may be its most articulate exposition — because we have lived it. White culture in America and Europe hates itself because we see ourselves as entirely last men, people who have become servants of the system they created and in doing so, displaced all higher values for the practicality and compromise of “getting along with everyone else.” We destroyed our sense of purpose in order to keep the group together.

One of the reasons for this displacement is our loss, especially after WW2, of a sense of group identity. Identity requires people who look similar, have similar inherent tendencies for their values systems, and want to work together for a purpose, sort of like an extended family. You need to feel that your group is in control of its own lands, ruled by good people, and has intelligent enough people among it that there are things worth believing in. Since democracy, we have had none of those.

As it always does, democracy also got to work in our ethnic replacement because foreigners are easier to control, since they can be counted on to act against the former majority and therefore, are a way for a leader to stay in power. Resentment is a powerful motivation, and any group displaced from its own identity and imported as labor is going to resent those who are doing the importing. Tyrants always want to replace their populations with foreigners, but the populations will vote for it if it is presented as something personally advantageous to them, which is easy enough to set up. Like taking candy from a baby.

This replacement displaces culture and produces people with no sense of identity, which means they have no idea of their origins, future, or values. They are merely atomized individuals existing for their own pleasure and when this bores them or they outgrow it, they have nothing but to adapt to the system as best they can in order to avoid its negative effects. Loss of ethnic solidarity — being 100% of the same background — leads to the creation of what T.S. Eliot described in his poem “The Hollow Men”:

Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar

Shape without form, shade without colour,
Paralysed force, gesture without motion;

He describes face value without meaning, aesthetic without underlying structure, and activity without intention, all of which are symptoms not causes of a society which has lost its center, namely its identity and the ensuing sense of purpose that comes with it. That purpose can be as simple as the identity itself, meaning that people would act so that they could be the best possible form of what they are; this is similar to how children want to grow up and adults want to always improve at what they do, without losing the sense of who they have been and who they are destined to be. In the West, we aimed for all of those plus the idea of excellence, or striving for greatness to the level that we became significant in terms of the order of nature all around us, rising above mere materiality for an informational and metaphysical importance. We are wired for this, and we need it, but we cannot have it in society with any diversity, even one drop, whether ethnic or racial or — as inevitably and invariably arises from ethnic — both.

Bugmen appear when people lose shape and form because their heritage becomes a broken line. When you mix a German with an Irishman, meld a Slav or an Italian with an English person, or cross caste lines to produce caste-mixed people like Prince William and Kate Middleton have done, or even merge with a “white-presenting” miscegenated person as Price Harry and Meghan Markle have done, you produce bugmen. They have no particular distinction in their faces and bodies because they have no genetic consistency, and this is what makes them bugmen, not the specific races that are mixed into the muck. Breeding Western Europeans into Eastern or Southern Europeans, thanks to trace admixture, or breeding natural Brahmins into natural Vaisya, produces bugmen just as surely as mating a Norwegian with an African or Mongolian. Bugmen are defined by having no consistency and thus no identity, and that is what produces their slightly weird and amorphous visages and outlooks, much like the people who replaced the great empires of Athens and Rome resembled the Asian cultures around them and no longer had in them the capacity for greatness that their ancestors possessed.

White Nationalism 1.0 failed in part because it refused to address issues of trace admixture and caste. Your people who have ethnic identity have no interest in joining with a mixed-ethnic group, as it would destroy what they are; those who are higher castes have no interest in a “classless society” as Hitler wanted, because it will abolish what they are. No one wants to be a bugman, even a 100% “white” one.

The Alt Right took a sane course of action when it endorsed nationalism instead of racial nationalism, which like “civic nationalism” is a bastardization of the idea of nationalism. In this platform, the identity of “European” becomes more important than forming generic whites; if you are German, you get to remain German, even if your family has lived in America for five generations; if you are a natural Brahmin or natural Kshatriya, you get to remain at that rank, instead of being bred into white drones for the sake of a Utopian racial ideal (which is itself a form of egalitarian thinking).

In the West, we are just now emerging from a slump that began when our mercantile castes (Vasiya) joined with our drones (Thralls) to overthrow our natural aristocracy, replace our natural cultures, and obliterate the differences between people so that a new generation of the useless could feast on the wealth of the past without being attacked for their obvious treachery. Their method is the notion of egalitarianism or abolishing of the caste and aristocratic hierarchy, which rapidly blooms into political equality (democracy), sexual equality (feminism), economic equality (socialism) and other attempts to blur the line between good, bad, and mediocre so that no one can suffer a loss of social status for being unrealistic, crazy, or bad. With globalism, they attained their modified goal, which was a system with the attributes of Communism but applied indirectly so that it could have a thriving capitalist economy and not be observable as the tyranny that it is. With their victory, came their defeat, because as happened after the French and Bolshevik revolutions, it became clear that the Utopian promises delivered only an existentially-defeating dystopian wasteland disguised as a paradise of consumer delights!

What comes next will delight some and dismay most: a purge. This will probably not involve murder, but instead relocations. Since diversity does not work, we will likely ethnically sort ourselves through reparations-with-repatriation, such that Irish people and Negroes will receive a stipend to fund the return to their homelands and compensation for their time lost, in exchange for a non-optional deletion of their citizenship. Leftists, who are civilization-wreckers, will likely be exiled to the third world where they will find a society that already has all of the “reforms” they wanted for us to make in the first world. The insane, neurotic, sociopathic, and perverse will likely also be relocated or incarcerated. A caste system will reward the good by pushing them upward and demote the bad by pushing them downward — the antithesis of egalitarianism — such that competence will be rewarded and soon, proliferate. The West will heal itself. This is not as difficult as it sounds.

Before this can happen, however, we need to remove democracy from our souls. We can no longer rely on symbolic crutches like racial nationalism, or believe in ideologies that address some but not all of the vital issues. There is only one path to traditional civilization, and that is by recreating the whole thing, taking advantage of the technology we have (which was created based on the research that occurred under traditional civilization) in order to make the transition as smooth as possible. In the end, we may have only twenty percent of our people, but they will be the right twenty percent, and with them, we can build a civilization greater than any preceding it.

Dominance Of Asiatic Admixture In Caucasians

Monday, December 4th, 2017

Humans rarely get destroyed by the obvious. Instead, the details conspire very slowly over time, and doom creeps up on us. Such is the case with trace admixture, which is the process by which small amounts of foreign genetic material slowly builds up in a population until the point where it ceases to resemble the original.

In the above photo are the daughters produced by Sylvester Stallone and his wife Jennifer Flavin. Flavin is Irish, Polish, German, Danish or Norwegian, and distant French-Canadian in heritage; Stallone is half-Italian, a quarter French, and one quarter Ukrainian with possible but not probable Jewish ancestry.

You can see Flavin here:

The mostly Western European looking Flavin, combined with the Italian looking Stallone, produced three daughters who do not look very European. The one on the right could pass for Mexican; the one on the left, could easily be a sister to Jessica Alba (Mexican, distant Sephardi Jewish, Danish, Welsh, German, English, Scottish, Scots-Irish/Northern Irish, and French). The girl in the middle could pass for half-Japanese.

When Rome fell, it followed the same pattern as happened in Athens, with leaders importing foreign labor, mercenaries, and subjects who settled in Italy and contributed to the ethnic mix that exists after the empire.

If the white ethnic groups are exterminated, it will not be through dramatic outbreeding, but a gradual influx of trace admixture until it is present on both paternal and maternal lines. The children will then cease to resemble their Western European origins both outside and in, and genetic reconquest will be complete.

Ethnography of Civilization Collapse

Wednesday, October 18th, 2017

Tendentious bashers such as myself have a habit of reminding you that history runs in cycles, and if a civilization does not restart its cycle by restoring traditional society, it goes off into third world style subsistence living because of a lack of social order, and ends up a mixed-race shadow of its former self.

The “mixed-race” part is crucial because, throughout history, bad leaders have used diversity as a means of shoring up their own power. When they need support, they can count on those people who depend on them, namely the various different types of minorities who are allied against the majority, whose interest does not reflect their own.

When you encounter a failed civilization, you will find shorter and weaker people, generally without much intelligence but weighted toward the verbal and not the spatial, with mystical traditions based on primitive symbols, who are fundamentally comfortable living in a society where corruption takes a third off every deal and nothing ever gets done, or done right.

Third world people are individualists, and to them, the burden of struggling to have social order is too much relative to how they want to enjoy life, which is just not worrying too much. Very carefree individuals in these parts, and they seem very happy, but they never produce anything of greatness. Their society demands little of them, so they spend most of their time on themselves.

We can tell that this is the case by looking at a civilization that faded away long ago:

Researchers from the University of Tuebingen and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, both in Germany, have decoded the genome of ancient Egyptians for the first time, with unexpected results.

Publishing its findings in Nature Communications, the study concluded that preserved remains found in Abusir-el Meleq, Middle Egypt, were closest genetic relatives of Neolithic and Bronze Age populations from the Near East, Anatolia and Eastern Mediterranean Europeans.

Modern Egyptians, by comparison, share much more DNA with sub-Saharan populations.

In other words, ancient remains showed genetic consistency; modern genetics show the influence of diversity. This society became more diverse as it failed, and it does not necessarily matter what the diversity was, only that the genetic consistency of a network of traits was broken up and replaced by a more chaotic, less competent biological compromise.

This applies to ethnic groups as well. Mixed-ethnic states, especially those with hybridization, even trace hybridization, tend to perform less well than homogeneous nations. Most likely, when places like Egypt become diverse, it is through trace admixture; few people will marry and mate with the Other, but someone who is only an eighth other they can accept, until those are the only option and the original ethnic group is long gone.

When people talk about diversity, they often attempt to discuss it through “problems”: how to manage crime, how to indoctrinate the newcomers in our Constitution, how to assimilate them, why to make them equally accepted so they will not riot. But there is only one real problem, which is the replacement of the founding ethnic group and, with it, a loss of whatever traits it had that allowed the society to succeed in the first place.


Sunday, July 9th, 2017

On this blog, we tend to rage against moonfaces, which is what happens when trace admixture in European-derived people modifies their naturally long Nordic-derived faces into round generic shapes. This is at its worst when multiple trace-admixed groups are then blending, not only destroying the original European form as admixture does, but compounding it with multiple injections of extraneous DNA.

Jack London seemed to understand the natural repulsion that people feel for the moonfaced ones:

John Claverhouse was a moon-faced man. You know the kind, cheek-bones wide apart, chin and forehead melting into the cheeks to complete the perfect round, and the nose, broad and pudgy, equidistant from the circumference, flattened against the very centre of the face like a dough-ball upon the ceiling. Perhaps that is why I hated him, for truly he had become an offense to my eyes, and I believed the earth to be cumbered with his presence. Perhaps my mother may have been superstitious of the moon and looked upon it over the wrong shoulder at the wrong time.

Be that as it may, I hated John Claverhouse. Not that he had done me what society would consider a wrong or an ill turn. Far from it. The evil was of a deeper, subtler sort; so elusive, so intangible, as to defy clear, definite analysis in words. We all experience such things at some period in our lives. For the first time we see a certain individual, one who the very instant before we did not dream existed; and yet, at the first moment of meeting, we say: “I do not like that man.” Why do we not like him? Ah, we do not know why; we know only that we do not. We have taken a dislike, that is all.

It may be that ignorance is bliss. That is the theme of the story; it adds that natural counterpart to that, which is that those who are not ignorant will find the bliss of the ignorant to be infuriating and threatening.

Why There Is No “White Race”

Monday, June 19th, 2017

American Renaissance points out a vital problem with the Caucasian animal, namely its seeming lack of racial loyalty under duress:

The racial dynamic in prisons puts whites at a tremendous disadvantage. First, whites are often outnumbered by both blacks and Hispanics. But far more important, just as they show no racial solidarity in “the free world,” whites in prison do not band together to protect each other from predators. As No Escape reports, Hispanics sometimes rape Hispanics, and blacks sometimes rape blacks, but neither group permits anyone of another race to rape its own people. If a black tried to “turn out” a Mexican, the Mexicans would riot and try to kill him. Blacks also defend each other from white or Hispanic rapists. It is only whites — unless they are known members of white racialist gangs who do stick together — who are on their own and can be raped with impunity. It would be hard to think of a more cruel consequence of stripping whites of racial consciousness.

It is important to read this in context: these are whites in prison, many of whom are not really good people at all. It is quite possible to go to jail in this country for something that is not bad, but the majority of people in jails are sociopaths. Lots of people use drugs, for example, and some guys get sent up for wrong place/wrong time. But the rest are probably greedy dealers.

White Nationalists bemoan the fact that whites do not stick together. They do not do it at the ballot box, nor in the media, nor in conversation. Whites seem to identify more with the type of automobile they drive than with race. If pushed, most of them will admit that they like to live near, work with, and befriend “people like me” but will not elaborate.

This is why we should face the ugly truth: there is no such thing as the white race.

But first, let us look into the other reasons why whites are not particularly race-loyal. The first is that whites still perceive themselves as a majority in power and as a result see no reason to be racially alert, and the process of awakening takes many years, so when thrust into prison or another rough situation, they are not prepared to think in racial terms.

Another important reason for the missing white cohesion is that whites are highly competitive. This means that we see each other not as natural allies, but as the other team that needs to be beaten down. In highly competitive situations, helping out the opposition means losing position and prospects.

With this we see the problem of high-trust societies like we have in Western Europe. That high social trust is used against us in class warfare, where those with more than others are perceived as free riders and demonized for their lack of sharing. Think of how your average white parent would react to a child in preschool who refuses to share a toy.

High-trust societies function efficiently and as a result are wealthier and more resilient than other types of societies. However, they also have an Achilles’ Heel, which is that the trust can be weaponized into demands for universal sharing of resources. At first, this seems like a good idea, because it promises to reduce conflict.

The problem with it however is that it also reduces trust. When any person can launch a social attack on you for what you have, it is best to socialize only with those who you know will not do so. This is why class warfare produces even more radical class separation: each class can only trust others of the same class, and so naturally acts to exclude all other classes.

In addition, whites do not perceive a need for racial unity because they still see themselves as the majority in Europe and the USA. For those of us who have grown up in majority-minority areas, this is laughable delusion, but most people take a snapshot of the world around age eleven and expect it to be (mostly) that way for the rest of their lives.

As a result, most whites expect that the mostly-white communities of the 1980s and 1990s still exist, when in fact rising majority populations, refugee resettlement and redistribution of Section 8 housing to the suburbs has changed the nature of those communities. In addition, propaganda in schools has raised new generations who see this not as threatening but positive and cheer their own replacement.

Majorities are notoriously slow to defend themselves. The reason for this is that they do not recognize themselves as having an identity as a majority since they view themselves as the norm. To whites, identifying with being white is like introducing yourself as an aficionado of breathing air.

Because of this majority status, people within a majority identify with smaller groups (lifestyle, class, region, profession, religion) and see no link between themselves and others who share a genetic background, identified as generic because it is of the majority, but not the special interest group to which they belong.

Minorities on the other hand are constantly reminded of their racial identity. They are aware every minute of every day that this society was not designed, created or maintained in its healthy days by people who looked like them. Instead, it belongs to the Anglo-Saxons who founded it, drove out the murderous Indians, and set up systems of law, economics and culture which reflect their heritage.

In addition, it is important to note that white diversity does not work, just like every kind of diversity does not work. Poles and English and Germans and Italians can work together, but at the end of the day, they want to go home to neighborhoods filled with people “like them.” This is why ethnic groups have steadily been pulling apart in America, starting with white groups.

This is why there is no white race. There are white ethnicities, but many of these reflect an origin in Nordic-Germanic people and subsequent admixture, so they are alien to the root and resent it much as minorities resent the majority. Someone of Irish-Italian descent who is told that white diversity does not work inevitably retaliates by insulting Western Europeans. Diversity creates resentment, even among whites, and among admixed whites like Southern and Eastern Europeans, envy and hatred of the Western European founders can be seen as clearly as it is in Hispanic, Black, Asian, Arab and Amerind groups.

We do not view ourselves as a white race because of internal differences, and trying to force us to do so will fail as it has in the past. We know that there is a seed of our people which came out of Asia, brought its blonde-haired long-faced blue-eyed presence among us, and melded with lower castes of previously mixed whites from Central Europe with some ancestors from the Mediterranean.

All of our literature alludes to this distinction in castes, where those who are blonde, tall, long-faced and cerebral rule over the darker, shorter, and brown-eyed lower echelons. In German, Scandinavia, England, France and the Netherlands this is recognized as true, as it was in American class tension literature from the last century. Whites are different based on percentage of Nordic-Germanic (“Aryan”) heritage.

Those who are not Nordic-Germanic tend to want to displace that group, so that the shorter/browner trace admixed Central Europeans — who are either a previous iteration of Europeans, or a group with some mixture that happened in the near Middle East — can rule in their place, just like minority groups agitate for overthrow of whites. Every group wants to rule the world, and needs to displace higher groups to do that.

Some would call this white supremacy, but in actuality, it is a revelation of the caste system within whites which ranks us by degree of admixture, plus the natural tensions of diversity in which every group wants to be in power.

The good news is what white unity is not what we need. Our future will be one of balkanization, or many small tribes breaking away from the failed nation-states of liberal democracy. These groups will be defined by a cascade of race, ethnicity, caste, religion and region on a basic level, with additional modifiers like lifestyle, sexual preference, politics, philosophy and profession.

For example, you may find a neighborhood filled entirely with Irish Catholic ship-builders, or a gay neighborhood that is open to whites and Asians. Maybe there will be a community of metalheads or punks somewhere, like the squatter communes of the 1970s. Perhaps people will find nice WASP neighborhoods isolated by high walls and armed turrets. We are entering a time of collapse when government is an enemy.

In the coming “balk,” being one big group is not useful. Being a distinctive group is however. For example, Western Europeans can recognize each other by sight and immediately read caste/class status, so they group together well. That distinctiveness counts in the split seconds before encountering another person or group will turn out to be friendship or racial violence.

There will be no middle ground. Where old school racism was based on stereotypes and perceived slights, new school racial politics will have a simple rule: if he is of my tribe, he is good; if he is not, he must be killed quickly before he calls others from his tribe to conquer mine. Friendship or violence will erupt seconds after meeting, and to be indecisive is to die.

This saves us from a unique form of suicide that many — usually from the admixed groups of “whites” — think is a really good idea. They want to create a white group, at which point they abolish distinctions between types of white (Western, Eastern, Southern) and caste/class differences. That will produce a generic white group with none of that traits of the group that made Western Civilization great.

Our suicide move would be to throw all whites into a category for purposes of defense, just like in the prison written about above, at which point interbreeding will be natural. This means that all of the white sub-groups will assimilate each other, losing ethnic distinctiveness and caste orientation. This will create generic Europeans who will lose their distinct traits.

To do that, in effect, will be to genocide ourselves. Western Civilization pops up from time to time in different places. Those societies eventually fail, and then the members of the tribe move on to another place and start another society. Ancient Greeks fleeing the fall of Athens went into Central Europe just like Europeans fleeing their socialist states came to America.

But the core, the essence, of Western Civilization remains its Western European people. These are basically still the same group that ranged the steppes, set up empires across Asia, North Africa and Europe, and provided the genetic seeds for the Greek, Roman, German and Nordic empires. These are the Western Europeans.

America has fallen, and Europe is dead for all practical purposes, but as long as we have our people, Western Civilization can rise again. This is why all of our enemies, both white and non-white, want to destroy that group. (Note: there are many non-whites who do not want to destroy us, but their position is a relative rarity because diversity creates such intense minority-majority resentment).

If we mix all the whites together, we will bring in the trace admixture of Asiatic found in Eastern and Southern Europe, which rather than being reduced will be amplified as racial mixing tends to be. At that point, we will have destroyed the seed of our unbroken heritage, and replaced it with a mixed future.

That will lead to white third world countries, where a light-skinned group with the features of the Middle East rules over a slightly darker but dumber herd. If we mix within the “white” race, we will produce a hybrid society like those of Iraq, Mexico, India, Brazil, and the Levant. We will have destroyed our potential for restoring Western Civilization that way.

As the West slowly awakens from its latest stupefactive flirtation with equality, interest in nationalism has risen to new heights. The problem is that the newly-minted “nationalists” are taking Leftist assumptions with them, and so they want an egalitarian nationalism, which is the exact opposite of what nationalism is.

We can see nationalism in white attitudes toward other whites. Nationalism is not race-patriotism, or swearing fealty to the “white” race, but hierarchy including caste and a rough calculation of how much Nordic-Germanic is present in each person. Its ultimate goal is not to form a political herd, but to preserve the subspecies of our peoples, and this cannot be done by combining or associating them.

Consequences Of Trace Admixture In “Reality Leigh Winner”

Tuesday, June 6th, 2017

At this site, we warn frequently of trace admixture, or mixing between white groups. While Western Europeans have low admixture, most people in Eastern and Southern/Irish Europe have some Asian and Mediterranean admixture.

Although these foreign influences are in “traces,” or amounts of one quarter or less, they are still there, and these groups have since that admixture evolved for different climates and social structures. Mixing them produces people who lose the original European traits and end up as round-faced people of no particular talents.

As mentioned around here before, genetics takes the form of clusters of genes producing traits and clusters of traits producing abilities more than single genes we can swap out and produce supermen. People are refined as profiles comprised of related genes, and mixing groups — whether races, ethnicities or ethnicities within a race — erases these delicate profiles.

Wherever white people mix across Western, Southern and Eastern European lines, we see the same result: round faces, low moral character, slightly above average intelligence without wisdom, and no particular cultural leaning, therefore, natural Leftists who are fanatical about it in lieu of having healthy normal lives.

Reality Leigh Winner, the most recent NSA contractor to leak information, was caught because a newspaper refused to protect its source. While one wonders who the heck is doing the vetting at the NSA these days, the bigger point is that this toxic employee was perfectly fine with her job under Obama, but freaked out when Trump was elected.

This means she is a committed Leftist, which makes sense when you look at her. There is the round face, the chunk nose and absence of any particular form or beauty. A century ago, she would have looked odd to the inhabitants of any Western European nation, and they would have identified her as foreign. She is foreign, but only through trace admixture.

When the white race is exterminated, it will not be through blatant race-mixing but through a replacement of the original groups with “whitish” people who have none of the traits of the original group, the Western Europeans, who founded Europe and then expanded into South and East where they mixed with local populations after the failure of their empires there.

Most people can accept that mixing races is destructive, but awareness is now rising that mixing within the white group will also exterminate the white genetic strain, and at that point, further outbreeding is inevitable.

Deciphering The Egyptian DNA Puzzle

Thursday, June 1st, 2017

It is great when science confirms traditional wisdom. The net buzzes with discussion of a genetic study of ancient Egyptian mummies, following up on the the knowledge that parallel human evolution occurred in Europe (see contrarianism). But most have missed the point.

From the abstract:

The researchers discovered that ancient Egyptians closely resembled ancient and modern Near Eastern populations, especially those in the Levant, and had almost no DNA from sub-Saharan Africa. What’s more, the genetics of the mummies remained remarkably consistent even as different powers—including Nubians, Greeks, and Romans—conquered the empire.

Here we have an exercise in “hide the ball.” What is not being mentioned?

  1. Ancient Egyptians resembled modern Levantines. But who do modern Egyptians resemble?
  2. The mummies remained consistent despite occupations, but what about Egyptians as a whole?

We are — cleverly, so very cleverly — ducking the question of population change in Egypt. As a child, you too may have wondered why the Egyptians once built great monuments but now seem barely able to build a two-story house, and are known mainly for hopeless invasions of Israel and cuisine. What happened?

Luckily, National Geographic is willing to tell us something about modern Egyptian heritage:

This reference population is based on native Egyptians. As ancient populations first migrated from Africa, they passed first through northeast Africa to southwest Asia. The Northern Africa and Arabian components in Egypt are representative of that ancient migratory route, as well as later migrations from the Fertile Crescent back into Africa with the spread of agriculture over the past 10,000 years, and migrations in the seventh century with the spread of Islam from the Arabian Peninsula. The East African component likely reflects localized movement up the navigable Nile River, while the Southern Europe and Asia Minor components reflect the geographic and historical role of Egypt as a historical player in the economic and cultural growth across the Mediterranean region.

Modern Egyptians are 68% North African, 17% Arab, 4% Jewish, and 3% each from Asia Minor, East Africa and Southern Europe. In other words, while the mummies remained consistent, the population has not, which may explain why modern Egyptians do not do the things the ancient ones did.

Each population has a genetic profile based on centuries of adaptation, and these genes convey abilities and inclinations known as traits. By themselves, traits are rarely complete in the form we think of them, but when a profile is complete, different traits complement each other and produce the abilities, preferences and intuitive knowledge that we see in each population. Just as there is no single gene for intelligence, it takes many genes — like a net — to produce the effects we recognize as distinct to a population. When the genetic profile is disturbed by admixture, even trace admixture, then those abilities are lost.

In Egypt, we see a warning. Traditional wisdom was that as Egypt rose in power and wealth, people came from all over to be part of this civilization, and gradually replaced the original Egyptians with a group whose genetic net was disrupted and so lacked the abilities of the original. Originally it was thought that gradual absorption of Nubians shattered the Egyptian bloodline.

It turns out that the picture is more complex and delivers a more dire warning for us. The question is not what you mix with, but that you mix at all. Even trace admixed groups like Southern and Eastern Europeans, when mixed into another European group, can erase its genetic net and replace it with generic people lacking the original abilities.

Ariana Grande: Technically “White”

Saturday, May 27th, 2017

When you wonder why white nationalism never took off, and was replaced instead by the Alt Right, remember this image: technically, this girl is white, having 100% Italian ancestry.

But it is worth mentioning that we are men among the ruins of an empire that failed long ago, and that many of “our people” now are infused with other races. Italians have Mediterraneans, Eastern Europeans have Asians, Irish have Semitic history. Trace admixture will breed us out just as surely as miscegenation.

Our future will be born through our people, not hybrids. We cannot play the numbers game that the Left excels at and rope together a huge number of “white” people in order to win. We need our people, and the quality of those more than their number will determine the outcome.

In the meantime, the term “white” has lost all meaning when we politically correctly shifted it from “Western European” to “anyone European-descended, no matter how much other weird stuff is in the woodpile.”

It is interesting that Ariana Grande — the root of her name is the term “Aryan” — shows up in recent bombings as if to illustrate this point. Those who are mixed have no allegiance to the West, because they must defend their own people, which is the mixed-race group.

Only those who want a restoration of the West through its people understand what must be done.

Consequences Of Admixture Between “White” Groups

Saturday, May 20th, 2017

On this blog, our writers emphatically reject not just race-mixing, but ethne-mixing, such as occurs when Southern, Eastern and/or Western Europeans reproduce with one another.

The problem with these white diversity hybrids is that trace admixture, or small amounts of foreign DNA, are compounded not diluted by admixture. Someone who is 0.25% Polish, Irish, Greek and Italian will end up being barely European at all.

In addition, the different traces combine radically different traits, leading to people with round faces and pleasant features that look different from every angle.

At first, these faces seem pleasing. They are inoffensive, and frequently one can see pleasant features. But the shape of the head is wrong, and the features while pleasant in isolation when taken as a whole, become a muddle. There is no balance between them.

Consider the actress in the first photo above, Dakota Fanning. Her ethnic makeup consists of:

Ethnicity: German, English, as well as Irish, French, Channel Islander (Jersey, Guernsey)

At this point, enough different traces have mixed in this person to destabilize the design of the person as a whole. While the basics are there, small incompatibilities subvert consistency in the facial structure as a whole. Now consider that if this is true for something as blatant as physical appearance, how extensive it must be for physical health or intellect.

In the future, white nationalists will be viewed as mentally unstable clowns who advocated for white destruction through trace admixture. Those who defended a single strain of European, like Western Europeans/WASPs, much as the American Nativists did, will be hailed as some of the few clear-thinking people out there.

Richard Spencer Broaches “The IQ”

Thursday, March 9th, 2017

Most people talking about immigration concern themselves with “assimilation,” or whether new group can be absorbed. Consequentialists ask what the results of doing so will be, since the process of assimilating others means altering the genetics of the original group. Since traits are heritable, this means an elimination of what made the society what it was in the first place.

Recently Richard Spencer, who is both subtle in trolling and insightful at leading with hearts and minds, brought up “The IQ”: the question of whether different European groups can combine into the same nation, given the fact that Europeans split into three general groups — Western, Southern/Irish, and Eastern — which are remarkably different.

Some, including those on Amerika, have pointed out that combining different groups with different clinal trace admixture can result in an increase in extraneous DNA within the combined group, effectively destroying what it is to be “European” by mixing it with traces from Southern (Middle Eastern admixture) and Eastern (Asiatic admixture) which then pile up and drown out the original group.

The Irish, for example, were a favorite target of groups such as American Nativists and the Ku Klux Klan, who pointed out that not only were they Catholic, but they were different, betraying past migrations of middle eastern people through Iberia into Ireland where they mixed with the Neolithic remnants. Different is a matter of degree, but different enough means loss of our founding group.

As America separates into different ethnic groups in the wake of the failure of diversity, the Irish Question raises itself time and again, and implicates other questions of ethnic confusion. The Old Inheritance has more with a warning of how “white diversity” may have caused the liberalization of America:

Clinton Stoddard Burr wrote a book, published in 1922, which is very pertinent today. In the foreword, he indicates just how important he believed the subject he wrote on would be in the near, and more distant future. It seems he was prescient:

[…]In fact it is high time that we should comprehend the primary cause of the loathsome plague of anarchy and Bolshevism. It is time that we should be alive to the fact that most of the hordes of immigrants who have been pouring into the United States from countries of Southern and Eastern Europe, from lands inhabited by races impregnated with radicalism, Bolshevism and anarchy, belong for the most part to the lower strata of humanity from those regions, who prove to be most susceptible to the wiles of the radical agitator. Surely this view, in itself, is a logical plea in advocating restriction of a certain class of immigration.

[…] All thinking people are awakened to the realization that we must choose our future entrants to this country from such as show assimilable qualities of mind as well as favorable physical attributes. The callous exploiters of cheap labor and the incurable sentimentalists stand alone in their misplaced loyalty to our fatuous boast in the past that America was the haven of the down-and-out, the dependent, the oppressed, the pauper, the foreign agitator, the unassimilable and what not.

Western Europeans cluster together because they are genetically similar and thus share the traits that make them aware of certain needs and challenges presented by existence; this is what makes them the reflective people who form the basis of Western Civilization. Introducing other groups will merely destroy the Western Europeans through outbreeding, and lose those shared traits for Western Civilization.

In addition, the white diversity causes new groups to feel alienated from the majority, and thus to partake in the ironist and anti-majority sentiments of Leftism. That, coupled with the resulting loss of social standards, destabilizes the nation and thrusts it into a spiral of infighting over the new agenda.

Personal experience tells me that the vast majority of Irish, Italian, Greek, Slavic and Jewish people in America lean Leftward. There are notable exceptions who are praiseworthy, but they are a relatively small minority. This is likely a consequence of these groups finding themselves in a nation where they almost fit, but not quite fit, and therefore, feel anti-majority sentiments.

A sensible response is to realize that the American Nativists were probably right. Only one ethnic group can exist in a nation; Western Europeans, who cluster together, make up that group in America. When we deviate from that, we go down the path of internal division that ends in our current diversity nightmare and screaming descent into Leftism.

Recommended Reading