Whether described in terms of politics, culture or demographics, the current social environment clearly opposes the pervasive whiteness of being. White girls long for the dark-skinned cock or adopt black babies out of pity (because it’s politically correct, it’s cheaper and because nobody else wants them), while younger white women abort white babies out of disgust for white men..
Well, that was a shocker (requiring age restrictions for boomers).
But historically the following become evident too:
However, the interesting story bringing all this together is about the rampant increase in dog fighting in South Africa. Investigations (recently) showed that dog fighting is not only an indicator of crime, but a predictor of it; in other words, it impacts society. But the important realization is that it is largely driven by a lust for blood.
Knowing about the remarkable South African Bantu lust for dogs bleeding out, one starts to see the equally disturbing Bantu lust for white farmers bleeding out.
How did this happen?
First, the lust for blood is basically inherent in (most) humans. But while any society limits that to prerogative of “leaders” who then largely focus such lust on the enemy to be killed by any means necessary, it was found that uncontrolled anger is actually bad for business. At this point it is important to understand that business is a white thing. Business requires safety as a basis to work from. As the graph indicates below, the fewer people that die, the more competitive the country becomes and black countries don’t do well.
Secondly, having won a war typically give invading soldiers a “rite of passage” to loot and rape at will. In both the above examples, blacks won, but the troubles that were the pretext for the war got worse. In both cases blacks became free to do as they please and in both cases it was the next black generations that became toxic, bringing to mind how migrants never really assimilate in part because they have now “captured” whites who are expected look after their black masters in perpetuity (like captured dogs look after their lusty owners doing bloodsports for money). It is almost as if the rape has been postponed due to an unwanted peaceful transformation.
The prevalence of violence against whites in America has not reached the intensity of farm murders yet, because African-American leaders have not been calling for it yet. The recent liberal cry for incivility is an indication that such (sanctioning) calls however, is not far off.
Knowing that leaders have an uncanny effect on their followers, even going as far as sanctioning and encouraging blood sports, the question has now become how to celebrate whites instead of capturing them?
First of all the motivation to celebrate whites is by reference to the world of real business (not the affirmative action kind). For example during Apartheid, there were more black millionaires in South Africa than whites, but they were despised as “collaborators” and ignored with respect to policy development by the new ruling party.
White leaders do not call for the extinction and raping of blacks, or Chinese or even those bad Russians, but black leaders in South Africa call for and sing about the murder of whites. Maybe black leaders should be persuaded by business and churches to sing “bless you” songs about whites, like my domestic servant does.
To celebrate whites, religious and political leaders must sing our praise, because that will stop dog fighting, create jobs, and move society away from the wartime mentality of blood sport.