I recently watched the latest episode of Modern Family entitled “Torn Between Two Lovers.” The show has been a letdown over the course of years and the humor has become stalemate, but I still find myself indulging in cheap Hollywood entertainment from time to time.
The Love Triangle And Genital Testing
What I want to focus on first is the character of Hayley Dunphy (Sarah Hyland). Her character was, at a point, turning for a more mature and adult direction, but for whatever reason be the creators took her back down to a low level of dumb Hollywood brat. That aside, I want to focus in on her latest scramble of a problem. She is torn between two lovers.
One of her lovers is a British man named Arvin. He’s a scientist, a well-rounded intellectual who knows how to dress like a man with a solid career, and is projected toward great things career-wise. The other is a guy named Dylan. He’s the stereotypical dumbass high school “blonde” who somehow manages to put himself through nursing school and actually begins to do rather well for himself.
This triangle love affair plays out very well in that Western women have far too many choices when it comes to mates. This episode demonstrates well the genital testing by the female of the two male specimens in order to sort out who is the best suit for her to wear. Hayley ultimately cheats on Arvin (the scientist) while he’s away on some scientific engagement, then tells Arvin about her mistake. And, for whatever love interest be, he later shows up at her house to surprise her and forgive her. Arvin confesses to having kissed (only kissed) a female co-worker due to intoxication, but has no clue that Hayley herself actually banged Dylan (the other guy).
So, Hayley is the object of desire while two men, both relatively attractive, gun for her love, passion and dedication – the latter being very flimsy. I’ve read and listened to gentlemen divulge their own thoughts of females and their high option rates amongst men. They have a variety of very useful tools which they may utilize at any given time to garner a variety of things: no-strings attached sex, fancy dinners, shiny product and swagger, etc. They utilize sites and apps like Tinder and Instagram to fuel their dopamine lust while receiving continuous verification from both men and women on what “beauty queens” they are. This is nothing new. But this episode of Modern Family slams it in the face of its audience and, in our contemporary backwards America, it’s not even looked at as a big deal because that’s just how it is.
Is Conservative Muslim Culture Onto Something?
In the more conservative Islamic cultures and religion, it is common for a man to have multiple wives. Four to be exact, as long as he treats them all equally and without favoritism, as essentially stated in the Qur’an. Women do not get to have a multiple of husbands and, because of this, the sons and daughters will always know who is father is. This is important because the father is (at least should be, as I see it) the intellectual and philosophical leader of his children, especially his sons. Having a multiple of mothers does little to help in this regard. That is personal opinion, obviously.
But by observing the more misogynistic and patriarchal cultures and how (despite being sometimes rough) law and order are maintained, in agreement with natural order and natural law, I find myself envious of these cultures and saddened the West has not engaged more in that direction. Western society has since broken the chains of the patriarchy and have replaced it with the false doctrine of equality, feminism, and so on. A list of things which have given way to the core foundations of the West, which now seem distant and lost.
Should women be allowed to have so many options? Why use the word “should?” To use that word suggests that something is being dictated to another by a higher force, or entity. If one was to believe man is above woman, thus woman is below man, then it would give way that it is man’s duty to lead the female in a positive, more productive direction. Not the other way around where she’s given a potential thousand different options in terms of universities, jobs and career pathways, men or women, to be childless or be a traditionalist and good housewife, etc. I fully support denying women these varieties and converting back to a ruthless patriarchy where men lead, women follow and the natural order of things plays out.
Many women (and shamefully men) would be appalled to realize there are men (like myself) who genuinely hold steadfast to these values. And I do value a society run by the patriarchy, the hierarchy and natural order.
Natural Order And The Beta Male
A lot of folks may question what exactly is natural order? Well, I’ll simplify my humble view of it: revert back to the Ancient Ones. What was defined as masculine and feminine, in terms of the Ancient Ones? What were the common gender roles between man and woman? Who fought and bled on the battlefield? Who stayed home nurturing the young into adulthood? If one actually needs those answers revealed, this article is out of your league. It isn’t complex a manner to grasp. Today’s men are far removed from the Ancient Ones. Endless streams of video games, cheaply produced basement pornography, potato chips and beer guts are what now acts as the modern West-based man. That’s a huge sweeping generalization but is becoming the norm each and every year.
Modern Family plays well on this weakling of a man. Take the character Phil Dunphy (Ty Burrell) who is the family clown. He’s possibly one of the lamest TV dads in some time. And Modern Family isn’t the first time Hollywood has depicted the man of the house as a bumbling buffoon who doesn’t know his head from his ass. He’s a beta-style male, he’s talked down to often times by both his son and daughter, and he’s white. In the American dominant pop culture as it stands today, the white guy is often portrayed as the weakling. And I find this to be accurate. The cracker used to be firm and hard, but has since dunked itself in soy milk and has become this softened, easily breakable limp-wrist disaster.
Natural order had men at the front lines of war and combat, raising their sons as warriors and daughters as respectable housewife material, as also helped by the gift of the wife and mother. This is considered immensely old-fashion and, as many would put it, “backwards.” This also used to be normal, healthy and productive for society overall. Divorces weren’t rampant as they are in contemporary America, nor were there as many children and teenagers growing up in a split home. Sometimes divorce may be necessary, but at the rate it’s at now, I find it a disgrace.
Phil Dunphy is the modern Western man. To put it in three words: he’s a clown.
The Modern Gay Couple
I used to not be anti-gay marriage until I realized the political and cultural snowball effect of such implications. I was recently listening to Two Catholics author and conference speaker Patrick Coffin and online personality and recent Catholic convert Lizzie Reezay, go back-n-forward, and one thing the Mr. Coffin brought up was, basically, how birth control was the first step toward legalizing abortion. And I am well aware that many folks will find distaste in that, but there is a correlation we can draw out and examine. Same with gay marriage. It wasn’t even two years after that decision that the whole transgender bathroom controversy broke out and spread far and wide across America. Now men identifying as female could use the bathroom designated for women, lest you be labeled a bigot. That can be examined and dots can be drawn and connected. To put it another way, gay marriage was the dam which held back the flood.
Gay marriage is portrayed as normal in Modern Family. And as much as I enjoy watching the gay couple and their shenanigans unfold, or how they make melodrama out of the pettiest of circumstances, I cannot come to support gay marriage on a legal basis. I’d prefer government stay out of marriage altogether, but since it is part of our society, I fully support blocking same-sex marriage.
So, yes, I am a bigot. Everyone is to one person or another. If one was to truly proclaim themselves not a bigot, then they also proclaim they have no moral compass, guiding ethics or stand for any values other than what the masses happen to support at that given time.
I am of European ancestry with a possible 3-5% chance of some other mixture, possibly of Middle Eastern descent. Nonetheless, it irks me to see so many race-mixed couples. Is it natural to feel irked? Is it blind disgust? To be totally upfront and honest, I believe it is natural. To see a member of your (ethnic) tribe mixing it up with another is probably a very ancient feeling that is rooted way back when the Ancient Ones walked the earth. I find that makes it neither acceptable nor unacceptable. To each their own feelings about the manner, but I still hold racial tribalism. Some may hate me for that (because I’m white), but others may at least understand it, and that in no way is it driven by supremacy of any kind. This simply isn’t the case.
In Modern Family the character of Jay Pritchett (Ed O’Neil) is married to Gloria Delgado-Pritchett (Sofía Vergara), who is Columbian. Jay looks primarily of European background, or possibly Jewish. Either way, it paints a clear reality and it is very modern. But what I’m curious about is if there’s a negative feedback soon to occur. Many are foolish enough to believe if all races mix it up and become mocha children that somehow, it’ll lead to a more peaceful society. Some may be even more foolish in believing an actual utopia is possible.
What these fools lack is an understanding of how false the doctrine of equality is. There shall never be equality of outcome or equality in intelligence, strength, ability to garner resources for survival, etc. If Mother Earth was to truly become a mocha-based society, then it’d be no time until something else popped up as the issue of the day. Either the rich versus the poor, the intelligent versus the stupid, the attractive versus the ugly, the lighter shade of mocha versus the darker shade of mocha, men versus women, trans men versus trans women — it never ends. But libtard loony toons seem hellbent on carving out this fantasy into reality which, ironically, stirs up further hostility amongst the population of that set society, and overall ends in war and much bloodshed.
But race-mixing has become the norm. It is often displayed in advertisement and in the art world. And there are many out there quite hostile about it and actively engage in praising the lessening of European people. Well, I do have a very hard truth to convey to the non-whites who actively praise and encourage this instead of letting a natural merging to occur: whenever you look into your little mocha child’s eyes — those green or blue or hazel eyes — that is European blood staring right back at you. The white man never dies, but you have destroyed your bloodline and replaced it with something else
This also brings up a hypothesis of mine: will the darker mochas then begin attacking the lighter mochas for possessing too much “privileged” DNA? It’s not that farfetched to believe. There was a time when children being given hormone-stoppers to attempt transitioning into the opposite sex would’ve been ruthlessly criticized and the person advocating for it would’ve had their (rightfully so) ass beat down for it.
It has been said that politics is downstream from culture, and culture is downstream from genetics, which is why the Left is so anti-nationalist. If one truly pays enough attention to the dominant pop culture of the West, Hollywood, film and TV, the literary and publishing world, then one may begin to see how pop culture most definitely reflects reality. Or, rather, does it create it?
Tags: miscegenation, television