Posts Tagged ‘white genocide’

Every Ethnic Group Acts In Self-Interest, Which Means They Want To Kill You

Wednesday, November 29th, 2017

Leftism was doing fine when it relied on the promise of Utopia. For Leftists, “true equality in our lifetimes” was always the goal that would salve all of their problems, both personal and as a civilization. Leftism thrives on an effect known as “the grass is greener,” in that it gives people a scapegoat and a daydream at once.

As soon as it is realized, however, Leftism goes from making promises to having to deliver on those promises, and there its fundamental clash with reality emerges. Leftism asserts the primacy of the human individual and projects human thinking onto the world. As a result, it creates a widening gap between our idea of the world and its reality.

Part of that widening of illusion consists of the notion that people do not act in self-interest, but out of obedience to universal ideologies of support for human rights. We think that we can control others with obligations to which we bind ourselves, forgetting that it is easy to claim to support something while planning to be an “exception” oneself.

Every now and then, someone offers a glimpse into the differing motivations of ethnic groups, such as the following piece from the Texas State University school newspaper:

Texas State University Star, November 28, 2017

Your DNA is an abomination

by Rudy Martinez
Opinions Columnist

“Now I am become white, the destroyer of worlds.”

When I think of all the white people I have ever encounter — whether they’ve been professors, peers, lovers, friends, police officers, et cetera — there is perhaps only a dozen I would consider “decent.”

My colleague, Tafari Robertson, in his brilliant column “Debunking the Myth of White Majority,” already exposed whiteness in the United States as a construct used to perpetuate a system of racist power. This column functions, however, within a different definition of whiteness: to be white in the United States is to be a descendant of those Europeans who chose to abandon their identity in search of something “new” — stolen land.

Racial categories — white, black, brow, red, et cetera — are used to subjugate non-white people. This bending of semantics upholds a white supremacist society. As someone “white,” whether you know it or not regardless of your socio-economic standing, you benefit from privilege. In Texas, a bizarre state I have no inhabited for four years, I continuously meet individuals that either deny the existence of white privilege or fail to do something productive with it.

A lot of you tell me, upon my insistence that whites should have an active role within activist circles, that you “didn’t choose to be white.”

You were not born white, you became white. You actively remain white. You are estranged from yourself and, in that absence, have been instilled with an allegiance to a country that was never great. One that has continuously attempted to push non-whites into non-existence through crusades that have been defended by the law.

In your whiteness, you are granted the luxury of not having to think about race daily. Your heartbeat does not speed up when you get pulled over and find yourself staring at the red-and-blue lights of the fascist foot soldiers we call the police. You don’t leave your home wondering if you will ever come back. You don’t give a damn.

The oppressive world you have built, through the exploitation of millions and the waging of barbaric wars against one another, is coming apart at the seams. Through the current political climate, in which a white supremacist inhabits the White House and those of his ilk would try to prove otherwise, I see white people as an aberration. Through a constantly, ideological struggle in which we aim to deconstruct “whiteness” and everything attached to it, we will win.

Whiteness will be over because we want it to be. And when it dies, there will be millions of cultural zombies aimlessly wandering across a vastly changed landscape.

Ontologically speaking, white death will mean liberation for all. To you goodhearted liberals, apathetic nihilists and right-wing extremists: accept this death as the first step toward defining yourself as something other than the oppressor.

Until then, remember this: I hate you because you shouldn’t exist. You are both the dominant apparatus on the planet and the void in which all other cultures, upon meeting you, die.

You can see the original text here:

He is correct in one thing: if you are Caucasian, you are “are estranged from yourself” and simultaneously are on the path to “defining yourself as something other than the oppressor.” This begins in realizing that their dream is not ours, and our goals are not theirs.

Every group wants to rule the world. Only then is it safe from other groups, and can establish its own standards, customs, and purpose. This means that while other groups do not intend it, they are enemies of Western Europeans.

Those of Western European descent are starting to emerge from the fog of the ideological era. Humanity has spent the past two centuries in a stupor, chasing a symbolic goal that evaporates as soon as they get close as it self-destructs, but then they redouble their efforts: “This time, this time, we will surely truly be liberated!”

The bodies pile up, and each year we are weaker and less competent. Realists sigh as they watch society destroy itself in pursuit of what is ultimately just another trend. Monkeys in a troupe, screeching, chase after a shiny object, each clawing the others down in order to feel himself in possession of Power.

When Leftism attained globalism, it realized its dream. It could abolish nations, unite the workers of the world, and force everyone into a purely human agenda so that none felt that they would lose social status for their stupid, crass, destructive, parasitic, or otherwise anti-realistic actions.

But when we saw the reality of globalism, we realized that it was like living in an endless hotel with each day the same, going through the cycle of churning through work for a paycheck, then seeing it go away, all while insanity ascends and everything good is eroded. The white soul is reborn as it flees this false religion of human omnipotence.

Neo-Nazism Is Whites-Only Socialism

Sunday, October 29th, 2017

Socialists, like all Leftists, worship equality. They believe the State is a family. They believe you absolutely cannot have society without socialism. Anyone who disagrees is nothing but a stoned Libertardian who doesn’t realize flush toilets would be impossible without common infrastructure to dispose of the wastes. People who live in society’s family, on the other hand, can lead the Life of Julia.

But wait. This was Barack Obama. This was socialism that catered to minorities and brought in more minorities. It subsidized the importation of inferior people and therefore got inferior outcomes. Heck, if stocked with moron, affirmative-action pozzoids, Wall Street could even blow up the housing market or something. Put them in charge and major energy companies will immediately steal their employee pension funds and lie about their earnings to boost the CEO’s compensation package. Get too many of those people in charge of the government, and they’ll start pointless, unwinnable wars in countries that have virtually nothing to do with America’s national security intrests. And you don’t really even want them in Congress either. They’ll keep asking NASA scientists where on Mars the US astronauts put up the flag.

Now if you’ve read this paragraph and followed the links, you may well notice that it subtly inverts a common meme you’ll read on one of these websites. Two of the villains in the paragraph above were pozzoid poachers of the worst order. But what of the other three examples? Ken Lay, Ken Lewis, Jamie Dimon and The Bush Cuck Dynasty are all nasty in a common way. They also share a common nastiness with Barack Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee. All five sets of malefactors share the common malady despite the politcally correct !DIVERSITY! of their skin pigmentations. All five examples I’ve cited are at least somewhat incentivized by ideologies that feature large government intervention in markets to improve outcomes. In other words, it’s the introduction of the negative incentivization implicit to socialism that leads every person I’ve mentioned above to do or say remarkably evil things.

To describe things further, the problem with any sort of system where the government takes resources from some people and uses them to benefit the tribe, the order, the race, the umma or whatever, is one of moral hazard. Moral hazard occurs when people recognize that they are able to mine the system, tribe, corporation, nation or whatever we are discussing for benefits without putting any skin in the game. They get membership in the collective without having to pay for it and then start receiving “Lebensraum,” entitlements, artificially inflated stock options or any other collective benefit paid for with the taxes, property or blood of other individuals in the group. This invariably gets abused. This ability to parasite off the system invariably allows the worms to multiply and to eat the beautiful and complex higher-order organism.

The problem here is that many people, even those supposedly on the Alt-Right, believe that socialism involves nothing more than publicly governed, owned or financed property. This is not accurate. Socialism is an ideology that argues that people are entitled to use and enjoy this property regardless of whether they are required to do anything to earn that right. There is some inherent characteristic that allows them a special right to inflict The Tragedy of The Commons on others without concern for the societal outcome. The typical Communist version of this is that a member of The Proletariat gets to do this as redress for past slights or depredations. They even have a potemkin Theory of Surplus Value to accuse anyone who expects them to get a job and support themselves of being an exploiter.

Civic Nationalists subscribe to The Magic Dirt Theory. Get plopped out in the right country and you get all the benefits of that country. You can even directly and deliberately insult that nation like Lt Rapone or Colin Kaepernick and still get all the rights, benefits and privileges of a heroic Combat Rifleman who got an arm and leg shot off back in The Tet Offensive.

Credentialists argue that getting the piece of paper from the right University and knowing all the right people allows you to take over a corporation and run it like Ken Lay, or more recently, Heather Bresch. Again, neither of these individuals has to contribute, they have the right papers so they get to be CEO and rape it for what the futhermucker is worth.

In case of White National Socialists, the entitlement mentality is no different. They are !WHITE! Maybe even genetically white enough to pass as Shuan King. Therefore, they actually expect to receive that Platinum White Privilege Visa Card in the mail that Mr. King hypocritically and dishonestly accuses them of walking around with and using to get unfair benefits. National Socialism, as practiced under the auspices the White Nationalist Movement; is simply dishonest socialist entitlement based on racial characteristics. It’s still a one-way ticket to hell. Hitler’s Berlin ended up just like Democratic Party Detroit. Both were governed by Socialists. Both wound up in ruins. The means vary. The result doesn’t. Socialism leads to death.

And I get the case for preferring white cultures to others. I get that not just because of the fact that I’m corusucatingly white like the undershirts in a Tide commercial. White culture gave us this:

Euclidean geometry. Parabolic geometry. Hyperbolic geometry. Projective geometry. Differential geometry. Calculus: Limits, continuity, differentiation, integration. Physical chemistry. Organic chemistry. Biochemistry. Classical mechanics. The indeterminacy principle. The wave equation. The Parthenon. The Anabasis. Air conditioning. Number theory. Romanesque architecture. Gothic architecture. Information theory. Entropy. Enthalpy. Every symphony ever written. Pierre Auguste Renoir. The twelve-tone scale. The mathematics behind it, twelfth root of two and all that. S-p hybrid bonding orbitals. The Bohr-Sommerfeld atom. The purine-pyrimidine structure of the DNA ladder. Single-sideband radio. All other radio. Dentistry. The internal-combustion engine. Turbojets. Turbofans. Doppler beam-sharpening. Penicillin. Airplanes. Surgery. The mammogram. The Pill. The condom. Polio vaccine. The integrated circuit. The computer. Football. Computational fluid dynamics. Tensors. The Constitution. Euripides, Sophocles, Aristophanes, Aeschylus, Homer, Hesiod. Glass. Rubber. Nylon. Roads. Buildings. Elvis. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. (OK, that’s nerve gas, and maybe we didn’t really need it.) Silicone. The automobile. Really weird stuff, like clathrates, Buckyballs, and rotaxanes. The Bible. Bug spray. Diffie-Hellman, public-key cryptography, and RSA. Et cetera.

Let #BLM go off in the woods and live without that stuff for a month because #CulturalAppropriation. White culture is why you use a functional toilet instead of a cat box or a hole in the ground. White Pride, without a pestilential background of hatred towards the other, is understandable, logical and should be cultivated in all of our children.

Staving off White Genocide, promoting White Pride, celebrating various white cultures and keeping the successful and positive traditions of all of these societies alive should be an unquestioned good that people of good will should actively pursue. You can protect yourself, respect yourself, continue your kind and elevate them yeah, verily to the stars without any sense of entitlement. The sense of entitlement is not what made the White Race great. We didn’t take over and redefine the planet as a Great Society Program. Socialism is not the key to accomplishing this goal. Whitewashing the tragedy of the commons will not somehow make it less tragic. Socialism can only lead to death in the end.

Leftists Finally Admit That They Hate White People

Monday, October 2nd, 2017

Leftists waited only a few hours after the Vegas massacre to announce two things: first, they want gun control, and second, they hate white people.

While I find it ridiculous to fire people for their opinions, the first real salvo of the second prong was a CBS executive who wanted Republicans dead in the shooting:

A top legal executive at CBS, Hayley Geftman-Gold, said she “is not even sympathetic” for the victims of the shooting at a country music festival at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas Sunday night.

“If they wouldn’t do anything when children were murdered I have no hope that Repugs will ever do the right thing,” wrote Geftman-Gold on Facebook, perhaps referring to Sandy Hook. “I’m actually not even sympathetic bc country music fans often are Republican gun toters.”

Since Republicans are the only party that marginally stands up for majority interests, the coded message here is clear: get rid of the white people and their political interests.

This coincides with what research tells us, which is that Leftists are oriented toward minority interests at the expense of the majority (and here is the full paper):

Half of the participants received a version of the scenario where the agent could choose to sacrifice an individual named “Tyrone Payton” to save 100 members of the New York Philharmonic, and the other half received a version where the agent could choose to sacrifice “Chip Ellsworth III” to save 100 members of the Harlem Jazz Orchestra. In both scenarios the individual decides to throw the person onto the trolley tracks.

…While self-described conservatives more readily accepted the sacrifice of Tyrone than they did killing Chip, the liberals were easier about seeing Chip sacrificed than Tyrone.

…So we went in Orange County out to a mall and we got people who are actually Republicans and actually Democrats, not wishy-washy college students. The effect just got stronger.

…If you’re wondering whether this is just because conservatives are racist—well, it may well be that conservatives are more racist. But it appears in these studies that the effect is driven [primarily] by liberals saying that they’re more likely to agree with pushing the white man and [more likely to] disagree with pushing the black man.

So we used to refer to this as the “kill whitey” study.

Leftism requires that people rationalize equality of human beings despite evident inequality in abilities and quality of character. In order to do this, they must mentally construct a victimhood saga where those who need equality — those below the average — have been oppressed and held back by those above. This causes them to visualize the above-average as stupid, cruel and evil.

In the same way, Leftists when witnessing a mass shooting decide that the majority are to blame for the situation, and reason that it must be not just fair but good if that majority is killed off.

Egalitarian movements all have this duality: because equality is not real, they must invent a narrative in which they can justify the belief despite its delusional quality. In so doing, they separate the world into that which supports the narrative and that which does not, and while they hide this in social settings, fervently wish for and work toward the death of the non-narrative elements.

At this point in the West, our people have divided into these two groups. Not all of the non-narrative are conservative, but all of the narrative are Leftist, and their desire to destroy the other group is pushing us toward open civil war. We no longer have anything in common, and therefore the center cannot hold, making such war inevitable.

Conspiracy Thinking As Metaphorical Truth

Friday, June 30th, 2017

When the space shuttle blew up the first time — well, and the second time too — we became subject to what is referred to as “conspiracy thinking.” This variety of opinion depends on the improbable to argue that there is an external parasite controlling our government or society that is engineering events to herd us like cattle.

That part is true at least — that we are ruled by manipulative parasites — but in my experience, those parasites are created by the chaotic and selfish behavior of humans, and the antidote to them is not anarchy but aristocracy, or putting the smart/good people in charge to rein in the rest of the squabbling, shrieking monkeys.

A mob will always choose the simplest possible answer to any question. They resonate to emotional statements, usually ones that explain their own failings as (actually) victimhood and give them a bad guy to both blame for those failings and to aspire to destroy. This is how you unite a mob, which represents a lowest common denominator of all of the people involved.

Conspiracy thinking is almost always of this nature, but not always. There is a variety of conspiracy thinking that is best described as metaphorical politics. It represents a type of extended disbelief that things were as bad as they must have been for an event to occur, and consists of blaming something more interesting for ordinary, hum-drum, everyday mundane human tendencies toward ineptitude.

Let us tour a world of dysfunction and its conspiracy theories.

Agenda 21 may be my favorite because it is both interesting, and the metaphor is correct. Officially, United Nations Agenda 21 involves “sustainable development,” and most of its wording reflects that. To the best of the conspiracy theories, UN Agenda 21 is total world control:

This document describes nothing less than a global government takeover of every nation across the planet. The “goals” of this document are nothing more than code words for a corporate-government fascist agenda that will imprison humanity in a devastating cycle of poverty while enriching the world’s most powerful globalist corporations like Monsanto and DuPont.

…Notice carefully that nowhere does this document state that “achieving human freedom” is one of its goals. Nor does it explain HOW these goals are to be achieved. As you’ll see here, every single point in this UN agenda is to be achieved through centralized government control and totalitarian mandates that resemble communism.

The interesting thing is that the conspiracy theories are correct, if we take their concerns as metaphorical, or symbolically accurate without being literally true. In that sense, UN Agenda 21 is a symbol of what is going on behind the scenes.

Here is where it gets hairy. International law relies on a heap of treaties and precedents in law in the countries which sign them. This means that the law only goes one way: toward the direction indicated by the treaties, because otherwise, it would have to swim upstream against what has been achieved so far.

This means that once one has set a toe on the path toward Leftism, there is only one direction that can be taken, and that is to greater Leftism. In this way, the conspiracy theorists are metaphorically correct: the UN is taking over our countries because we have signed treaties, the definitions of which are in the hands of UN agencies, which will take us down a further direction toward Leftism.

Many of these treaties involve “standards,” which are rules promulgated by international bodies. We agree to obey the rule, but then there is this international committee which defines the rule, and so if the rule changes, we are still bound by it. In the same way, treaties contain clauses — such as that if 2/3 of the members agree to a change, it becomes law — allowing foreigners to write law we must obey.

None of these laws will ever reverse course. They start with certain assumptions and the correct answer favored by career politicians is always to expand upon what has already been decided. This is the safe choice. This is the career-advancing choice. And so it will never change, because people fundamentally seek what will advance them.

And so, “Agenda 21” conspiracy theories might as well be real: we have launched ourselves down a path whereby, if people do what is expected to bring them fame and acclaim, they will gradually and successively convey us toward the state described by the “Agenda 21” conspiracies. Even when they are not real… they are real.

This situation is in fact even worse than a conspiracy. Instead of shadowy forces intending evil, we have normal people doing what is necessary to succeed in society, and their well-intentioned efforts are producing the destructive force. Once you adopt one Leftist rule, more will follow, and soon every successive rule simply follows the implications of the previous. One cannot change direction at all under those circumstances, at least without saying effectively that everything done for the past century or two was wrong. And voters do not like that.

White Genocide is widely reported in our media as a conspiracy theory on the basis that no one, anywhere, has made a Wannsee Protocol about white extermination. And yet the process is happening through diversity, because when you settle groups together, they tend to interbreed, destroying the original groups over time.

This meme has gained popularity as conflicts with diversity have increased, and is often expressed in a way that is barely conspiratorial; this recognizes that replacement of unique high-performing races, ethnic groups and social castes or classes is part and parcel of the ideology of egalitarianism which is the root of Leftism and seems always to result in the higher being destroyed by the lower, which is why white genocide fits right in:

  • Moving millions of non-White immigrants into traditionally White countries over a period of years. This alone is not genocide, but the next step makes it a part of genocide.

  • Legally chasing down and forcing White areas to accept “diversity.” This is known as “Forced Assimilation.”

    A combination of mass immigration (of different groups of people) plus forced assimilation would qualify as genocide, as defined by Article II, part (C) of the United Nations Genocide Conventions:

    Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

Is someone who is 3/4 English, genetically, and 1/4 something entirely different still English? Of course not, in the same way that ice cream with one quarter bacon fat in it is no longer useful for its original purpose. Or beer if you add 1/4 Metamucil. But it is usually through those smaller amounts of mixture that tribes are erased.

It happens simply through the oldest of mechanisms. A tribe that could not defeat another militarily simply moves as close as possible. It starts sending its unattached young women to walk through the settlement of the other tribe, selling flowers. Soon a few find also unattached young men of the other tribe, usually the underconfident or nerdly ones.

The magic happens a generation after that. The mixed offspring look enough like the other tribe for normal members of that tribe to consider marrying them. They then bring in the hybrids, and normalize their 1/4 foreign offspring. Those genes begin circulating. The important change that happens is that the other tribe ceases to be totally consistent, and becomes something else as the trace admixture knocks out part of its genetic networks.

Was this diversity designed as genocide? Maybe, or maybe not, but either way, it creates genocide through outbreeding and when it is done, the original group no longer remains. At that point, it has fewer restrictions on intermixing because the damage is already done, so what are they preserving at this point?

If diversity is allowed to continue, the “white” people of the future will be Semites, or those who are of mixed Caucasian and Asian ancestry with some African influences. This reflects what would happen if you took all of the successful groups in a diverse society and mixed them, as is the nature of things. Mostly Caucasian, some touches of Asian especially on the paternal line, and traces of other groups who had a few fortunate members who succeeded. If the US Congress or subscribership of The New York Times became a separate community, in 100 years it would resemble Arabs (if lower social classes) or Jews (if higher social classes).

So you can see that the conspiracy theory here is metaphorically correct. Diversity is, or rather leads to, white genocide. No one knows if it is deliberate, or where they would find such a smoking gun… but it does not matter, because as Rightists, we are consequentialists or those who care about results in reality more than human feelings, judgments and desires.

Let’s look at another one.

September 11, 2001 (“9/11”) is often seen as a government or world government conspiracy where the World Trade Center and Pentagon either had bombs in them already or were attacked by cruise missiles. The sentiment is good, but the details do not add up. However, metaphorically this conspiracy theory is correct because the incompetence of government and special interest groups essentially (but unintentionally) arranged for this to happen.

The best of the 9-11 conspiracy theorists tend to take this approach:

The “mainstream media” – a complete misnomer if ever there was one – would have us believe that 9/11 truth is the domain of radical and wacky “conspiracy theorists”. These labels, however, are simply more misnomers used by the controlled media to try and marginalize the growing number of people who understand that we have been lied to about what really happened on 9/11.

The 9/11 truth movement is anything but radical. The real radicals are, in fact, the controlled politicians and media who have pushed the lies about 9/11 and the War on Terror for the past fifteen years and counting.

As written here before, the real story on 9-11 is the unions and organized crime both made shoddy construction and used shoddy materials, which is why so much of the wreckage vanished when it passed into private hands.

The bigger story might be that our government was too bloated, prone to infighting, and generally politically correct to have a clue, and so nineteen guys without combat training were able to stage the most successful terrorist attack in history on a nation that should have been able to anticipate and interdict that attempt. Nope!

Some might point to past incidents where governments provoked attacks. For example, the Americans essentially baited Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor after FDR cut off their steel supply. The Gulf of Tonkin attack, which was a symbolic version of other attacks in the past in that area, sits ill in many craws. And we remember the yes-no-maybe “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq.

Or even farther back, there’s the Zimmerman Telegram in WWI. Perhaps the attack on Fort Sumter was triggered. It’s possible that the Boston Tea Party was an arranged provocation. We know this is possible because other groups do this sort of thing all the time at protests, being as obnoxious as possible in the hope that one of them gets shot and the real riot can be begin! (Proles friggin’ love riots.)

But in reality, there is nothing too weird about the 9-11 narrative. 757s full of jet fuel hit a building made by union labor, whose steel was obviously of an inferior grade but sold as a higher grade while the mob took the profit. The building was insured to heck and gone probably because they knew it would fall down and that the evidence would disappear as it always does in pro-union, pro-mafia NYC.

Of course, these days the mob is speaking Chinese, Korean or Russian with a Hebrew accent instead of Sicilian. But the scams never change.

So we either admit that our country is corrupt and has been for a half-century, that our government is incompetent, that our union labor may kill us and that our people are so cucked that they would sit still to be flown into an overpriced Manhattan address rather than fight back, or we can come up with a conspiracy about how government did this to fund a war it was going to be able to justify by finding “WMDs” anyway.


The important thing about this journey into conspiracy theory is that it shows us the power of symbolism. Conspiracies indicate where things are so broken and wrong that we might as well come up with a far-fetched chain of reasoning, because the actual reasons are so incompetent, corrupt and stupid that it makes our brains hurt to think about them.

South Africa: The Fire Still Burns In Rainbow Nation

Sunday, April 16th, 2017

Apartheid ended. Nelson Mandela became President. The Springboks won the 1995 Rugby World Cup. The Golden Age had dawned and everyone in Sun City would now get a brand new pony. Oh, wait… The video below shows us how well the ANC seems to be running things.

When a nation’s leadership is unable to function, hell erupts across the countryside. Even South African President Jacob Zuma amuses himself by signing “Kill The Boer.” Genocide at least appears to have a government stamp of approval. It seems Rainbow Nation wants to become a touch more monochromatic.

Analysts of our data must consider that South Africa’s crime rates are uniquely high. Our murder rate, for example, is 500% higher than that of the United States and 3000% higher than parts of Western Europe such as the United Kingdom and Germany. This brings us to our fourth conclusion that all South Africans face an extraordinary criminal onslaught. People who have previously regarded farm attacks as a somewhat distant problem, nothing to do with them, must realise that they arguably live in as much peril as farmers do. It is clear therefore, regardless of how they rank compared to other citizens, that as a best-­- case scenario, farmers live a perilous existence in a largely lawless society.

To further the problems faced by isolated South African homesteaders, the ANC has instituted the following sets of policies to render rural South Africans less able to survive the ongoing wave of criminality.

  1. Gun control. The SA government is actively confiscating privately owned firearms.
  2. Reduced Policing. Police forces designed to protect rural residents have been reorganized and repurposed away from defending farms.
  3. Promises of Land Distribution. The SA Government has talked a lot about redistributing land and has not done so. Worse, they have blamed the farmers for the failure of the policy.

So this stuff is all theoretical evil. We don’t like theoretical evil. But if actual, real-life White Boys aren’t hurt in the making of ANC propaganda, what then is the issue? Let’s take a look at what happens when the raceturbatory rubber meets the road. Dr. Gregory Stanton studied the rural farm attack phenomenon in 2012 and reported the following under the aegis of Genocide Watch.

According to experts and estimates compiled by citizens who track the killing spree, at least 3,000 white farmers in South Africa, known as Boers (from the Dutch word for “farmer”), have been brutally massacred over the last decade. Some estimates put the figures even higher, but it is hard to know because the ANC government has purposely made it impossible to determine the true extent.

With the total number of commercial farmers in South Africa estimated at between 30,000 and 40,000, analysts say as many as 10 percent have already been exterminated. Even more have come under attack. It is worse than murder, though. Many of the victims, including children and even infants, are raped or savagely tortured or both before being executed or left for dead. Sometimes boiling water is poured down their throats. Other attacks involve burning victims with hot irons or slicing them up with machetes. In more than a few cases, the targets have been tied to their own cars and dragged along dirt roads for miles.

As I blogged earlier, Socialism can only lead to death. It always fails, it always tends towards totalitarianism and every INGSOC eventually needs a Goldstein. The more radical the socialists, the sooner it degenerates into a Winnie Mandela necklacing society.

The ANC under Jacob Zuma has every earmark of a political movement seeking to eschew any remnants of Nelson Mandela’s initially conciliatory tone towards the nation’s White minority. It is also obviously failing to provide stable governance as a unified empire instead of a warring set of tribal enclaves, even among the native Black Africans. Someone has to be blamed to continue the dance for a few more tunes. Someone must be pillaged to prevent the Marxian Visigoth Holiday from running out of beer. The peasants are weaponized. Their wrath falls upon the Boer. After the fire, the fire still burns.

Leftists Formally Declare War, Genocide Against White People

Friday, April 14th, 2017

In any group, there are some who do well and some who do less well. Like a teenage movie — say, Napoleon Dynamite or Revenge Of The Nerds — all of those who are not doing so well make excuses for their failures, then bond together to form a group that can through superior numbers overthrow the people doing well.

Leftists come from the group that does less well. Even when materially successful, they are enraged at their inability to control reality to fit the vision in their minds, which is not so much about that vision but the sense of power it conveys. Something has made them insatiable and powerless, and so anything good, beautiful or realistic must be destroyed to make way for their egotism.

Unfortunately for them, they steadily gained power last century, and when National Socialism collapsed they shifted the world Left, and were able to shift it further when Communism collapsed and removed barriers to going farther Left. Once their dreams were realized in the 1980s, they laid the seeds of disaster. Those seeds are now sturdy samplings of misery.

The Left demanded globalism; this destroyed the economic independence of nations worldwide. They wanted sexual liberation, which destroyed the family. They screamed for universal education, which removed the value of education. They wanted socialized medicine, and radically increased costs and decreased quality. And they demanded diversity, which has ended in a flurry of Bataclans and Fergusons.

For many years, those on the Right have pointed out that diversity does not work, and that those who desire diversity want a servile beige race to make into perfect Leftist voters, and then to erase the majority group through outbreeding by convenience. In other words, diversity is genocide and the destruction of the nation, but this excites the Left.

Now, finally, they have formalized this by demanding white disenfranchisement:

If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.

At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners. After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism. A period of twenty years without white men in the world’s parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared. The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.

A familiar trope with the Left is the idea that capitalism is the enemy or that somehow capitalism destroyed our world. This is offered because capitalism is inherently unequal, and its success contradicts the ideology of the Left, so they wish it destroyed even if they do not have a working substitute. Competition must be beaten, no matter what the cost.

In the article above, they reveal their strategy as being what they accuse white men of doing. The Left wants to “use the imposition of Western legal systems around the world” to “allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared.” In other words, white males are the last barrier to world Communism and must be destroyed. Remember, the Soviets loved diversity, too.

Leftists do not want to tell you that they are living out a fairy tale and it is not one that will end well for them. It is “The Goose That Laid Golden Eggs,” and it goes like this:

A man and his wife had the good fortune to possess a goose which laid a golden egg every day. Lucky though they were, they soon began to think they were not getting rich fast enough, and, imagining the bird must be made of gold inside, they decided to kill it in order to secure the whole store of precious metal at once. But when they cut it open they found it was just like any other goose. Thus, they neither got rich all at once, as they had hoped, nor enjoyed any longer the daily addition to their wealth.

Much wants more and loses all.

Gold is not the source of itself. A goose that lays golden eggs is not full of gold, but of what causes that gold, and this is beyond the control of humans. The same is true of civilization: there are known ways to make civilization work, but these require sacrifice from individuals mainly through committing themselves to acting morally, all of the time. They want civilization without that burden.

And so, they cut civilization open. They rip out market competition and replace it with subsidies; they tear apart social order and replace it with conformity; they destroy heritage and religion and replace them with ideology; finally, they obliterate the family and individuality and replace them with coarse self-interest. Then, civilization collapses because its functions are demolished.

Contrary to what egalitarians will tell you, the distribution of wealth across the world reflects the fact that humanity is unequal. Groups are not equal, castes are not equal, sexes are not equal, and individuals are not equal. Some deserve more because they will put it to a better use, and in sane times, they have it.

What the Left has done for the past centuries is, in the name of redistributing wealth and power, grant those to people who are not good and do not use them wisely. When that causes a crisis, the Left demands redistribution again. They are pathological, unable to see that their actions do not produce the results they desire. But all they really want is to win by destroying those with more than themselves.

Witness the foaming hatred of a Leftist celebrating the self-harm and death of white males:

What charming people, these Leftists! They claim to bring us peace and love, and instead they bring thinly-concealed hatred, envy and anger.

As one commenter pointed out, this may be because Leftist mentation resembles that of people with Cluster B personality disorders:

Cluster B personality disorders

Cluster B personality disorders are characterized by dramatic, overly emotional or unpredictable thinking or behavior. They include antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder and narcissistic personality disorder.

Antisocial personality disorder

  • Disregard for others’ needs or feelings
  • Persistent lying, stealing, using aliases, conning others
  • Recurring problems with the law
  • Repeated violation of the rights of others
  • Aggressive, often violent behavior
  • Disregard for the safety of self or others
  • Impulsive behavior
  • Consistently irresponsible
  • Lack of remorse for behavior

Borderline personality disorder

  • Impulsive and risky behavior, such as having unsafe sex, gambling or binge eating
  • Unstable or fragile self-image
  • Unstable and intense relationships
  • Up and down moods, often as a reaction to interpersonal stress
  • Suicidal behavior or threats of self-injury
  • Intense fear of being alone or abandoned
  • Ongoing feelings of emptiness
  • Frequent, intense displays of anger
  • Stress-related paranoia that comes and goes

Histrionic personality disorder

  • Constantly seeking attention
  • Excessively emotional, dramatic or sexually provocative to gain attention
  • Speaks dramatically with strong opinions, but few facts or details to back them up
  • Easily influenced by others
  • Shallow, rapidly changing emotions
  • Excessive concern with physical appearance
  • Thinks relationships with others are closer than they really are

Narcissistic personality disorder

  • Belief that you’re special and more important than others
  • Fantasies about power, success and attractiveness
  • Failure to recognize others’ needs and feelings
  • Exaggeration of achievements or talents
  • Expectation of constant praise and admiration
  • Arrogance
  • Unreasonable expectations of favors and advantages, often taking advantage of others
  • Envy of others or belief that others envy you

The root of Leftism is an inner discontent that is not quelled by material needs, so they attempt to salve it with material needs (of course). Like greedy people or drug addicts, they think that having more will raise the quality of their experience, when the real problem is that they have no purpose.

Much as the people in the tale of the goose that laid golden eggs had enough, Leftists today have enough. They have comfortable apartments, cars, entertainment and perhaps a lot more. But for them, like Captain Ahab chasing his white whale, it is never enough. They want to be “in Control” and they will destroy anything in their way — which is everything else — to achieve that sensation.

What we should do now is to pass these ideas onto Leftists: yes, whites are your enemies. Yes, you want to destroy religion, culture, heritage, caste, sex roles and the family. Go ahead and embrace your inner demons, degeneracy and decay. Force everyone else to obey. You are victims, and now it is your age to destroy.

Then we can finally get this quiet war — a thousand-year sitzkrieg — to kick off and shortly after that, we can get it resolved.

Why The Left Is Anti-White

Wednesday, March 29th, 2017

Much drama and conspiracy-analytical thinking has gone into trying to understand why Hollywood and the Left are consummately anti-white, casting non-white actors to play white roles and portraying white people as stupid, incompetent and weak. It seems like a conspiracy, since we see the same thing in politics that we do in movies and literature.

More likely, this behavior represents a simple pathology. Most human behaviors distill down to simple cognitive mistakes which become pathological because a pillar of self-image rests upon them; think of drug addicts who inject drugs into suppurating limbs in order to overcome self-doubt, or obese people who gobble food because fullness suggests safety to them.

In this case, the pathology is resentment. People resent those who rise above because the act of separating from the herd shows the relative gap between the exceptional individual and the group. Naturally, since few are excellent and most only in one area, the rest are consumed with a sense of guilt for not being exceptional, anger at this person for making them look bad, and a sublimated hunger to similarly be excellent in something. The best of us overcome the guilt and anger because those are misdirected rage at the self, having both the confidence and the analytical skill to dispense with such things. The undisciplined and the rest simmer in their discontent and decide to destroy the person who made them look bad, feeling perhaps correctly that they cannot be changed, and yet too egotistical to admit the need for guidance by those above them.

Someone wrote a book about this once. This fellow came down, asserted difficult truths, disturbed the comfortable pretense by which most people were rationalizing their bad behavior, and so the group came together and had him killed. This book is either The Bible, The Apology of Socrates or Stranger in a Strange Land because this tale is as old as time. Herds hate heroes.

In the case of Western European civilization, we rose too high for the rest of the world, including those among us who found themselves excluded because they did not participate in that rise. As a result, they invented a reason to feel good about themselves by declaring our rise to be cheating, and concluding that tearing us down would make the world more “equal,” so that non-contributors would feel good again about not being those who gave more than they took.

Resentment defines daily life in egalitarian societies. We hate the excellent, so we remove them and place celebrities and politicians in their place. The Rich™ are blamed for every problem, as are successful groups like whites and Jews. Entertainment hates the suburban family with a white picket fence, yet it is what we all desire, or some reasonable equivalent.

To defeat this anti-white bias, we need to go to its root cause, which is resentment caused by a lack of hierarchy. Strong leadership, powerful culture, and a clear purpose obviate the appeal of resentment. By making these changes, those of us who can still think can form a society which will rise from among the ashes and again achieve greatness.

Zero Immigration

Saturday, March 25th, 2017

In the Wall Street Journal, a commentary buried within a commentary appears in the form of an introspection regarding immigration:

Finally, limits on immigration also protect the stability of our social arrangements. To be successful and harmonious, any society needs to cultivate a sense of fellow-feeling and solidarity among its members. Most of our fellow citizens are strangers to us, and yet we tax ourselves for their benefit, yield to their political choices at election time and perhaps serve in uniform to protect them. We do this precisely because they are our fellow citizens and have a claim on our loyalty and affections that citizens of other countries do not.

In more homogenous societies, like Japan or Denmark or Swaziland, this fellow-feeling may arise organically from kinship ties and a shared cultural heritage. But in a more heterogeneous society like ours, it must be cultivated if it is to flourish, and we can’t ignore factors that undermine it.

This is not to say that immigrants don’t learn English, get jobs, join the military and drive on the right side of the road. They do all those things. But the deeper and more important process of reorienting one’s emotional and psychological attachments from the old country to the new has not fared well in recent decades in the U.S. and would be overwhelmed, I believe, by any dramatic increase in immigration.

Mainstream media will not get any closer to the idea of identity: genetics and culture linked, and culture is a better system than government, thus societies need to be homogeneous to avoid being internally conflicted and dissolving. Even more, diversity inevitably leads to hybridization, which genocides the original group by replacing them with a mixed-race grey tribe.

We know immigration has failed because American national culture has vanished. Social trust has died. Every decision we make is now made in minutiae consisting of details split by details because there is no common standard, purpose or agenda.

In other words, we are falling prey to what destroys organizations. We no longer have shared purpose, and we have a divided power structure. All of our energy now gets wasted on internal conflict, similarly to how we waste our wealth with entitlements instead of focusing it on producing more.

The result is predictably horrifying:

“Ultimately, we see our story as about the collapse of the white, high school educated, working class after its heyday in the early 1970s, and the pathologies that accompany that decline,” the authors Anne Case and Angus Deaton, of Princeton University wrote in the report.

…According to the report, white non-Hispanic people of all ages show an increased mortality rate from 1999 to 2015 with some age groups seeing nearly a 50 percent rise in mortality rates. People aged 25-29 went from a mortality rate of 145.7 deaths per 100,000 in 1999 to 266.2 per 100,000 in 2015 and people aged 40-44 went from 332.2 deaths per 100,000 to 471.4 deaths per 100,000.

… Case and Deaton found that while gains were made as fewer people died of heart disease and cancer, these gains have mostly stagnated and did not cancel out the rising number of “deaths of despair” or related to alcohol, drugs or suicide.

In 1990, France, Germany and Sweden outpaced the U.S. in these deaths which totaled approximately 40 per 100,000 from those countries.

Looking back through history, we see that in the mid-1960s the United States and its European allies started to believe their WWII propaganda and adopted diversity as an official affirmative goal of government. It took a few years to hit, but the decline kicked into gear during the 1970s, and has really flowered in the decades since.

We warned you. You are killing our people for an ideological imperative which has never worked. You justify it by claiming that it will help the economy or make us benevolent kings among men, but this denies the existential side of things. It makes European-descended people into a conquered group, discriminates against them and convinces them there is no future.

For now, it is hitting the poor whites. The wealthier ones can escape to Whitopias but soon, that too will go away. Then they will fade away as well, starting with the most sensitive and perceptive, who realize that all they need and work for will be erased in the new beige regime.

It makes sense to have zero immigration. It makes even more sense to have fully negative immigration and to repatriate everyone who is not of Western heritage. Diversity has not worked and cannot because it is paradoxical. Each group needs its own nation so that it can know it has control of its future, and this is the only way to avoid the existential despair that is killing off white Americans.

Leftists Hate White Americans

Wednesday, January 25th, 2017

Leftists hate White Americans. White Leftists hate White Americans and fear their precarious state of being that which they hate. So what does the White Leftist attempt to do? Take control and brand themselves as different White People. According to the DNC Chairmarxist from Idaho, who is running for the national DNC Chairmanship, she is here to dictate what White people are permitted to say.

No, I kid you not. This is what the DNC Chairmarxist from Idaho, Sally Boynton Brown; has to say for herself.

“My job is to shut other white people down when they want to interrupt,” Brown said during a DNC candidate forum. “My job is to shut other white people down when they want to say, ‘oh, no, I’m not prejudice; I’m a Democrat; I’m accepting,’” Brown bellowed during the forum, which was hosted by MSNBC’s Joy Reid.

So guess what happens? People believe the dishonest DNC CHairperson and start assumming they can help her out and take matters into their own hands. You get garbage like this.

And also, this. Which then escalates to “jokes” about people’s children. This then escalates into physical violence against people. Which, in turn; is predictably excused on ideological and “moral” grounds.

This will eventually escalate into assassination. This will happen for several reasons.

  1. People who disagree with certain opinions held by a spectrum of Conservative, Traditionalist White people feel morally entitled to silence and stifle these opinions. This eventually becomes a self-imposed moral mandate to do so by any means necessary.
  2. People who want those opinions gone are becoming increasingly shrill and desperate in their attacks. The escalation stages have gone from:
    1. Insulting and berating anyone who dares to suggest these people are correct.
    2. “Jokes” about people’s family members.
    3. Direct verbal confrontations with people’s family members for the sake of personal harassment.
    4. Physical violence targeted at these people intended to intimidate them into silence.
  3. People such as Lauren Duca and Chrystelyn Karazin offer passive-aggressive cheerleading for each new step of violence. People on airplanes who get screamed at by nut-jobs have it coming for dressing provocatively.1 Ten year old kids can be accused of being future school shooters by “Comedy” writers and it’s totally cool because everyone is “just kidding.” People can be punched in the street and they deserve it because they disagree with a popular YouTuber while sounding “arrogant and smug.”2
  4. So obviously, the next step is the assassination attempt. At which point the passive-agressive maggots who cheerlead and excuse every step in the escalation progression then silently disappear. No responsibility or culpability is assumed when cute little Knockout Games get turned into, you know, violence-violence.

So I’ll lay this post down a marker. These people who hate the messages of certain individuals and use that as a justification to cheer for escalating harassment against them in public propitiate two consequences that Lauren, Christelyn and all the rest are not going to like.

  1. Someone who is a couple of root beers short of a crate will feel justified in publicly murdering some of the people getting abused by these Leftist demonstrators. For those reading this whose beliefs are to the left; remember what a joyride you thought it was when the weirdo wounded Gabby Giffords.
  2. Someone or a whole bunch of someones who are collectively a good gallon short of a keg are going to decide that the only lives that matter are the lives of people represented by the group most willing to send the other guy straight to the morgue. This is how Rawanda-Burundi turned into Rawanda-Burundi – one cute little “joke” at a time.

That won’t bother the Left. As long as the ones getting the machete are non-Leftist white people.

1 — I wonder if Lauren Duca believes the same about women getting diversity-raped in Sweden and Germany.

2 — No racial stereotyping intended there. No Siree, Bob.

Media Blitz: #StopWhiteGenocide Trending On Social Media

Thursday, December 29th, 2016

Keeping pressure high on the cultural change wave that is carrying us into 2017 through the defeat of Leftist illusions, activists on social media are using the hashtag #StopWhiteGenocide to raise this issue against the general obliviousness and brainwashed complacency of the public. You can participate by going on social media and posting to the hashtag channel using the links below:


The best content features stories about how white people are the targets of Leftist governments, insane corporations and the angry mob of Leftist cultist zombies who want to destroy us. They want to kill us off through soft genocide. Visit our newsfeed for some ideas and help wreak havoc on the big media with a blitz of our own!

Recommended Reading