Tanya Gersh Lies About Her Actions That Caused The “Trollstorm”

In perpetually-clueless The Guardian, Montana realtor Tanya Gersh — best known for her attempt to extort money from Richard Spencer’s mother — whines about how she has been made accountable:

The post on the Daily Stormer last December claimed I had been trying to extort and threaten the mother of Richard Spencer, a white nationalist whose family has a vacation home in our town. It had a photograph of me and contact information: phone numbers, email addresses, and links to social media profiles for me, my husband, my friends, my colleagues. It had my son’s Twitter handle. He is 12 years old.

…Do we tell our children that we’re running in the middle of the night because we’re Jewish?

There are too many lies so far, so we are going to stop there. First and foremost: are you running because you are Jewish, or because you committed the Federal crime of extortion in collusion with a Leftist terror group?

Here is the vital quotation from Richard Spencer’s mother:

On November 22, Gersh and I spoke on the phone. She relayed to me that if I did not sell my building, 200 protesters and national media would show up outside — which would drive down the property value — until I complied.

Tanya Gersh does not refute this statement anywhere. By doing so, she admits it is true. She spins it slightly different, but never refutes it.

However, she wants to shift the blame to anti-Semitism — admittedly a component of The Daily Stormer — instead of her own actions.

Jewish people may be as self-destructive as whites, which makes sense since Jewish people are just white people with an additional 2-5% of Semitic DNA.

Gersh, by denying the actual complaint and blaming anti-Semitism, is weakening every case of outrage at actual anti-Semitism. She broke the law. Deflecting from that will make people very angry. This is how Holocausts happen, just like the 40% participation in the Communist Party by 2% of the general population made it all too easy for people to buy into the anti-Semitism and go along with the raging mob.

Then, with no warning, Sherry Spencer published a post on Medium attacking me and telling a twisted version of our interactions.

Gersh seems to forget her own statements:

“She (Sherry) is profiting off of the people of the local community, all the while having facilitated Richard’s work spreading hate by letting him live and use her home address for his organization.”

She contradicts herself and in doing so, proves that her statements in The Guardian are lies.

That being said, Amerika stands against anti-Semitism. Jews act in self-interest like every other group, and the solution as Theodor Herzl said is nationalism, or relocation of Jews to a land of their own where they are safe. (The last part is crucial; they are not “safe” while Palestinians, Syrians and others are raging around with homemade missiles and suicide attacks.)

We also do not take the position of The Daily Stormer, although we do not support the lawsuit against them either. The correct response to abusive and criminal realtors like Tanya Gersh is to submit a complaint to the regulatory board. Note: she has not been prosecuted for her extortion attempt.

Instead of acknowledging her own failings, Ms. Gersh and those who support her have embarked upon a disastrous lawsuit which can only end badly:

Andrew Anglin, publisher of far-right site Daily Stormer, has been sued in Federal Court today for $300,000, stemming from his reporting about Tanya Gersh, a Montana real estate agent who he accused of attempting to extort Richard Spencer’s mother into selling a Whitefish, Montana property. In the lawsuit, Anglin is accused of creating a “troll storm” against Gersh that caused her emotional distress and anxiety.

…The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula Division, seeks compensatory and punitive damages. It accuses Anglin of invading Gersh’s privacy and intentionally inflicting emotional distress. It also outlines how his campaign violated the Montana Anti-Intimidation Act.

If the courts approve of this suit, they are going to open the door to infinite frivolous lawsuits by people enraged at their clashes with others. After all, what did Gersh lose? She received threatening messages by phone, email and social media. She lost her job, but then again, she also committed a crime, so Gersh losing her real estate license or job is hardly Anglin’s fault. It is Gersh’s fault.

On the other hand, if the court refuses this case, they may open the door to more online harassment. Then again, one wonders if that cat can be put back in the bag, since too many people rely on online information as “true” and not enough realize that it is the new daytime television, i.e. of dubious truth value at best.

In the bigger picture, however, the truth is plain: Gersh is not a good actor here; in fact, she is committing what can only be viewed as extortion. American courts are unwilling to raise this case because they fear violating political correctness.

At Amerika, we both reject trollstorms and think Tanya Gersh belongs in jail. Sherry Spencer did not deserve this attack, which leveraged the threat of Leftist rioters against her, and Richard Spencer should be able to speak his mind without all of these puny, parasitic people attacking him.

All of this is more evidence that America the nation ended years ago. There was a chance for a nation here, but instead, we divided it up into special interest groups, and now they are warring it out in court, essentially passing the costs on to the rest of us. As Roosh V elaborates:

As for prudent measures to protect yourself, I recommend not criticizing or speaking against individual Jews in the United States, who can reach out to multiple organizations with deep pockets. Jews are a privileged group that can not be criticized like heterosexual men or white people can by the media or organizations like the SPLC, which came after me in 2012. This lawsuit proves that even a middle class Jewish woman in the middle of Montana has the full backing of the powerful Jewish lobby—with tens of millions of dollars in the bank—to attack her enemies.

He’s right, but we should elaborate on this: Jews are only one of the many special interests dividing America. GMO foods, elderly pensions, women, military contractors, Hispanics, the pharmaceutical industry, minority races, minority religions and mothers against drunk driving all have their advocacy groups, donors and lobbyists. This is how democracy always ends, as a de facto oligarchy that becomes so chaotic it culminates in tyranny.

In the meantime, the actual problem remains unaddressed. Sherry Spencer should not have been persecuted for her son’s beliefs. Tanya Gersh (and others) did the persecution. We need to end the situation where people can be attacked for their beliefs alone, and grow up and accept differences in thought.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

10 Responses to “Tanya Gersh Lies About Her Actions That Caused The “Trollstorm””

  1. M. Kohn says:

    At a certain point one has to accept the hierarchy as it stands and not as one wishes it to be. If you go against Jews, you can expect to get the business. This is no different than what whites have traditionally done to their competitors.

  2. Kvädare says:

    since Jewish people are just white people with an additional 2-5% of Semitic DNA.

    Indeed, they are a mostly white population, but they are their own distinct group. That is why their IQ is the highest in the world, but their art is trash, as you would expect from centuries of accounting and banking.

    Don’t confuse them for being the same.

    • Svmmoned says:

      Yes, that 2-5% is apparently more than enough to make a difference. Actually it’s the subtleties in composition and sequencing of the same universal elements of which everything is created which makes colossal differences. It can be perhaps best seen in case of our shared genes with other primates. So that 2-5% is not some trait isolated somewhere in organism – it is present in any given part of it. That small difference like a thread reproduce itself in intervals and shape overall fabric to a point, where it is something alien, despite having many familiar traits.

      Or alternatively, we can make of Jews prime example of how material, or at least most of it, can be transcended by a cultivation of sprit.

  3. Svmmoned says:

    What you sort of downplayed, hiding it under the term of leftism is this: she only used leftist means (imposing morality and organizing mobs) in typicall manner which in past proved to be effective in achieving racial goals. She is not so much leftist as just instinctively Jewish. Racial conscience is the underlying cause of all of this, as you can tell by her immediate retreat to her identity when confronted, which I believe is something more than cynical strategy. Is foreigner acting for his people self-interest actually a leftist? She’s rather nationalistic, although in Jewish case “nationalism” isn’t very fortunate word, because they are in a league of their own. And liberalism is a system in which different groups of interest are in fact supposed to divide and tear the state from the inside.

    On a sidenote, any signs of communism should be treated for what they really are, namely, an external (idea of internationalism grants alienation of its “proponents” from the values of their nation) aggression.

    • Kvädare says:

      I think that the jewish question at this point is more cultural than racial. It is true, that they often seem to be soulless robots, whether they choose the liberal secular path or the orthodox tyrannical one.
      But many pure Germanics are that way, too. The difference is that some Germanics aren’t, whereas almost all jews seem to be.

      At this point jews look more like ugly Europeans than Semites. I doubt that they would be up to their usual shenanigans if they didn’t have a distinct culture. It’s like the Catholics versus the Protestants.

      Having said that; out with the pack to Israel.

      • Good point: Jews would be happier in Israel. But much of that depends on how Israel, a small state surrounded by enemies, is able to secure herself, including against internal threats like Leftism and Palestinian diversity.

      • Svmmoned says:

        Whats more – perhaps what grants such loyality to jewishness is simply empowerment and benefits offered by the group.

        Also, I was refering to them as a race in slightly older meaning of that word, that is, as a sub-type of a more general surrounding population.

  4. Adam G. says:

    I really hope Anglin takes Gersh and the SPLC to task with this upcoming suit. Reporting on criminal actions, and encouraging others to do likewise, isn’t a crime.

  5. Jake Saga says:

    Hmm…
    Unfortunately, the era of the legal system being able or willing to adJewdicate acts like Gersh’s against Mrs. Spencer is over.

    Thus, trollstorms and holding Jews who act this way accountable by other means is baked into the cake. This can’t be avoided.
    I think it’s going to be all out ethnic conflict, only increasing until it’s resolved one way or the other.

  6. Rhino says:

    I’m a lawyer. Anglin is what we call “judgment proof”.

    It’s relatively easy to get a judgment against an individual as compared to actually collecting it.

    The whole thing is a fool’s errand.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>