Amerika

The thing to realize about invasive species and resentful people is that while you have many agendas — career, family, friends, hobbies, personal development — they have only one, which is dominating, and everything else is subordinate to that.

They scheme on it constantly, in part because this is how they succeed in their social groups, by “counting coup” (an old Amerind custom of striking the enemy to show bravery and superiority) and doing whatever they can to destroy you.

Much of this consists in demoralizing propaganda. Almost all of it — George Floyd, the CP5, the Trail of Tears, the Holocaust — is a fake narrative based on a partial fact pattern from reality from which broad conclusions have been drawn.

For example, they are trying to argue (again) for African origins to Europeans:

Archaeologists have unearthed surprising genetic evidence that two individuals buried at opposite ends of the south coast of England in the 7th century CE had recent West African ancestry.

The majority of individuals interred there had northern European or West British and Irish ancestry, as was the norm. However, one person in each cemetery was different.

In each of these cases, mitochondrial DNA—passed from mother to child—was consistent with northern European ancestry. Autosomal DNA showed 20–40% genetic affinity to modern-day Yoruba, Mende, Mandenka, and Esan populations from sub-Saharan West Africa. Statistical models suggest that each individual probably had a paternal grandparent from the southern Sahel region, who may have come to Europe sometime between the mid-500s and early 600s CE.

I remember seeing this argument early in a history book: Europe opened its borders to the world and all of its many bloodlines flowed in, and that was responsible for making Europeans so powerful, in theory.

The reality is that not opening the borders avoided destroying useful bloodlines and therefore allowed Europeans to develop traits that made them successful. This is how nature always works: it refines things through natural selection, instead of magically making something more powerful out of random ingredients.

But here, we have two examples out of many graves where foreigners may have been present, with no indication that this DNA spread to others buried there. In other words, a foreign slave returned or a migrant was present, but then that easily-detectable bloodline vanished.

Exceptions strengthen the rule and this can be seen clearly in the case above. All but two of the bodies examined were ethnically the same, so the exceptions stood out, but the Leftist eggheads want you to believe that the exception is the rule.

This is different from the situation with The Irish, where the foreign DNA was part of the founding population and left its traces in all subsequent individuals.

Tags: african admixture, england, human genetics