Posts Tagged ‘cuckservative’

The Race Card And Cowardly White Conservatives

Sunday, August 28th, 2016


Jonah Goldberg has a problem with the liberal media. He has just recently become concerned that they have a credibility problem. He has finally figured out they are too liberal to do their assigned job – after over a decade of writing for National Cuckview. His nauseating queefage follows below:

Every election cycle, the GOP nominee is smeared as a racist by the Democrats or the press — or both. Representative John Lewis of Georgia trades in a bit more of his hard-earned moral authority each time he insinuates that the GOP nominee is like George Wallace or wants to bring back Jim Crow, and political columnists relinquish a bit more of their claim to objectivity each time they let his comments pass without condemnation or criticism.

So essentially, Jonah’s vaginal eructation issues stem from the total inability for the MSM to properly use the race card to ru-ru the electoral prospects of a Republican candidate for president. Remember when we were all suppossed to swallow our misgivings and vote like it mattered for Mitt Romney and John McCain? Jonah doesn’t. When he has to eat the ideological crap sandwich for the party, Kameraen, it’s different. Then, the same MSM that indulged in amateur gynecology over Sarah Palin’s pregnancy in 2008 now has a credibility problem.

You see, Jonah and his Cuckservative compatriots, are rabbits. They feed off a different clover patch than the Sandernistas, but they are still the numerous, sub-optimal products of the r-style reproductive strategy gone Supa-Fly. And as rabbits, they cannot stand up to the predators. They get eaten. When Jonah hits the beach and the Great White Shark hits the shallows, his defense against this misfortune is to swim faster than the unfortunate swimmer next to him.

Robert Tracinski displays similar behavior in his efforts to throw The ALt-Right under the #BlackLivesMatter Bus so that they can go back to lapping up the cuck like a good little trained loyal “opposition.” The paragraph cited below is what greasy, congealing cuck truly smells like.

Hey, lefties, we finally found your racists for you. For as long as I can remember, people like me—by which I mean advocates of capitalism and free markets and freedom of speech—have been accused by the left of being secret racists who pine for the gold old days of the antebellum South. Tiresome stuff like this. Then along comes a group of actual, declared racists who really do pine for the antebellum South, and who is one of the main targets of their invective? People like me.

Poor, Little Robert The Rabbit. That big, bad wolf on the Alt-Right is targeting him. Caucasoid, Please! He tells the world the following about the Alt-Right.

The alt-right isn’t part of the intellectual traditions of the American right, nor is it an alternative to anything. It’s just the same old white-sheet set, repackaged with red “Make America Great Again” golf caps. They’re serving as ignorant tools of the left, and they should be exposed as such.

It sucks when people do evil, racist things like stereotype.

So that brings us back around to Jonah Goldberg’s whinging. He, Kevin Williamson and much of the rest of the “respectable” conservative online presence have been playing the race card since the first hand of this season’s electoral campaigns. If the “Trump is racist” storyline is losing potency, its because anyone listening has heard all before. And then again. Repetitively.

There are only so many race cards in the standard 52-card deck. Once your magazine has published “The Father Führer” you’ve played your card. The bridge game is on to the next hand. Jonah, Robert Tracinski, and the rest of the conservatives Amerika has lost with for the past eight years are now fully aware they’ve overbid their hands and are about to get Trumped and lose the rubber.

Cool = Cuck

Saturday, August 27th, 2016


How did modern society become so cucked?

The root of cuck is that you see something that you should care about, and notice that it is being savaged, and do nothing about it. You humiliate and abase yourself to avoid noticing what is wrong because noticing things that are wrong will interrupt your personal individualism, or desire to put yourself before all else.

Individualism ties inevitably with convenience, or the process of taking the path of least resistance. Acting toward personal pleasure, wealth and social status is always convenient, but asserting and acting toward goals higher than the individual never is.

This leads us to the origin of “cuck” or embracing known evils in order to advance oneself socially, in a career, or in politics. In a dying civilization, most people cuck because the other option is to admit that something really big is wrong. That is a scary, ambiguous and dangerous path and most flee from it.

By the time an empire falls, it has rotted from within; what rots it from within is an inherent human tendency toward solipsism, which in groups becomes “collectivized individualism” or Crowdism. This individualism originates in the desire to be “cool,” or do what is convenient.

One view of history is that humanity has faced many different crises in the past. However, most of these appear to be internal or related to difficulty in maintaining organization. Applying Occam’s Razor, that suggests that common human pathologies are most likely the culprit, such as individualism.

We know that in groups, humans tend to band together on the idea of equality (which translates into no hierarchy of ability, equal acceptance) and then seize power, erasing the past knowledge as they do so. This pattern repeats as a cycle: civilization rises, population grows, neurotics assemble, equality appears and the decline begins.

My theory, which is Spenglerian/Platonic, is that most of what we see now is the result of many thousands of cycles of smaller civilization-deaths. Local areas and regional governments succumb most frequently, but whole empires eventually catch the disease and fall apart.

In each case, those create a bottleneck that pushes a population out and away from the failed areas. The majority of the population however continue focus on being “cool,” and so when the ruins fall in dust, what is left is a highly social population that is very verbally adept, good at art and dancing, and generally excellent at socializing.

Since the West is in the middle of this process, we see mostly the “cool” that comes of never dedicating oneself to anything larger than the individual. This manifests as “cuck” because people are unwilling to reject the cool and strive for what is less socially successful but more accurate.

A backlash against cool, by seeing it as the province of the inept, may begin by seeing “cool” as a compensatory behavior similar to the “sour grapes” of fairy tale lore: those who cannot make anything of themselves focus on being big cheeses in the social scene instead of achieving something in reality.

Our media, cultural and arts industries have driven themselves insane pursuing the “cool” because it ultimately has no aesthetic except narcissism. Similarly, as politicians try to be more popular, they are forced to reduce their positions to pitching convenience to an apathetic public.

When those in authority try to bow to “cool,” they create a tyranny of the rebellious attitude that tears down any meaning larger than that of the individual. Instead of being current, or staying in touch with youth, this should be viewed as what it is: concession to decay.

Will To Pettiness

Saturday, July 2nd, 2016


It’s a tough slog being a Republican in DC. Especially, if you are the Washington Post’s Official Republican™. So what does one do to get by? He behaves himself. Wears a sharp bow-tie. He does exactly what The Washington Post’s Official Republican™ is supposed to do.

So how does the bow-tie wearing Official WaPo Republican™ behave? The cucking is eminently predictable. This means he treats other Republicans the way Ramsay Bolton treated his fellow peers. He feeds them to the ravening hounds. Richard Nixon? He has a long shadow…Tsk, Tsk, Tsk. According to Will, Republicans can never be traitors. They can never truly play the Game of Thrones against Liberals. Never mind that the Dems have just all but nominated the real world equivalent of Cersei Lannister in a rigged primary season Tywin would have smiled fondly over. In Willworld, only Republicans have to maintain any code of honor.

And how about that rabble-rouser Ronnie Raygun? He was too risky. As Goerge H. W. Bush put it – “Wouldn’t be prudent.” Reagan of course won two elections and had the Soviet Union teetering on its heels. One would think Will would let bygones get gone. But no, Cucks have got to Cuck.

Will, who has built a highly lucrative career, aided by his special relationship with his sometimes friend, Ronald Reagan, feels highly incensed as if betrayed by his former, special pupil, whom he coached before the Great Debate with Jimmy Carter. Will fears that the Great Communicator has become the Great Disinformer by not adhering to Will’s approved script and will prove no match to the Great Manipulator–Mikhail Gorbachev. So the characteristically unflappable, intellectual guru of the “Far Right,” reacting like a wounded bull seeing the world through his darkly, red-colored glasses, viciously attacks the President.

Will, you see, accused Reagan of not being manly enough when he met with Gorbachev in Iceland to discuss what would later become Perestroika and the end of the Soviet Menace. Like Michael Jackson implying the Fresh Prince of Bel Air had latent homosexual tendencies, George Will was castigating Ronald Reagan over his low testosterone levels in foreign policy.

It would take time before the WaPo needed their Cabana Boy Cuckservative to properly insert dagger in a Republican Party vertebrae, but in the Mid 00’s; Liberalism’s needs again called. Will delivered with a column designed play right into the Democratic Party’s mid-term campaign strategy.

Today, with all three components of the “axis of evil” — Iraq, Iran and North Korea — more dangerous than they were when that phrase was coined in 2002, the country would welcome, and Iraq’s political class needs to hear, as a glimpse into the abyss, presidential words as realistic as those Britain heard on June 4, 1940.

So guess how George Will reacts to the nomination of Donald J. Trump?

Conservative columnist George Will told PJM he has officially left the Republican Party and urged conservatives not to support presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump even if it leads to a Democratic victory in the 2016 presidential election. Will…had a message for Republican voters. “Make sure he loses. Grit their teeth for four years and win the White House,” Will said during an interview after his speech at a Federalist Society luncheon.

This is classic Cuckservative behavior. Conservatives are supposed to be with them to the bloody, gore-smeared hilt when they nominate Bob Dole. When factions of the party not up to the WaPo Official Republican™ standard nominate a Reagan or a Trump, the knife is sharpened and aimed at the vertebrae. If one of his can’t win the day, than no Republican can win at all.

This sniveling scribe of Cuckservatism leaving the GOP is a positive sign for the GOP. George Will going away is like having a case of colon cancer go into remission. George Will supporting Gary Johnson is essentially what Gary Johnson deserves for being Gary Johnson. Trump should take pride in having George Will show his campaign the well-rounded pair of heels bought off and paid for by The Washington Post. Again Trump has flushed an enemy of Conservative America out into the open. George Will’s will to pettiness is revealed before all in its repulsive, Cuckservative glory.

The Canadian Conservative Party Abandons Marriage

Wednesday, June 15th, 2016
A Conservative MP points left

A Conservative MP points left

Most Canadians — liberal and conservative alike — see America as a huge, looming power, simultaneously feared and resented for its prosperity and size, and envied and loved for the same reason. Canadians enjoy bashing America and Americans as a means of differentiating themselves, and compensating for a sense of inferiority. Think of the skinny nerd who tells himself that the smiling jock, who could knock him flat with an effortless blow, is such an idiot because he’s probably never even heard of the band the nerd likes.

Canadians will plug themselves into a stream of 90% American pop entertainment while telling each other how boorish, rude, and uncultured Americans are. In order to assuage their inferiority complex, they project an image of being ahead of their neighbors, of being morally superior. Having internalized the filth of American pop culture, they attempt to predict from a progressive mindset where American cultural trends will lead in ten or twenty years, and try to be that now. As a result, Canada legislated “gay marriage” more than ten years ahead of America, and it made Canadians feel so good.

On the other side of the 49th, liberal Americans imagine Canada as liberal Canadians want to be imagined: ahead of them, more progressive, the future. A refuge to pretend to want to retreat to when the winds of change are forecast to temporarily wane, and a utopia to point to as justification for more liberalism. Conservative Americans see the signaling, and a hateful grimace forms on their face whenever they say “Canada.”

After a humiliating defeat of the eleven-year party leader to the son of the man who made multiculturalism an official Canadian institution, the Conservative Party is doing some soul-searching. At the party convention a few weeks ago, a sound decision was made to enshrine firearms as a Canadian Heritage, and this week a decision was made to abandon a sound conception of marriage, completing a capitulation long in the making:

The Conservative Party gave itself a makeover, donning a more moderate and modern face as grassroots members voted overwhelmingly to ditch the traditional definition of marriage from the party’s policy book.

Notice how leftists always talk about the “definition” of marriage? They want you to pretend that marriage is a completely arbitrary idea that is simply defined one way or another, that as long as there’s more than one warm body and some vague warm feelings involved, it’s just as good as any other definition of marriage. They see marriage as solely a social construct, and ignore the necessary foundation of human reproductive biology and sexual differentiation. A database engineer freed from any connection to the messy, difficult to quantify real world, can spiral down into an abyss of ever-refining “definitions” of marriage until all connection to the actual concept of marriage is lost, and a final exhausted destructive conclusion is made: “Perhaps the simplest solution would be to ban marriage outright.”

There are two major reasons why we should always be opposed to what’s called “gay marriage.” The first is overtly practical: marriage is a fundamental component of civilization in that it is the linchpin of the family structure, which allows for a loving environment to nurture and guide the healthy growth of children. It is the channeling of base animal instincts of sexual desire and offspring protection into a more organized form that reduces confusion and unnecessary conflict. Within this formalized unification of the genetic interests of a breeding pair these base instincts become refined and ennobled for both the individuals and their wider community. The individuals gain richer and more meaningful sexual and reproductive experiences, and the community gains clarity in intersexual relations and an environment that allows for selection of traits beyond short term opportunistic brutality, the benefits of which reverberate for generations.

None of this rooting in reality makes sense with two men, or three women, or five men and a sheep, which points to the second major reason: it’s a lie. A “redefinition” of marriage means using the word for something that it isn’t. It’s not a matter of “differing views,” it’s a matter of failure to view. “Gay marriage” is an absurd concept, and going along with the illusion for tactical reasons, to give this to liberals so that we can focus on something deemed more important, is to sanction the acceptance of yet another popular lie. It’s giving up on yet another truth. This sounds like an idealistic point, a moral luxury unaffordable to those who desperately fight a leftist behemoth bloating further every moment into every aspect of our lives thereby providing more tangible battlegrounds to fight more concrete harm than some abstract notion of truth, but there are of course practical implications when any mass of humans agrees to deny truth. Abandoning truth is giving up.

The Conservative Party has done this, and has ceded ground to and legitimized the liberals. They are continuing the tried and failed cuckservative method of simply being yesterday’s Liberal party, or the party of slightly lower taxes plus guns. Through this change, the Party is able to stay in power as the official opposition candidate, but gives people no option to the ever-accelerating liberal dominion. So the voters stay home, and curse the television, then forget about it the next day. Conservatives surrender what should be defended in the name of convenience, and this, too, is merely giving up.

More than cuckservative: the passive mentality

Monday, March 14th, 2016

Most of us at this point, if we were paying attention, know that our “elected leaders” are not just surprisingly weak but incompetent. This is the nature of parasites, who once they get elected view their job as an entitlement where they succeed by making happy feelings in other people in the way of salesmen, and actually getting anything done is secondary.

But what unnerves us is how comfortable the whole situation is. Government seems to work like an episode of The Office: people show up every day to pretend to hate on each other, make a lot of drama and accomplish very little. That one half of them claim to be “the Opposition” means very little because to them, it is a job. They show up to do job-things, act out the roles in which they stand, and make others like them. The consequences of this? Accountability? Responsibility? Those are not even on the menu.

I wanted to point out three parallel areas in which this process can be observed: cuck, the merchant mentality and the band-aid.

  1. Cuck: This simply means what happens when “regulatory capture” takes over on the level of personality. Guys and gals who go to Washington enjoy their coworkers and so they start a comfy little society where no one really rocks the boat. They also do not want to violate the moral pretense involved, to flatter the voters, that “equality” is anything more than the words of a salesman.
  2. The Merchant Mentality: When customers get used to being customers, they fall into a permanent passive role because (1) the attention flatters them and (2) someone else is responsible. The best of both worlds, right? You buy something because the nice salesman said such pleasing things, and then if it is not what you needed, you take it back and get something else. This is the mentality not just of voters, but of politicians to entrenched interests like minorities, foreign powers and big business. The goal of white politicians and voters is to keep signing the checks to buy off these entrenched interests, and if we step outside of that role, there will be hell to pay… or maybe not.
  3. The Band-Aid: You will notice as you go through life that any failing enterprise will have the same general tendency, which is to apply band-aids to broken things so it can avoid thinking about the process as a whole. If the pump keeps breaking, get a repair contract. Do not think about why the pump keeps breaking. When the repair contractor is not fast enough, get another contractor to compete with them. There, that’ll show ’em! If that doesn’t work, hire an intern… on and on it goes, never ending. At the bottom is the truth: something is out of place which keeps breaking pipes. The direct solution probably means a lot of pain right now, and then no pain after… but in the tried and true manner of humans, we will instead opt for the delayed monthly pain plan and avoid fixing the problem, and instead fix the public image.

When you wonder why government is dysfunction, in addition to to obvious appearance-over-reality failings of democracy, look for the above. They are all the same basic mentality, which is to compromise what one knows is true for the sake of what is socially popular, but they take such interesting forms.

Russ Douthat and the real face of the GOP

Tuesday, March 8th, 2016


Do you know what that was? The YouTube video Cuckservative Columnist Russ Douthat attached to the following tweet.

Good news guys I’ve figured out how the Trump campaign ends:

— Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) February 24, 2016

People call The Donald a slob for not buttoning his jacket. Former Trump Advisor Roger Stone offers us insight. He doesn’t own one that fits over the bullet-proof vest.

@DouthatNYT are you freaking serious? Imagine if you made this joke about President Obama. What is wrong with you, dude?
— Eddie (@BasementOnaHill) February 25, 2016

Yeah, what is wrong with him? How could a writer on morals, religion and culture make assassination jokes about a presidential candidate he doesn’t happen to like. Well, let’s look at what else cultural conservatives who write about religion, morals and social issues are perfectly happy with.

That Carrier factory shutting down: that is the status quo that Russ Douthat seeks to defend as he joins the GOP for Hillary. Those people having their dreams crushed – those are the peasants, the stupid, ignorant Hookworm People. At least according to Annas, Caiaphas, Douthat* and the rest of our conservative commentators on morals, religion and culture.

That Russ… His Holiness is so pro-life. Except when the life in question belongs to someone threatening *his* people’s jobs and *his* people’s position of prominence. That’s totally and completely different from the Carrier situation.

So just what is it that makes The Donald worthy of assassination? Maybe he’s prone to say things like this.

“This country is dying. And our workers are losing their jobs,” Donald Trump declared. Noting the announcement of plans by the air-conditioner company Carrier to transfer production (and 1,400 union jobs) from Indianapolis to Mexico, the billionaire said, “Carrier is moving. And if you saw the [workers]…. They were crying.” Promising a no-more-tears presidency, Trump said he’d renegotiate “trade pacts that are no good for us and no good for our workers” and tell corporations to keep production in the United States or “we’re going to tax you.”

Does he not properly understand who Amerika exists to benefit? He’s a freakin’ billionaire. Is he not entertained? And that’s just it. The Donald has taken up for the losers in American Life. If you’re one of Trump’s supporters; your America probably really is dying. Read Charles Murray’s Losing Ground to find out just how much Annas, Caiaphas and Douthat really care. He may be sincere, he may be a scam artist. Whatever, he’s sure shown us the true face of America’s leading “conservatives.” The more I see this, the less I hold Conservative Inc™ in any regard whatsoever.

*-Just to make it clear. The Donald, like The JPW, is miles away from Jesus. The comparison between Douthat and Caiaphas? That one’s looking far better.

How Trump should have handled the David Duke Question

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2016


We join our news disinformation program here at Circle of Jerks already in progress. The somewhat controversial Presidential Candidate from the NRX Party, Mr. Jonathan Peter Wilkinson, is preparing to sit down with the circle – the circle that jerks.

“Mr. Wilkinson, Good Morning. How are you today?”

“Oh, I’m peachy-keen, Lord Haw-Haw. How about yourselves?”
“Were fine. Thank you.”

“Now we’re all glad to have you here and congratulate you on your rapid ascent in the polls. But we do have this one silly, little question…We noticed that Caucasoid Domestic Terrorist, Ragnor Skolkruscher, who heads up the White Internet Supremacy Eliminationist Rhetoric Party (WISERP) has spoken favorably concerning your candidacy. This according to the always fair and even-handed $PLC Hatewatch Blog. What would you like to tell us about this, Mr. Wilkinson?”

“I’ll be succinct. Fvck You.”

The panel sits there aghast. Finally, the talented and lovely Ms. Tokyo Rose breaks the silence.

“I’m sorry, Mr. Wilkinson. I fail to understand.”

“Ma’am, I’m not quite sure that you’re really sorry. However, I will try to simplify what was already a pretty basic response. Here goes. First, ‘Fvck.’ Second, ‘you.’ Is there any part of that which you guys are still too arrogant to understand?”

“Now Mr. Wilkinson.” Begins Walter Duranty of The New York Times. “Is this the level of dialogue you believe the voters deserve?”

“Why no, Mr. Duranty. I believe this is the level of dialogue that you deserve and here’s why. WISERP, on a good day; has almost but not quite as much political influence as The Onion or The Girl Scouts. So while I appreciate your recognition of how I’ve made inroads into the traditional constituencies of my opponents in The Democratic Party,* I question the timing of making Mr. Skolkruscher’s stated preferences an issue. I don’t recall you asking Mr. Sanders to explain his endorsements from The Spartacus Society or the ACP after his recent win in New Hampshire. I don’t recall you asking Mrs. Clinton to explain or disown her support from The New Black Panther Party after she racked up massive totals of the African-American vote in South Carolina. With the possible exception of Ms. Rose, none of you have any legitimate excuse to have your liberal slips showing quite so badly this fine morning.”

“But aren’t you concerned with how this appears?” Lord Haw-Haw interjects.

“I’m mildly perturbed that old cock-knocker Skolkruscher hasn’t died of The Syph. But beyond that, not really.”
Ms. Rose interjects incredulously. “You can’t just Twitter-follow guys like Ragnor Skolkruscher and not leave the voting public with questions and uncertainties. They track your Facebook friends and could get the wrong ideas. What do you say to this, Mr. Wilkinson?”

“Well Ma’am, I’ll give you three guesses and the first two don’t even count. If you have any further questions regarding what I really mean, I’ll have my press secretary send you a pdf of the Illustrated Karma Sutra for your records.”

“My Gosh, Mr. Wilkinson!” Interjects Lord Haw-Haw. “With that, we’ll move on to someone less controversial than Mr. Wilkinson. When we come back from commercial break, we’ll discuss how much money needs to be stolen from Whites and Asians to fund Bernie Sanders’ free college program here on the circle that jerks….”

*-WISERP is of course a fill-in for the KKK. KKK founder Nathan Bedford Forrest was about as likely to vote Democrat as either Jake Tapper or George Stephanopoulos.

Nikki Haley’s opposition to President Donald Trump

Tuesday, January 26th, 2016


Henry Olson correctly describes why the GOP no longer has any legitimate right to call itself a Conservative Party.

Thanks to Donald Trump, American elites are finally paying attention to blue-collar, white America. They do not like what they see. Racist. Bigoted. Irrational. Angry. How many times have you read or heard one or more of these words used to describe Trump’s followers? Whether they are the academic, media, and entertainment elites of the Left or the political and business elites of the Right, America’s self-appointed best and brightest uniformly view the passions unleashed by Trump as the modern-day equivalent of a medieval peasants’ revolt. And, like their medieval forebears, they mean to crush it.

The Governor of South Carolina attempted to say these things nicely. It was almost as if she could bore Donald Trump to sleep ahead of the Iowa Caucus through the mind-numbing force of her predictably ill-informed vapidity. She adopted the atrocious pose of a Southerner who had grown. She denounced the vile ¡RACISM! of a church shooting in Charleston. She forgot to look up the proper name of the church. There is no historic Mother Emmanuel Church in Charleston. I’m sure both of her special black friends were still quite deeply impressed. With The Cathedral, it’s always the thought that counts.

You should obey Governor Nikki and stop being so gosh darn mean. Bad Redneck; no shotguns and Wild Turkey. Ya’ll do know your place, am I right? The British Aristocracy could at least piss on you with a certain flippant panache. “Villains ye were, villains ye remain!” Scans like Shakespeare. Instead we get the Dominatrix of Dullness. If she ran an S&M Dungeon, her clientele would fall asleep. She’d be dumb enough to think they were passing out and try to come up with a more comprehensive safe word policy.

And then we get to the reason all us Unreconstructed Southerners are such horrible people. We aren’t willing to sit down while our bettors abolish us.

“No one who is willing to work hard, abide by our laws, and love our traditions should ever feel unwelcome in this country.”

Genghis Khan had a work ethic worthy of J.J. Watt. He’d follow the laws; after he executed a couple of obnoxious justices on the USSC. As long as he got to rape another woman in every village, he never felt the slightest bit unwelcome. Nikki could be happy and so could Genghis. Civility is such a special thing.

I’ll offer a protip. You don’t want either Genghis or JJ anywhere near your franchise QB. Do you think those guys raping women in Cologne were taking the day off? Nobody is going to respect traditions that you are not willing to defend. Nobody is going to incur the social cost and inconvenience of obeying a law that you are too lazy or gutless to enforce.

“It means welcoming properly vetted legal immigrants, regardless of their race or religion.”

According to the laws on the land circa Y2K, Mohammed Atta was properly vetted. How did that work out for NYC and Logan Airport? Way to hammer out that vetting. I hope the vetters were properly courteous and respectful when they signed off on all 21 of the student visas. It’s a pleasure to watch bureaucracy work like hell.

“[T]here’s a tendency to falsely equate noise with results. Some people think that you have to be the loudest voice in the room to make a difference. That is just not true. Often, the best thing we can do is turn down the volume. When the sound is quieter, you can actually hear what someone else is saying. And that can make a world of difference.”

Be quiet you ignorant boobs. When your jobs get destroyed, when your women get raped and when your communities are no longer like anything you would personally recognize, we want you to object more pleasantly. We don’t like it when The Hookworm People keep bringing up all these unpleasant topics. But hey, she was willing to be patient and tell us these things nicely.

People wonder how Donald Trump was able to nuke these turkeys with such a significant Wake-Up Bomb. Nikki Haley was assigned to address the President after The State of The Union Show. She did one thing right. She ignored what went on during The State of The Union Show and spoke athwart the real President instead. She addressed the man who truly drives America and took up her cudgel against Donald Trump. She showed us that America is a strange and foreign country to the people in the GOP who seek to govern Amerika. If you want to smash the Uniparty, you have to vote Trump or Cruz this GOP Primary session. Otherwise, just wipe that cuck off your chins and vote for Hillary and get it over with.

Will it really be a party if the GOP wins in 2016?

Tuesday, December 1st, 2015


So Josh Kraushaar of National Journal offers us a doom and gloom scenario for the Democratic Party which should only leave me wondering which sort of alcoholic beverage I should choose when I take to the streets and celebrate. He points out the following in claiming that the GOP could reenact Desert Storm against a culturally and socially deracinated Progressive Democrat rump.

Most pundits are expecting a very close presidential election. I’m not so sure. With terrorism on the march, rising fear of crime at home, growing racial polarization, pervasive economic anxiety, and a president detached from it all, the pieces are in play for a GOP land­slide.

Then I take a step back and examine that analogy. Two reasons for further ratiocination come to mind before I load up on the party juice. One, the bad side of Desert Storm was the totally bungled aftermath that pretty much frog-marched us into Iraqi Freedom. Two, a Democratic Party loss is the assumption of power by the other side. In this case, we are discussing the GOP. Is that a positive bargain for America? Let us examine.

For starters, there are only two men left in the GOP Primary Race that could potentially leave America less like Amerika than they found it. The Donald and The Theodore (Ted Cruz) are about it as far as positives.* The rest of this noxious gallimaufry are not worthy of further mention and may well convince me to swear off voting in the Presidential Election of 2016 if they show up on the GOP ticket in either slot.

The Theodore appears the closest thing left in the current filed to a Constitutionalist. He’s read the founding documents and studied them in law school. Unlike most Harvard grads he left the Pretention Palace on the River Charles with a certain level of respect for where America came from. It would be nice if we had a CEO that attempted to run America the way people far smarter and more grounded in reality designed it to actually work.
The Donald, the Donald is the closest thing to an affirmative traditional populist that we have in either party. If you want it to get blown up, you want the man who knows how to throw a blow-out. Trump is a hammer treating the issues of the day as if they were nails. Let’s examine just how he’d drop the hammer.

  • On ISIS: “I’ll bomb the (#$%^) out of them!”
  • On Immigrants: “I’ll toss ‘em out.”
  • On Border Security: “I’ll build a big wall and make Mexico pay for it.”
  • On Healthcare: “I’ll just make the Congress pay for all of it.”
  • On Crazy Foreigners: “Screw ‘em in every hole you can reach.”

Graph it on a 2X2 grid using the definitions popular in poli-sci and Trump’s ideological meanderings make no sense whatsoever. Based on that, it’s easy to write him off as a Rightist Huey “The Kingfish” Long.

Rate them on a 2X2 scale where the X-Axis runs Easy to Complex. Add a Y-Axis of Populist to Elitist. If we went through about 25 different Trump proposals to fix some aspect of America you would get a big cluster of dots that map to the quadrant of Easy, Populist. That’s a new and coherent ideology. Call it Simplificationism. He proposes to make America great again by rendering it more comprehensible to the citizen of average abilities and standard means and less of an elitist reunion of The Harvard Club.

It’s proper to caveat this because anyone’s simplification would create negative externalities and probably not solve all the stuff it was aimed at. So what? As opposed to what? Obamacare? The Gang of Eight immigration plan? Our current Global Disagreement with Terror? The advantage Simplificationism has on all of it is that at least we’d understand what was messed up. At least we’d have a guy in their trying to fix it instead of just making another buck off a once great nation driving drunk into the high-crime drainage ditch.

But all of this desire to restore Constitutional Primacy and simplify a fractal-complex world would run into a potential buzz saw of concealed iniquity: the “established” and “respectable” GOP. The “established” GOP would seek to kill the Populist aspect of Donald’s Agenda and much of The Constitutionalism of a President Cruz in order to allow their donor class to better rake in the rewards for “loyalty”.

The “respectable” GOP wants to promote civility with The Left. It preaches cooperation and accommodation with all forms of diversity and perversity. This would make it utterly impossible to govern the way either Cruz or Trump would want to if the wrong GOP factions were winning big down ticket from either man’s hypothetical victory. So stay frosty my NRXers, even a GOP victory in no way guarantees a necessary hard right turn in Amerika towards the direction of America.

*-I could see Rubio breaking even on the America/Amerika DSM Axis, but only if Congress or the USC stones him on his immigration agenda.

The one man they could not cuck

Monday, August 24th, 2015


Donald Trump eviscerates the Republican establishment by refusing to play by the rules — set by the Left — which require conservatives to apologize for noticing reality. He is the one man they have been unable to cuck, although it remains unclear whether he would be a conservative in office.

Either way, he has forced a lack of submission on the Right as people have realized that we live in a leftist society. Everything it does is based on leftist principles, and leftist goals, with softer methods but no different end-point than the Soviet Union.

While even the moderate right is public anathema, no one freaks out at the idea of Socialism or even Communism lite, a pathway (inevitably) to Full Communism. You can have your life destroyed for being more right-wing than the official Republican position, but no one blinks when someone advocates immediate Stalinesque Communism. This alone proves the Leftist stench of our time.

They will not mention it on your television or the big internet sites, but this society destroys people all the time for not agreeing with its ideological agenda. They do not even need to disagree, only fail to agree. People who notice the man behind the curtain find themselves publicly humiliated, demonized and ostracized.

We are all cuck until we overthrow this delusional system.

If we look at history, we see that America (and Western Europe) thrived with a Western European identity and ethnic composition. The definition “WASP” at first meant the English, but grew to include Germans, Scandinavians, Dutch and other Western European descended people. With that as our ideal, we had an innate commonality of culture, religion and reverence for both history and our unique standards for the future.

With the removal of WASP America, the “melting pot” idea followed, with people thinking foolishly that with enough propaganda… err, “education”… and government regulations, anyone could follow The WASP Method and make our nation just as successful. What has followed has been increasing corruption, incompetence, deception, bloat and dishonesty.

A central ethnic and cultural identity gives people a sense of common purpose and a reason to trust and believe in one another. We come from one root and we are working toward the same goal, which is perpetuation of our society through its principles and heritage. No amount of laws, rules and government videos can compensate for the loss of this unity.

With that loss, we have embarked upon the path to becoming Brazil: a multi-ethnic nation unified only by economics and ideology, comprising mostly a third-world slum with a few fortunate wealthy types on top. This model is not only unstable, but cruel. It deprives people of a sense of pride in who they are and of the moral standards and principles to guide them. It replaces civilization with obedience, positive aspiration with fear, and social order with shopping — even if only shopping for enough private security to avoid the disaster.

Our public opinion currently finds itself in a cycle of desperate search for scapegoats. We blame Nazis, African-Americans, Mexicans, White people, cops, Satanists, right-wingers, Christians and hackers in turn, but the real problem is us. We are disunified. We lack purpose. And so we consume ourselves.

Rule by public opinion — democracy — favors fears and victimhood over any sense of common goal. It delights in the weak and quavering, using a presumed sense of the appearance of injustice to argue for acting in their name, always following the egalitarian pattern: punish the successful in the name of the unsuccessful to make central control stronger. Public opinion makes snap judgments and destroys lives so that people can go back to a somnambulism of apathy and self-interested, short-term purchases.

Democracy has failed. Liberalism has failed, and diversity has failed. Throw them out and try picking up where we were before we turned down this idiotic path. Donald Trump may not be the ideal leader, but he has succeeded by refusing to bow down to the court of public opinion — which represents a plurality and likely not a majority — and instead pointing us toward common sense logic. Whether or not he will be a good President, he has begun the process of galvanizing our people toward deconstruction the liberal authoritarian regime that threatens to destroy us for ideological disobedience.

Recommended Reading