Amerika

Years ago, we simply had fewer options if you opposed diversity. You either joined the Left, who following their core idea of egalitarianism insisted that all people were equal but we needed exotic ones anyway, or you joined the “far-Right” which seemed to delight in hatred of Jews, Negroes, homosexuals, and non-Christians.

It turns out that as usual careerism played us. In order to make it big in politics, you have to conjure up an audience and concentrate them, which requires dumbing down your message and finding a bad guy. For the Left it was wealthy Whites, and for the Right it was minorities.

Those of us who wanted to express an alternative idea, namely that the problem was diversity as an institution and not any specific group, least of all Whites, found ourselves shouted down by those who were sure they had found the audience that was going to take them to victory.

And then, a funny thing happened. “White Nationalism” tanked on takeoff, and thirty years later, liberalism did the same. People observed logical contradictions in the designs of these two ideas and hungered for a different response, instead getting a compromise with “Christian nationalism” Tea Party style political consequentialism.

You will find that in human groups any issue splits into two opposing camps based on emotional responses because the people involved are trying to curry audiences from the apathetic, distracted, and generally self-centered herd.

When that fails, you end up with the compromise because this enables those careerists to keep making bold distinctive statements so they can have their own little audience and get votes, book deals, interviews, honoraria, and other benefits that reward their little careers.

Now perhaps you can see why prole-rule is doomed and aristocracy is inevitable.

However, the autopsy on “White Nationalism” requires facing a salient fact: those who oppose diversity want mono-ethnic states, not mono-racial ones. Nationalism is ethnic not racial. Mainstream America disregarded “White Nationalism” because it did not want to be identityless generic huwhites.

Even more, people recognized that race is not culture. We can say that Western European descended people share the basics of culture with each other, or that southern Europeans do among people from that region, but we cannot say that all Europeans share a culture. We are very different.

Ironically, “White Nationalism” was a diversity program of its own: it wanted to make all European ethnic groups equal and combine them, effectively destroying culture using the same methods that racial diversity did. It was just a lesser version of the same illness.

Only one thing will unite people and it is mono-ethnicism. We want an Anglo-Saxon America; that was the last functional version. The usual witless wits will tell you that this is unpopular and therefore destined to fail, while they pitch you some version of the current system that is sure to fail.

We want culture back, and that requires mono-ethnicism, but also other things too, like letting go of the free stuff from government and the nanny state. It requires getting rid of unions, most insurance, and other forms of protection against the world. We anticipated evils, and created them in their own mirror image.

At this point, we are discussing whether Western Civilization should continue or not. It cannot as a mixed-racial or mixed-ethnic state, and for that reason, “White Nationalism” will not save us any more than regular Democrat or Republican nonsense will.

Tags: Ethno Nationalism, nationalism, white nationalism