Humans discovered an isolated island, then brought with them invasive species like dogs, cats, and pigs. These, being less specialized than those on the island, promptly destroyed the native species because the indigenous species had more specific requirements for survival. At that point, the invasive species had exhausted the food supply and began to die out as well. Now centuries later, humans can finally sort of fix the problem by introducing animals from a nearby island, but we still wonder what genetic diversity was lost with the specific population. As we contemplate yet another year of no one being able to say in public that diversity is genocide and does not work anyway because it is wholly self-contradictory even in theory, it may be worth remembering that certain temporary effects like the power of invasive species and hybrid vigor are followed by a future of unending failure. However, even asking people to consider that effects change over time is too difficult for most of the population, and so they continue to believe in one-step solutions like diversity that will kill them.
Modern society made white people miserable. White people, being pretentious, would rather defend the egalitarian basis of modern society and die out in the process than admit that we have taken a wrong step. This is why caste-mixing is so dangerous: you get people who are clever on the surface, but in their souls, have deeply disorganized and confused thinking, and so are unable to get to a point of clarity where they know what they should do with their lives.
Leftists — who do not care if the USA is destroyed, so long as Leftists control the ruins — are sending money and personnel to encourage these migrant invasions. Apparently caught in a stupor, our media seems to be ignoring this fact and instead wondering why people show up when Democrats promise them free stuff. The real solution, of which democracy is incapable, is to make a clear statement about what we want and therefore what we will tolerate. In reality, America has learned that diversity is a failure and is arming itself against the fallout; this will not protect it from when its daughters come home with boyfriends who are one-quarter Asian, African, or mixed, and it will wake up a century from now as a third world population wondering, “How did we get here?” The answer: hubris. You thought you could rule yourselves with the vote and it drove you insane, just like it has done to everyone else who has attempted it. We need to cast democracy, egalitarianism, utilitarianism, and diversity into the black hole of history along with Communism and National Socialism, but most “educated” and “responsible” people cannot even achieve that level of clarity. We either get the kings back to oppress the insane among us, or we perish.
Dershowitz, writing for the far-Rightish Gatestone Institute, tells us “It is both bigoted and hypocritical to apply a different standard to Jews who support Israel than to Muslims who support the Palestinian cause.” He is correct, but let us zoom out and apply this paradigm as broadly as possible. Under diversity, every group will have dual loyalties. They will be loyal to their host nation, to a degree, but also loyal to their own people, and this means that they will act for the former as long as they can but when conflicts arise, act for the latter.
Democrats want more Latinos because Latinos always vote Leftist. Americans do not want this. No one has much of a brain, and so only a few right now are pointing out that the problem is diversity itself. With diversity, you bring groups into your society so that they can, as is natural, fight for their own interests. To the dumb conservative, it seems like they will fight for their rights as individuals; in reality, they fight for individual and group, but mostly group, because when their group is powerful, they are protected against other groups. Only in Western societies did we have elegant, thoughtful politics; now, as everywhere else, it is prison ethics and Machiavellian realism. You are in a gang and your heritage is your uniform. The only “compromise” possible in the border wall is backing off from the sensible position of ending all third world immigration now. We already have too many people and it has savaged our economy, and we probably need fewer. Stop all immigration, preserve our power balance, and do not let Leftists take over our nation with a permanent demographic replacement. This should be obvious, but to the voters who are self-mesmerizing in a fog of egoism and consumerism, it is a mystery, floating out there like everything else that might save them from what they are doing to themselves. They say that in any society, the one group that you cannot criticize is the group that controls you. In our society, this is true: people will laugh off any criticism of democracy, since “everyone knows” that it is the best thing ever, because the individualism/egalitarianism behind democracy flatters their evil little “talking monkeys with car keys” souls. However, the voters are the ones who screw up constantly, democracy is what keeps them in power, and to survive for the future, we will have to get out of democracy.
Ending globalism — a worldwide wealth transfer from rich to poor much like unions, insurance, and socialism — providing the US with an economic boom because we stopped doing the stupid thing (exporting wealth, tying our hands behind our backs, and growing government at the expense of everything else) and went back to what worked, which was focusing on productivity and fair deals, not ideologically-motivated treaties that favored the third world. Leftists want two things: (1) no social order, so that they can be as individualistic as they want, and (2) that society pay for them to do it. Every parasitic person wants something of this nature because the mental state of the parasite does not change. We now have parasites at the top — our “elites” of educated people who got the right scores but have zero analytical or critical thinking ability — as well as at the bottom, meaning our permanent third world and low-caste white underclass, and this group wants to free ride on the heart of the West, which is its upper half of middle class and above that produces people of genius, intellectual clarity, and moral direction. If we cut ourselves free from the parasites (send them to Venezuela at $500 a head) we will get a chance to explore the universe and rise above all previous levels of greatness. If we do not, the best case scenario is that we end up like Sicilians or Jews, a mixed-white population that is intelligent on the surface but lacking any deep intuitive connection to the reality or genius.
When you import different tribes into your country, they become special interest groups working against the majority while fighting against each other, some according to ancient hatreds. Arabs hate Jews for breaking free of the middle east and become commercial wizards who later admixed with greater degrees of European blood; Jews hate Arabs for being of a similar origin and therefore showing them the dark soul of what it is to be Semitic, or mixed of Yamnaya, Asian, and North African blood.
Instead of admitting that diversity does not work, our pretentious democracies are trying to limit the behaviors of other groups to force them to “assimilate,” or become cultureless slaves of the consumerist and Leftist regimes in which they find themselves. This is both oppressive and stupid as it merely legitimizes the complaints by this group and redoubles their resolve to overthrow the majority, just as banning Holocaust revisionism did nothing but make it a commonplace belief thirty years later.
Anatomy of a revolution: our top percent of a percent have been agitating for the removal of modernity, democracy, hubris, consumerism, and equality for some time now because they recognize that these ideas are not realistic on the level of their own inner logic. They are paradoxical and will fall on their own, but this takes centuries and it destroys the host population, as Plato wrote. Instead of listening to our intelligent people, the herd decided that it knew better because it wanted to think it knew better, and so we have gone down a path of more democracy, wealth transfer, diversity, and special interest group equality. However, that revealed itself in its final form as the EU mutated into a new version of the USSR and the USA under Barack Obama seemed to stink suspiciously like Soviet as well. Now people want out, but as usual, they are mentally lazy and want to make as few changes as possible, instead of realizing that we have gone down a wrong path and we need to reverse course fast. That realization is coming, and the fact that a quarter of the brain-dead, wealth-clotted, mentally stupefied, propaganda infused, and lust-drugged European population has recognized part of this is greatly encouraging. Our revolution ultimately aims to un-do modernity; right now, we are taking baby steps away from committed Leftism, but we will have to accelerate or we will settle for a short-term solution instead of ripping the problem out by its roots.
You still believe that we can democracy our way out of this one? Only by voting to dismantle Leftism entirely. The Leftist establishment hates home schooling because it takes the smartest kids out of the schools, which reveals that schools are basically indoctrination camp daycare for idiots, and if you take away the high-scorers, the results are appalling. As a result, governments everywhere fight home schooling and try to raise property taxes to a level that discourages parents from taking their kids out of schools.
Markets are just forms of competition based on choice. When Trump stopped Chinese tariff abuse, despite conservatives screaming about his tariffs, he changed the market in international trade. No longer could the West accept Chinese abuse in exchange for cheap products; we had to demand that our output be respected in these “rising economies” of the “developing world” so that we did not simply outsource all of our industry to them and become dominated that way (this was the model that people thought Japan was using in the 1980s to win its WW2 objectives). Now that Trump has gotten America out of this corrupt gig, Europe slowly has come to realize that it has placed itself at a double disadvantage, and until it corrects this, will see its sales numbers fall. If anyone gets any degree of intelligence, or at least gets close to what Trump and Xi Jinping know, they will realize that we are in a new industrial race: the competition to achieve total self-sufficiency. Whichever nation manages to produce everything it needs and still have a working economy will be the winner; this means that the West will lose the two-thirds of its budgets that go to entitlements programs, find substitutes for rare elements, and trim down its workforce radically so that we can all be secure from foreign intervention and the utter financial destruction that is coming to those nations stupid enough to rely on international trade.
The dummies are at it again. “AT&T promised to add more jobs if they got a tax cut, but now that the tax cut is here, they are actually firing people!” Correct: they are eliminating union jobs because unions are parasites. American business suffered under eight years of Obama and two previous recessions, and so their first goal is to make themselves stable. Unions make American labor non-competitive by raising costs and offer nothing in response, so American industry is doing its best to automate and offshore in order to get away from the parasitic unions. Somehow these “journalists” never dig this deeply.
Teachers are upset that they will face consequences if they preach Leftist dogma in Sex Ed classes. This is why you cannot partially reverse the beast, but must rip Leftism out by the roots: to get a B+ on this assignment, remove Sex Ed from schools and let the parents teach it; to get an A+, remove public education entirely because whoever is in power will use it as a propaganda organ. It is basically subsidized daycare so that women can work, and reducing our workforce at this point — thus forcing jobs to become more reliant on personal initiative, ability, and responsibility instead of following mindless procedure — would be a benefit for all in the West.
How the world cucks the West: the West is in the grip of individualism, which leads it to strong support an agenda of human rights and civil rights. This means that the West is the dumping ground for the world, since it knows that we maintain artificially higher standards that are unrealistic, so we will always give in and take whatever they send us — in this case, a mentally ill man from Afghanistan — simply to uphold our own pretense of being democratic, egalitarian, and “nice.”
The clever and crafty but moronic leaders of the EU want to become independent of American power so that they can realize their EUSSR dream, and this begins with becoming dependent on Russian oil instead of American oil. America, on the other hand, wants to dominate the oil market in order to starve out other players like the middle east, Russia, and parts of Latin America, since when those groups get money they turn into actual threats to world stability. Petulant, the Europeans decided to resist the Americans, and now have created a huge mess as people slowly realize that this means effective Russian control of Western European economies. Can we admit that Merkel and Juncker are morons yet?
The people who appointed themselves to determine what was “fake news” in fact managed to fake some of the data, making for silly headlines but revealing a grim fact: scientific papers are paid assignments. Someone benefits. “Science” is not inherently objective as a category. It varies with the scientist and who is signing their paychecks or buying their bestsellers.
Black fellow is honest about the nature of diversity; white people, addicted to the pretense of egalitarianism and therefore honor-bound to support diversity, try to rein in this sentiment by censoring it, forgetting how well that worked the last few thousand times. In the meantime, no one in the audience is surprised or cares, because they all realize that this system is entirely doomed anyway and race war is one of the hundreds of failures it will experience, catastrophically, at about the same time. You either have a bug-out bunker with ten years of food and weapons, or you are little people.
The Left is still trying to nickel-and-dime these microscandals into a picture that portrays Trump as corrupt. In reality, what Manafort did was his own business. Trump will eventually return to deflect instead of answering these people, asking the vital question, “What is the relevance of this to my own conduct?” The answer, so far, is nothing.
The revolt against over-taxation — where have we heard that one before? — has correctly surmised that speed limits, like sin taxes, are simply pretexts for taking more money from an already over-taxed population, and so they are sabotaging speed cameras in order to sap the government of its money. If the libertarians and “yellow vests” ever have a meeting of the minds, they will set up an agenda that will defund European governments to the point that they can no longer pursue the egalitarian agenda and will have to default to realism. There is great promise in this.
They have learned from Trump: people cannot make choices until you offer a tangible alternative, such as “let’s do it the way they do it over there.” An ideal choice would be for them to mate their anti-immigration rhetoric with anti-tax ideas, cutting social welfare programs and creating healthy economies instead, then redirecting society away from government and toward organic civilization, or the mosaic of culture, heritage, customs, faith, and values. That way, people have an option other than the “Fifty Shades of Leftism” offered by conservative and liberal parties in the West.
White nationalists are still sticking with the “marches and media attention” model. The Alt Right has moved on to practical organizing at the local level. The media will love this protest, as it will give them a chance to show the lumpy and alienated as the only alternative to obedience, which drives more people toward conformity to our egalitarian-consumerist society. However, the defiance spreads, and people are tending to see these white nationalist marches and then go looking for other nationalists to support instead.
Anatomy of a modern screwup: au pairs are young women hired from Europe to take care of children for affluent families. In exchange for a menial salary, they get room and board and a chance to see the world and complete part of their education by experiencing the real world. Some clever lawyers worked up a lawsuit against several firms that essentially vet and list au pairs, and now those firms will have to pay higher wages and prohibit families from asking their au pairs to do things like clean chicken coops. The end result will be fewer au pairs, because the whole point of them is that they are inexpensive because something other than monetary value is getting traded; usually, they get a nice room in a wealthy neighborhood and a chance to meet successful young men and experience foreign cities. Now, they will get to stay home and work minimum wage jobs in their native lands. This may be a good thing, as in the end it may reduce the “thot patrol” by a few members. The lawyers will get paid handsomely either way.
Orban points out the brutally obvious: Europe is dividing into nationalist states and multicultural states. We are about to see multiculturalism be debunked as thoroughly as Communism.
When we say that history repeats itself, we mean that the same patterns turn up time and again. In America, we learned that the sugar industry bought the science industry in order to demonize fats and make sugars seem acceptable. Now in China, people are discovering yet again that science is not a god; instead, it is a practice carried out unequally by humans, with some doing it well and some poorly, and most in the grey area of mediocrity in between. Even more disturbing, they are all human beings who receive paychecks and possibly book sales, so they have an incentive to come up with headlines that either flatter popular illusions or seem to refute them, provoking outrage. Either way, science is about as “objective” as the output from any large corporation or government, which means that it is manipulative and motivated by a desire for increase in personal power, wealth, and prestige, not some sacred or holy truth shared universally with humanity.