Amerika

You may have noticed of late that just everything — goods, services, public institutions, pop culture — has become low-quality and high-cost, as if corner-cutting was built into the system because it was carrying something on its back. Like the O’Carter economy, the blight of the second O’Clinton term, and FDR’s Great Depression, the O’Bama/O’Biden economy is characterized by this.

At the same time, you may have noticed that people who look like you are now a stranger in the lands civilized by your ancestors. The economy seems dependent on a steady flow of cheap labor, and bound and determined to eliminate what it sees as the obstacle to that, which is your culture, which everyone secretly knows is tied to the genetics of your ancestors.

One major problem we have on the Right is that we have become so alienated and addicted to the stimulation of social media and videos that no one bothers to look into how things actually work. Instead, they want a nice easy answer which boils down to religious thinking about good and evil, instead of looking at how the decisions by the voters have led us here.

Let us state from the start that, per the theory of Crowdism, our battle is not between good and evil but between individualistic thought and realistic thought, which the former being chaotic and emotional, and the latter by grounding itself in the external world, freeing us up to explore our own inner worlds.

In Crowdism, the audience modifies the product, and the audience per the DKE and Bell Curve wants easy emotional answers that involve someone else doing something, paying for it, and cleaning up. People see government as a service and want free stuff that someone else pays for.

This provides them with a particular weapon, namely that if they can force another group to pay for them, they drain the resources of that group and kill it off for the benefit of their own group. Government is a weapon of genocide, and in a diverse society, every group is trying to exterminate the host group, so they vote to take their money.

Although doing research is inimcal to Right-wingers on social media and the video needle, it helps to do some background research. First, it helps to know that our economic system is a mixed economy that uses a capitalist engine to drive a socialist policy:

Mixed Economy: in economics, a market system of resource allocation, commerce, and trade in which free markets coexist with government intervention. A mixed economy may emerge when a government intervenes to disrupt free markets by introducing state-owned enterprises (such as public health or education systems), regulations, subsidies, tariffs, and tax policies. Alternatively, a mixed economy can emerge when a socialist government makes exceptions to the rule of state ownership to capture economic benefits from private ownership and free market incentives.

In other words, instead of a centrally controlled economy as in Soviet Russia, we let free markets generate the wealth and then tax them. The problem here is that they then adapt to this expense and simultaneously take advantage of the wealth the government redistributes, which gives us a mostly-centrally controlled economy.

The average job in America now is government-created, mostly indirectly through regulations, taxes, legal protections for unions, minimum wages, civil rights laws, and affirmative action.

Since 1789, goal #1 of all governments has been to avoid the heckler’s veto of revolutions and mass uprisings like in the 1960s. These threaten to overthrow governments, so if government is your day job — this is a bad idea to ever have in your country — your first goal is to avoid the big screwups.

Consequently, governments buy off their citizens so that complaints never reach a crucial level. If someone is starving, there is a program to hand out money. If someone is upset that their ethnic group is not getting ahead, there are programs for that, too! Drunk driving, abused mothers, drug users, farm subsidies, union protection, and affirmative action are all the same.

When government gives out lots of money, it switches to a demand-side economics model because it has made the economy dependent on those government handouts and regulations:

Keynesian economists believe that the primary factor driving economic activity and short-term fluctuations is the demand for goods and services. The theory is sometimes called demand-side economics.

This perspective is at odds with classical economic theory, or supply-side economics, which states that the production of goods or services, or supply, is of primary importance in economic growth.

One of the core characteristics of Keynesian economics or demand-side economics is the emphasis on aggregate demand. Aggregate demand is composed of four elements: consumption of goods and services; investment by industry in capital goods; government spending on public goods and services; and net exports.

Under the demand-side model, Keynes advocated for government intervention to help overcome low aggregate demand in the short term, such as during a recession or depression. This could reduce unemployment and stimulate economic growth.

Any money taken out of the system affects the system, and it adapts by cutting corners and raising prices, so the more you tax so you can give out free stuff, the more expensive everything gets and the lower its quality falls. They call it “inflation,” but really it is a loss of value for the currency because increasing demand requires reducing barriers to acquiring the currency.

One of those barriers is production. Government wants to find people who are quasi-criminal and will waste the money it gives them because this creates economic stimulus, pumping up the GDP, and giving government more money to tax, even if that money is worth less. Eventually you get a permanent malaise like the O’Carter administration or second O’Clinton term.

Does anyone remember how dark and dismal the economy was around 1998 or so? It was not until George W. Bush bailed us out with a simple tax break that things started to come back. After him, however, we got O’Bama with a few trillion dollars of new government benefits and regulations, and the dark days returned.

When government gives out free stuff, it must necessarily go to a demand-side model because it is actively damaging production. Like the Soviets, it decides to let government control the economy by handing out trillions of dollars, but this slows production, so it becomes addicted to handing out more and more money.

Over time, this means that people stop trying to produce anything and if they do produce it, they make a cheap version because they are already carrying a huge amount of extra costs. For example, affirmative action requires you hire as many minorities as possible, which imposes a massive cost load.

It has become clear that the diversity economy cannot equal the Anglo-Saxon economy in production. But what can government do? If it admits that diversity is failing, it runs the risk of revolution, so it doubles down. Demand-side economies require cheap labor to fill in the hole created by what government takes out of the economy.

Bush, Reagan, and Trump favor a libertarian theory known as “classical economics” or the economics which is not conjectural, but proven through history, and this theory requires a supply-side economics model:

The theory of supply-side economics maintains that increasing the supply of goods and services is the engine of economic growth. Additionally, it advocates tax cuts as a way to encourage job creation, business expansion, and entrepreneurial activity.

Supply-side economics is sometimes known as Reaganomics for its association with the former president. Reagan and his Republican contemporaries popularized the controversial idea that tax cuts for wealthy investors and businesses give them incentives to save and invest, producing economic benefits that trickle down into the overall economy.

This is the single big distinction: a pure Keynesian believes that consumers and their demand for goods and services are key economic drivers. In contrast, a supply-sider believes that producers and their willingness to create goods and services set the pace of economic growth.

To get to supply-side economics, you cut the taxes, regulations, and civil rights and start rewarding productivity. This differs from the demand-side model, which rewards people using the currency for random economic activity, and therefore needs low interest rates, lots of free stuff, and lots of rules to keep creating fake jobs to pump up the GDP.

At this point, the entire American economic is a Works Progress Administration style program with a protected group of non-Whites that it hires as cheap labor to keep the economy afloat despite the staggering burden of government-imposed costs. This penalizes production, so we get less of it; reversing this makes the currency more valuable.

Voters do not understand how they can have lower numbers of dollars but have those dollars buy more, but that is exactly what a supply-side economy does. No one on the Right — the journalists, essayists, influencers, vloggers, etc. — seems to understand this principle.

How does this lead to White Genocide? In order to keep the demand-side economy going, government needs warm bodies, but these displace the native population that would otherwise take those jobs, but now cannot compete with people who work for low wages, live ten to an apartment, and fund their food budget with government aid.

In addition, government finds it has a permanent support base in these foreign workers. They will vote for one thing only: more money taken from the host population and given to them. They are permanent Democrat voters, and they will vote for full socialism if given the option, as in NYC.

Any protected group qualifies: ethnic minorities, transsexuals, White and Huwhite women, poor people. All of them vote for theft because it is the only model they understand.

White Genocide arrives because government, through giving out free stuff, has dug itself into a hole that can only be resolved by importing third-world labor to keep the system afloat, while White and Huwhite people labor at moronic office jobs that can be easily replaced.

Through this example, we see that everything in life is a market, and most of those markets do not involve cash. Democracy, for example, is a market for pleasant warm feelings portrayed as policy. Whoever makes people feel warm and happy gets the votes and the power. Culture is a market. Even popular entertainment is a marketplace of ideas.

Fundamentally, our White Genocide problem in the West comes from Keynesianism, which does not work, and therefore requires importing foreign labor to fill the hole. If the White population gets genocided, that is of secondary concern to government, which is fulfilling job #1 of not having any revolutions or social upheaval, and everything else is far less important to it.

Tags: capitalism, crowdism, demand, demand-side economics, socialism, supply, supply-side economics