Amerika

Furthest Right

Heads or Tails: A Seventy-Fifth Anniversary in Cultural Pathology, “Art Rock”-Style

Under certain conditions, the ability to survive discredits the person who did. — Nicolás Gómez Dávila

(*) Eighty years ago, Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich attacked and occupied its tiny neighbour the Netherlands, the author’s home nation. The unprovoked German sneak attack, breaking Germany’s pledges and assurances of good-neighbourly intent, forced the country to abandon its long-standing tradition of neutrality and fight the Second World War alongside the Allies. Hopelessly outmatched, Dutch armed resistance was swiftly and brutally crushed by the German war-machine – the following five-year long the German occupation brought large-scale deportations, forced labour laws, economic exploitation, mass starvation and massive infrastructure damage. As a direct result of the war, the Netherlands lost its East Indies colonial empire as well as its ability to conduct an independent foreign policy – it was basically reduced to a third-rate power and a minor vassal of the victorious United States. To the Dutch people, the name of Germany’s unscrupulous war-time leader, Adolf Hitler, who had signed off on Germany’s breach of Dutch neutrality and who was (held) responsible for the many outrages of the German occupation, became the by-word for all that was evil and corrupt in the world. Today, it is 75 years ago that he committed suicide during the last agony of the Third Reich – a moment celebrated in a world that would henceforth be dominated by his archenemies. History is written by the victor – the winner takes it all. In any case, to the Dutch people, Adolf Hitler still represents the archetype of ‘the enemy’ – it will most likely remain thus for always. Other nations will have their own – better or worse – reasons to regard him thus. It is said that ‘even enemies can show respect’, but with regard to Adolf Hitler this remains a quite tall order. Even so, if we cannot do that – and we cannot make heads of tails out of this enemy – then, at least, we can remind ourselves of something that is too easily forgotten after a particularly effeminate eighty years of peace: that war is war. Time to move on.

One late morning, on some ordinary week day in the fall of 2018, an ‘Archaeo-Futurism’ moment occurred in the largest space of Holland’s largest city: the great hall of Rotterdam Central Station. This surreal moment came and went in an instant, barely noticed by anybody at all in the great mad crowd of that multicultural vortex. Frantic commuters, newly-arrived tourists, heavily-packed asylum-seekers and well-trained pickpockets have other things to do than to study the shifting advertisement screens high above. But no meditative ‘freezing at the epicentre’ of that great maelstrom was necessary for a significant Archaeo-Futurist moment to imprint itself on the mind. There, across one of the great advertisement screens the mind-boggling ten-second message came: Adolf Hitler has reached second place in the best-selling book listing of one of the nation’s prime print vendors. Commercial interests have finally overridden the nation’s two generation book banning – Mein Kampf, obviously critically annotated in perfect ‘polcor’ jargon, is now available in mass print for those parts of public still able to read and still willing to pay for paper. Obviously, the real Archaeo-Futurist counter-epiphany was this: that Hitler’s long-feared message was now no longer deemed dangerous. In other words: in the estimate of the rulers, the ruled are now deemed to have been ‘dumbed down’ to such degree, that no word and no message can now ever penetrate their ‘idiocratic’ preconditioning. In a word: Hitler had become safe.

In Cultural-Nihilist public discourse the ‘Hitler phenomenon’ has now taken on a mythical life of its own, totally separated from its original cultural-historical context: a caricature mythology has now ‘fixed’ and ‘framed’ it at an ontologically indisputable level. Within this frame, any attempt at reaching something approaching ‘scientific objectivity’, as defined by the now utterly anachronistic 20th Century Western academic discipline of History, is doomed to fail immediately and abysmally. The last such attempt, limited to the technical reconstruction of Hitler’s function as a warlord, was made by British historian David Irving in 1977: the cacophonous controversy that followed it effectively cost the writer his professional career and his personal reputation. Irving’s work is now relegated to that sphere of inquiry and debate that can perhaps best be described as the contemporary equivalent of medieval ‘demonology’ – the sphere to which the ‘Hitler phenomenon’ has been definitively relegated since the passing of its last living witnesses. Since then, political vigilance and book bannings regarding the ‘Hitler phenomenon’ have basically become redundant – as proven by the ‘Rotterdam Central Station moment’. Depending on one’s point of view, the contemporary ‘reading public’ may be said to have either risen above or fallen below the ‘cognitive vulnerability point’ that was guarded by censorship for two generations. Thus, Hitler’s 130th birthday recently passed without any historical reassessment: what is the subject of demonology cannot be the subject of history – and vice versa. Thus, the most that Archaeo-Futurism can now achieve is to give a mythological reassessment of the ‘Hitler phenomenon’. Even from this angle, however, the cultural access points necessary for such a reassessment are few and far between.

The last straight reference made to Hitler’s mythical status by a European artist of stature dates to 7 May 1945 – one week after Hitler’s death and one day before Germany’s unconditional surrender at the end of the Second World War in Europe. The short obituary written by Norwegian Nobel Prize writer Knut Hamsun — who had actually disastrously ‘fallen out’ with Hitler after his confrontational meeting with him 1943 — earned him (among other statements) a treason trial and public disgrace. This is the English translation of the obituary he wrote for Aftenposten:

Adolf Hitler – I am not worthy to speak up for Adolf Hitler, and to any sentimental rousing his life and deeds do not invite. Hitler was a warrior, a warrior for humankind and a preacher of the gospel of justice for all nations. He was a reforming character of the highest order, and his historical fate was that he functioned in a time of unequalled brutality, which in the end felled him. Thus may the ordinary Western European look at Adolf Hitler. And we, his close followers, bow our heads at his death. — Knut Hamsun

Since that last straight ‘mainstream’ reference, only a few crooked ‘artistic’ Hitler-references have been made by European creators of stature. Perhaps the most significant of these can be dated to 16 October 1989, a little over three weeks before the Fall of the Berlin Wall, when ‘Faerie Queene’ Kate Bush (cf. Solère, ‘Kate Bush’) released a studio album that included a strange Hitler-referencing song: ‘Heads We’re Dancing’. Obviously, the rarefied atmosphere that ‘latter-day witch’ Kate Bush conjures up in her artistic concoctions defies any definitive classification – as befitting any creation of feminine genius. Thus, ‘Heads We’re Dancing’ can only be analytically dissected at the ‘flat level’ of simple dramatic structure. This is the song text as she included it in her album ‘The Sensual World’:

 

Timeline: Lyrics:

BINARIES

Dramatic Arc:

BINARIES

1919 Diktat – PLUS Character:
1933 You talked me into the game of chance

ACTION

(1) Protasis

plot line

1939 It was thirty-nine before the music started

When you walked up to me and you said

Hey, heads we dance

Well I didn’t know who you were

(2) Epistasis

trial

seduction

♀ PASSIVE

  Until I saw the morning paper

There was a picture of you

A picture of you ‘cross the front page

It looked just like you, just like you in every way

(3) Catastasis

climax

PUBLIC

(IMAGE)

  But it couldn’t be true

It couldn’t be true

You stepped out of a stranger

(4) Catastrophe

unravelling

disavowal

1945 Stunde Null – ZERO Chorus:
  They say that the Devil is a charming man

RE-ACTION

(1) Protasis

plot line

  And just like you I bet he can dance

And he is coming up behind in his long

Tailed black coat dance

All tails in the air

(2) Epistasis

trial

seduction

♂ ACTIVE

  But the penny landed with its head dancing

A picture of you, a picture of you in uniform

Standing with your head held high

Hot down to the floor

(3) Catastasis

climax

PRIVATE

(FEELING)

  But it couldn’t be you

It couldn’t be you

It’s a picture of Hitler

(4) Catastrophe

unravelling

disavowal

1990 Tag der deutschen Einheit – MINUS Exeunt

 

When I get to the bottom, I go back to the top of the slide

– Paul McCartney

 

* 30 April 2020 15h30 PM *

 

Tags: , ,

|
Share on FacebookShare on RedditTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn