Having standards is racist. When you have standards, fewer diverse people show up, which means that standards must be racist, instead of that diverse people have different cultures which value different things than your standards.
DEI is driven by the same contrarian careerism that creates much of the bad science out there: people want to participate in a trend, but have to do so in some way that seems unique, novel, and exciting to their audience. Consequently they always double down on the dominant trend, even when it takes them to absurd places.
When you let the foreign into your lands, it buys your politicians, and then in turn command your intelligence agencies to appease rather than provide solid intelligence.
Scientists observe that wealthy cities tend to be popularity-focused and therefore tend toward Utopian absolutes like diversity, and infer from this that diversity is the cause of their prosperity, when in fact the relationship is the other way around. Bonus: they talk about restaurants.
When international politics exists within your country, you suffer for all of its extremes as well.
Giving diversity legal representation merely weaponizes it because minority groups can either conquer or be conquered, and anyone sane chooses the former option.
Academics cannot resist a trend because it gives them relevance and thus importance, leading to a sense of power. Really they are careerists trying to one-up one another to grab headlines and get advancement in their fields.
Even the normiecons are starting to notice the ongoing genocide.
Foreign populations have been tolerated rather than wanted for centuries.
As diversity craters, those who justify their importance because of it agitate for more of it.
More minority privilege from those afraid of looking “racist” and who want to make their careers rise by being cute and following a trend.
Backdoor gun control in the name of diversity.
When a society goes down the egalitarian rabbit hole, it has nothing but fetishes and trends remaining.
People have opinions. We either accept this or
You ever wonder if everything Leftists do is projection, blaming others for what they are doing while claiming to be doing the opposite? Joe talks tough on China, too.
Relax standards, add subsidies, and fire up the propaganda machine. But is this serving anyone well, least of all the people who are on the receiving end of this science?
They send your kids to multiracial public schools, but send their kids to whitish private schools. Rules for thee, not for me. Old story, very sad.
Marketers cash in on social trends. A few people can agitate a sad situation into a pathological denial of that sadness masked by aggression and false cheer. Then the companies like livestock follow along.
Wherever diversity goes, some group ends up on top because as a foreign import, it is solely focused on wealth and not on normal life like everyone else.
People like to live, work, marry, and transact with those like them.
This is a typical peer bullying situation. Everyone is afraid of being tagged as a Hitler and then invaded by everyone else, so they all pursue nonsensical political programs in order to pacify the other parties. Peer pressure means eliminating nonconformists not because they are wrong, but because they are right and that threatens the majority of the participants.
Diversity does not work anywhere, in any form, with any ingredients.
The witch hunters were obsessed by superstitions… we have replaced them with ideological superstitions and neurosis.
Fear and trembling as democracy fails and new things rise to take its place.
No fantasy is too absurd for the egalitarians. Blacks and Asians had zero to do with the creation of Britain.
People complain about the problems of diversity and this causes conflict, but no one can mention any benefits of diversity except restaurants.
They rewrite history to justify their programs that are failing in the present.
You are in a society designed for another group; this is the main barrier.
Christians love Israel because they believe it is where The Ratpure will start.
They want to “retcon” diversity into history, when history shows us that the lack of diversity was what made us great.
Law firms like having diversity candidates in order to preemptively defend against discrimination suits, which otherwise shake them down for billions every year. Remember Ellen Pao.
They have downgraded Christine Blasey-Ford style attacks from requiring rape to merely requiring “misogyny,” making woman-criticism on par with ethnic criticism as taboo that will destroy your life.
Under political pressure, businesses are adding random minorities to their boards, just like they have been hiring random minorities under affirmative action for decades.
The guiltgrift continues. Sane people have a Darwinian morality, where the insane choose humanistic. Not every human is good and useful; guilt is useless. Fix the situation by ending diversity through reparations-with-repatriation.
Diversity fails in every form.
Another diversity conflict lights off.
Leftism operates by sabotage: set up a situation so that it will fail, and then use that failure as an excuse to argue for what you really want, namely more subsidies.