Posts Tagged ‘monkey dynamics’

Moral Preening Could Splinter The Alt Right

Tuesday, November 1st, 2016


There is a spectre haunting the alt right – the spectre of Moral Preening.

The term describes those who mistake their acceptance of the taboo for proof of their superiority, and as a result feel a need to smash down any others who don’t immediately accept their gnosis. Following this are the constant “purity spirals,” endemic to alt right discourse, where each party tries to be more true to an arbitrary ideological standard than the other, which creates constant infighting, concern trolling and pretense which renders alt right dialogue into impotent babble. If impotence is what you seek, you can go back to the Tea Party right now.

Those who moral preen might at first seem to be autistic, lacking the ability to process social rules without a legalistic framework or categorical flowchart unlike a neurotypical adult. As if in a bad episode of Star Trek, they will spill gallons of ink trying to solve a moral conundrum that a half-wit could solve successfully in a moment. But another possibility, specifically with the high functioning offenders, is that they have spent so much time reading alt right blogs and trolling Twitter, Facebook, and mainstream media comments sections that their baseline perception of reality is no longer calibrated properly.

At the root, moral preening is a high-level manifestation of a typical human behavior. Going back to our simian days it is most commonly seen in the phenomenon of “keeping up with the Joneses”: if your friend buys a smartphone, you do also, but it is important that yours have better specs. That way, you win! The same is seen in yard-of-the-month competitions, how SJWs use sophistry to pervert reality for their sociology program, and people who measure their life’s value in terms of number of Facebook friends. Preening has been with us since we were monkeys.

Unlike buying the latest increasingly dysfunctional Apple product, moral preening on the alt right shares a common vector: recognition of racial differences (the “Jewish Question” is an overlapping subset). Most of our population is programmed to avoid any acknowledgement of distinctions between the races in terms of ability, so the person who acknowledges them will suddenly be convinced that they have walked out of Plato’s cave and have seen the face of God.

This leads to hubris, and what started out as recognizing reality collapses back into wishful thinking, with an upcoming crash into a brickwall of reality, provided by the Nemesis Bricklaying Company. The problem is that, like a monkey who has found a shiny object to put on his head, they think that the power of this truth should color the rest of their personality, ideas and often-failing lives. A fact is made an idol, which turns it into a lie. The alt righter becomes as narrow minded as the libertarian, just switching out a dogmatic devotion to Austrian economics with an obsessive compulsion regarding racial hygiene (which then replaces ethno-nationalism).

Recognizing racial differences is not a Copernican revolution. I became aware of racial differences in high school because I did not have the luxury of growing up in a whitetopia where believing in multiculturalism was a live option. When daily experience demonstrates the implications of evolution and statistics on racial differences, the empirically-minded simply acknowledge its truth, much as they do with anything else that’s covered under Steve Sailer’s “War on Noticing.”

The problem is that, in order to weaponize their insights, the moral preeners frame the recognition of racial realities in moralistic language. The moral aspect allows them to transfer the observation from the empirical to a question of their own personal value in making a “better” choice.

This is arguing Ford versus Chevy, which always devolves into a battle of personalities, and not a question as to the merits of the actual vehicles, no matter how many specs decorate the flame wars on a message board. This resembles the trivial choice between the Democrat versus the Republican. Once the moralistic is brought into any discussion, it ceases to be a question of facts, and becomes a contest of will to power. The moral preener wants power, not truth.

Differences in race, sex, caste and ethnic group are not moral observations. They are realistic ones. They have no relationship to God, human social patterns, or a war between the angels. They are simply the reality-driven thoughts of animals attempting to adapt to their environment by understanding each of its parts. We seek optimal behavior like any other animal. If you are not prepared, on some level, to change your mind about race if presented with new data, you have abandoned realistic skepticism, and just invented a new Sunday School story for yourself.

Recognizing this allows us to see through the moral preening of some hangers-on, including some prominent and successful ones, within the alt right. The sane people are thinking about reality, and for them racial differences are as vital as knowing which plants you can eat and which ones poison you. The people who use racial recognition as some type of badge of moral honor are infected with the same disease of unrealistic thinking as the rest of this collapsing civilization.

The important point we can take away from this is that moral preening is a failure that all men a in danger of falling into. We feel contempt when we see the typical leftist engage in moral preening by denying reality, but no virtue is found in moral preening when our goal is instead grasping reality. Ideas that conform to reality are not shiny trinkets to dazzle the other monkeys in your troop with, but tools for navigating a hard, cold, inhuman, and uncompromising reality.

Monkey Dynamics

Monday, September 12th, 2016

Monkey Dynamics

Throughout human history, one constant has appeared in all ages: the temptation to give in to evil.

The root of evil originates in individualism, or the desire for the individual to be more important than the order of reality. In the classic view, all of reality is a hierarchy, with the divine at the top and the rest arrayed below, and everything has a place like in an ecosystem, assuring balance and harmony with a constant inner struggle that produces people and things of quality, much like Darwinism or martial competitions.

We might refer to that abstract natural order as the plan. It includes the bigger picture: the civilization, the structure of existence, the goal, ideals of integrity and conquest, morality and nature.

All people at all times contain the tendency to desire what is evil. They want the individual to be larger than the plan. They fear the plan, because it ranks the individual, and their egos want them to be bigger than they deserve to be.

This fear compels them into a psychology of resentment: they must tear down any that are higher than they are, so that the lower are just as raised as the rest, and therefore no one looks bad for falling short of an ideal. This pathological mental state appears throughout human history as a necessary consequence of individualism, and always justifies it with a form of pacifism, equality, which states that all will be included in the group regardless of how they rank according to standards or questions of contribution.

Humans have called this “evil” through history because it is pathological, which means that it repeats itself obsessively regardless of success or failure. Where most people try something, then step back to see if it worked, the egalitarians repeat their actions with obsessive insect-like reflex action, blindly destroying in their need to assert these ideas as true.

We can see this evil in operation through how it is represented in mythology. The Greeks called it hubris, or a type of arrogance that reflected self-importance above the role of that individual in the plan. In the Bible, the hubris of Adam and Eve in the Garden resulted in their exile from a life of innocence/excellence. When humans try to place themselves above God and God’s order, chaos and horror results.

This extends to the mythical fall of Satan. As an individualist, Satan thought his personal desires were more important than the plan. As a result, he fell from heaven and became king of a different domain, but this was also his punishment: in Hell, all good things are inverted or turned into their opposites.

Then we turn to nature. Hubris can be seen in monkeys as well. A monkey tribe will gang up on any monkey who does not conform to the low standards of behavior of the group, and individual monkeys will frequently challenge the leaders — alphas — of that tribe with provocations. It is human behavior, in microcosm.

The conformity that is being forced is equality, or the rule that everyone must do the same thing, and any who exceed that are seen as a threat to the rest for having raised standards. If standards rise above the mediocre, it will alienate many in the group, and that threatens the feeling of equal inclusion that seems to prevent conflict — again, this is a form of pacifism, or bribing people with acceptance, tolerance and moral relativism in order to avoid friction.

Seen through this lens, evil is more of a mathematical certainty than a mystical force. In any group, a tension will exist between having standards and having universal inclusion, with most people desiring the latter because it creates a guarantee for them personally that they will be accepted. This is why the root of collectivism is individualism, even though it is collectivized as the group demands what each individual in the group desires, much like a union, street gang or lynch mob.

From this comes the great evil of the modern time: the compulsion to dominate the personalities of others. Created from equal parts pathetic need and a mental violence that demands satiation through victimizing others, this predatory mental state demands that nearby personalities be subjugated through social pressure, including humiliation. Like other forms of mind control, this method does not use sci-fi technologies, but simple peer pressure or psychological manipulation through the threat of what others might think.

The typical vampiric predator-parasite of the modern social scene seeks others around him, usually of lower self-confidence, and immediately begins to sow doubt in their minds. He attacks what they believe indirectly, so it does not seem like an assault, and then introduces a plausible but unproven alternative. Now the passive-aggressive begging-the-question attack begins in earnest: if they do not agree, he asks them why they are denying the truth, or the obvious, or some other phrase implying social agreement with what he has said. He then bullies them into accepting his view of reality, all for the simple reason that it makes him feel more powerful, in the absence of real power like the ability to change the failure-bound direction of his society.

Personality parasites appear in abundance because people are given no other mode of power than that which can be had through enforcing the official ideology of the Crowd, which is always egalitarianism, plus a perception of individual exceptionalism. In other words, individuals demand equality because these individuals believe they are exceptional, but must rationalize their lack of influence by believing that they are unrecognized geniuses instead of entirely average. This produces the poisonous and viral state of mind which demands that they compel others to recognize them, validate them and by doing so, recognize them as exceptional; that in turn requires that everyone be pulled down to the level of a faceless mass above which the narcissistic individual believes he can rise.

All of this is illusion. Social recognition is fleeting because the impetus behind social activity is directed toward the individual, so other individuals allow themselves to be dominated in order to achieve the sense of being part of something bigger than themselves, which makes them feel important. Looking at the audience of the average rock concert or political rally, one can see that the audience acts as if they were the ones on stage, even as they acknowledge their presence there for the concentration of social energy triggered by those actually on the stage.

Monkey dynamics persist in all human behaviors, and this tendency toward projection is no exception. It reveals the true struggle of humanity, which is not for any of the various issues that people advance as part of their psychic vampirism, but for sanity. Sanity means a clearing of the mind, and then enforcement of self-discipline, so that one can first adapt to reality, and then select the most optimal means of engineering it so that the best possible results ensue.

Modern people — like any people in a society in its last stages, regardless of technological level — find themselves under constant assault by those who want to dominate them and force them into the reigning narrative. The old saying “misery loves company” applies here: most people are miserable, and wish to drag others down into that misery, to feel better both for having dominated others and having validated their rationalization of their condition as inevitable and necessary. The modern person faces a social order in which most people are outright evil in intent and conceal it behind normalcy, “everyone does it,” and other statements of social endorsement for that evil.

The war for sanity is a quest to discover reality and escape the prison of our minds. The individual mind finds it more convenient to work through other minds, since they share a language, whereas reality is not human in nature and requires application of self-discipline to understand it. This is the nature of the hive-mind, groupthink, the echo chamber, mob-rule and other forms of the Eternal Human Dysfunction: a lonely ego, finding in other egos the ability to deny the world, which is a path of least resistance compared to understanding and finding beauty in reality.

It was for this reason that our ancestors, dating back to our origin, selected from us the best: those who were able to adapt to reality and choose excellence, because that benefited the civilization. The problem is that, over time, making civilization stronger extends that protection to those who cannot understand the importance of civilization and take it for granted, thus immediately begin to conspire against it for their own benefit. They want “anarchy with grocery stores” because that provides the broadest canvas on which to splash their egos, and the unsatisfying result makes them pathologically demand more of the same, like a drug addict who has reached a high level of biological tolerance for her substance of choice and can no longer feel the high.

When power is given to the best, they become a combination of babysitter and war-leader for the rest, giving them direction where they are afraid or incapable of thinking. This will exhaust and destroy them unless the civilization implements some method of filtering out monkey behavior where it can constrained, and exile of those for whom there is no cure.

Western Civilization has been awash in parasitic, resentful and poisonous people for too long. These are perhaps a fifth of our own people, but they have disproportionate influence because they appeal to the lowest behaviors, such as panic, emotional gushing, self-pity, fear and envy. A sane society will protect its leaders by sending its toxic people away to the third world, which is more appropriate for their anti-civilizational mentality.

This is how one fights the evil that threatens to destroy civilization, the loss of which will make all work and hopes of the individual futile and impotent.

What Is The Root Of Human Behavior? Pretense, Posturing And Bragging

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2016

Darwin said we came from monkeys, to use the vernacular paraphrase of his findings, but what he failed to mention is that we are still monkeys — just a complex variety that can talk, do equations, build stuff, drive cars and post on social media.

Monkey behavior seems to rotate around trying to seem more important than one is, so that one can rise in the troupe without having to demonstrate actual ability. Humans are no different: our game is to become socially important without showing actual skills in leadership.

Consider race. Most of our countries are ablaze with fear of terrorism, brutal crime, and social disorder. But the elites? They are camped out in gated communities. To them, “Immigrant problems? What immigrant problems?” is a sensible and logical response, because they face zero of the consequences of these problems.

When it comes to ethnic tension, humans quickly divide into two groups: those who can claim it does not affect them, and those willing to lose a little social cred because they mention that real problems are actually real problems. “It doesn’t bother me” is a way of saying that you are above the problem because you are above those who suffer it. It pushes others down and raises you up.

This is just more of the pretense, posturing and bragging of the human monkey. Christians sometimes call this original sin, or the knowledge that without self-discipline and purpose toward a transcendental goal, we are just talking monkeys with car keys. Such monkeys ignore the actual issue, such as the effects of immigration on civilization, and focus on the non-issue — their own gated community — instead.

When historians look back on this time, the 60% of the population that took over and enslaved or exiled the rest will be seen as a reaction against not just their own government, and not just Leftism, but this entire crazy attitude of ignoring the big picture to focus on the little details that flatter the individual. They will (rightly) see people who behaved that way as mental defectives.

Recommended Reading