The ultimate legacy of SJW Pope Francis


Josef Stalin once famously inquired “How many divisions has the Pope?” He was responding to a growing sense within the CCCP Party elite that papal displeasure would lead to a hiccup in the grand Marxist global conquest. It did at a later date. This was to be long after the long run had ended for Premier Stalin. Donald Trump has essentially offered up a similar inquiry. “Of what validity is a papal fatwa?”

You see, Pope Francis has heard Donald Trump speak out on several issues near and dear to the Pontifex Maximus’ Inner Gramsci. It would appear that His Eminence views The Donald as The Bad, Old Antithesis. According to Pope Francis, those who build walls instead of bridges have not heard the good news. He offers his homilies below.

“Building walls instead of bridges is not Christian; this is not in the Gospel,” the pope said. The pope said he hadn’t heard about Trump’s plan, but took reporters’ word for it, and said he’d give Trump “the benefit of the doubt.” But he added: “I’d just say that this man is not Christian if he said it this way.”

Donald Trump went positively Beast Mode when he picked up the social media joystick to respond.

I think he doesn’t understand the problems our country has,” Trump said. “I don’t think he understands the danger of the open border that we have with Mexico. I think Mexico got him to do it because Mexico wants to keep the border just the way it is because they’re making a fortune and we’re losing.”

This was Trump being nice. He later went to a rally and reached back for full-metal concern-troll on The Pontiff.

“…if and when the Vatican is attacked by ISIS, which everybody knows is ISIS’ ultimate trophy, I can promise you the pope would have only wished and prayed that Donald Trump would have been president.”

So the question for Pope Francis became “What was His Holiness thinking?” You don’t wrestle with pigs unless you like it down in the gritty mud. That’s where The Donald lives*. If you’ve ever played prop in a rugby match against an opponent with absolutely gross personal hygiene, you know what a verbal sparring contest with The Donald is like. So why did Pope Francis so completely disgrace The Holy See?
Well, here goes the explanation of why.

  1. Pope Francis could give a flying Kangaroo-Rat’s Rear-end less about Catholicism. Like any good Gramscian termite, he saw it as an institutional base of power he could subvert, use and help rot. So what if he has to put the clown suit on and say ridiculous things? “Magna cum laude, summa cum laude, the radio’s too loudy.” He’ll put the show on as long as he gets the power and adulation. His hatred and contempt for the poor desperate souls that he flim-flams with his pseudo papacy knows no logical boundary.
  2. Donald Trump is appealing to a certain audience that Pope Francis believes are his. Not in the metaphorical sense, not in the show-biz sense. Pope Francis believes the poor are truly his. He gets to collect them and trade them with his friends like Simon Legree. If Donald Trump were to merely issue mortal threats against the Vatican, Pope Francis couldn’t be bothered. But the Donald threatened Francis’ true concern. The Donald now has to be excommunicated.

So Francis was out of his league with The Donald. The truly cynical man sees Francis for the utter fraud that he is. The Donald has seen every slimy SJW entriest that ever came down the pike and knew his best course of actions was to tell Faux Francis to go blow it out the sanctified cloaca maxima. When Trump publically explained Pope Francis was a disgrace, it was time for Snidely Whiplash to hop back into his Pope Mobile and slink away. A papal Spokesman emerged with the pooper-scooper to do the unenviable media cleanup job.

“In no way was this a personal attack, nor a voting indication,” Lombardi said. At first, Trump responded angrily, calling the pope’s remarks “disgraceful,” and saying no religious leader should question his faith. But Thursday night, he also softened his tone, saying during a CNN town hall that he likes the pope and what he represents. “I don’t think this is a fight,” Trump said. “I think he said something much softer than was originally reported by the media.”

As one talented Twitter smart-aleck put it “What we have here is failure to excommunicate.” This taught me two lessons. One as the newly-minted Nrxer and another as the believing Christian. As an Nrxer, I learned that the true rebel can challenge a phony SJW abusing an unearned title and banish the imposter the way the wielder of blessed crucifix sees off the malignant Nosferatu.

As a believing Christian, the words of St Paul were truly verified.

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. 2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.

In the end Pope Francis is just an SJW fraud. He has no love. As St. Paul so presciently predicted, he is nothing. This is why the crass, hard and cynical Donald Trump just pried him off the bottom of his shoe like a flattened pile of dog turds. Go and do thou likewise with all the SJW frauds that bedevil your existence.

*-Because it’s somewhat cleaner than Atlantic City.

Tags: , , , , ,

11 Responses to “The ultimate legacy of SJW Pope Francis”

  1. J Clivas says:

    Harsh, but well-deserved.

    • The traditional Western European critique of the Vatican was that it was a separate hierarchy that competed with our kings and overrode our social standards. Pope Francis was chosen — democratically, it seems — for his representation of the third world, and he is representing their interests: destroy the Western European races, and replace them with a miscegenated aggregate so that none feel threatened by European excellence.

  2. Dualist says:

    So then, it comes down to me to defend the Holy Father. The problem is, I agree with almost everything you wrote.

    Just how ‘corrupted’ the Church is (or some of it’s Members are, to be Theologically precise) at the highest levels is a vast, thorny problem with many aspects I’m still unsure about, so I’ll leave that aside for now. If only half of the anecdotes I’ve heard about what happens in certain seminaries (and even the Vatican itself) are true, things aren’t looking too good, to say the least.

    But it suffices to say that Pope Francis, like the majority of Church leaders since Vatican II, has swallowed the doctrine of Egalitarianism whole. Yes, Charity is a central part of the Church’s mission. But its true reason for being is much more fundamental: the perfection of souls.

    As Christ reminded us, ‘the poor will always be with us’. This isn’t to be taken in a callous way but the implication is clear – the nourishment of the soul is infinitely more important than the providing of earthly bread.

    It’s sad to admit, but the modern doctrine of Egalitarianism is rooted in the (correct) notion that God WANTS all souls, equally, to rid themselves of Sin ie. imperfection and come to Him. Where the Enlightenment (and the Pope ) went wrong is by applying this doctrine to the world of Man. Because Inequality is an inherent part of Creation: it comes from God. It is Good. As the Angelic Doctor wrote on the subject:

    “Therefore it must be said that as the wisdom of God is the cause of the distinction of things, so the same wisdom is the cause of their inequality…….. Hence in natural things species seem to be arranged in degrees; as the mixed things are more perfect than the elements, and plants than minerals, and animals than plants, and men than other animals; and in each of these one species is more perfect than others. Therefore, as the divine wisdom is the cause of the distinction of things for the sake of the perfection of the universe, so it is the cause of inequality. For the universe would not be perfect if only one grade of goodness were found in things.”

    But these ideas are anathema to the Modern man. This put the Popes in a genuinely difficult position. They know The World, with its demonic Media apparatus, is breathing down the Church’s neck, snarling, desperately trying to invert all morals and Goodness, and always ready to unleash the sneering, sarcastic, bestial mockery that is a feature of the godless.

    I believe (or hope) this is the reason the last pope ‘resigned’, as opposed to something much more sinister: he had become a liability, the media had threw enough mud to stick. It reached the stage when every time a lefty comedian mentioned his name, the word ‘Nazi’, ‘abuse’ or ‘Hitler Youth’ followed it. The minds of people outside the Church were being poisoned against it, so another Pope was selected that was more ‘acceptable’ to the Left, in the vain hope that the attacks would cease, and maybe more people would come back into the fold.

    We can only hope all of Francis’ SJW ‘aggiornamento’ is merely a deception tactic against the snares of the World, as opposed to any ‘Inner Gramsci’ (and, if you’re interested, the genitive of Pontifex Maximus is Pontificis Maximi – it’s one of those nasty Third Declension nouns) and that his real views are better expressed in the following video, when he finally told the leaders of ‘Cosa Nostra’ and Camorra that they were, de facto, excommunicated and would end up in Hell if they didn’t repent:

    But, sadly, I’m not sure this is the case. The Church has been forgetting its true Mission for the past 50 years. Making a deal with the devil never turns out well. As you mentioned, Charity without Love is nothing. This is why socialism, which on the surface seems so similar to Christianity, always leads to degeneration and evil. All the changes forced through with Vatican II (such as having the Mass in the vernacular, with lay people placing the Most Holy Eucharist directly onto the hands of the Faithful) have had one, main effect: the churches are empty.

    We can only hope the next Pope has more courage and instead of trying to appease the Left (which is impossible – their hatred of Goodness is infernal), restarts the Church’s Mission. If this doesn’t happen, it appears that certain prophesies are going to be fulfilled in our lifetimes….

    • JPW says:

      Freakin’ 3rd Declension…Dammit Man!

      • Dualist says:

        Yes mate, it’s a bugger. The vocab would be considerably easier to learn if it wasn’t for the irregularities of the accursed, dreaded Third Declension. You just gotta learn ’em, no other option.

        And the penny’s just dropped! You’re into rugby. I thought that name was familiar! Nice one. It’s really cool an American is into the game, how did you get into it man? I’ve now ‘retired’ from Rugby League, probably for good, played wing. Check out some matches on youtube. See if your mates fancy having a little game of League – you’d love it mate! Bit of the ol’ ultra violence, it’s great! Just imagine the other team are all liberals who write for The Guardian, that’s the ticket. Get it out of your system. Brilliant.

        But yes, League’s the only game to play up North. My grandad played pro for Salford and one of my uncles played for Wigan. League has always been professional, unlike Union (which was always seen as more of the gentleman’s game, socially) and is played in only about 10 working-class Northern towns. We used to still play in Winter when I was younger (in the snow on the moors was grim) but it’s been changed to Summer now.

        And yes, the hygiene wasn’t great, at times. I don’t think, some of the lads I’ve played in some of the most backward, bleak places like Saddleworth even had baths in their houses! When I was really young I used to play 2nd row, and later Loose Forward. And I think some of those Props were still in nappies, judging from the smell!

  3. Antichrist says:

    Christianity is dead and should be buried once and for all. The most common and inane incentive from these Christian Authorities can be summed up as: “as long as the Other is of Christian faith they have a free pass.” Like all inclusive religions it has no other purpose to propagate itself through whichever means possible.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>