Don’t “adapt”

hms_beagle

That something is true or good does not mean its opposite is false or bad. Humility is good and so is pride. Being adaptable is good and so is being steadfast or resolute.

Today, the concept of adaptation is well-spoken for. However, the opposite, steadfastness or resoluteness, is just as vital. In fact, given the context of the here and now, I believe it is much more vital. If you think about it, the words ‘steadfast’ or ‘resolute,’ are not words we hear often. I actually had trouble thinking of what the opposite of adaptation is. I believe that says something about the social environment we have created for ourselves. Steadfastness, resoluteness, and faith have become slandered as stubborn, obstinate, and lazy. We have become carried away with adaptation and change.

I’ll never forget when they explained in middle school why we had to learn a foreign language. I had no interest in learning a foreign language. But this will look good on a resume. There were going to be a lot more Mexicans in our future and communicating with them was an opportunity we wouldn’t want to miss. We could all be translators, apparently. Imagine a world full of translators. It would be like a commercial for Apple products come to life.

If I was an evil genius, and I wanted to manipulate someone, demoralize them, and keep them malleable, I would constantly be shifting their environment and landscape, so that they constantly had to adapt to it. They could never relax or get comfortable. They could never master a skill or body of knowledge deeply. They would have to dance to my tune. If they objected, I would claim that they were stubborn, they were going to be left behind, this is the future, adapt or die.

The rhetoric of adaptation is often nothing more than manipulation. He who adapts to the other is weak, he who forces the other to adapt is strong. A translator only has a job because someone more important than them has something interesting to say.

I think people give in to adaptation because not adapting is the bigger gamble. They can’t wait that long and they crack under the pressure. They now spread the word of adaptation so that others will join them and so they don’t have to second guess themselves that maybe they gave in too soon.

When we tell people to adapt, we are not telling people to adapt to reality. In fact, we insult reality when our best advice to each other is to adapt to our own man-made social environments. Biology and millennia of evolution have already adapted us to reality in the most important sense of reality, the work has been done for us, and there’s hardly any way we could improve upon it.

I suppose it is all a matter of strategy. A good coach will have two strategies, the long term strategy, and the short term strategy. The short term should be flexible, like a coach making adjustments at half time; it can “adapt.” But it is absolutely a mistaken strategy to easily lose faith, and constantly change and “adapt” at the drop of a hat. That is exactly what your opponent wants you to do; you are putty in their hands at that point. They are leading the discourse, not you. You don’t game plan for an entire week only to throw it out the window at the first sign of a hiccup. It makes you the weaker party.

We should not teach people to get with the program; we should teach them to understand how reality works fundamentally. One word can be translated into many languages, but the meaning of the word is always the same. This “sameness” is what reality truly is.

Understand those aspects of communication that are universal, not the mechanics, but the meaning behind the language. Adaptation is like translation, it has its use, but the real substance of reality is not moved by it. We should encourage our children to write the masterpiece that must be translated, not to be the translator of someone else’s masterpiece. While everyone else is adapting in a panic, he who does not adapt, stands out from the crowd and signals confidence and strength.

12 Comments

  1. steve says:

    They tell you to adapt, which means to tolerate, conform, and propagate, a constantly changing ideology disconnected from reality.

  2. Adapt&Die says:

    Awesome post. I have one small matter to add. At the end you spoke of not adapting and standing out, I have found this not to be so. You will stand out of course, but usually the adapters will roll right over you. You’ll be left penniless and with little recourse and resource. It’s still better than adapting, but there you’ll be nevertheless.

    I’ve found that most people self-identifying as “conservative” tend to be the first to ‘adapt’ to any and all nuttyiness. They adapt first and best. And they are usually proud of it while simultaneously cursing their “liberal” society. I don’t think they pick up on the irony.

    1. Ted Swanson says:

      Tell the adapters to bring it on! This is my game. I roll the nickels. I deal the cards.

    2. Wayne Earl says:

      For the most part, the labels ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’ are identical – they are defined as being which ever fantasy one pretends to hold which creates enough cognitive dissodence to allow any selfish rationalization to want to have be true. Ive often been accused of being a conservative – this is the biggest insult, because i see very very little worth conserving.

      Remember kids: its only porkbarrel when you dont get your own hamhock from other peoples money.

      1. MeToo says:

        I notice that some folks fly into a rage when someone says that there is not much worth conserving (as I have a tendency to do). What the heck…

        1. I notice that some folks fly into a rage when someone says that there is not much worth conserving (as I have a tendency to do).

          The question is what we’re conserving. If we see a thousand years of decline, and at least 5000 years before that of tradition, we see how hard-fought every element of good in society today has been. Furthermore, the “throw it out and start again” is generally a leftist idea; the rightist idea is to simply throw out what’s defective, and even if you’re left with 10% remaining, you build outward from that.

  3. Karolis says:

    When your country is using the most widely used language , I guess you do not have to adapt to any other language, but when you are from a land that has 3 million people and a unique language that no one else speak apart from us – matters are different , and I do not believe it is a sign of weakness

    1. Ted Swanson says:

      The guest must adapt to the host.

      1. Ted Swanson says:

        which is not weakness, but proper behavior, gratitude.

  4. Doug says:

    Another great article. Generally speaking there is currently an inverse relationship between one’s popularity and soundness of mind. Sure they are witty people but the most well liked at the office or club invariably are going to exhibit the highest levels of capitulation and delusion (I am witnessing this horror first hand in my own family). Those darned rigid spines and wide open eyes of the lesser liked provide them with a sanity that, regardless of any endearing personality, ensures their relative ostracization via “sanity envy” precipitated from the crowd.

    The crowd’s gut-level seething hate is almost always a benchmark of success. And though the effect of this hate may at times feel more like a tornado, it’s in fact a pat on the back from mother nature and should only strengthen fortitude.

    In response to Adapt&Die, the three words that I live by are: camouflage, emulate and infiltrate (actually I just came up with that just now).

    1. MeToo says:

      Camouflage/emulate/infiltrate. Er…I think that’s called taqiyya. We should’ve learned that ages ago; we wouldn’t be in this 4-star mess.

      Re your first para. Yes, indeed. It’s an ominous sign when everyone says you’re “nice”. But let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water. Sometimes it pays to be nice ‘n’ amiable. Like everything else, it’s the wisdom to know when to apply it and when not to.

      1. Sometimes it pays to be nice ‘n’ amiable. Like everything else, it’s the wisdom to know when to apply it and when not to.

        The original idea of politeness was a way of being amiable while telling difficult truths.

        It has taken over the content and become a way of restricting difficult truths from being said.

Leave a Reply

39 queries. 0.354 seconds