People are fond of saying, “We never voted for this!”
Like most easy answers, this is a lie. What they mean to say is that they did not vote for this outcome, but they voted for the things that made it necessary.
Consider replacement migration:
Although fertility may rebound in the coming decades, few believe that fertility in most
developed countries will recover sufficiently to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future,
thus, making population decline inevitable in the absence of replacement migration.The projected population decline and population ageing will have profound and far-reaching
consequences, forcing Governments to reassess many established economic, social and political
policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.For France, United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union, the numbers of migrants
needed to offset population decline are less than or comparable to recent past experience. While
this is also the case for Germany and the Russian Federation, the migration flows in the 1990s
were relatively large due to reunification and dissolution, respectively.
On the surface, it seems like the UN is saying that you should be replaced. Reading more deeply, it says that in order to keep the taxes and social programs running. If you want the stuff you voted for, you need more people, because there are not enough taxpayers as it is.
You voted for the free stuff. You voted for the higher taxes. You wanted a social safety net. This takes half of the wealth out of the economy and routes it through government, making civil servants and bureaucrats wealthy at your expense. But, after all, they are just doing what you voted for.
Democracy is inept because human groups flee from hard questions and go instead for easy illusions. Eventually, it votes itself into socialism, and at that point, the taxes kill off its population and it must replace them with imported substitutes.
You voted for this.
Tags: demographic replacement, replacement migration, white genocide