Amerika

Back in the late 1980s, people started to notice that diversity was backfiring after government shotgunned it down our throats from the 1950s onward. It seems we believed the Communist propaganda that said our republic was illegitimate because of racial discord.

Since that time, a manic push to obey the suggestions of Communist propaganda resulted in numerous Civil Rights acts based on the 14A mandate of “equal protection of the laws,” which always translated into a transfer of wealth, power, and status from the founding WASP population to Southern European, Eastern European, Irish, Levantine, African, Asian, and Arab newcomers.

My criticism at the time was simple: each group has its own folkways and aesthetics because these are wired into its genetics, and to preserve diversity, these groups must be kept separate to avoid interbreeding.

It was clear even then that diversity imported the problems of international politics to the national level. It would mean constant conflict, but more importantly, the erasure of culture: to fit in the behaviors of the newcomers, the founders would have to relax their own standards.

I saw no upside to it despite the “but the food” type commentary and talks about how America was a nation of immigrants. As far as I could tell, America is a nation of pioneers who left rotting European systems to create a new nation, and then voted it away.

At some level, the biggest problem was pollution of the blood: when you mix one thing with another, the original thing disappears and only the hybrid remains. Even tiny traces, a tenth of a percent, of DNA changes radically alter the original.

We could see this in groups like the Irish, Italians, Spanish, Slavs, Jews, and Arabs. Something which was once White had become something else, and certain abilities or inclinations had vanished.

If you ever get a chance, drive from Western Europe into Eastern Europe or Southern Europe. You immediately notice the change before even opening your eyes: the place smells different. When you look, you see it is ramshackle and filthy, disorganized and often dysfunctional.

Correlation is not causation. Do we blame poverty? Or has something else happened? Throughout Southern Europe, for example, corruption is a way of life; people pay bribes the way they pay the water bill in England.

The state institutions are less functional. The jobs, subsidized by massive social benefits, often involve people doing very little over the course of their careers. People sit around, taking coffee breaks, and almost nothing is achieved.

These states essentially exist because they are subsidized by others which enables what little production remains. Their people are wholly dependent on the state. This keeps order to some degree in a chaotic environment, but organized crime flourishes behind the scenes.

You may notice that these societies never agree rise to the level of the past. They are filled with grand buildings slowly rotting away, artifacts that no one could reproduce, and great works of literature from centuries ago that now no one reads.

Clearly even trace admixture — tiny amounts of DNA from foreign populations — complete the decay of a civilization to the point where it will never be great again.

When your author first encountered nationalists, their focus was complaining about other races. Blacks commit a lot of crime, or Muslims cause terrorism, they said. The problem was that we were integrating the wrong foreign groups.

Many were so brainwashed that they wanted to bring in Orientals, because those are the “model minority” and would not cause problems, or took Eastern European wives. That has calmed down because all of those marriages ended in chaos and theft through no-fault divorce law.

It turns out that the best civilization is formed of people genetically like you, since you will then see the world through the same filters formed of similar abilities.

The search for the “bad” races misses the point: diversity itself as an institution is genocide. If you have more than one ethnic group in the same place, they erase each other and you are left with an inferior mixed-race population that cannot achieve greatness.

We can switch from the negative critique of diversity — “who are these bad groups who are ruining my diversity Utopia?” — to the positive critique, namely “any form of diversity will kill my group, and I want my group to exist.”

Vast change is coming. We have realized that humanity is dying of too much humanity. We have spent ourselves into debt, destroyed our reproduction, and worst of all, turned everyday life from a joy into a jail sentence.

We are now, instead of demanding crackdowns on Blacks or Jews or whoever, demanding that we have mono-ethnic states with a single ethnic founding group and that all who are not completely genetically of that group must go back to their homelands.

This is at least consistent, and gives us a basis to develop further, since now our orientation is not against-Them but instead pro-Us.

Tags: diversity, Globalism, immigration, internationalism, mono-ethnic, mono-ethnicism, multiculturalism, remigration