Amerika

People across the West are starting to realize that all immigration and diversity means White Replacement. This was always obvious — the “melting pot” means making everyone into a tan human mutt — but never stated because it conflicted with political aims.

Democracy made an alliance with Communism in WW2 and in doing so, validated Communism for its own citizens, although it then fought two wars against it. The Baby Boomers loved Communism because it made them feel powerful against their parents and others more successful than they were, so they continued importing tons of diversity to make it happen.

We will reach the next level when we stop looking at specific diversity groups and look at diversity itself, since diversity fails in all forms (ethnic, racial, religious, cultural).

In the meantime, the first step was taken twenty-four years ago when the writer Michel Houellebecq criticized Islam, got hauled into court, and won because he was attacking an abstraction not a physical group:

The controversial writer Michel Houellebecq was today found not guilty of inciting racism by calling Islam “the stupidest religion”.

A panel of three judges, delivering their verdict to a packed Paris courtroom, acquitted Houellebecq, 45, of the charges of provoking racial hatred in remarks made in an interview with the literary magazine Lire last year.

The charges had been brought by France’s Human Rights League, the Mecca-based World Islamic League and the mosques of Paris and Lyon in a trial reminiscent of Britain’s Salman Rushdie affair.

Bonus: he extended this critique to the rest of the Abrahamic religions, recognizing in metaphysical dualism the basis for a morality of judgment not of consequentialism, or measuring actions by their results (ends-over-means).

Houellebecq, a reclusive writer whose eccentric work and lifestyle are the subject of intense literary and social gossip, argued in his defence last month that criticising a religion did not mean he was insulting its followers. He said all three monotheistic religions — Christianity, Judaism and Islam — were based on scriptures that were “texts of hate”.

Christianity seems closer to self-hatred because it idealizes sacrifice and failure, where the other two are more prone to idealize conquering and real-world effect.

Tags: abrahamism, christianity, islam, judaism, michel houellebecq