Amerika

We only had a chance of understanding Ronald Reagan after the Soviets fell. Instead of a monolithic entity like the Empire in Star Wars, we saw a corrupt, unstable, and crumbling regime which fell apart because socialist theory subsidizes problems instead of fixing them.

We also saw that during the short time in which it was semi-functional, this aggressive parasitic system almost took over the world, at which point it could have enslaved us all with no alternative and ruled in perpetuity like a third-world warlord.

Similarly we are only going to understand Trump when the BRICS hit the bottom of the dustbin of history as they will in due course. South Africa and Brazil are destroyed by diversity; China is wrecked by Communism and its Mongol history; Russia is a diversity ruin trying to find a Eurasian identity; India struggles with its past and may come out okay if it applies population filters.

But in the meantime, this third world posse wants to take over the world, and they are not shy about saying this. They want revenge on the West for rising above and creating the political, economic, legal, and social systems that took over the world.

Trump sees this and also sees that, despite the horrors of Western liberalism, we have built the basis for first-world living. He also sees that no other option will provide that, so we have to view the Western system as a starting point for all future civilization.

To do this, the West has to ditch socialism and diversity. Like the rest of DEADS, these are egalitarian programs designed to subsidize the failing instead of rewarding the creative, productive, and those who maintain vital things.

The future will view Trump as a moderate.

It will understand that his inspiration was Andrew Jackson, who defeated rampaging Amerinds and pushed back against the bureaucracy in order to preserve not just Social Darwinism but freedom to live autonomously, which cannot exist in subsidy systems that tax the independent.

He took a great deal of knowledge from Ronald Reagan, who recognized that the moral and philosophical questions batted around by egghead nerd “intellectuals” were concerned with the form and method of argument, not the outcome of actions.

If we measure the world in the outcome of actions, Communism is unthinkable.

We now realize that diversity is the same way. It is fatal to whatever civilization is foolish enough to undertake it because it is unrealistic, and unrealistic things collide with reality over time, leaving humans as the losers.

When we look back, Trump 1.0 wanted to be reasonable and find compromises, but Trump 2.0 is all about dominance, which is how the system is played when you get a paycheck. He understands O’Bama’s desire for “fundamental transformation,” or wrecking whatever your opposition can use to retake ground.

The reason for his gentler first term is simple: he hasn’t taken a paycheck in decades so he has forgotten normie rules. Normies at jobs know that you have to throw your weight around in order to capture power, then back away and hide the evidence if what you did does not work.

You get promoted at your normie job for having suggestions that seem easy and complete. Hire a different vendor. Make a big rule. Replace all the gadgets of a certain type. These things appeal to the human desire for power because they are easy and seem strong.

In the real world, nothing works that way. Like Communism, you get a brief boost as everyone mobilizes to make the change, but then failure over time because the change does not address the underlying cause of the problem.

For example, normies love equipment and software upgrades as a solution to problems. Clean, easy, fast, and definitive. However, this just shifts whatever problem was cropping up to the limits of the new gear, and the dance begins again.

Similarly normies like Big Rules. If people are mean on social media, make a rule! Never mind that this must be enforced by someone and will be re-interpreted by them in whatever way gives them the most power, including banning competition for money.

Trump looks at this comical normie stuff as amateur hour. He likes to get to the cause of problems which usually is paradoxical motives. Each person wants to accumulate power, so if you give them the chance, they will bend the law or rules to give them more power.

If instead, there are fewer rules and clearer goals, those who can advance us toward those goals get rewarded and everyone else gets filtered out, like in nature.

Normies will not understand this so they will gather in neurotic groups and protest, revolt, and vandalize. This is what they do: for them, every effect is a cause in itself, so you have to act directly on that cause by banning it, subsidizing it, or upgrading your printers.

As time goes on, it will become clear how destructive normies are. They want free stuff, then are amazed that this means that you go into debt while infrastructure rots. They like unions, then are shocked when the labor goes offshore and to illegals.

In short, normies are not fit to rule, and giving them the vote gives them the power to rule.

We are going to have to exile these people in order to survive.

Tags: donald j. trump, jobs, normies, rules