Amerika

Diversity is a failed experiment. It was offered to us as the solution to falling birth rates after the Baby Boomers retired. This was an issue because of the socialist-style benefits already promised to Boomers that we could no longer fun.

And thus, the decision was made, because the voters refuse to consider repealing those benefits thanks to cultureless me-first individualism, cheap labor had to be imported. It would promote the GDP, we were told, and the resulting economic growth would make us all wealthy.

These decisions happened gradually starting with the rise of the middle class after the middle ages. Prosperity created by the aristocrats led to an explosion of shopkeepers, peasants, and the local governments that depended on them, and these challenged the kings.

Rather than plunge their people into perpetual civil war, the kings retreated, and democracy took over. A creation of the bureaucracy — bureaucracies love simplicity, so “equality” was their idea — it allowed for reckless growth.

Over time, democracy became more powerful, doubly so after the world wars. Once Communism fell, nothing stood in its way to become the dominant system of government for all of humanity. Without any checks and balances, it increased its power.

As part of defeating the Communists, democracy adopted many of their ideas, such to the point that by the 1960s, socialism had become the norm in the UK, EU, and US, just in a “mixed economy” form where socialist programs were powered by free markets.

Through its attention to Communist propaganda, which emphasized the unfairness of America to its African citizens, the West gradually began to shift… to a pro-diversity position. This occurred at the same time that Communism was abandoning the same, having found it unworkable.

Starting in the 1990s, when the Baby Boomers — the first generation raised on the idea that media was speaking truth to power, when it fact it was echoing the sentiments of the System — hit their forties, America and Europe became dedicated to diversity.

At first, as mentioned, it was sold as a way to fill in the tax gap created by all the free stuff promised to Boomers. When that failed, it became a path to the new Enlightenment, and was portrayed as “our strength” even as it failed.

Now we know better. Diversity did not fill in the tax gap, but made it wider, at the same time that it replaced culture with an impersonal consumerist void and the globalism “rules-based order” dedicated to removing human agency.

It replaced our culture with a void, prompted taxes that caused people to stop breeding, promoted diversity hires in our institutions that wrecked our competence, and redirected us from thriving toward a subsidy state.

This is total failure. Even the proponents of diversity recognize that our civilizations have become moribund. We are caught in a socialist economy of taxing so that we can subsidize diversity so that it can spend money randomly and wildly in order to drive up GDP.

The situation no longer concerns innocent minorities versus sadistic White racists. We are now seeing that diversity, as an institution, leads to civilization collapse. It does not matter who the diversity are, only that they are a different ethnic group, and this destroys us.

People talk about the impossibility of total remigration and the establishment of mono-ethnic states, but really, these are inevitable; if we want to survive, this is the path we must walk. Diversity has failed and in order to survive we must undo it and start again.

That offends the previous regime but people no longer care. Survival is more important than sybmolism, finally. The diversity experiment failed and ordinary people want it gone so that our culture — which is genetic — can survive. History has turned again.

Tags: diversity, Globalism, remigration