Amerika

Furthest Right

Ethnicist

Back in the hazy days of the 1980s it became very clear to me that the society around me was dying, that what was killing it was its pacifism, and that to have pacifism you must stop having goals because that rewards those who fulfill those goals, which meant it was a society adrift.

Having been obsessed with WW2 since a very young age it was clear to me that a backlash was coming. People made a public show of hating Hitler but privately they fetishized Hitler. They wanted to be the edgy bad boy like in The Outsiders or The Pump-House Gang.

This was not to say that one could like Hitler. The Holocaust, a slave labor program gone wrong, struck me as dumb and cruel, just like slavery did. Why enslave people when you could pay them and avoid creating friction and dissolution in your society?

Feudalism as a contrast always made sense. Some are born to sweet delight, some to the endless night, and most to the three basic levels — Jarl (leadership), Carl (artisan), and Thrall (repetitive) — which separate them into social groups of similarly-oriented people.

Without liking Hitler or slavery however, it was possible to see that Hitler and the Confederates were right… society needed culture and hierarchy at its core, which required having a goal, which contra-indicated individualism and pacifism.

This created two types of potential societies. In one, the strong took everything and rose, but everyone benefits from their competence; in the other, the strong are restrained, the weak settle everything by committee and bureaucracy, and there is no goal and therefore no real unity.

Forget the Athens-Spartan division, the fake Democracy-Communism division, or even the fascism-socialism split; the real fracture is how you organize your society, and politics is a result of that. Either you emphasize something larger than the individual or you restrain those things.

It became clear that individualism was the crisis of the West. Individuals want pacifism so that nothing restrains the individual, not even culture. That makes an incompetent, addled, and unstable society which quickly begins to collapse.

Counter-collapse movements tend to swing the pendulum too far the other way and embark on extremes like the Confederates and Nazis did. They go to war, when really what they need to do is change their laws, and they find symbols to unify themselves that backfire.

Consider for example “racism.” Every person is “racist” against some group, and all groups act in their own interests alone, therefore are “racist” against… every other group. “Racism” is part of human life as well as animal and plant life. If you want to survive you differentiate.

But can it unite a population? Maybe in a society with one founding ethnic group, the Nordic-Germanics, and associated groups surrounding them, like in Germany. “Germany for (ethnic) Germans” is a wholesome message compatible with reality.

However trying to unite all Europeans under the banner of “white” works about as well as the European Union. People identify with their ethnic group — French, Basque, Finnish, Flemish — more than their nation-state, which is the political entity designed to protect that group.

In the New World it is even worse. When you tell someone who is mixed Irish, southern German, Italian, and Welsh to explain their culture, you get mixed bits of a generic European culture plus essentially politics and lifestyle identity, like the Constitution and Christianity.

This is why conservatism has failed. It has nothing organic to unite it. As a result, it resorts to fallbacks like religion, race, capitalism, and democracy. However none of those have anything to do with conservatism.

Conservatives like order and therefore select time-honored methods because those work, and getting the method question out of the way gets us to the goal question, but that is where conservatives stall because goals correspond to ethnic groups not racial or civic “nationalism.”

If you are Japanese, you want to be the best Japanese person you can be, which is expressed in culture, religion, and genetics just as it is in your personal choices to be competent, intelligent, diligent, clean, respectful, sane, healthy, and productive.

But can you be a generic Asian? This sounds like one of those fusion restaurants in California malls. Generic White sounds like a type of character in one of those Disney costume shows. Even generic African skips over so much of the internal variety of Africa.

If we must be anything, we should be ethnicists. That is, we work to preserve an ethnic group — like Germans, Jews, WASPs, or Japanese — because those tie together religion, culture, and genetics. They are the identities you cannot escape.

Maybe this places “racism” in the bit bucket where it belongs, since it is almost as stupid as “anti-racism,” and both deny the reality. People identify with their ethnic groups even centuries after “assimilation” and “integration.” We should respect that since it obviously brings them joy.

There is no need to denigrate other groups, nor make enemies of them. They are simply representing their ethnic interests, and those interests cannot overlap with ours. Diversity is suicide. It is also genocide for any group caught in its web.

Ethnicists bypass all of the “racism” drama and focus instead on the essence of our quest: preserve civilization against the onslaught of delusional individual interests. “Racism” ironically usually serves as a cover for those delusional individual interests, much like socialism does.

To an ethnicist, find the ethnic group that you are most compatible with in terms of culture, religion, and genetics. If you act like and think like the members of that group, you will fit in. Then be honest about ethnic interests: your group wants control of its future.

In the end, the enemy of all of us is diversity, and it has been destroying things for a long while. The only way out is to end diversity and repatriate foreign ethnic groups, same as how for Israel to survive it must repatriate the Palestinians.

To the people of today, grown up under pacifism, this seems horrible and abrupt, but in reality it is removal of a horrible and abrupt order that was instituted by the pacifistic individualists. Even more importantly, it represents the only way for all of us to survive.

Tags: , , , , ,

|
Share on FacebookShare on RedditTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn