Amerika

For most of my life, the notion that diversity is suicide has dogged me. From the early readings on Rome as a young child, to observing a multicultural metroplex in New York and Chicago, all the way through seeing multiculturalism (now “diversity”) forced on us in college, the conclusion remained.

Of course, one tries to dodge it. Maybe the things they say in textbooks on television can be true, everything will work out all right, and we can go back to sleep in the seas of our own impulses and desires. It would be nice, wouldn’t it, not to have to worry.

In the same way, many of us did the grin-and-bear-it routine with other stupid ideas from democracy. We thought rent control was stupid, sure to drive up the remaining prices and reduce quality, and we realized the welfare state was just buying more of an eternal problem.

We were skeptical of the War on Some Drugs since trying to regulate addictive substances has a long and storied record of failure, not to mention that many of us saw the natural selection argument. We knew “tough” DUI laws would catch occasional violators more than extreme abusers.

People like groan when someone gets afflicted by patriotism or religion just like we facepalm anytime someone talks about saving the homeless, ending poverty, or lifting up the afflicted. Life is what it is, and we can enhance it, but we cannot change it.

And so we have watched many government enterprises attempt the impossible, destroy everyone involved, and then come back with their hands out for more money. We are familiar with the clash between intentions and reality.

Our intentions often involve pacifism. That is, we desire an easy way out of problems that does not involve conflict. Much of this is self-preservation, but the biggest portion is a desire for mental ease and contentment. We wish to ignore the dark sides of existence like conflict.

White Guilt presents an easy answer. Instead of admitting that diversity means our society is doomed unless we change, we opt for no change and no conflict. Better to blame Whites, write another check, and watch another movie about the Holocaust or slavery.

However, over the years it has become clear that White Guilt is nothing more than a cop-out, and by feeling bad about themselves, White people are avoiding the question of civilization so that they can work on their personal desires. Group individualism strikes again!

The good news is that White Guilt is also factually incorrect.

• The Holocaust is what happens when diversity threatens a population and that population is held back from acting on the problem by egalitarian and dualist pretensions. When the door drops, everyone goes nuts, like the barn-burnings, pogroms, and partisan executions that happened at the same time.

  Jews, Gypsies, and Saami always represented a problem for Europe. Everyone knew it, including these groups. And yet they stayed! One must assume that they saw Europe as more beneficial than their homelands, but this meant that they had to either reject their heritage, or act against Europeans.

  Europeans at least saw it as the latter but, baffled by Christianity, they could not simply state a Darwinian argument: we must be alone to survive. No, they had to invent blood libels and other mystical-symbolic nonsense, which clouded the issue.

  While many admired the Jews, for example, almost no one wanted to be Jewish. To be Jewish is to be mixed-race, an outcast(e) and bastard to use the old terms, and to be without a homeland, which means that your position is always precarious.

  After immense Jewish success, in part owing to nepotism and aggressive pursuit of the professions, in Europe and especially Germany, many questioned their loyalty. This was not always right. However, it was inevitable, as it always is in diverse societies, and ended in tears as predicted.

• Slavery came to Europe through raiding bands from the South and East. When the progressives of the day abolished serfdom, mainly so that the middle classes could earn more money, this shifted labor to a slavery model for several centuries.

  Slavery was of the greatest utility to the same bourgeois people who hire illegal migrants today. If you could get together the money for a few slaves, you could start a farm or factory and make some real profits.

  Millions of Europeans were kidnapped and enslaved, changing the genetic profile of the lands where they were taken, whether Janissaries in Turkey or Barbary Coast captives taken to African and Arabia. The American Marine Corps was formed to deal with the problem of Barbary pirates.

  The term “slav” for Eastern Europeans was associated with slavery from the early days. Eventually Europeans tired of this, suppressed the enslavers, and fought many conflicts to abolish slavery in Europe and the territories. No one seems to thank them for this.

• Racism occurred because of diversity. When two groups live together, one must be in a greater position of power or the two endlessly fight, and when one tries to rise, the other will suppress it for fear of its own safety.

  After the northeast, home to diversity, found itself victorious in the Civil War, it found it difficult to solicit more money for the relocation of slaves to Africa. As a result, diversity became the norm in many communities and as it always does, created conflict.

  Many of the abuses described were not in fact abuses but retaliations, just like many of the slaves who were whipped behaved as badly as the people in ghettoes, trailer parks, and churches do today. Many of the race riots and lynchings were not unprovoked; it would be illogical for someone to hang another simply because of race hatred, and so this was rare.

  Every workplace features a few people in power and the many on the floor who are certain that those in charge are incompetent, yet worker-run collectives tend to go bankrupt. Similarly, slaves and diversity scapegoated Whites for their own problems.

• Colonization serves as the universal scapegoat for the problems of the third world, but the third world was poor and dysfunctional before colonization, which was a response to Muslim, Hun, and Mongol invasions of Europe in the middle ages.

  Had those invasions never occurred, Europeans would not have had need to upgrade their war machine and explore surrounding lands, but after the invasions, Europe wanted to know when the next one was coming and possibly to smash it down before it could get started.

• The Trail of Tears gets a lot of history, but we hear less about the real story: pioneers came to the new world, fleeing liberalism in Europe, and were friendly to the Indians, until the Indians attacked.

  After that came years of coexistence and defending against the rape, murder, theft, and arson of Indian raids, until finally enough was enough and the enemy had to be completely defeated. That meant killing the braves and marching everyone else off to reservations.

  With the Indians broken, America could grow again.

  We will never likely see historical proof of this, but most likely Europeans retained some cultural memory of the Mongol raids, and when they saw a new group of people who looked like the old and behaved the same way, they knew what they had to do: break them so the raids would stop.

History is not politically correct, nor is it anything but a description of function. Morality enters the picture only as a group delusion; each group does what any animal does, which is act in its own best interests as it can understand them through its abilities and experiences.

Europeans get blamed for a lot, but what we are seeing with DEI and woke is the continuation of the Mongol and Muslim wars. The third world hates us for moving to a resource-poor continent and making a great civilization out of it, then defeating those who tormented us.

This will never end. No amount of White Guilt, welfare payments, or dubious minority heroes in propaganda movies will make it go away. We have to learn from our ancestors and exclude the foreign, then focus on making ourselves better, before they destroy us.

Tags: diversity, white guilt