Amerika

Currently, the media is obsessed with the rare schism over fundamental issues on the Right. I see this as a sign of health, since compromise leads to non-direction, which means that this is growing pains more than a fatal disease. However, some clarity is needed.

The debate started when the Heritage Foundation praised Tucker Carlson who in turn interviewed Nick Fuentes, who hates Jews and loves Hitler and Stalin.

Roberts told RCP that the backlash has further clarified something that he already believed, namely that antisemitism has become “a much more pronounced problem on part of the right.” He said Heritage will redouble its efforts to root it out, even if some conservatives vehemently disagree with his approach.

Roberts rejected online speculation that Heritage was distancing itself from Carlson, saying that the popular former Fox News host remains a “close friend.” Addressing the ongoing debate over U.S. policy toward Israel, he argued that conservatives are under “no obligation to reflexively support any foreign government,” adding also that Christians can critique actions of that nation “without being antisemitic.”

But then Roberts, who launched “Project Esther” specifically to combat antisemitism, said that while he abhors some of the things Fuentes has said, “canceling him is not the answer.” Instead, he continued, “When we disagree with a person’s thoughts and opinions, we challenge those ideas and debate.”

When we disagree with the thoughts and opinions of another, we challenge those ideas and debate, instead of censoring people. He got it 100% correct in my view — who cares what the views are? — we should pursue hot-button issues and explore them instead of accepting more pluralism and decay.

In the past, I have said that The Jews™ unfairly get blamed for what Christianity and liberalism did, but also that diversity means dual loyalties. We are now discussing dual loyalties, probably more prompted by Muslims than Jews, but no one wants to be accused of “Islamophobia” in this climate.

Muslims, after all, have diversity privilege as well, since they are obviously non-White with less White admixture than Jews have (Jews are roughly speaking Druze Syrians who took on ancient Italian, French, and Greek wives). Less White = more privilege.

We are inching toward the recognition that we need a mono-ethnic society; any other group will act for its own interests when those diverge from our own. This is the mathematics of humanity and nothing will change it. Iron Rule: all things — ideas, people, groups, genes — act only in their own self-interest alone.

A mono-ethnic society in America would consist of WASPs (northern Germans, English, Scots, northern French, Dutch, Scandinavians) who share an unbroken Nordic-Germanic root. Everyone else would have to go back home and would be happier there in the long run.

In political drama, the Right is shifting away from the “Christian” part of “Christian nationalism” because Christianity is no longer applicable; morality that does not overlap with reality is our doom, not our salvation, and allowing that type of thinking among us steals what we do best, which is function.

Conservatives get elected to make the trains run on time. They do not get elected for interfering in personal stuff like abortion, homosexuality, drugs, speech, and religion. People will elect us on the basis of needing a mono-ethnic society, but not for using Jesus to try to make bad people behave as if they were good.

King Charles gave us the signal issue of the coming time: value for money. We spent all the fantasy money and now have to pay the debt; in that shadow, we are going to spend money on things that make more money or make life better for everyone.

This means that in the long term, welfare programs are doomed, as are all diversity programs. Socialist entitlements in general will be seen as an artifact of a suicidal and deluded time. Government managing every area of life for “safety” will be viewed as the voters fooling themselves again.

Before we have to set up a conflict over “anti-semitism,” we should focus on the big issues. First, we defend free speech, especially unpopular speech like that of naturalized Mexican Nick Fuentes. Second, we need freedom from the needs of others, a.k.a. socialism. And finally, we need a national entity rooted in genetics.

This means that Jews are going to be hopping on boats and heading to Israel, but so will everyone else who is not a WASP. They will find people more like them in their forever homes and be psychologically happier there, and in time, just as prosperous.

It is not “stealing” from anyone else to keep our own wealth. Any taxes commit a market distortion and drive prices upward for everyone, so we need to minimize taxes to the absolute lowest level possible. But even more, we need to have faith in ourselves to thrive from our own labor and direction.

The postwar order of “mixed economy” socialist-capitalist hybrids dedicated to civil rights is over, and in the future people want value for money, i.e. measuring people and programs by results and whether or not those benefit everyone. If they do not, like welfare programs, they are going away into the dustbin of history.

The same will prove true of diversity. Did diversity benefit the migrants? In the short term, perhaps, because they got free stuff. In the long term they lost their culture and ability to determine their own future, something they will never find acceptable, nor should they.

Historians looking back on this time will see diversity and socialism as two of the cruelest frauds ever perpetrated on humanity, since they subtract from the productive and subsidize the unproductive and destructive, getting more of it in a death spiral until civilization crashes into third-world status.

Tags: anti-semitism, free speech, heritage foundation, islamophobia, nick fuentes