~~~
The insane are driven to seize power in order to displace the power of others whose success otherwise reveals that the insane are insane and therefore, make bad decisions and do destructive things. AJAB
This would force Europe to stop funding Russia. Currently, the Russian war effort runs on Chinese and European money.
Society creates large pots of money for people to steal. In a state of nature, we do not have those, and organized crime is limited.
Slowly the conservative raises its head from the swamp plants it was munching. With a tiny brain in proportion to its massive body, it thinks slowly, and it may take it over ten million years to realize that the root of civil rights law is the 14A — unless a large meteorite gets here first, at which point the creature will become extinct.
It is not very PC to admit it, but the outpouring of emigrants from the UK created the structures of society used worldwide now.
None of these movements go anywhere until they become advocates for mono-ethnicism, instead of against things like immigration. Christianity, capitalism, bureaucracy, etc. all succeed because they are bazaars where people can forage and find niches, and whose basic rules permit plunder of nature and other people. Make mono-ethnicism into an opportunity and it wins.
When we were kids, the media taught us that most pedophiles were White; guess that was an artifact of having a White majority at the time. Now that we are diverse, it seems the proportions have shifted.
This is what liberals always do: take from the successful to give to the unsuccessful, who promptly waste it and impoverish everyone.
“Indigenous” — actually Mongolian immigrants — leaders take issue when anything they can as an excuse to shake more money out of the Whitey tree.
If what the “tax the rich” people say is true, the “privileged” are ruthless manipulators, which means that “privileged” people endorsing socialism are in fact manipulating their own voters to the disadvantage of those voters. What percent of humanity do you think can parse the previous sentence?
Diversity judge comes up with absurd ruling, since there is no first amendment right to the data of others, and no fifth amendment right to access to government as a contractor.
They do not want equal opportunities, but equal outcomes, since equal opportunities alone simply persist the “inequalities” that are natural to every society.
Diversity conflict now has at least a starting point for resolution on a political level, but the issue of a clash of civilizations will always remain.
Not just for whites, but for Whites: ethnic Western Europeans.
The homeless issue overlaps with the diversity issue. Insane and drug-addicted people become homeless and then perpetrate billions of dollars of damage and lost enjoyment of public spaces, but under civil rights law no one can remove them.
Make the bureaucracy powerful and lawyers become little kings, at which point they convert society into a profit center for themselves at the expense of everyone else.
A sensible historian would attribute lynchings to what drove them, which was ethnic conflict brought on by diversity.
Finally someone blames the actual culprit: the voters keep demanding free stuff, and those policies then wreck society, at which point the voters demand more free stuff.
He claimed the diversity privilege of ignorance of our ways, but the jury was not having it this time.
Management prioritizes diversity and cloning past successes above all else.
Imagine how much it cranked up prices in America, which has even more mass migration. Higher demand means higher prices; lower demand means lower prices. Democrats are the party of higher demand because it lets them weaponize usury, both borrowing more and by driving up prices to others, forcing them to borrow as well. This is the core idea of the Left: minimal oversight of the individual in order to cater to their consumerist impulses (consumerism is a hybrid of capitalist producers and government-financed socialist consumers).
You know what is worse than the N-word? When people hate you quietly and stay away from you. That is what diversity does. You can ban the words but not the rejection, judgment, resentment, and hatred from any group toward any other group.
Everyone who can wants to escape the Chinese equipment trap, since once you depend on them for your gear, you cannot really resist any of their demands, can you?
Diversity guy gets caught possibly misappropriating funds, as if he knew COVID-19 was going to be a big bonanza bungle for those attached to government agencies.
In my view, “direct power” is obsolete because of competition, and instead what you need to do is reward the good and let culture do the rest. Gay pride stuff should probably not even be on our radar because other than its politicization by the Left, it is irrelevance to the big issue: gaining mono-ethnic societies because all other options are suicide/genocide.
Good. America has always relied on a hodge-podge system of antiquated paper files, but that no longer works in the digital age. Give us a complete citizenship system instead of these insecure files that are routinely exploited by criminals, foreign actors, and law enforcement.
Guys who have names like “Diaz” with multiple passports, realistic gear, and obvious funding are being paid to impersonate police in order to discredit the police. This is probably a foreign power at work.
I have become convinced that “unequal” simply means that the useful are rising above the useless, which is why these cities tend to be wealthy where the really equal places like the third world are favelas.
Remove diversity, problem solved. It would be even stronger in an ethnic Western European USA.
~~~
~~~
Tags: diversitywatch, news