~~~
People like to believe that organizations and governments have agency, but the reality is the opposite: organizations have no will but are compromised of careerist opportunists jockeying for power, and the results they achieve are incidental to paychecks and job titles.
She tells a typical story of an innocent White child who goes out to try to save the world from itself, only to realize it does not want saving. The biggest question here is why middle-class parents indoctrinate their children in Leftism, and the answer is jobs. To get along at their jobs, they must preach democracy, so they come home and unload that same bushel of neurotic paradox onto their children, breaking them and turning them neocommunist from an early age. It takes a lot of deconditioning to save anyone from themselves, even if they are merely the tool of democracy, which instructs them in baffling contradiction which must be accepted as ideological truth.
Apparently the cure for depression is to stop viewing the world through a negative lens. Let us consider, then, Christianity and democracy, two ideas based on the universal equality of human worth. Since nature is unequal and people are varied and most of them are insane, the mind will always find negative in the world due to this state of inequality and drive itself mad trying to make it come about. “Equality” is the resentful rambling of those who are not doing anything useful with their lives, but when it gets to the middle class, they try to make sense of it and end up lobotomizing themselves in the process.
Despair is an insult to God and also a form of hubris. Testosterone reduces this:
For men with lower testosterone levels, a stronger physical reaction to an outcome was followed by a decrease in risk-taking on the next turn.
For men with higher testosterone levels, the opposite pattern emerged. A stronger physical reaction to a win or loss was followed by an increase in risk-taking on the subsequent draw.
Testosterone enables confidence, which in turn makes an attitude of positivity, and people who anticipate good in life take more risks in order to intensify outcomes rather than retreating like low-self esteem cucks the instant a challenge to their personal will arises.
Ray Bradbury remains undefeated, but Star Trek and the Unabomber take a back seat: our problem is not technology, nor is technology what will save us. Our problem is civilization decay, and finding a purpose in existence itself (not symbols of existence) is all that might save us.
In the 1980s, Christian activists panned Monty Python as blasphemous, but it came from that wonderful genre of comedy that essentially makes fun of everything at once, achieving a balance in disorder. Now in the 2020s, the Muslims are outraged that they get treated “equally” to the Christians. Diversity means constant enmity. We have to send them all back.
Diana Spencer is a case study in trace admixture. Despite being less than 1% foreign, she and her brother have systematically sabotaged England just like Meghan Markle or Rishi Sunak, driven by the same revenge pathology as the third world. Diversity is a toxin that poisons our civilizations.
In the 1960s, “science” was pimping sugar and demonizing fat because industry stood to profit. Currently, “science” is pimping carbs because you can make money in the wide margin on carbs but not so much on proteins. They cooked up a measurement of biological age, the KDM, that reflects temporary health markers and not actual biological aging. When do we stop trusting the science, since science is just a job and a lottery for whether you get propaganda or actual research?
While technology is not what will break us or save us, it has downsides, including both its tendency to prop up failing democracies and to poison its citizens:
Among these contaminants are benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene, a group of petroleum-derived compounds collectively known as BTEX. These chemicals can be toxic to humans and other organisms, and some are known carcinogens.
Most economic activity is unecessary, fueled by the needs of the many lower-echelon types to have jobs and paychecks. When everyone has their own homestead, this is less urgent and life is better than in the cities and their sprawling anthrophagic wastelands.
Since the founding of America, White people have gone through great contortions to find housing and lifestyles away from the depredations of Amerinds/Hispanics, Africans, Gypsies, Orientals, Semites, Eurasians, and most of all, the Irish and Italians. We have held our tongues for two and a half centuries just to be nice, but instead of making the problem better, this has emboldened the groups who want to conquer us. They can either conquer us or feel conquered, so they opt for the former, which is typical of diversity and means endless conflict. Show weakness, and they will bully you. Give them an inch, and they will take a mile. But hit them with the obvious — diversity has failed and they are all going back — and they will see the sense in the rule and go along with the plan.
The far-Right protests are always “violent” because the police always steer the counter-protesters into the protesters, ensuring that fights break out and XOG gets the headlines it wants. It seems as if diversity-democracy-socialism-consumerism is falling apart everywhere.
This is as ridiculous as the guy who thought that “black hole” was a “racist” term. We have reached peak racial sensitivity and these last absurd protests are going to drive it over the edge.
When we were kids, there was a house a few streets over that was derelict and ruined. Everyone encouraged the neighborhood kids to go there and basically destroy it further so that the city would remove it. Not only did you feel safe vandalizing it, but your vandalism — normally “bad” — was now “good” because you were removing a blight from the neighborhood. It was a blast to be able to paint the walls, throw toilets off the roof, and smash each other’s heads through sheetrock. Someone eventually went all the way and burned it down. This is how the third world views America: vandalizing it is not just okay but “good.”
Guy with foreign name embraces groups of even more foreign origins, showing us how the SEMI-people cluster with the third world in their desire for revenge on the West. We have to send them all back.
Fairness? Your entire social network is a wealth transfer program that uses affirmative action to penalize the founding group while forcing everyone through years of tedious schooling that champion the obedient and squeeze out those who are not simply job-oriented sycophants. Why would anyone believe in “fairness”?
Another outbreak of far-Left and diversity violence goes undernoticed by the mainstream media, but it signifies that the anti-diversity parties are gaining reach among the voters.
People in jobs love trivial change but fear reorganization because it might endanger their jobs and all of the cushy little adaptations and transactional benefits they have worked out for themselves. The political system is the same way; it has no problem with re-arranging the deck chairs, but big changes like escaping diversity and socialism offend it, since its comfy existence will have to adjust.
The UN is like a worldwide House of Representatives in that demographic strength is more important than the rights of the people who contribute almost everything, which makes the UN a vehicle for vengeance on the first world. Ending slavery required a massive outlay of money which only recently was paid off, but no one issues thanks for that, although many will come forward with their hands out yet again.
Even this liberal article, written by a low-T slib with an Indian wife, acknowledges that diversity has hit a tipping point. Then: “A shrinking minority is desperate to maintain power and privilege.” When they tell you what they really think, listen carefully.
~~~
~~~
Tags: diversity news report, news