Amerika

Democracy always rushes headlong into the abyss. It takes about two centuries but eventually it inverts our concept of reality so much that we are doing the literally insane as not just what is normal, but what is perceived as “good” and all alternatives as “evil.”

This comes about because individualist religions like democracy, Christianity, libertarianism, and socialism share an idea: nature is bad because it is not the individual, so we will replace nature with a human order that is actually fair, good, and progressive.

That order always involves denial of what is inherent to nature that bothers humans, namely the massive inequality of abilities that makes us separate into social classes. All human societies by class war of the have-nots (lower competence) versus the haves (higher competence).

To get to their victory, they declare reality bad and create a symbolic reality in its place, then ban anything but that because it alone is the path to morality, goodness, progress, and justice. Whether religious or secular, the behavior is the same.

In the West, we have just emerged from an era of universal ideas. Instead of us all being different, they say, we are all the same, so the broadest principles — like big envelopes to contain all of our messy variations — are the best, even if that means few principles in actuality.

We were sold on the increasing democratization of everything. Make everything equal, tolerate everyone, encourage the principle of universalism where everyone is the same (except for their life experiences) and therefore anyone can be anything.

Every political speech starting in the late 1980s included “diversity is our strength” in the front matter. Every major magazine reported breathlessly on demographic change. This was not thinking; this was a period of ideological zeal motivated by symbols.

Political correctness drove anyone competent out of academia. Publishers refused to sign anyone but airy neurotic diversity progressives. Television and Hollywood shifted their 1960s Left-wing viewpoint to an exclusively civil rights oriented curriculum.

People went along with it because they wanted to avoid more LA Riots. In their view, diversity are just like anyone else, so if they are rioting, it is because they were mistreated, not a consequence of their own behavior. Therefore, the diversity must be appeased!

Your average worker in media, government, academia, or big corporate desk jobs has no idea how much things have flipped. After the BLM riots, we realized that the LA Riots were a sham, too. Rodney King was guilty. George Floyd was guilty. Emmett Till was guilty. It was all a con.

Then we began noticing the pattern. In the third world, taking anything that is free — especially if this screws your fellow citizens — is viewed as intelligent, where we see it as insane and stupid. This is why the third world cannot keep functional institutions.

Across the third world you find the same pattern of individualism. The individual comes first before reality, but because reality does not agree, the individual styles himself as a victim while at the same time he steals everything he can.

The only places that reversed this process were high-IQ mostly-homogenous zones like Western Europe, Japan, Korea, and Israel. Not surprisingly, the Left wanted to drive diversity into those areas in order to take over, and it did so with race guilt.

Race guilt presupposes that we are all the same except for surface color, and then asks why some are poor and some are rich, same way it did with peasants and kings (they both bleed red, etc). The only possible explanation is “racism.”

They used race guilt to hammer down the doors of every institution and depose anyone who could think in a realistic manner. They replaced us first; they replaced us with zombie neurotics like themselves and diversity who support them.

Now the tides have turned. People believed the excuses for almost a century but now we are seeing that we have exactly the same problems as before except worse, and the diversity have made it clear that they want to replace us and destroy us.

Diversity is over. People no longer have faith in it, no matter what their ethnic background. Other than the zombie cadres, ordinary people distrust diversity now like they distrust Communism and fundamentalism. They realize it is a path to self-destruction.

Mono-ethnicism through total remigration is now the moderate option. For us to survive, we need to achieve a zero foreign DNA status. This means that while the power structure does not know it yet, a deeply-entrenched public desire to end diversity has taken over our future thinking.

Tags: crowdism, diversity, multiculturalism