Amerika

Throughout this life, you will find that people cling to socially easy answers that let everyone feel good because morons assume that feeling good means everything is fine and the wolves at the door will just vanish instead of becoming a problem like they always do.

In essence, humans hide the world from their sight when it upsets them, and assume that this symbolic act somehow protects them from its real-world mechanisms. The flipside of “monkey see, monkey do” is the monkey hiding its eyes behind its hands.

The socially easy answers (SEE) people want to believe that we are all the same and differ only by what we have been exposed to, so everyone can be made a prosperous bourgeois desk jockey with enough effort. Then when we are all equal, there will be no conflict.

As they tell it, the difference between the homeless guy under the bridge and the CEO of a major corporation is “luck.” The homeless guy got the bad education, lived in the bad neighborhood, worked bad jobs, and never had a chance.

The CEO on the other hand just got lucky. His father had an MBA, so he just followed in those footsteps. Then he stumbled across some opportunities and suddenly was rich. Maybe that happens to some, but not to most. More likely, it was a long painful grind.

Those little fictions exist — the CEO had a higher IQ, more acumen, and worked more diligently toward his goal, generally, and exceptions confirm the rule — because people want to believe that if they want something or want to believe something is true to regulate their mental state, the world should accomodate and make it so.

“Life is whatever you believe it is,” they say fondly. It is sociable to let every person exist in his own state of illusion for two reasons: first, this pacifies him and reduces the threat he makes to you, and second, this encourages him to destroy himself so you can get ahead.

That is the crab bucket mentality of the individualist. He does nothing for the world at large; in fact, he denies it because it conflicts with his desires. He sees other people as a means to an end, namely his own mental state (bolstered by wealth, power, sex, and maybe drugs).

To that end, he summons a social group by telling them that they are all equal, their misfortunes are not at all their fault, and they can make everything better by fighting for equality, which involves tearing down the successful and taking their stuff.

On the other hand, if you believe in the intellectual revolution that is Darwinism, you recognize that all behaviors are genetic, and removing genetic recipes prone to certain behaviors eliminates those behaviors from your society.

Consider for example how executing murderers reduced the frequency of violent crime in the West dramatically:

These hindrances began to dissolve in the 11th century with a consensus by Church and State that the wicked should be punished so that the good may live in peace. Courts imposed the death penalty more and more often and, by the late Middle Ages, were condemning to death between 0.5 and 1.0% of all men of each generation, with perhaps just as many offenders dying at the scene of the crime or in prison while awaiting trial. Meanwhile, the homicide rate plummeted from the 14th century to the 20th. The pool of violent men dried up until most murders occurred under conditions of jealousy, intoxication, or extreme stress. The decline in personal violence is usually attributed to harsher punishment and the longer-term effects of cultural conditioning. It may also be, however, that this new cultural environment selected against propensities for violence.

At first the Church, an egalitarian institution, resisted this idea. To them, murderers were sinners who could be forgiven and rehabilitated. However, real-world experience suggested that criminals and vagrants were simply wired to be that way.

Eliminating the criminals filtered out many of the antisocial behavior profiles and increased efficiency of society through high-trust living and safety. The program was massively successful and allowed civilization to thrive without being held hostage by a minority of arbitrary killers.

In addition, it created an incentive. Knowing that arbitrarily violent people would get hung encouraged other people to avoid these antisocial types, and so society selected them out of the gene pool with two different powerful methods, execution and ostracism.

The fact that killings became less common proves to us that this behavior was genetic and not merely a case of having a bad education, poor upbringing, bad influences, or other excuses. People are wired differently and some are just bad.

Knowing that we can implement a “natural selection” filter on ourselves lets us think about not only eliminating bad behavior, but increasing good traits like intelligence, which is heritable like any other trait:

For all four cohorts, in any of the estimated models, social transmission is very small and not significant. Genetic transmission, in turn, seems to be the primary mechanisms of intergenerational transmission of cognitive ability and becomes increasingly important with age.

If a civilization were to remove its dumbest members consistently and possibly stop penalizing its more intelligent with wealth taxes and boring day jobs, the average intelligence of its citizens would rise.

Imagine a society that decided it would rid itself of waste humans: generally incompetent, insane, criminal, stupid, psychopathic, sociopathic, narcissistic, and perverse people. These represent a net negative even if they work hard at jobs because of the damage they do.

This includes the bumbling manager who has everyone stay late doing busy work to look good, the abusive ex who clearly enjoyed tormenting you, the passive aggressive types who always insist the rules do not apply to them, OnlyFans whores, violent incels, you name it.

Humanity could have a defective defecation or simply defecate these defectives. For the bloodthirsty, it could be execution, but exile is faster and more efficient. There is also something of a lack of bloodlust in those who have seen too much already.

But the Great Defecation of Human Waste Defectives could benefit humanity by taking it to the next level of evolution. We are being held back by blockheads, bunglers, the oblivious, and most of all, the self-centered.

Self-centeredness is not so much selfishness per se, although it usually includes that, but an obliviousness to anything other than the self and other things like the self. That is, it is denial of the wider world and its transcendent beauty.

Humanity shares a disease. Wherever humans go, someone will be an individualist and gather others to them; individualists use the world to manage their mental state, instead of adapting their mental state to the demands and working of the world.

Individualists always have the same riff, which is that reality is bad and not real, and we can get to the “true” real by making everyone equal, which pacifies the herd and allows the individualists to continue stealing, manipulating, and conniving.

The third world is entirely individualistic except for a handful of people who keep it minimally functional. The poor in the West are mostly pure individualism, each certain he is the center of the universe, and achieve correspondingly bad results.

Your sociopaths are all individualists taken to an extreme. For them, the world is not real and individuals are real, except for individuals who are not them personally. Psychopaths believe in an alternative reality that comes from their own self-centered paranoid/messianic ideation.

We know that about two hundred and fifty million — Africans, Orientals, Mongolian/Hispanics, Irish, Southern Europeans, Levantines, Eastern Europeans, Arabs — must go simply to save us. Diversity kills societies and we want to live, so diversity must end here.

But on top of that, we want to look hard at the remaining two hundred million. We can keep the WASPs (unmixed ethnic Nordic-Germanic Western Europeans like English, Scots, Dutch, northern Germans, Scandinavians, northern French) as a group but then we need to look at individuals.

People without depth of discernment, with no obligation to a “whole” of reality, or who are mentally incoherent in any of the various ways need to be exiled to some other place. They are not capable of being what we need to make our civilization.

My estimate is that this would leave us with about a hundred and twenty million highly functional WASPs who are more competent than the population of any other country. Thus would begin not the American century or millennium, but aeon.

Tags: crowdism, eugenics, individualism, waste humans