While around here we recognize that biology is the ultimate mathematics, and therefore that survival of our tribes is more important than politics or money, most of the world is still playing catch-up and trading ideological symbols instead of looking closer at the underlying issues.
In particular, they like to idealize certain concepts in law, like equal opportunity or equitable outcome, and argue between the two as if these were solutions; they are not. Instead, they are alternatives to looking at the biological and mathematical solutions we need like zero diversity.
The side that argues for equal rule of law likes to cite Abraham Lincoln, who was while not a racial bigot per se, a foe of racial equality and integration:
In April 1862, Lincoln was still of the mind that emancipation and deportation was the key to a peaceful United States. He supported a bill in Congress that provided money
to be expended under the direction of the President of the United States, to aid in the colonization and settlement of such free persons of African descent now residing in said District, including those to be liberated by this act, as may desire to emigrate to the Republic of Haiti or Liberia, or such other country beyond the limits of the United States as the President may determine.
This would become the final portion of the DC Emancipation Act.
In August of 1862, Lincoln invited five prominent black men to the White House, the first black delegation invited on such terms. The topic was simple, that white and blacks cannot coexist and that separation is the most expedient means to peace. Lincoln encouraged these five men to rally support for an exodus.
…Four days before his death, speaking to Gen. Benjamin Butler, Lincoln still pressed on with deportation as the only peaceable solution to America’s race problem. “I can hardly believe that the South and North can live in peace, unless we can get rid of the negroes…I believe that it would be better to export them all to some fertile country…”
Had he stuck with this plan, his historical record would be mixed instead of simply being all bad. His alliance with Tammany Hall Yankees plunged America into modern government which in the name of enforcing equality everywhere came to control all aspects of American life a century later.
Lincoln in fact stated opposition to racial equality and miscegenation, catering both to his audience and his own experience:
I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause]-that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied every thing. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. [Cheers and laughter.] My understanding is that I can just let her alone. I am now in my fiftieth year, and I certainly never have had a black woman for either a slave or a wife. So it seems to me quite possible for us to get along without making either slaves or wives of negroes. I will add to this that I have never seen, to my knowledge, a man, woman or child who was in favor of producing a perfect equality, social and political, between negroes and white men.
While this seems extreme to us now, it made sense for a man who grew up on the edge of the frontier and recognized the differences between species and subspecies, not to mention a cynic toward the idea that humans had anything close to equal intellect.
In the mathematics of nature, “racism” is a survival strategy that enables people to ally with those who have similar goals and behaviors:
In the study, 15-month-old toddlers watched an experimenter with a collection of four small toys share them either evenly or unevenly with two other adult volunteers. When allowed to choose which experimenters the babies wanted to play with later, 70% of them preferred the ones who had divided the toys evenly.
Nice, but there was an exception: when the two adults who were receiving the evenly or unevenly divided toys were of different races and the race of the one who got more toys matched the babies’ own, the 70% preference for the fair distributor dropped and the share of babies wanting to play with the unfair one rose. The implication: unfairness is bad, unless someone from your clan is getting the extra goodies.
“If all babies care about is fairness, they would always pick the fair distributor,” said University of Washington associate professor psychology of Jessica Somerville, in a statement that accompanied the study. “But we’re also seeing that they’re interested in consequences for their own group members.”
Babies know this primal truth: build up your group, and you have the greatest chance of survival. Turn on your group, and you have no one. The latter state is the condition in which White America finds itself in the present day, because it ignored this rare sage advice from the traitor Lincoln.
Tags: abrahama lincoln, africa, diversity, remigration