Amerika

To understand this post, you need a grasp of the arc of events unfolding as revealed in Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow more than Barack 0’Bama’s retelling. In this view, like the Bell Curve, the arc of time is a mathematical constant to the universe.

Systems reach their peak before their descent, which is the opposite of how we humans see things. When we see a peak, we assume that this is the essence of that thing, and that it will persist, instead of the grim reality that it is a moment of time before the collapse.

To a human, the arc of an event seems like it will all be hunky-dory until it runs into decay. To nature, as soon as the peak is passed, the event is in the process of decay, although it occurs gradually and not through sudden moves.

For example, an empire that hits its peak after a few centuries will probably last a few more before it hits absolute rock bottom, but its glory days are over. Some might say that the science lies in never hitting a peak of efficiency but focusing on staying in the middle.

It is possible to envision a human civilization where it never over-extends itself to become empire, but instead stays doing what it does without formalization, meaning that it is forever in a sine wave of alternating between similar versions of itself.

But to do that, a society must abandon vaingloriousness and aspirations to empire, and focus merely on being itself. Then again, empire seems to involve trying to reinforce what you are by forcing it, half-understood, onto others.

America became an empire internally, instead of externally. Rather than invade foreign nations, it invited them all here during the 1960s, and by the 1990s, they took over, with the help of the original diversity here, the traitor Irish.

After the victory in WW2, it seemed nothing could stop America except its internal contradictions. That is, despite defeating Hitler, it was still a heavily segregated place, with its founding population distant from those of other races.

Its founding group, the unmixed ethnic Western Europeans, were in fact not willing to accept Irish, Italians, Slavs, Jews, and Arabs among them. This presented a contradiction to the notion that it was an egalitarian state.

In their infinite wisdom, the bureaucrats forced integration and mainstreaming upon the population. They created a diversity empire which took hold in the 1960s and then peaked in the 1990s when the students of the 1960s inherited leadership roles.

At this point, America hit its peak, probably about 1996. The economy was booming thanks to Chinese labor; domestic costs were low thanks to Mexican labor; housing prices were rising thanks to immigration, so everyone could retire wealthy.

However, this was not the dawning of a new golden age; this was the moment before the golden age descended into utter chaos. As diversity grew and took over, competence failed; as government payouts increased, prices went up and quality plummeted.

Generation X saw this happening and warned against it, but neither Boomers nor Millennials wanted to hear it. This was their time, and they were going to succeed big, after all. They tuned out the criticism.

Thirty years after the 0’Clintons launched the great norming of diversity in the wake of the LA Riots, the good days of American culture are over. Housing prices are high, quality is low, jobs are boring jails, and diversity is taking over everywhere.

If we want to fix this, we have to go back farther than the 1960s, or even farther than 1924 immigration rules. We need to end diversity. Only as a mono-ethnic society with a unified culture and unmixed ethnic Western European DNA can America restore its greatness.

This offends many, but change is coming. They savaged the value of a massive property, namely the USA itself, and that level of loss endangers all future productivity. To fix this, we will have to end not just immigration but diversity itself.

Tags: diversity, empire