Climbing the Mountains of Darkness

Something small and scientific, well, big science – unified theory science, something the brain conjured up:

What goes bump in the night?

I can’t imagine nothingness in the dark anymore, It’s impossible – whilst i’m trying to think 0.4% of the whole magnificent universe is all you can barely see – even less nowadays with light pollution and other modern stupidities, but if you could see all of the galaxies, stars, planets you would only see 0.4% of the universe! The mind simply cannot comprehend that enormity of space and time, the amount of information residing within this universe is beyond anything of substance.

Who ate all the pie?

Think. If life can reside on a tiny fractual percentage, on a blissfull little island amidst a black sea of infinity. Alot goes on in the dark, you stare at darkness at night, what do you see? Nothing? or maybe the quanta of various photons hitting your eyes, like static on a screen, or maybe even, something so obscure, something taboo of all taboos, maybe there actually is life there – not made from light matter compounds, but from dark matter compounds.

When we think about how compounds are formed, are they formed in the place of their atomic fusion? No they are not, hot dark matter is what is generated within blackholes by the fusion of dark energy – can you think of a better solution? A star of dark matter, a mountain so high that darkness accumulates at the tip of the mountain.

Inversely, cold dark matter - like cold light matter, forms clouds of molecules for small accumulations. What if cold dark matter mountains form like inverse gravity wells, with the ice on the top, the ice of ordinary matter – this here, our Earth – freezing to all life, what could survive on such a hostile planet?

And think also, if humans have the possibility to create machines from metal, why not these machines create life from dark matter? why not dark energy? Why limit ourselves to 0.4% of the pie? Why not eat abit more of the pie?

Open your minds for a universe that thrives with life, be prepared to shit your pants at the almighty expanse, the twilight amidst darkness:

Warped light rays and distorted space-time, you’re seeing the rise and fall of billions of civilizations, perhaps every photon hitting the telescopes lense here can not only see more than a gazillion terrestrial planets, you’re seeing the darkness thriving with life, the vacuum of space – isn’t. This image is staring right through a dark mountain of cold dark matter. Cold dark matter accumulates between galaxies and allows them to ‘socialize’ between the void, solid dark rock at the land’s edge of the galaxies, right before the sea of dark energy – cosmic lava tubes of a long dead quasar, cave systems beneath our observable universe.

Cosmic Geology

Like the Earth’s crust, it is a tiny slither, this observable universe where the life thrives, underneath, beneath where any photon dares tread, lies the behemoth, the hell beneath our cosmos – beyond space and time, a liquid phase of our universe beyond future or past, yet there it is, in the early cosmos spewing up all kinds of observable matter, seeding the galaxies with the intergalactic dust to generate stars from, from where? Conservation of energy? Creation of energy – or perhaps, our universe isn’t alone, perhaps our observable universe is just a continent, or maybe a tiny island next to billions of other continents and little islets apon the crust of our hyperverse, our megaverse.

Where the Gods live, where they evolved from, coming through to our universe through the timeless magma space-time beneath all of creation – when the collosal eruption occured! The big bang blew up this timeless quantum foam, with its own idealistic properties the Gods warped it into their own evolutionary creation, they formed themselves out of imaginary mass, uncreated mass, and then cooled and solidified into the abundant dark matter gravitons, and then from there evolved upon the other forces, slowly reaching over the boundary of reality, first there was light, the electromagnetic force, then the earth – the strong force, and finally life itself, the weak force – all to combined to create the four time dimensions in the residue of our universe. 

Our Earth, the cold matter encircling a dim yellow sun – a combination of electromagnetism, strong and weak forces, all residing in matter. But where lies our gravitons? Our gravity force? If Earth, comprised of these ‘figured out’ forces numbering three and if the majority is that which we cannot see, then surely dark matter must be gravity and the fourth dimension, being the ‘time’ dimension, oh yeah, and.. coincidentally, space and time are very linked together, curved space-time? It’s the volume of gravitons, gravity wells are dense dark matter mounds which provide the support niche for our cosmos to even exist.

Just imagine an island in the south pacific, if we cannot see the sea bed, how do we know it is connected? We just see these little islands ignorance of the mound of mass beneath it as to raise it above that sea – that sea of dark energy. And where there are seas there are marine animals, space marine animals – These are your deities whom crawl onto the planetary islands, like crabs, and then evolve into land animals over aeons, light matter animals, constructed around their dark halo that they have forgotten, like our biosphere, ignorant of the gravosphere above it – the gravity beach.

Tell me what problem of gravitation doesn’t this solve?

All of modern physic’s problems for gravitation are on dark matter, all of dark matter’s problems are on gravitation -  are we seeing double here? Or are they the same?

Dark Matter - a weak, barely interacting gravitational particle, doesn’t react with light except with curvature, makes up the majority of the universe and ‘holds it together’ – indifferent to mass and passes straight through it.

Gravity - the weakest force, barely interacting force, yet all pervasive and everywhere, where ever there is mass, there is gravity – but how can it interact between the observable matter? Gravity bends light, holds the universe together, is small, indifferent to mass and passes straight through the majority of the universe.

See the difference? – What difference! Gravity is Dark Matter!

The Wave-particle duality problem, isn’t

Electrons, less abundant then gravity, only effects known mass – ordinary mass, creates a wave through a particle slit experiment.

Photons, less abundant then gravity, only effects known mass – ordinary mass, creates a wave through a particle slit experiment.

Their just sailing particles across a dark sea, literally.

Is it an ether? like Newton’s and Aristotle’s, infact many more scientists so called ‘space ether’? YES, Gravity waves exist we can detect these from binary stars, pulsars, quasars and every other massive thing that smashes into the underlying rock as to create a quake across the cosmos – that is what these are, and even writ small in our relatively dense space-time well, we see the slit experiment here with relatively solid waves, like in a solid – like  a transparent rock, beneath the dark mountain, here on our Earth.

And that’s all the science I can be bothered with today, stay tuned for my new thesis on civilizations. Little civilizations go out like planetary nebulas and create little heavy metal when they die, but heavy civilizations, like no others before them go out with a bang in the early cosmos - like supernovas creating all kinds of rare things, they create gold, platinum, silver – beyond an alchemists wildest dreams, up there floating in space.

Likewise mechanizations may not be all the fear, doom and gloom they are cranked out to be, they are the sublimation of life, the heavy nuclei kind, here on Earth, creating rare lifeforms that are more precious than gold - heralding the end of a first generation of civilizations and the beginning of a second generation of civilizations, the chemicals will mix with heavier nuclei thanks to the life giving supernova of the aging technophilia civilization.


  1. Hello

    finally a scientific article from you. Being quite a big math/physics fan I really appreciate it. I agree that the pure physics is the only part of science worth of time, the other ones are just a “turn the microscope on and get a nobel”, like Houellebecq points out in the beginning of Atomized. And the amount of brain training I get while learning physics is invaluable.

    1. Robert Martin says:

      Hey, yes the maths is the part that lags behind and tends to be the frustrating part because all we see is a skeleton of reality, i’m still trying to understand most of it. Best advice is to never start out with the symbols, it leads us down a blind alley. Primitive thought combined with natural philosophy – it’s the best way to understand physics, given that most physicists nowadays are polluted by modernity and political correctness, they can’t start with nor understand nothingness, and they have to have something to believe in that puts their ideas before everything else. All of science needs to observe how evolution occurs with our biosphere and our planet and apply to every specification we occupy, as nature is a whole.

      What amazes me the most is this dark matter and the potential for life within it, in interplanetary space or within the interior of wormholes beneath a ‘sea’ of dark liquid-like energy. Observing the speciations and mutations that occur as a result of the geologic phenomena on Earth, how life adapts to internalized caves in the darkness like extremophile slugs that glow in the dark and capture little travellers wondering through the open space (space-slugs eating space ships), also the crystals that evolve below contact with the surface world are fascinating, and especially in the deep ocean where there is no solid land mass, so many alien species evolve almost entirely independant of our ‘observable’ world up here on the land mass. Nature has the best ideas, always.

      Will be blogging more on science soon.

  2. Eric says:

    “Nature has the best ideas, always.”

    I like that. Great quote.

    1. AnHero says:

      Ironically it also has some really bad ones. What’s important is that nature admits when it’s wrong and dumps the bad ones.

      Doing so is the best idea ever.

      Humans cling to their bad ideas unto death.

  3. Charles Haines says:

    “Best advice is to never start out with the symbols, it leads us down a blind alley.”

    Well that certainly explains how you could come up with your theories.

    “hot dark matter is what is generated within blackholes by the fusion of dark energy”

    What is this based on, aside from a pretty poetic notion? It is completely unknown what dark energy is, why would it have anything to do with a black hole? What does ‘fusion of dark energy’ even mean?

    “Cold dark matter accumulates between galaxies ”
    Actually, dark matter is pretty much centered around galaxy cores just like ordinary matter.

    “dark matter gravitons”
    “Gravity is Dark Matter!”
    gravitons cannot be dark matter. The dark matter model that accurately predicts structure formation (with those numbers you dislike) is cold dark matter, meaning non-relativistic. Gravitons are massless and thus relativistic.
    Furthermore, we can (indirectly, of course) measure the location of dark matter. The bullet cluster is a collision between two clusters of galaxies, which left all the dark matter in behind. This cannot happen if dark matter would be made up out of massless particles.

    About the forces, in fact, after gravity the strong force broke off first (if it actually happened, so far, no indesputable GUT has been found), followed by electroweak breaking, where the electroweak force split up into weak and electromagnetic force both. Earth, life and the number of dimensions are all unrelated to these processes.

    As for what problem your, admittedly beautiful, metaphor does not solve, well, it would still not solve the problem that gravity is non-renormalizable, meaning we can’t do any math, meaning we can’t predict anything quantitatively, meaning we don’t have a scientific theory. That kinda sucks.

    Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the beauty of cosmology as well, and I enjoy your vision of it, but please don’t pretend that staring really hard is all one needs to do to understand nature. Mathematics is the language of nature, and if you find it too tedious or hard to learn it, then don’t, but realize that without the symbols, we’d have called it a religion instead

    1. Robert Martin says:

      I agree with some of those, but we don’t start out with symbols, never ever never – symbols are socialized and can mean anything. You must observe first and then correlate observation with these second rate symbols. ‘Maths’ isn’t the language of the universe, it’s artificial and is created through civilization, it’s a language and not the physical thing in itself – it’s idealism of the most practical type.

      “Actually, dark matter is pretty much centered around galaxy cores just like ordinary matter.” That’s right, but I did say it is between galaxies, i didn’t say it was centered – when we look at the distribution of dark matter we can see that they ‘web’ toward each other, they have a bridge between them. All things that touch share information transfer, such as gravity. Dark matter exists in the centres of glaxaxies, where the gravity is greatest.

      Right massless particles are relativistic, they distribute ‘equally’, uniformly across the entire cosmos, right now what happens when ‘equality’ breaks, there’s a singularity and the cosmic pressure within it is so great that it can fuse into another particle, a particle with MASS. We’ll say dark energy is like a lesser form of gravitons, and alone it has negative energy, it is the cosmological constant, it pushes away rather than together, now when the universe was younger, space was a lot more hemmed in then these negative massless particles are today. This quintessence would fuse, it would socialize to form a group of these things as waves and then compound into a higher particle, and that packet of energy would be the next particle on the evolutionary hierarchy.

      The quintessence of negative energy is the food of mass, mass is the compound of negative energy – and that packet of quanta/ mass is called positive energy. It is buoyancy of the most universal form. Gravity is not massless, it is a phase of mass, much like gases, and the ‘mass’ we think of, as in the solid objects that sink, they are a solid – there is a greater quantity of mass within it. And with that bullet cluster – If you could measure the speed at which the stars orbit, they would slow down, the gravity would be reduced, would it not? because their is reduced dark matter there in the collision, it would be reduced in proportion to the dispersal.

      The gravitons with collect together in the right conditions and fuse, it’s the best solution to ‘where’ all our matter came from, our atoms fused in our stars so why not quantum particles in singularities? Why are balckholes black? Maybe, just maybe, it could be the source of dark matter, or maybe a different phase of it alltogether, Gravity so dense that it solidifies, or turns into a plasma and time reaches ‘infinities’ and other ‘mathematical’ loopholes that they are completely obliterated by. The goal of science would be to explain in the most economical way as many observations as is possible.

      Gravity is not massless in my sense, if I use ‘gravitons’ I mean mass – the base of ordinary mass, if they are massless (or anti-mass) then that is dark energy rather than dark matter. From dark matter evolving onwards, from there is the positive energy, beneath the hierarchy is the algae of the cosmos, the dark energy that it feeds on. The only reason we think gravity is massless is because we can’t weigh it as such, ‘because it passes right through us and is indifferent to mass’. Dark matter, also, is very similar and if it is not gravity in itself then it is a very close relative of it, a subtle difference. If we had dark matter in our hands right now, we would expect that it would fade right through, just like gravity, so how do we measure it? ‘gravitational’ lensing, the same way we detect gravity, the curvature of light – the very same process, put an object over a light and just see how the light ‘curves’ around an ordinary matter body, light bends in relation to our mass, our gravity – our dark matter than sustains ordinary matter from decaying and ‘sinking’. And gravity waves as well, what’s the solvent it is passing through? We can’t just say oh it’s a particle and a wave! (as most physicists do) That is creating more problems then it is solving. Dark energy/ quintessence/ cosmological constant is the base, dark matter/ gravity/ positive energy/curvature is the next, it’s our middle caste of the cosmos and above that, on the pinnacle, the elite part is our very positive energy, our ordinary matter. And life does not form at the very peak, but revolving around that on cooler planets and such, life evolves downwards by creating structures that preserve form whereas before it would just not exist – by compounding the substance into higher forms, from atoms to compounds to life – that is what symmetry breaking is! cosmic evolution!

      Non-renormalizable is the paradox that we hit when we cannot overcome different phase transitions that occur through space-time. Certain areas go from our ‘normalized’ liquid flow, our happy pleasant earth existence, toward the ‘non-renormalizable’ infinities of a void or of a singularity, solid and gas/plasma. Time would be effected accordingly, blackholes have infinitely small time transfers as you approach the event horizon (Einsten and stephen hawking would agree) as to completely freeze and slow our perception of it completely – space-time solidifies. then as you go over the event horizon, you reach a certain ‘pressure’ a positive pressure in space so great that no negative pressure around it, no dark energy can escape, and so the solid space-time through the horizon begins to melt and the ‘laws’ of physics are scrambled, unsolified space-time – magma. Our perception of space-time is irrelevent inside the core of the cosmos, because the structures that have evolved to create our laws are at a temperature that breaks all bonds, all forces and gives us the ‘unification of all forces’.

      Our forces will never be unified by maths alone, though it will conceive half of it, the rest is for life to evolve with those laws and generate byproducts along the way, from which new laws emerge to shape and evolve those byproducts even further (ordinary matter).

      I like maths, but I realize that symbolism comes second from observation, we observe a process in nature and try to represent this as best we can – if we start from symbols, sure it helps us with the maths in general, but we indirectly observe it, I like to see with my own eyes, to see it before we symbolize it. Reality with all its warped senses toward idealism.

  4. [...] In response to a comment from a reader regarding dark matter here’s an extended comment replying to it as well as some interesting points unrelated, but as a consequence of it. [...]

Leave a Reply

37 queries. 2.186 seconds