Will To Pettiness

george_f_will

It’s a tough slog being a Republican in DC. Especially, if you are the Washington Post’s Official Republican™. So what does one do to get by? He behaves himself. Wears a sharp bow-tie. He does exactly what The Washington Post’s Official Republican™ is supposed to do.

So how does the bow-tie wearing Official WaPo Republican™ behave? The cucking is eminently predictable. This means he treats other Republicans the way Ramsay Bolton treated his fellow peers. He feeds them to the ravening hounds. Richard Nixon? He has a long shadow…Tsk, Tsk, Tsk. According to Will, Republicans can never be traitors. They can never truly play the Game of Thrones against Liberals. Never mind that the Dems have just all but nominated the real world equivalent of Cersei Lannister in a rigged primary season Tywin would have smiled fondly over. In Willworld, only Republicans have to maintain any code of honor.

And how about that rabble-rouser Ronnie Raygun? He was too risky. As Goerge H. W. Bush put it – “Wouldn’t be prudent.” Reagan of course won two elections and had the Soviet Union teetering on its heels. One would think Will would let bygones get gone. But no, Cucks have got to Cuck.

Will, who has built a highly lucrative career, aided by his special relationship with his sometimes friend, Ronald Reagan, feels highly incensed as if betrayed by his former, special pupil, whom he coached before the Great Debate with Jimmy Carter. Will fears that the Great Communicator has become the Great Disinformer by not adhering to Will’s approved script and will prove no match to the Great Manipulator–Mikhail Gorbachev. So the characteristically unflappable, intellectual guru of the “Far Right,” reacting like a wounded bull seeing the world through his darkly, red-colored glasses, viciously attacks the President.

Will, you see, accused Reagan of not being manly enough when he met with Gorbachev in Iceland to discuss what would later become Perestroika and the end of the Soviet Menace. Like Michael Jackson implying the Fresh Prince of Bel Air had latent homosexual tendencies, George Will was castigating Ronald Reagan over his low testosterone levels in foreign policy.

It would take time before the WaPo needed their Cabana Boy Cuckservative to properly insert dagger in a Republican Party vertebrae, but in the Mid 00’s; Liberalism’s needs again called. Will delivered with a column designed play right into the Democratic Party’s mid-term campaign strategy.

Today, with all three components of the “axis of evil” — Iraq, Iran and North Korea — more dangerous than they were when that phrase was coined in 2002, the country would welcome, and Iraq’s political class needs to hear, as a glimpse into the abyss, presidential words as realistic as those Britain heard on June 4, 1940.

So guess how George Will reacts to the nomination of Donald J. Trump?

Conservative columnist George Will told PJM he has officially left the Republican Party and urged conservatives not to support presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump even if it leads to a Democratic victory in the 2016 presidential election. Will…had a message for Republican voters. “Make sure he loses. Grit their teeth for four years and win the White House,” Will said during an interview after his speech at a Federalist Society luncheon.

This is classic Cuckservative behavior. Conservatives are supposed to be with them to the bloody, gore-smeared hilt when they nominate Bob Dole. When factions of the party not up to the WaPo Official Republican™ standard nominate a Reagan or a Trump, the knife is sharpened and aimed at the vertebrae. If one of his can’t win the day, than no Republican can win at all.

This sniveling scribe of Cuckservatism leaving the GOP is a positive sign for the GOP. George Will going away is like having a case of colon cancer go into remission. George Will supporting Gary Johnson is essentially what Gary Johnson deserves for being Gary Johnson. Trump should take pride in having George Will show his campaign the well-rounded pair of heels bought off and paid for by The Washington Post. Again Trump has flushed an enemy of Conservative America out into the open. George Will’s will to pettiness is revealed before all in its repulsive, Cuckservative glory.

Tags: , , ,

33 Responses to “Will To Pettiness”

  1. crow says:

    Which brings to mind other cucks that reiterate the fact that the term ‘conservative’ will never amount to anything, ever again…
    Michael Gove, the adult-wanabee UK conservative wanabee-leader. Dress an eleven year old up in a suit, and there you have the best that conservatives have to field.
    With their last chance to get their country back, all but in the bag, they come with that.
    I’m finished with politics and politicians. What a sad, sad joke it all is.

    • Jpw says:

      Gove’s knige-work vs. Boris was a classic Cuck move.

      • Boris seems too willing to play the system and lure in the voters with their worst traits, not their best. Gove seems to have exterminated himself as a political force and left it open to the careerists (May).

    • I’m finished with politics and politicians.

      With the end of equality, both vanish.

      Politics is mass manipulation, which is a product of democracy, itself a product of equality.

      Politicians are salesmen.

  2. avraham says:

    The Republicans have been a disappointment to me. They seemed to talk about family values, but then when in office would simply join the Democrats in the destruction of the american family.

    • The Leftists had 250 years to make good on their Enlightenment™ promises. They failed.

      The Republicans had 70 years to take a stand against the encroaching Soviet-style Leftist group-think bloc. They failed.

      Spring cleaning is about throwing out the useless, and replacing it with the useful.

  3. Noah says:

    It’s not that he has withdrawn his support because he doesn’t feel that Trump’s ideas are good ones? Or that maybe a psychologically unstable narcissist shouldn’t have access to the nuclear codes?

    • crow says:

      The psychologically unstable narcissists are the ones who sling the label ‘psychologically unstable narcissists’ at those who are unlike them. The typical inversion/projection of the mentally ill.

      Unable to imagine what a genuine human is, when they run into one, they think they’ve found the reincarnation of Hitler.

      Then, unable to bear in mind that they have confused the one with the other, they imagine what might happen if Hitler had access to nuclear codes.

      People read this crap in the media, and choose to take it seriously. Which is as good a reason as any, to never treat the reading of things as anything but a last resort.

      Take real life out for a test drive. Accept no substitute.

      • Noah says:

        No dummy, psychologists have said he is a narcissist.
        http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/the-mind-of-donald-trump/480771/
        http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/04/trump_concession_suggests_narcissistic_personality_disorder.html
        He’s pretty much a text book case. Shallow charm, egocentric, power hungry, dishonest, hypocritical, grandiose. It’s blatantly obvious to non stupid people Crow.
        “Which is as good a reason as any, to never treat the reading of things as anything but a last resort.” Yeah, the intellectually superior “reality centric” crowd has shown me the deeper of wisdom of never ever taking in information sources outside of one’s immediate experience. None can be trusted. At a certain point, debating Crow is like kicking an intellectual cripple.
        JPW: I didn’t say I supported Hillary. There are more than two possible perspectives, and I think Hillary is terrible. Though I probably think she is terrible for different reasons than you do. I’ll take her over Trump though.

        Are all conservatives who adapt to post feudal modernity guilty of “cuckservatism?” I get the implication. Cuckold conservatism. Weak people who are letting their women/ideology get fucked by the enemy in front of them.
        Jesus Christ, please get talk therapy. Modernity isn’t all bad people.

        • No dummy

          I know you are just kidding, but please treat your fellow users with respect.

          It will benefit you as well.

          • crow says:

            He’s not kidding. He doesn’t know how.
            What you see is what he is.

            But it is immensely humorous that he has no way of gauging how little respect I accord him, and those like him, with the result that all his dire insults pitter-patter like a light drizzle on a shingle roof.
            Utterly harmless, although a bit wet.

            It amazes me, in retrospect, that I ever accorded any attention at all to his kind.

            • The inclination of more thoughtful people is to take other people seriously, at which point they end up wasting a lot of brainpower trying to figure out what are basically nonsense positions: paradoxical, duplicitous and invariant.

      • Unable to imagine what a genuine human is, when they run into one, they think they’ve found the reincarnation of Hitler.

        If someone speaks the truth, he is literally Hitler™ to them.

        This is not a sustainable state of affairs.

    • Jpw says:

      About unstable narcisists accessing launch codes, how confidant would you feel if we ushered in a Cersei Lannister, oops, I mean Hillary! Peesidency?

      • cecilhenry says:

        Hilliary:

        ‘I know I gave the launch codes, I know that 2 million are dead and there was civil war for 2 years.

        BUT, what difference does that make NOW???

        That is in the past. ‘

        Coming to a theater near you??

      • Another way to look at this:

        Democracy produces nothing but narcissistic candidates. It makes sense to pick one who is driven by achievement instead of one whose goal is careerism. Trump will get a kick out of doing a presidency right; for Hillary Clinton, the presidency is a means to her own résumé just as it was for her molesty husband.

  4. J.j. Cintia says:

    Controlled opposition is an old political trick. Having fake opponents lead dissidents down blind alleys to dead ends is what these cucks do for a living. He’s made his thirty pieces of Silver by selling out and being the igor that helps Dr. Frankenstein build his monsters to attack the populace. I hear he has a nice little townhouse with a plain horsefaced wife and a retarded son. What does this cuck have to lose? With his puffed up ego and pusillanimous vocabulary he uses his poison pen to do his boss’s bidding. Just a hack using words to fill his coward’s life of selling out. Soon his fake world will crash down around his deaf ears, and his family, such as it is will dissolve. But at least he’ll look forward to watching some baseball before his little insignificant byline disappears from a dying fishwrap no one cares about anymore.

    • Eduardo the Magnificent says:

      Controlled opposition is an old political trick. Having fake opponents lead dissidents down blind alleys to dead ends is what these cucks do for a living.

      Took the words right out of my mouth. Will is a CFR and Trilateral member. He has no real conservative leaning, and never did. Not a surprise he hates Trump.

      • One other factor here is that writers depend on an audience, and Will has been appealing to the same audience for the last forty years. His knowledge of the world is trapped in the beginning of that time period as a result, and he is probably wealthy enough at this point that he does not see the struggles of ordinary people at all. From his gated community, or his desk if working from home, everything must seem quite peachy after all. The tendency of monkeys (and humans) in that position is to indirectly gloat, and I pick up that vibe from most cuckservatives and all Leftists of moderate success on up.

    • Apparently, he has four children, and the eldest has Down’s syndrome:
      http://www.newsweek.com/jon-wills-aptitudes-193538

      The pity party ruins every mind. Witness:

      Without the prevailing wind of political correctness my life would be very different. The life of my son would be unrecognisable.

      Eddie is 14 and has Down’s syndrome. It’s politically correct to say ‘Down’s syndrome’, but in earlier times it was wholly acceptable to use rather different terms.

      http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/03/how-my-disabled-son-has-changed-my-mind-about-political-correctness/

      All of them, patting themselves on the back for ignoring the obvious: the kid is retarded and it is a misfortune.

      I am not saying that full-on Aktion T4 is needed, although I see its beauties. Retarded kids ruins the lives of their parents.

      In wiser times, they were sent back for reincarnation, usually by allowing them to die early in life.

  5. avraham says:

    Psychology is pseudo science. It is best to take what they say about others as projection of their own nature.

    • It is best to take what they say about others as projection of their own nature.

      Seems to be good advice with humans in general! E.g., when liberals say that we are intolerant, they are covering up their own intolerance.

  6. Noah says:

    Cecilhenry:
    Yes I agree with you there. Hillary is a hypocritical warmonger. Many of us on the left see the Democrats as basically the lesser of two evils at this point, and don’t consider them a genuinely leftist party.
    Brett: Seriously!? I was disrespectful towards Crow? This entire site is predicated on the assumption that most of humanity is inferior and deserves to be subjugated to your will, and you’re insisting on “respectful” language. Not to mention the awful awful shit that Crow and others will shout at me/anyone for disagreeing with them. I don’t remember who, but a while back when I posted a dissenting opinion on an article about how gay people should remain closeted, someone said to me “Shoah, shut the fuck up.” Invoking the Jewish Holocaust as a convenient rhyme on my name, and telling me to shut the fuck up. He referred to me as “Shoah” several more times, it wasn’t a typo.

    What I’m ephatically not saying is, “Play fair you big meany!” That would be silly and useless. What I am saying is this is why you can’t be trusted with power. You’re hypocritical, have double standards, don’t really give a damn about basic aspects of human dignity and morality. I’m not sure you’re conscious of this. I think you think that you mean well. But you and your friends are classic authoritarian personalities. I have posted this before and will do so again. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Authoritarianism#The_authoritarian_mindset
    It’s a small example, but it should indicate that something is seriously wrong when “dummy” is over the line when applied to someone on your side, but “Shoah shut the fuck up,” is acceptable when applied to the opposition.
    If you were actually interested I can think of other double standards I have seen you exhibit off the top of my head. But you’re not interested, which is exactly why liberal ideals of egalitarian power dynamics are meant to reign people like you in…

    • I don’t remember who, but a while back when I posted a dissenting opinion on an article about how gay people should remain closeted, someone said to me “Shoah, shut the fuck up.” Invoking the Jewish Holocaust as a convenient rhyme on my name, and telling me to shut the fuck up. He referred to me as “Shoah” several more times, it wasn’t a typo.

      I don’t agree with this approach either. Then again, when you come in here swinging, expect people to give what you gave.

      • crow says:

        He doesn’t get that we are not like him.
        He doesn’t get that we will never be like him.
        He doesn’t get anything, period.
        Because he is so self-important that unless something fatal happens to him, he is incapable of realizing he is suicidal.
        Your typical missionary leftist: insane to the point of being permanently unable to measure his performance in terms of consequences.
        I move to ban this whatever it is. It serves no purpose whatsoever, other than to irritate and sidetrack.

        • I move to ban this whatever it is. It serves no purpose whatsoever, other than to irritate and sidetrack.

          I cannot imagine the dialogue is refreshing for him, so I must (regretfully) concur. I think there is good in Noah but some things are best mulled over for some years, rather than confronting them when they are disturbing.

          • crow says:

            There’s some good in Noah? So what?
            There’s probably some good in wood-ticks, too, but that’s no reason to have them around.
            Let the child have his tantrums somewhere else, while he grows up.

    • Jpw says:

      You seem to think you have a carte blanche to insult people and then whinge when they retaliate. Their is a technical term for the sort of person does that – a jerk. Stop being one and others will be nicer to you. That, or you could repeat kindergarten and learn something this rime.

  7. Noah says:

    What you just said is absurd, and you frame it as reasonable. You may “disagree,” but you didn’t call him out for it at the time, and it was very very overt. Also, when you say swinging, you mean disagreeing. And even when I do go from disagreeing into rudeness, it is nothing compared to telling someone to shut the fuck up while making allusions to genocide. Most of the comments towards people who dissent on this site are not that bad, but still kinda mean spirited.
    Once again, my point is not asking someone who says that most of humanity should be metaphorically smashed in the face to please play fair. My point is that this is a strong ass argument for a social structure based on egalitarian power dynamics. Because the people claiming to be morally and intellectually superior generally aren’t, they just have all the characteristics listed here http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Authoritarianism#The_authoritarian_mindset.
    Hence rule of law and concern for individual rights.

  8. -A says:

    This is gonna be long, ya’ll. You all know me.

    • -A says:

      Lol, I thought you weren’t coming back, Rosey? I guess you are more of a weed than I thought.

      “It’s not that he has withdrawn his support because he doesn’t feel that Trump’s ideas are good ones?”

      No. Not from a Conservative perspective. Conservatives don’t have a problem with closed borders, literal walls across the border between us and a savage nation, kicking out illegal immigrants and sending their children with them, ending an amendment that allows even illegal immigrants to breed and then get an easy pass to stay, or men with balls to shout down the politically correct mewling.

      “No dummy, psychologists have said he is a narcissist.”

      You are the last person who needs to be calling people names here, especially where intelligence comes in. The very nonsense you shilled out here proves you are not quite as intellectually dexterous as you would like to believe. These psychologists seem to be doing anything but psychology for their work. In fact, they not only ignore the fact that it is unscientific and unethical to make statements that could reasonably be considered to be diagnoses without sitting down with the subject, they not only clearly project their biases on incidents out of context of the reality that most Americans would consider to have Trump in the right: a whole group of them actually do this shit for a living to historical figures instead of working as psychologists in the first place. Rosey, this was nonsense and you know it.

      “He’s pretty much a text book case.”

      Well then why were they so “flummoxed” by the uncommon nature of his personality? I actually read these articles, Rosey.

      “It’s blatantly obvious to non stupid people Crow.”

      There you go again. I don’t think you know anything about being keen on that which is blatant to non-stupid people, Rosey. Stop flinging the shit and complaining when we call you a monkey.

      “Yeah, the intellectually superior “reality centric” crowd has shown me the deeper of wisdom of never ever taking in information sources outside of one’s immediate experience”

      You didn’t learn that from us. You already had those problems before you got here.

      “At a certain point, debating Crow is like kicking an intellectual cripple”

      There you go again. Flinging bullshit insults and also talking about shit you know nothing about. You have never had an honest argument with Crow. He is far from stupid. You have only ever antagonized the regulars of this comments section which is not open territory for entryism. If you bothered trying to have areal argument with the man, you would learn much. Furthermore, you have never had to argue an intellectual cripple. Regardless of what your actual intelligence might be, you use intellectual cripples as an echo-chamber. You lefties always did love the handicapped. With your ramps and such shit.

      “think Hillary is terrible. Though I probably think she is terrible for different reasons than you do. I’ll take her over Trump though.”

      Oh yeah, you’re really gonna settle for that one, aren’t you champ. A woman who openly brags about defending people she refers to as pedophiles, laughing about the notion of her husband raping underage girls, being derelict during the Benghazi incident, and certainly (what we know she did) allowing sensitive information to fall into the hands of at least one hacker because of her incompetence (while most likely selling state information to foreign interests) and actively campaigning in favor of “preponderance of evidence” models below the shadow of a doubt model in the name of feminism: she’s a real catch. Much better than that man old White man who wants to send the foreign rapists back home to rape.

      “Are all conservatives who adapt to post feudal modernity guilty of “cuckservatism?””
      Yes. Demotism is a farce.

      “Yes I agree with you there. Hillary is a hypocritical warmonger. Many of us on the left see the Democrats as basically the lesser of two evils at this point, and don’t consider them a genuinely leftist part”

      Oh but, you’ll take her over Trump, huh? She’s sooo much better. What liberals aren’t warmongers for the ideology? What could be better evidence that you are indeed a pinko that Hillary isn’t liberal enough for you. If she is too liberal for you, what in the fuck are you doing voting for someone who isn’t even a benign opponent to lose out to? You clearly just want to keep in what you perceive as being the conversation. Which might surprise you, has nothing to do with presidential candidates, except for when it does.

      “Seriously!? I was disrespectful towards Crow? This entire site is predicated on the assumption that most of humanity is inferior and deserves to be subjugated to your will, and you’re insisting on “respectful” language.”

      Our Elitism must immediately apply to you because you have taken to commenting on this site? So this is how it is! When you are off in meatspace it’s all about the equality but when you are among elitists it’s all “do as the Romans do” and you assume this applies to grand-standing snark and potshots at the material we come here to read in the first place.

      ” Not to mention the awful awful shit that Crow and others will shout at me/anyone for disagreeing with them.”

      Perhaps this has something to do with your overall attitude of demanding deference to your difference of opinion? Perhaps also, you come here to read material that will never be in alignment with what you believe, and then you go on the comments to pussyache about it. Then, you are shocked when nothing changes because of your “””arguments.”””

      ” someone said to me “Shoah, shut the fuck up.””

      Probably had something to do with the above. Also, I agree. Shoah is not suitable. Would you prefer Hymon? I think I will call you Hymon from now on. It’s a funnier joke.

      ” What I am saying is this is why you can’t be trusted with power. You’re hypocritical, have double standards, don’t really give a damn about basic aspects of human dignity and morality. “
      We don’t want power. There are likely some people who still comment here who do think that some kind of demotism would be acceptable. We do not expect, however, to be elevated into that caste off of virtue of wanting hierarchical culture to make a comeback and many here are against demotism entirely. We do not expect to be anything other than what we are able to be on our own. The people you would entrust power with would never leave us alone to live our lives. They would constantly meddle, constantly pick our pockets and constantly seek to make strictures and laws over every little thing which will affect us even in our own homes. Pardon us for saying fuck you, get off my lawn and yes: some people have different rules to follow, different challenges, different lives to lead and all have the same single expectation of striving for greatness and being a part of their community. All based on the lives they choose to lead and are able to lead. Fuck you, Hymon! Get off my lawn!

      “But you and your friends are classic authoritarian personalities. I have posted this before and will do so again. [shamelessly plugs RationlCuck]”

      Leave that 8-Chan for pussies in your toilet when you leave the house. Also, how convenient that when we propose legitimate cultural restoration and de jure power structures instead of disingenuous ones, we are “authoritarian personalities” as if that is an innately bad thing in the first place. Since when is authoritarian personality synonymous with a personality disorder? Many behaviorists would disagree and call bullshit. And is this as opposed to SJW’s and every other liberal demanding their frame to be acquiesced to?

      “If you were actually interested I can think of other double standards I have seen you exhibit off the top of my head. But you’re not interested, which is exactly why liberal ideals of egalitarian power dynamics are meant to reign people like you in…”

      I believe this too. We were disenfranchised in our own country that our ancestors built because we don’t give a shit about the imaginary or misleading complaints by leftists. We should all drop what we are doing and work on Hymon’s complaints! This has a lot to do with the overall lack of hospitality you receive here.

      “You may “disagree,” but you didn’t call him out for it at the time, and it was very very overt.”

      Probably because Brett understood where one of his regulars was coming from and because he allows us to fight our own battles. Why not stand up for yourself, then? Why not try to make what you mean more clear? Why not try to say: “hey, I know gay propaganda has been overbearing lately but blah, blah, blah…”? Would it not be easier to realize that we are not obliged to respect the opinions of the people who are invested in the current system? In fact, we consider these people to be suffocating us and our kind. Why bring that fight here when you can have it at a Trump rally, tough guy?
      ” Also, when you say swinging, you mean disagreeing.”
      No. he means swinging. You come swinging in here like an orangutan and you complain when we send you back to the zoo. We are all to accept the notion that your frame is morally and intellectually superior and accept that you consider the comments section to be open territory for entryism. You demand that we shift the conversation to a demotist and liberal friendly tone so that you can make this the Hymon show and oversee the tone and the subject matter even within the comments section like a gay school marm.

      ” My point is that this is a strong ass argument for a social structure based on egalitarian power dynamics. Because the people claiming to be morally and intellectually superior generally aren’t”

      We do NOT operate under the assumption that egalitarianism is the power dynamic by which we are to defer. This is the difference between you, the authors and the majority of the other commenters. If there are those who are commenters who do not, and they have not gotten hate, they have not assumed that we are all to entertain your point of view for the sake of redirection and reframing. In other words, they aren’t (((Hymons))) or shills.

      “they just have all the characteristics listed here [shills cuckrationalewiki again] Hence rule of law and concern for individual rights.”

      Stop shilling this swill you gomer. Also, all of this concern for “individual rights” doesn’t seem to come into play for little girls using public restrooms or locker rooms, private businesses not wanting to make certain products or do certain business with certain people, or not having a gay wedding in their living room. Does it? The same for self defense or the right to own firearms. Bullshit is called!

  9. -A says:

    Sorry, as for the article itself, I do wonder how many cuckservatives really are just pissed that their candidates don’t do exactly what they want or that their candidates didn’t get elected. Other than that, how many are secretly liberals who just either like the idea of being a Wall Street Journal snob, like to rail on about their Xtianity (keeping their virtue signaling old school but nothing else) and how many are just seeking to derail what is called conservatism from the inside because they know that once real Conservatism becomes popular that they don’t have a damn means of fending for themselves. Or, they know that they would not be on top and that infuriates them. Regardless of the reason, they are all liberals at heart and soul.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>