How #BLM is Ending America’s Patience With Diversity

There are people in Amerika that hate diversity. They simply cannot bear the burden of having people from a different cultural background. They are so steeped in their zenophobic bile that they lash out in sadistic violence and viciously beat those unlike themselves. In Chicago, four of these haters kidnapped a mentally handicapped person and torured him while yelling “F*** Trump! F*** White People!” They even celebrated it on social media the way ISIS does the end zone dance while chucking gay people off a roof in Ninevah.

So who are these whack-job nazis? Where is their entry on the $PLC Hatewatch Blog? They are #BLM and they are tired of ISIS getting all your atrocity attention bandwidth. I hope George Soros is proud of his ROI on this one. Savor what Mr. Soros contributes to Amerika with generous, ongoing support for #BLM!

Well, there’s a problem with even posting this. Amerika should literally not be allowed to say it. “Scientific” American derpsplains why I should feel shamed by even posting such an inconvenient hate truth below.

But another part of me wonders whether research on race and intelligence—given the persistence of racism in the U.S. and elsewhere–should simply be banned. I don’t say this lightly. For the most part, I am a hard-core defender of freedom of speech and science. But research on race and intelligence—no matter what its conclusions are—seems to me to have no redeeming value.

So “Scientific” American tells me. Yet clearly we have a ¡HATECRIME! Clearly it was inspired by ¡RACISM! What does Political Amerikan have to say*?

Although they are adults, they’re 18. Kids make stupid decisions — I shouldn’t call them kids; they’re legally adults, but they’re young adults, and they make stupid decisions,” Duffin said. “That certainly will be part of whether or not … we seek a hate crime, to determine whether or not this is sincere or just stupid ranting and raving.”

Can you imagine the destruction that would have ensued had the police in South Carolina had asked everyone to empathize with a sensitive and confused Dylan Storm Roof. If Van Jones thought Election 2016 was a (((“Whitelash”))) I’d recommend he stay in his fallout shelter for about the next week. Diversity Fetishism has got to be dismantled. We can’t lie athwart reality.

Diversity fetishism can either be dismantled peaceably, via the renewal of Freedom of Association Rights and the repeal of disparate impact statutes or this beating will be the norm in Amerika ten to twenty years from now. It will be normalized. It will be excused.

The Lunatic Left is trying to claim there is a new gender called Clover that basically just serves as an excuse to be a pedophile. Their excuse brigade will soon be out in force to protect #BLM.

If there is any good reason left in the bowels of mercy not to completely destroy any status quo that would attempt to excuse what these people did to the mentally handicapped; then peaceable dissociation from diversity, at pace at which each individual would prefer, is the only acceptable path. Let cooler heads prevail. Let us all just swallow our tongues. Let us all just walk away. It will work if the very stones don’t cry out.

If the races and factions don’t go in peace; there will be some that go in pieces. I don’t see this being tolerated much longer. Even if President Obama knocks off the chronic raceturbation and President Elect Trump asks us nicely to stay cucked just one more time. It will explode like a Diet Coke bottle dosed with a handful of Mentos.

Somewhere in Amerika, our very own Anders Breivik is muttering insanities while he loads the magazines and doesn’t even consider switching to decaf. The diversity fetishism of the Cathedral will end. Pray it doesn’t end in more people like Dylan Roof or Brittany Herring. Nobody of either skin pigmentation involved deserves to suffer cruelty at the hands of such an individual. But that tragic cruelty is exactly what a continued ignorant belief in diversity fetishism will bring to our nation. We have sown this too long and are reaping the predictable whirlwind.

Tags: , , ,

59 Responses to “How #BLM is Ending America’s Patience With Diversity”

  1. Chris I says:

    Races can go their own ways peacefully, although I don’t see some individuals going without being coerced, which I would be happy to oblige if it comes to it.

    But the leftists….they don’t deserve peace or even a one way ticket to Brazil. Let them be an inspiration to resurrect the brazen bulls.

    • But the leftists….they don’t deserve peace or even a one way ticket to Brazil.

      I do not know what they deserve, but I know that the lowest impact solution is to exile them to Brazil. No muss, no fuss, and we do not have to engage in a protracted battle.

      Yes, some part of me has great anger and wants to murder them… like fleas, mosquitoes, leeches, flu viruses, tapeworms and other parasites to which Leftists can successfully be analogized. However, imagine being on your 500th kill, and realizing that you have several thousand left to go. Leftists are simply broken people and the right solution is to repatriate them to the third world because that type of society matches their mentality, and this allows evolution to try again with the somewhat flawed raw material that veered off-course in the first world.

  2. Avraham Rosenblum says:

    Scientific American is a Left Wing rag. It used to be good but no longer

  3. Avraham Rosenblum says:

    In any case I think if it took BLM to wake people up to the facts then it is a good thing. It is safe to say that without the m and the president, then Trump could never have been elected. Before them almost all white people accepted the Leftist narrative.–Not from bad hearts but from the fact that that is what all the intellectuals were saying and every single university. Hegel had already been absorbed into the Left and made into a Marxist. If not for my own traditional education, I probably would have gone along with the narrative myself. However it was hard to fit the ideas of socialism into my own studies of the Old Testament and Maimonides. I realized however the current problems are not the same as those addressed by Maimonides, so instead of Hegel I more or less accepted the Kant school of thought.

    • Not from bad hearts but from the fact that that is what all the intellectuals were saying and every single university.

      This is an important point: higher IQ populations (Japanese, Western Europeans, Jews) brainwash themselves through goodwill. Each group interprets this according to its own culture, which leads to altruism for Western Europeans, something like universalism for Jews, and tentacle porn for the Japanese.

      If not for my own traditional education, I probably would have gone along with the narrative myself. However it was hard to fit the ideas of socialism into my own studies of the Old Testament and Maimonides.

      Traditional education may have been a huge factor, but you also seem adept at philosophical analysis, and so this is most likely the major factor if not the largest contributing factor.

      The “Bell Curve” — from the book The Bell Curve, the “normal distribution” pattern which describes how abilities are doled out in every human group — tells us that only a very few on the far right side of the curve will understand this stuff. Interestingly, they are the least likely to be hypersocial — in part because of high natural Openness — and so not very likely to get involved with religion, which is mostly understood as a social event.

      High IQ populations tend to be unstable because they are introspective and self-doubting as a consequence of understanding farther than others. This makes them prone to accept ideas like altruism and universalism.

      • JPW says:

        Narratives have a hidden teleology. You are being sold what you’re being sold to accomplish a purpose. Figure out the purpose and you can figure out the truth hidden behind the Psuedoerudite Bullsh!t.

  4. Avraham Rosenblum says:

    In any case, I harbor a secret desire to rehabilitate Hegel. But in any case I would not put him on the same level as Schopenhauer or Fries.

    • In any case, I harbor a secret desire to rehabilitate Hegel.

      Unfortunately, he did sort of write the theory upon which the notion of “Progress” is based.

      It might make sense to reframe what he wrote not as historical inevitability, but a reflect of the “committee mentality” which makes terrible decisions.

  5. Wilson says:

    Trayvon Martin was supposed to be Peak Negro.

    • Barack “Baby Doc” Obama was Peak Diversity. White people figured that if they finally got a black president in office, it would be clear that white people were not holding black people back. This missed the point that what is holding black people back is that they are in a society which is not designed for them and will never reflect their interests, at least beyond the simplest economic level. Diversity is causing black discontent, and it seems to me that this is mostly unrelated to economics, although people always mention that because it is the language of motivation here in the dying West.

  6. epochehusserl says:

    Here is what Richard Spencer should have said to the college students when asked if he was a white supremacist:

    I am really just a freedom of association supremacist. I believe that private individuals and organizations not receiving money from the state should have the right to voluntarily choose their members and hierarchy. If a private organization wants to use intelligence or aptitude tests to constitute its members they should be allow and we wouldn’t have as many indebted college students for example.

    The last point bears repeating, it should be explained to white college students that large numbers of them have to go into debt for the rest of their lives to attempt to get into the middle class because of disparate impact and duke power vs griggs. There is a lot more to the civil rights and “equalist” movements than being against lynching.

    • Jpw says:

      Hell yeah. I don’t really believe different races of people have to hate or want to dominate others just to desire their own place.

      • I don’t really believe different races of people have to hate or want to dominate others just to desire their own place.

        This is the anti-diversity argument in a nutshell: each group needs its own place. When they are put into the same nation, these legitimate self-interests naturally and inevitably conflict. The side result of this is a society with no standards, in which no one is particularly invested in making it succeed.

      • Jenifer C. says:

        Careful analysis of this position vis a vi history tells us it is woefully utopian, though not quite to the level of diversity worship.

        It would be sufficient to say “I would rather minimize the natural conflicts of interest between our groups through granting the option of separation.” This is both a statement of realism and altruism. It also stands in stark contrast to the diversicrat position that forced association is the only form of altruism.

        On a related note, the great problem with white freedom of association is that non-whites generally will not accept it as valid. Though they may hate or envy whites, they do not permit them to have their own spaces. This is the lynchpin of western destruction. Western spaces are supposedly owned in common by the whole world. Non-Western spaces are owned in common by their respective non-western peoples.

        So color me skeptical that freedom of association for whites will re-emerge and correct what ails the West. Colonialism ended only after a catastrophic series of wars and geopolitical realignments. Neo/Inverse-Colonialism will probably require just as much calamity to be unseated from the consciousness of those who hold it aloft.

        • Bruno says:

          Couldn’t agree more.

          When I hear people talk about White Genocide (which IS happening, don’t get me wrong) and that they have the RIGHT to exist, I have to shake my head.

          Nobody has a RIGHT to anything. They have to be fought for. Denmark exists as a Danish country because generations of Danish men have secured the existence of a territory where their culture rules, giving their lives if need be for the benefit of THEIR (genetic) group.

          Iceland has only recently repealed a 400 year old law which allowed its population to kill Basque whalers on sight. This is how our ancestors kept their nations/real estate/resources from being taken by other groups.

          Non-Whites will never leave us alone. They are in a paradoxical position because they ABSOLUTELY KNOW the truth, which is that when left to their own devices, they will only create third-world spaces. They are parasites of the White man and they KNOW it. That’s why it’s so hard to find ethno-nationalists among them. All the nationalist rhetoric coming from them is just a way to make themselves feared or whatever. They know what non-White nations look like. That’s why they’re moving to White nations. If there was an area in the U.S. (e.g. Southwest) reserved for them, in a few years the remaining White part would be getting thousands of “refugees” from there. These people are fleeing from themselves. They create hellholes where they don’t want to live, but resent and hate Whites when they live in White societies because they don’t belong there.

          In the end, it all comes down to US. WE have to secure our spaces. No one is going to give us anything. Trying to reach a consensus with them or to convince them of the benefits of Free Association is pure naivety.

          We need to build tribes, first at the local level and then larger confederations of racially aware conservative Whites and show our people an alternative. Some will come and we’ll decide if we want them or not. The others (self-hating Whites and non-Whites) can go to hell. And this is NOT going to be peaceful because we’ll be literally shaking off parasites and they’re going to go full bolshevik berserk.

          Like a famous Austrian philosopher once said:

          “Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live.”

          • These people are fleeing from themselves. They create hellholes where they don’t want to live, but resent and hate Whites when they live in White societies because they don’t belong there.

            This is why the solution includes encouraging them to stop fleeing and to focus instead on gradual improvement, according to their own standards.

  7. J.j. Cintia says:

    Diversity is a red herring. Like Civil Rights it is just a Trojan Horse. Its not wise Greeks doing this though. Stifling dissent, censoring media and shutting down scientific inquiry is par for the course for this cancer. They don’t want peace. They want you DEAD.
    Talk is cheap. Existential threats have to be dealt with much more directly. They want Genocide, and they will get it. Like Pharaoh to Moses, they have picked the form of their Destructor.
    I don’t care what they say or do now. It is what it is.

    • -A says:

      Do me a favor. When Gozar finally comes, please nobody think of the Stay Puffed Marshmallow Man.

  8. Avraham Rosenblum says:

    I think the American system was mainly meant for Wasps. I mean to say from the beginning with Hobbes and John Locke I think all their thought was based on the idea that their system would be for people that accepted the Old Testament and the New. Maybe not openly but I think that underscores everything they wrote as an unconscious assumption. The trouble with some blacks I have noted is they do not accept that basic moral system. Many seem to believe it is their moral obligation to bring down the USA.

    • I think the American system was mainly meant for Wasps.

      Most definitely, because that was the founding group and they intended it for themselves.

      Many seem to believe it is their moral obligation to bring down the USA.

      This is a natural consequence of being subject to a system that is not designed for your people: resentment.

      One of the many reasons why diversity cannot work.

  9. missy says:

    It seems to me the whites are going to have to leave and obtain geographic isolation like the people of Finland. All leftist whites who remain in the USA will become Mexicans and Brazilians eventually, which is what they want. If nationalist whites remain in the USA, they are not only propping up parasitical races who could never create a 1st world civilization but who also wish for the demise of whites because they are acting in the self interest of their own race. The territory of the USA will become Brazil and Mexico, sooner or later. Canada will also succumb but with more Arabs and Chinese.

    • JPW says:

      The alternative is to stop supporting dysfunction. Let people keep what they earn and earn what they keep.

      • missy says:

        It’s just not possible. We pay taxes and that is the end of that. Look at South Africa. Even when reduced to 10% of the population, whites can prop up a functioning civilization for blacks. The only thing that will work at this point is an economic collapse.

        • Even when reduced to 10% of the population, whites can prop up a functioning civilization for blacks.

          Best solution then is to hide the money and starve the beast.

      • Otherwise known as:

        1. Freedom of association, plus
        2. End of the socialist benefits state

        Europeans are kicking and screaming anytime someone mentions the second, and most whites are too cucked to consider the first. This is what we must work on in the near term, then.

        • missy says:

          These are good solutions. If that can be accomplished, it just might work.

          • missy says:

            The horror. I just found 128 people with my family name are living in South Africa. Poor souls. The rest are mostly in England and USA. Site is called “forebears”.

        • JPW says:

          Welfare needs to be restigmatized and means-tested. That’s how you begin to fight the love for the welfare state.

          • Or just abolished entirely. It is not the goal of government to save everyone from themselves.

            • JPW says:

              No. But they will claim that in order to coerce loyalty. Abolishing state income redistribution would greatly limit government power.

              • If we cut all the entitlements, we will no longer be in debt very shortly.

                However, on a broader level of historical trends, liberal democracy has died and we need something better.

                • Bruno says:

                  I think you are underestimating the violent response from non-Whites to these measures.

                  If you cut all the entitlements, you must be ready for a new French or Bolshevik revolution with Whites as the Aristocracy to be wiped out. This is already the core of the message coming from the Leftist intelligentsia.

                  – “White privilege”
                  – “White supremacy”
                  – “the problem of Whiteness”
                  – “Whites are root of all the problems”
                  – “non-White bodies are being massacred by White cops”
                  – etc etc

                  Think about Weather Underground and the 25 million people they plotted to kill. These genocidal leftards haven’t simply disappeared.

                  The writing is on the wall. We’re already under a genocide in disguise with more and more Leftists coming out of the closet and assuming their “All I want for Christmas is White genocide” sexual fantasy.

                  Right now, they may be contempt with the slow genocide, but if we show signs of fighting back, including half-measures like ending AA, we’ll soon see their true colors.

                  If we want to survive this, we’re going to have to secede politically and financially and then fight the inevitable war, which is not going to be pretty.

                  • If you cut all the entitlements, you must be ready for a new French or Bolshevik revolution with Whites as the Aristocracy to be wiped out.

                    As you say, this condition exists now, but is not recognized. Having it become formalized as its actual intent, as opposed to its “public face,” will unite people behind stopping it.

  10. J.j. Cintia says:

    Look you have to realize that separation is not a solution. The other races cannot create functional societies. The idea you can peacefully coexist with creatures who cannot feed and support themselves and mean to loot and attack you is suicidal. You may not approve of White Supremacy, but that was America until the Hart-Cellar Act. The idea you can reason with them has already been tried. They aren’t really asking for reparations at all. They’re stupid but not stupid enough to ask for payments for something that didn’t happen to them. The media goes along with this, but what they want is TRIBUTE. They want to ENSLAVE YOU. Someone has to rule. They cannot run shit. If they have to die, too bad. If its them or me, the choice is clear. Morality is meaningless when it requires death.

    • The idea you can peacefully coexist with creatures who cannot feed and support themselves and mean to loot and attack you is suicidal.

      It is worse than that: we cannot coexist with any diversity. Even the nicely-behaved ones. Each group needs its own place. It does not make sense to be fanatical about this, but to have it as the overall cultural direction of a civilization.

      The other races cannot create functional societies.

      I disagree. They may not create societies like ours, but they lived for millennia without us and can do so again.

      Our way will not work for them just as their ways will not work for us.

      • Bruno says:

        We can fantasize with a scenario where we ALL come to the conclusion that Diversity doesn’t work and that it’s better we all go our own way.

        Reality check: NEVER. GONNA. HAPPEN.

        The absurdity of Diversity may be obvious to us, but they know what the alternative is for them. And they hate it. That’s why they came here.

        Why do we waste our time on these fantasies? I think it’s pretty obvious they’re not going to leave except by force. We’re not going to have our countries back except by force.

        If anyone thinks the survival of Europeans in the countries they created will come about without the use of violence is day dreaming. And the later it happens, the more demographically weakened we’ll be.

        • I think it’s pretty obvious they’re not going to leave except by force. We’re not going to have our countries back except by force.

          Perhaps it will come to that. First, it makes sense to approach with a gentle touch so that we are not the aggressor, and if a backlash occurs, it will not be against us by our own people.

          I advocate a “pincer strategy” of two forks moving together to encourage nationalism:

          1. Remove attractors: end affirmative action, the welfare state, free stuff in generation, civil rights, anti-discrimination law and restore freedom of association. Assert a strong Western European (WASP) identity in all imagery, speech, etc.
          2. Add incentives: offer reparations with repatriation and advocate nationalism. Recognize and encourage nationalism in foreign countries. Give minorities pride in who they are and a faith in their home countries.

          Will those be as comfortable as this one? Maybe not, but people act more from a need for pride and belief in their future than purely practical concerns.

          Billy Roper writes convincingly on this topic about the “balkanization” of the US in the future.

          If that fails, then there will be a massive uprising of Leftists and their allies among minority groups, and this will force the West to defend itself, which it should be able to do easily.

        • JPW says:

          If it comes down to it, be ready to handle your sh!t. When someone comes for you, you have a moral responsibility to your woman and your offspring to put their asses in the grave 1st. But before it gets there, do everything possible to maintain peace without being enslaved yourself.

          • When someone comes for you, you have a moral responsibility to your woman and your offspring to put their asses in the grave 1st. But before it gets there, do everything possible to maintain peace without being enslaved yourself.

            Another way to put this: every fight is a roll of the dice, in part. The good guys do not always win and sometimes, even when they win, they are wounded or exhausted or worse, distracted from another fight that was more important. Thus, sane people avoid conflict unless unnecessary, but then go in with do-or-die aggression and brutality.

  11. Salger says:

    http://therightstuff.biz/2016/12/05/12-1genocide-the-inescapable-conclusion/

    “Nationalism For All” is a faulty position. Even from a non-White Nationalist standpoint doing a culling of Mexico’s Mestizos, Redskins, and Dindus while settling it with Europeans would serve to raise its GDP per capita later on.

    • Billy Roper explains the transition well with his concept of Balkanization.

      “Nationalism for all” means, per the definition of nationalism, means repatriation. Anyone who does not understand this is arguing outside of their capacity.

      In the near term, we will see several stages:

      1. Rejection of diversity.
      2. Rejection of the welfare state.
      3. Consequently, balkanization — as happened in the 1920s — each ethnic group retreats to its own communities.
      4. Cultural wave of identitarianism.
      5. As part of this, a need for repatriation, since balkanization is “separate but equal” writ large.

      As far as culling, our people oppose this for good reason. It is a radical leap to a final solution instead of how we are accustomed to solving problems, which is to first reach a clear point of focus, then to apply pressure in increasing degrees, and only to resort to culling when the situation proves clearly untenable. How do we know this? It was how the colonists addressed the Amerind situation: at first welcoming, then after the initial noble savage spergouts retaliatory, and finally grimly committed to breaking Indian power permanently. They did not fully cull the Indians, as that is too extreme without necessity for the Western mind; they did however give in to laziness, and not do the final relocation to Siberia that was needed.

      John Derbyshire provides an intermediate solution: dump refugees in Puerto Rico which could be extended further to using a place like Puerto Rico as a diversity preserve and sending all our non-WASPs there. In my view, this would require resettling the one in twenty Puerto Ricans who seem to be intelligent and good people. While West Side Story is clearly angels-versus-devils typical Hollywood blather, there are also some interesting people there have much to offer. However, taking Derbyshire’s point further, we reach my longstanding statement about repatriation: if we cannot do it to countries of origin (Asians to Asia, Africans to Africa, Amerinds to Siberia) we can dump everyone in Brazil, which is sort of like the world’s genetic centrifuge and proud of it. For that reason, it is also a great place to dump Leftists as it fits their ideal of the vibrantly diverse state.

  12. epochehusserl says:

    I am not hopeful that this can end peacefully. I was threatened on National Review for criticizing disparate impact too forcefully.

  13. Avraham Rosenblum says:

    You are getting to one basic point. I really hate to be arguing for Hegel, but nationalism makes sense in his context and only in his context. I just can’t see it anywhere else in Kant or anywhere in the German idealists. But since Hegel has limitations the only way I can salvage him is with Howard Bloom and his ideas about the social meme and the super organism. That is nationalism built around the basic set of values of Judaeo-Christian Civilization. [That is revelation in the Bible and reason {Aristotle}.]

    • I just can’t see it anywhere else in Kant or anywhere in the German idealists.

      Kant appealed to a sense of universalism, but Schopenhauer was clearly race-aware, and it is likely that Kant’s view was nuanced. However, looking at the roots of idealism, which is that ideas are distinct from one another through a sense of necessary reason via cause-effect chains, and we see how important race would be, if it had been considered by men writing in an age where strong nationalism and xenophobic discrimination were the healthy norm.

  14. Avraham Rosenblum says:

    That is nationalism based on a certain social meme is justified. But nationalism based on evil is not justified. –So it would not be like Hegel. It might what Hegel was really thinking but it would not be that the “State” is the Divine ideal embodied on earth. Rather it depend on what the state is built on. Moral principles? Then fine. But if built on some false or evil meme, then No.

  15. Avraham Rosenblum says:

    In other words there is no idea here of self determination. Rather people that are savages should be set far away.

    • In other words there is no idea here of self determination. Rather people that are savages should be set far away.

      It is easy to overlap the two, but basically: self-determination means sending everyone else away; some groups are more immediate threats than others, such as Muslims, but really, no foreign group can occupy a nation, even partially, no matter how nice they are. Diversity does not work.

  16. Avraham Rosenblum says:

    So I am really arguing for states that are based on Torah principles. For example Israel, the USA. That includes states that have a balance between church and state like Russia and England where Biblical principles are embodied in the fabric of the state.

    But people whose sole ambition is the destruction of Western civilization ought to be sent far away. That pretty much means any groups that are against Western civilization.

    • But people whose sole ambition is the destruction of Western civilization ought to be sent far away. That pretty much means any groups that are against Western civilization.

      This makes sense to me. However, speaking as a realist, any non-Western group is going to have as part of its goal the destruction of Western civilization, because its goal is to conquer. That is the order of nature. Therefore, we must exclude all Western groups. This includes gypsies. Jews are interesting because they are the “shadow population” of the West, outsiders — probably once Western — who wish to be Western again, but now have a partially Asiatic basis as well. It seems to me that despite a large number of them being Communists, a large number have also been some of the most fervent defenders of the West, in part because they have a unique perspective that proves its value to them versus the Asiatic elements — including Communism, binary mysticism and individualism expressed through social conformity — which makes the urgency of its defense not just apparent but existential.

      • Avraham Rosenblum says:

        I can not speak for Communists. I think they were thinking in terms of “progress” and Hegel. I just do not think that the flaws in communism were all that apparent to good hearted people. At any rate, I did notice people like Richard Epstein, and Pamela Geller that are on the right track. They seem to be are invincible when it comes to defending Western values.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>