Diversity is failing for everyone

We all know that two or more objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time.

Culture is the organizing principle of a society. It is intrinsically linked with genetics, or ethnicity, because it co-evolves with the population.

Culture is how we know what is acceptable and what isn’t, and how to behave, and how to be rewarded for our good acts.

Two or more cultures cannot occupy the same space at the same time. What results with “multiculturalism” is constant struggle for supremacy, racism and hatred.

Even the “anti-racism” displayed proudly and sycophantically by members of our chattering classes is a form of racism. It’s racism against the majority, disguised as ignoring the problem of cultural clash.

But ignoring problems doesn’t make them go away. It just makes them stronger.

Now we’re seeing how on many levels at once, diversity doesn’t work. It doesn’t work for Caucasians, it doesn’t work for Asians, it doesn’t work for Hispanics and for its poster children, African-Americans, it does not work at all.

People are living without culture, which forces government to take over many roles we do not (if we read history) want any government having. People are living in constant strife and constant suspect whispered racism. Tensions are high and each group believes the other has it easier.

While all that goes on, most of them are quietly miserable.

Women of all races bring home less income and own fewer assets, on average, than men of the same race, but for single black women the disparities are so overwhelmingly great that even in their prime working years their median wealth amounts to only $5.

[…]

Among the most startling revelations in the wealth data is that while single white women in the prime of their working years (ages 36 to 49) have a median wealth of $42,600 (still only 61 percent of their single white male counterparts), the median wealth for single black women is only $5.

[…]

Wealth, or net worth, measures the total of one’s assets — cash in the bank, stocks, bonds and real estate; minus debts — home mortgages, auto loans, credit cards and student loans. The most recent financial data was collected before the economic downturn, so the current numbers likely are worse now than at the time of the study.

Black women, in general, were more likely to have participated in the subprime loan crisis with upper-income black women being five times more likely to have received a high-cost mortgage than upper-income white men. – Post Gazette

That’s a bleak statistic. This means perpetual poverty for these people.

While this dismal result is clearly a consequence of low performance, it also indicates that these people are not in a supportive society.

A supportive society does not encourage whole swathes of its population to exist at subsistence level and take advantage of them when they are clueless.

In the clash of cultures, commerce wins, because it has no culture. It fits anywhere that there’s not a higher rule, like culture. Naturally, commercial interests support the breakdown of culture and ethnicity.

And then quietly but firmly, they rip all the wealth they can out of these people, such as by writing them impossible loans with the idea of later repossessing the property, including all of the wealth thrown into it for as long as its would-be owners kept making payments.

Is this a defect of capitalism? Probably not. More likely, it’s a defect of culture. Namely, a lack of culture. Culture to advise people. Culture to say what’s right or wrong.

When we claim there is no culture, all actions that are profitable are good. Capitalism without culture is larceny.

College-educated whites make up about one-fifth of the adult population, while minorities account for a little under one-third. The picture is changing, but whites who have not completed college remain the backbone of many, if not most, communities and workplaces across the country.

They are also, polls consistently tell us, the most pessimistic and alienated group in American society.

The latest measure of this discontent came in a thoughtful national survey on economic opportunity released last week by the Pew Charitable Trusts’ Economic Mobility Project. If numbers could scream, they would probably sound like the poll’s results among working-class whites.

One question asked respondents whether they expected to be better off economically in 10 years than they are today. Two-thirds of blacks and Hispanics said yes, as did 55 percent of college-educated whites; just 44 percent of noncollege whites agreed. Asked if they were better off than their parents were at the same age, about three-fifths of college-educated whites, African-Americans, and Hispanics said they were. But blue-collar whites divided narrowly, with 52 percent saying yes and a head-turning 43 percent saying no. – National Journal

What no one wants to say about “diversity” is this: commerce imports workers who have no goal except to rise above their previous impoverished status. They are hungry. They are desperate. And so they are willing to give their lives to the job, just about.

This displaces the native working class who, in addition to having their jobs, want to be part of a community and have a social life. That after all is the promise of having a country: you have a support network, and so you don’t have to work all the time.

The imported kaleidoscopic diversity knows nothing more than its job, has no connections for a social life, and so is easily taken advantage of us and pushed to do labor-intensive jobs cheaply. This displaces the native working class, and provides cheaper goods and services, but as happens when you exploit people, produces shoddier labor and often cut corners.

No one wins in that situation.

For a society to succeed, its citizens must be able to unite around common core values. The most fundamental values are national identity and a wish for fellowship with one’s countrymen. National identity means that you feel like a Dane if you live in Denmark. Fellowship means that similarities — first of all the fact that you live in the same country — means more than differences, for example religion, color, or country of origin.

National identity and the feeling of fellowship increase work morale, taxpaying morale, morale in relation to social services, and respect for the country’s laws in general. People who experience themselves as part of the community will feel that they harm themselves if they harm the community. National identity is also important for respect towards the nation’s authorities.

The sense of community is crucial to the quality of life for us “pack” animals, and common core values are the foundation of the mutual trust and mutual helpfulness, openness, understanding and respect among the population. People who are deeply divided on core values and who want the community to evolve in completely different directions simply feel less fellowship with one another.

When people identify with a culture whose values are not rooted in the nation’s indigenous culture, this identification happens at the expense of identification with the greater community. The step towards acting in violation of the community’s interest is therefore shorter, which is one of the reasons for the dramatic over-representation of certain immigrant groups in crime and unemployment statistics.

Multiculturalization of a society, therefore, leads to an increased need for control, prohibitions, police, and tougher sentences in order to prevent internal factions from cheating or committing crimes against the community. Multicultural societies thus move easily towards a less democratic and more fascistic condition. The former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt concludes in hindsight: “The concept of multiculturalism is actually incompatible with a democratic society. … If one asks, where in the world are multicultural societies functioning, he quickly comes to the conclusion, that multiculturalism can only exist peacefully within strong authoritarian states.” (Hamburger Abendblatt, 24 Nov 2004). – White Locust

Diversity has driven America to turn against itself, both through class war and now ethnic-cultural conflict, but most of all through population displacement.

There is no sense of loyalty. If we find someone new who will do it for cheaper, even if the quality sucks, we’ll replace you immediately. Your old neighborhood isn’t yours, and you don’t belong to a group.

You’re a just a worker. You’re equal, sure, but that just means it’s easier to make you an interchangeable part. A replaceable cog within the machine. Your equality means you have no job security and anything you gain is temporary.

This affects more than the white working class. It affects everyone. There are no winners in diversity. Not whites, not blacks, not Asians, not Hispanics (and any other groups you can name).

Everyone becomes fodder for the machine.

But at least we’re all equal, and anti-racist.

Tags: ,

9 Responses to “Diversity is failing for everyone”

  1. John Parker says:

    The Corporate-capitalist State with its globalist economic agenda cares nothing about culture, value, ethics, or heritage. It wants the cheapest labor and unthinking, perceived need now consumers that will trade quality of life for quantity of life. Spot on analysis.

    Community, transcendent spirituality, and family are all willingly sacrificed to enhance the bottom line and increase productivity. It is a fools bargain, because the unthinking need generated will never be met by material gain , your labor can always be replaced by yet another pool of workers willing to work for less, and the Source, the natural world is just seen as a unit of value in the machine of progress. We are being dehumanized and atomized into predictable, mindless consumers, a unit of production/consumption.

    Both capitalism and communism seek material well being at the expense of quality of life, I am an avid supporter of the “steady state” economy and would appreciate hearing the opinions of other readers at Amerika on the theory and application of this system to the US.

    • Rod says:

      This article misses the point. The reason people are both becoming alienated and losing their bonding culture is because of government destroying natural bonds (true). Freedom is being able to freely associate with whom we want, keep and choose how to spend what we earn, diversity and government programs as such intercede to destroy these bonds by the force of law. As George Washington correctly states that government is not reasoning or eloquence, it’s force.

      Sadly too many people blame natural laws (like freedom to associate) when government (authoritarinism) policy backfires. Further, corporate culture is wrong for sure. But once again in most cases this isn’t capitalism, its chrony capitalism. If you study what fascism as defined and created by Mussolini, was a partnership between big government and restricted but regulated co-partner in bed big corportations. In other words, Mussolini desired a corporate state pandering to his government control, not one of free enterprise and competitive free enterprise where wealth is controlled by the independent populace.. The big corporations love big government, it regulates and keeps its small competitors (mom and pop) from being able to displace it. And big government loves it because they use the smaller mob driven entities of corporations to control the larger populace who ultimately fall under its reigns, including those under mobs of unions which government also controls. Government cannot control and individual, but it can control mobs. Hence why it embraces corporations and unions and other institutions. It’s really the only power of retention they have over the individual…MOBS.

      Sadly we have too many socialist that rightly attribute the atmosphere to something wrong. But then again want the same failed policies of more government intrusion! And this corporate state model is not capitalism. Capitalism is a law of the uinverse. It’s basically you don’t get something for nothing. In other words it takes a seed to plant in the ground to get 100 fold back in a grown apple tree. If you don’t like exponential growth, seeds, planting, harvest season, and reaping then you don’t belong in this world. You belong in a world with unicorns. Would it help to take a seed away from a man that understands the harvest to a drunk that eats all his own seeds and doesn’t understand? No it would result in no seeds for planting.

      Further the idea of capitalism is not about BIG corporations. Its tying the above law of how the world works in seeds and growth and capital (seeds for replanting), to a freedom of association to do as we want with what we have and reap through cause and effect the outcome.. To choose our own culture. To be responsible with our own seeds (thus rightly rewarding good stewards), to choose our own professions without a queen or king (regulator choosing), to be most efficient at our own pursuits. Free market stands just for that, freedom, one where individuals (not government and its hand picked MOBS choose) reap the consequences for their own actions without relying on coercion of the force of government..

      Is NAFTA or Federal Reserve (banking mafia) or diversity hiring or forced government unions free market? NO! And the consequence for deviating like all authoritarianism is impoverishment and loss. In this case loss of spirit, loss of culture, and loss of creation. Authoritarinism is really no different whether its socialistic or fascist, its about interjecting by use of immoral force our views on someone else and their own personal choices and economic choices.
      Socialist believe in freedom as long as your view agrees with their own. Fascist believe in freedom as long as your view agrees with theirs. Both of them believe your money as an individual is theirs.

      Again we don’t live in a capitalist world, we live in a fascist and socialist one! We don’t live in free enterprise we live in a world of Federal banks and federal legal tender and fascist corporatism and socialistic policy and economic planning from top to bottom by “experts”.. So please stop blaming something like capitalism and free enterprise and freedom when those have clearly been dismantled by the very people asking for someone to put their cog back in the wheel.

      Want your lives and peace back? Ask for freedom in everything from choices of what to choose as money, who to have as friends and employees. But you people who want to blame someone for all your problems, will hate that. No what you really want is a world of lawlessness. Where the good truly are the bad, and the bad redefined as good. You people don’t fool me you are Mr. Envy. You want what you don’t earn, that is why you’ll never be on board with freedom, because it hurts your agenda of gaining without your own merits. You’re just a bunch of authoritarian losers, that when your own policy comes to bear its natural lawful outcome (loss upon yourself) you dig in deeper instead of giving up your reprobate beliefs.. There is a God and he does judge fairly both the individuals and their belonging of MOBS, your reaping is of your own sowing and its not going to change because you wish for a new system of your own laws of unicorns and fairy tales. This really is the problem is people that don’t want to be accountable but..blame..blame..blame.

      When they dismantle freedom like they have done and they don’t get unicorns but rather slums, they blame the dead horse..again and again. Freedom’s been dead for the last 40 years and its not the thing causing this loss to these crybabies. No its their chosen system of authoritarism, hybrid socialistic fascist junker.. So don’t be fooled by another lie of how to further deaviate to more authoritarinism. Cause and effect and resignation into an accountable system of how the world really works is the point of this world. That is how physics works and its how farmers yield successful crops and its how economics works. No amount of envy will change that!

      Lastly as an white electrical engineer who worked as a slave for big corporations in Amerika for too long. One who has paid innumerable taxes yet lived below the averages. One who hasn’t had kids because of economics, but paid for others who didn’t think in having tribes at my expense. Your missing the larger point. You think its the job of government and other people (mobs called corporation) to find a place for you. Quite frankly I’m assuming that you are the type of person who looks for a “job”. Those are gone and not coming back, and the ones left (jobs) suck because they are controlled by corporatist (that is liberals/commies/and fascist conservatives) that lobby likes sharks looks to eat off the productive. If you aren’t a fellow shark, yo aren’t going to like that environment.. Yet the world is richer than anytime in history. There is more money and more capital then ever, and even more opportunity. And the cadaevers of big corporations are a feeding feast and you people don’t even see it. One man can sell all his goods to the entire world out of his own home and without a sales force, when has that ever existed in time but now? One person from his house can now make things that used to be restricted to multi billion dollar corporations. And yet you people freely associate to wanker about not getting a hispanic or black job with the enslaved corporations. So sad you truly have forgot your true inheritance and culture, by buying into the lie of government and its chronies.

      Good luck and God bless.

      Rod

      • Freedom is being able to freely associate with whom we want, keep and choose how to spend what we earn, diversity and government programs as such intercede to destroy these bonds by the force of law.

        Who says “freedom” is the goal? Sounds like a surrogate to me. I’d prefer sanity.

  2. Answer to Slava M:
    It can be explained by the fact human beings have a very strong urge for sexual contact with other human beings. Therefore, it will be less important to what race the other person belongs. But when it comes to really forming a family and making children, people are somewhat more reluctant in settling with a member of another race.
    Also culture is a part for it. Who would think a black woman of let’s say a foraging tribe, with fat naked breasts, is attractive? But then once black women start to style their hair to make it straight, wear skirts, become slim, and follow Western modes of clothing, they become more attractive to European men.

  3. If I were a tyrant, and I’m not, I would be sure to make people set at each other’s throats. The reason for this is that they would never unite against me no matter how evil I was. Race, gender, class and urban warfare is tearing this country apart. It is really a shame since none of it is necessary, except for those in power. I don’t mean to sound like an anarchist because I am not one, but I don’t trust people with a financial interest in maintaining power. The rapacious droids in DC are definitely not to be trusted.

  4. Aditya Venkat says:

    I totally agree with what you have said above. In countries like India, culture is a less flexible aspect, especially among the youth. Parents have a strong influence when it comes to the institution of marriage. So, they try and prevent diversity in their very own family as far as possible. This is a clear indication that people in a few cultures know where diversity can lead them to way too well. When it comes to the society some people see no problem with diversity as long as one is not enjoying benefits that the others don’t (sometimes undeservedly). But things are changing way too fast in this country, with reservations in almost every sector for the “backward cast”, people are nice only on the outside. Purely hypocritical..

  5. Fry Johnson says:

    Diversity has failed.
    In order to get rid of it we must get rid of the beta races.
    Once we get rid of the beta races, we can have ourselves a clean non jewish intelligent society with actual morals and values.

    • Doug Vance says:

      I don’t know about beta races.

      We’ll probably get closer with beta typologies, as in enough of a collection of negative traits, especially psychological/neurological that cut across any of the races or ethnic combinations.

      What if this collection of destructive mental traits were especially prolific over many generations such that it eventually composed most of the people in the world until man made crisis such as economic collapse, ecological destruction, and political corruption were rampant?

      Let’s suppose this collection of destructive traits had a greater probability of replication each generation than say collections that compose honesty, selfless valor, foresight, or higher intelligence. There are recessive traits like blue eyes or blond hair as random examples. Perhaps there are many others.

  6. […] British Freedom Party has republished one of my articles, “Diversity is Failing for Everyone,” on their complete and elegant web page. I am honored to be a small part of such a […]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>