|What Heretics Are For
The Social Contract (Fall 2001)
by Garrett Hardin
Myths,â€ said Salustios, are â€œthings that never happened but always are.â€ Though distinguishable from myths, the best of the fairy tales share this paradoxical relation to reality. A truth we are reluctant to acknowledge can be insinuated into the mind by the account of an event that never happened. Hans Christian Andersonâ€™s The Emperorâ€™s New Clothes tells just such a story. His emperor is a fiction, unnamed and unplaced in time (â€œmany years agoâ€), but he is also all of us at all times â€” and no fiction.
This is the Preface to (and the reason for the title of) Naked Emperors: Essays of a Taboo Stalker (1982) by Garrett Hardin, Ph.D. The swindlers who fleeced the emperor first caught him in a neat logical trap. The exorbitantly priced and nonexistent clothes they tailored had the wonderful quality, they said, of being invisible to anyone who was â€œhopelessly stupid or unfit for his office.â€ Given the Emperorâ€™s acceptance of this criterion of reality, his loyal subjects were psychologically bound to see the invisible. Behold, then, the noble Emperor, naked as a jaybird, marching in parade to the enthusiastic plaudits of the throng! The denouement comes when the innocent child protests â€œBut the Emperor is naked!â€
This scene, first projected on the mindâ€™s eye of a delighted, giggling child, is periodically recalled by realities of the external world. Every generation brings new swindlers (many of them, curiously, self-deceived) and more new clothes for credulous emperors. At any point in time a sizeable wardrobe of such clothes is being paraded in the marketplace of ideas. There are far too few children, too few iconoclasts (to use another image), to keep up with the busy looms of the weavers of invisible cloth.
The story of The Emperorâ€™s New Clothes no doubt strikes completely socialized, other-directed adults as preposterous, but reality outrages myth. In Andersonâ€™s story the childâ€™s outcry leads to a rapid erosion of faith among the spectators; truth strips the Emperor naked. Unhappily, in real life, majority opinion frequently overwhelms perception.
Some experiments carried out by the social psychologist Solomon Asch are most enlightening. Asch asked a small group of college men to identify the longest of several lines drawn on paper. Unbeknownst to one of them, all the others had been instructed to agree on a preposterously wrong answer. Choices were announced in open meeting. As the responses forced the â€œodd man outâ€ to become aware of his position, he not infrequently gave way to the majority and expressed his agreement with them. It does not take an Inquisition to make heresy painful. (â€œHeresyâ€ comes from a Greek word meaning â€œto choose for oneself.â€) Out of 123 men subjected to this ordeal, 37 percent conformed. (Is it significant that this is about the same percentage as that of â€œplacebo reactors,â€ people whose pain is reduced by the administration of a placebo, a medication known to have no beneficial effect?)
Aschâ€™s experiment might tempt a cynic to rewrite the Anderson story to make the little child yield to adult opinion. We would not accept such a rewriting, of course, because the cynical version would deprive us of hope. The progress of science â€” indeed of all positive knowledge â€” depends on the courage of Thoreauâ€™s â€œmajority of oneâ€ in the face of nearly unanimous error. Yet there are many naked emperors parading the streets of learning, and we need a few people who have the Anderson childâ€™s confidence in their own senses and judgment. Statistically speaking, the populace may well be right more often than wrong â€” but sometimes the Emperor is indeed naked.
What follows is one hereticâ€™s attempt to point out some of the naked emperors of our time. Heresy is no guarantee of truth, but let us not forget (as T. H. Huxley said) that every new truth begins as heresy.
This is the Preface to (and the reason for the title of) Naked Emperors: Essays of a Taboo Stalker (1982) by Garrett Hardin, Ph.D.
Answering Our Critics
|Main Â |Â Journal Archives Â |Â Bookstore Â |Â Related Sites Â |Â About Us Â |Â Contact Us
Answering Our Critics Â© 2000-2005 by The Social Contract Press