Our nitwit species has never overcome its own cleverness. If we find an idea or symbol or image that appears to compel people, we’ll use it — and worry about the consequences later.
Equality is a powerful symbol to use. It conveys inclusiveness, and an automatic sense of group bonding. “We all agree we all should be equal, right? Now all we have to do is crush those who disagree!” It’s also a neat way to institute a witch hunt. If your neighbor doesn’t believe in equality, maybe you deserve his farm.
But those well-worn (at least here on this blog) paths give way to a more interesting question: what are the psychological consequences of equality? In other words, does it make our brains healthier, and is it a good interface to life? Here are two problems with equality as it impacts our psyches.
- External focus
- If we are all equal in value, then there is no way to distinguish ourselves except by our appearance. It’s like trying to make hamburgers interesting again. Put an avocado on the hippie one, arugula on the yuppie one, and a slab of ironically wholesome cheese for the hipsters. Your social rank is your burger. A bacon cheeseburger? You’re not as elite as someone with an arugula, avocado and feta burger.
- Because we must assume others are equal, we cannot demand that we be measured by the content of our personalities instead of our external traits. We are interchangeable parts, not individuals who determine themselves from within. If you start asking we be judged on moral character, intellectual ability, honesty and sincerity… well that ruins equality, because we cannot look at you from a distance, see you are human, and figure you are equal. It would force us to engage with life, and that scares us.
- Since we are all equal in value, and we cannot look within, external traits are how we draw attention to ourselves — and since others are doing it, we must all compete with them. In a mass of equal people, the person who figured out a unique and ironic hat stands out; this person is noticed, which advances their business, social and romantic prospects. Since there are few things not thought of before, this requires we embrace oddity and ugliness, like modern art and freak shows, and correspondingly become more “tolerant” so we can pretend we like them.
- No striving
- If we’re all equal and are going to get equal treatment, the reward has come before the labor. We now expect to be entitled to things and status, instead of feeling that it is a reward for our contributions. As a result, everything we do becomes backward: we assume we belong, and therefore that whatever we do is right, but then we try to justify those actions by proving to others how altruistic or moral or unique/ironic we are.
- Since equality is the goal of the society, rising above equality is a socially problematic issue. So instead of striving to make ourselves better internally, or to contribute in ways that might cause conflict as all, we focus on making life more comfortable for us. This inevitably involves selfish actions like retreating to the suburbs, buying an SUV, and turning up the volume to drown out the other equal people.
- If equality is the norm, an attitude emerges which finds those who want to refine themselves or improve on anything but their material circumstance to be “elitist,” and that’s a problem since most equality-based societies exist after revolutions against the elites. You don’t want to raise your head above the herd, or it might get cut off. Don’t strive, except for the material comforts we all agree (equally) are important; coincidentally, these material comforts create the most waste and use the most energy.
An interesting way to view this situation. If we could step back from our modern lives, we could see how simple it all is. There were revolutions, and we are obligated to consider them as absolute Good, in the same context religion makes Good and Evil. The revolutions aimed for equality because they wanted to overthrow hierarchies. Now you either obey the official revolutionary dogma, or you are considered an enemy of equality, and possibly destroyed.
I’m sure everyone reading this blog noticed this article deals not with equality but with egalitarianism in the Christian or leftist sense. Well, English isn’t my native language and I understand words having several meanings, but to me, equality is “equality of fair opportunity”, i.e. having the chance to fully realize your potential, should you have such an ambition. In this light, it means putting everyone on equal starting blocks so that “fair inequalities” may arise from personal efforts and abilities.
Again, hit the nail on the head. This is exactly what I see – no one wants to rock the boat for any reason.
We’re now seeing a big problem with, for example, keeping old fogies of 85 years old or so off the roads as more and more high profile cases involving elderly drivers doing damage and killing people behind the wheel are making the news. But driving is a right, isn’t it? No, it’s actually a privelege and takes some skill and reflexes. But in our society, it’s the worst thing to restrict someone’s “rights” – in this case particularly, as we were foolish enough to build our society around the automobile…so we HAVE to let people drive…
…don’t we?
How insanely foolish.
That answers the question as well as poses many more ;)
This is what I meant to articulate in the above post which is now irrelevant. I’m 27 now and my dx points strongly toward Asperger’s Syndrome. I’ve been into heavier, more abstract and nihilistic forms of art since I was a child. I’m currently attempting to rebuild my life.
I’ve been an Air Conditioning Technician (third year apprentice) for a few years but have great difficulty maintaining employment. I am not uncultured nor do I act like an idiot. I’m just a little too android like for most people.
At present I’m trying to find a College with learning disability support so I can actually do something meaningful with my life.
Punk Rock, Metal, Industrial and all other forms of outsider art are NOT excuses to act like a twit. They are designed to encourage to do two things:
1. Think for yourself.
2. Form your own opinion, based on a carefully tested hypothesis.
Problem is, I learned at an early age that facts were immaterial among the ‘nice’ people. It’s a hole I’ve been trying to claw my way out of for twenty years.
Whoever ‘they’ may be, I will not serve.
So that’s the state of things individually. But It’s about more than me :)
This was an excellent post/essay/article.
Thanks.