Immigration: the Baby Boomer/1968er plot to keep benefits afloat

Way back in the 1930s, people like myself saw the truth of benefits states: while it is cheaper per individual to distribute the cost among many, the imbalance between takers and makers quickly raises costs. The distribution also amounts to a reduction of value, which raises costs and reduces the purchasing power of money.

This is true of democratization in general, because by spreading a franchise it reduces its effectiveness to act in any given situation, resulting in a decrease in value. When you democratize steak, you end up with the half-soy McBurger.

But of course, the Crowd specializes in thinking in the short term, and declaring that because its policies have not caused the apocalypse right now, they are good and should be expanded. The great rush was on to spend money on entitlements, or payments directly to citizens, which are now the majority of Western budgets.

Some time later, of course, the piper must be paid: Western governments are broke because of their social programs and yet cannot reduce them because the voters will panic and rage.

The solution dreamed up by the Leftists who took over during 1968, themselves part of the “Me Generation”/”Baby Boomer” gold rush brought on by the population boom at the end of the Second World War? Import new labor and hope they work their little tails off to pay for Baby Boomer retirement.

No, seriously:

The demographic squeeze could be eased by the influx of more than a million migrants in the past year. If many of them eventually join the working population, the result could be increased tax revenue to keep the pension model afloat. Before migrants are even given the right to work, however, they require housing, food, education and medical treatment. Their arrival will have effects on public finances that officials have only started to assess.

There are many problems with the immigration plan. First, it stimulates overpopulation by creating an escape valve from the already-overburdened third world, which in turn causes people to breed more because the cause of that overpopulation is a Tragedy of the Commons style need to have a large enough family to subsidize each person in old age, so when that family leaves, they make more of them. Second, it destroys Western civilization entirely by ethnically replacing its one unique component, namely its people and their genetics. Third, it assumes that people from third world countries will produce at the level needed, when if they could have done that, they would have back at home where living is cheaper.

Generation X and Millennials are already looking at working until they die. What if, instead of paying 50% total taxes, they paid only 25% of their total income into taxes? They would be able to save that remaining about. What could you do, if you saved half of your tax payments every year in a retirement fund? Retire early, probably, and that is what they fear. They need to keep milking you for cash until they are all dead, which will take at least another half-century.

So go to those jobs and endure those rapefugee sexual assaults with a smile on your faces! After all, you are paying for the Me Generation — who destroyed everything with their Leftism fanaticism, and saved nothing — to live out their dying years in luxury. Now, don’t waste any more time reading this article — back to work!

Tags: , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Immigration: the Baby Boomer/1968er plot to keep benefits afloat”

  1. -A says:

    Perhaps they would be happier in their haciendas in Mexico?

  2. Harold says:

    “First, it stimulates overpopulation by creating an escape valve from the already-overburdened third world”

    The number of immigrants the West takes in doesn’t amount to much compared to the size and growth rate of the worlds poor.

  3. Dark Axe says:

    A lot of these policies cause people to be stuck permanently at low income levels .

    SSI forces disabled people to either keep their savings accounts below 2k or else they have to lose all their SSI benefits.

    Subsidized housing in major cities also caps income to prequalify .

    If you are a really poor working stiff there is also that cutoff at 15k where you go from getting an earned income tax credit refund to instead owing Uncle Sam a bunch .

    There are basically a lot of disincentives institutionalized in the US which discourage people from earning more income . and cause them to mooch off Uncle Sam instead.

    • Jpw says:

      These things are not coincidental. The Great Society was deliberately designed to be debilitating. It keeps the underclass down on the plantation. Lydon Baines Johnson was the most evil SOB ever elected president. He blows Obama and Nixon away.

      • I think this is why Europe adopted it as well: to prevent mass revolt by keeping the proles bloated on TV and bennies. This points to the ugly fact that it is prole revolt that is the agent of our decline.

  4. You were around in the 1930s??!!!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>