White trash is the wigga who wants to be the underdog, ‘the gangster wid all da sex drugs n da money’, they do not want to represent their own race nor honour higher culture because they are cowards, cultureless, stupid and a drain on natural resources.

Their parents are like dogs on heat and far outnumber the more sensible higher castes in society. They think that it’s cool to wear trousers around their ankles, and speak wid no spellinz man (coz we 2 cool innit!) they thrive in ghettos, listen to hip hop and r&b, basically they want to become africans, and not the respectable africans, but the gangster type who are pushed under society by their lack of willpower and victimize themselves rather than leading their evolution into greatness.

Problem for western nationalism

We must NOT support those individuals that tear any attempt that we have at greatness into nothingness, they do so because they’re too stupid and are not bred through any tradition whatsoever, they lack discipline and respect for their elders and most annoyingly blame everyone else for their own incompetence. 

We have to discriminate against those who are counter-productive. Nationalism is the first step and only protects a certain group, an ethnic group that has laid claim to the land, as sacred land for hundreds maybe thousands of years before the recent invasion of immigrants from third world countries.

But there are also secondary considerations, nationalism alone cannot cure a nation of its dumb poisonous undercastes, we must introduce caste systems and in doing so prioritise those of our ethnic groups which wish to preserve themselves and treat other ethnic groups with the same respect in their own nations, to appreciate human culture and heritage collectively instead of the self defeating attitude that is common place today in our society – that being, an appreciation of our races and of our cultures and traditions (within respect to the earth) and toward that which we revere as being sacred.

Far from that reality, similar to many modern nations – In Britain, there is this sub-human underling race called the chavs, they sometimes call themselves ‘rudebois and rudegals’, wearing fake gold chains and driving around their trashy council estates in ‘pimped out’ 30 year old pieces of neon shit on wheels.

They assert their authority of the street through turning the volume on their pimped out speakers to full bass, and then drive above the speed limit like, obviously, badass whiteboy gangsters who listen to dubstep or some other retarded, valueless, turd of audio.

They will yell out ‘WANKAAAA’ ‘DICK HEADDD’ to everyone they drive by as they attain social superiority through loudmouthing, any reversion of loudmouthing gives them a threat and they will, in a herd of approximately 30 apes, swarm around the individual who happens to be more intelligent then all of them combined.

Individually they are easy to take down, throw into shop windows, into bins and leave them a bloody face – and they know this, but instead of learning their lesson not to attack their own fellow citizens for ‘fun’ again, they will repeat their attack by drawing in the hive. They are cowards individually, which is why they only attack in swarms of insects, with knives, bats and anything else they can get their hands on.

In london and manchester, areas that are urban ghettos, these pests infest, like ghouls in an underworld. They coulden’t give a flying fuck about the environment (wat iz an environmet? fkin loserrr man innit!). Any sane nationalist leader would genocide these, drunk, ugly, useless undermen.

If you really want to see what these apes are like, then simply watch the underlord jeremy kyle and his plethora of chavs, they speak like retards, they are dumb, have aids, every genetic disease and these are your average voters!

Their facial features resemble chimpanzees, they think any hair longer than a finger nail is for ‘poofs’ and tend to brand themselves with a nike tick shaved into their head with a quif of gelled hair. They mix with half castes and other ‘underpriveledged’, lesser intelligent races within the occident’s poisonous undercaste. Their parents tend to die from those inherited diseases quite frequently (yes all twenty of them) although medicine is here to save them that little bit longer, they begin to go on heat at 13 years old and reproduce as many times as they can before they die from inserting their head into a lawnmower.

They happily repeat the lies of the media for their own advantage, individually, and use them as an excuse to carry on stealing tvs from their proletariat neighbours ’don’t pick on me cop, iz it cos i iz err,.. poor! discriminashan! its my rite!’ – And then the push over proles will think, oh well, he has no money.. Aww go on! steal everything! you poor soul you!

Nationalists take note of this

When many white nationalists mention ‘increasing the birth rate’ – do not just accept this without further scrutiny. Of course we need to increase our birth rate of indigenous populations which are declining, this is sensible for actually preserving a race – but take care to make sure that is not poison we are reproducing here.

We do not want more unintelligent, senseless, careless or irrationally aggressive ghouls due to their own low self esteem – we want only the best, the intelligent, the elites, the artisans, those who are able to deal with our problems through adapting toward them and making something great out of a dull situation. We must discriminate against those who go out of their way to cause unnecessary problems, those who are prone to cry ‘witch!’ or ‘racist!’ ‘xenophobe!’, we want a less self-destructive population. We most importantly need individuals who have respect for their own ethnicity and in doing so can achieve a compromise with other ethnic groups as to have respect toward each other in our respective territories.

For north america, there needs to be a continued consensus on race. White Americans, American Indians and African Americans need their respective territories within their own states, and in doing so only the best of these groups should ever reproduce – do not poison yourselves with the least productive of your castes.

Likewise for europe, each european needs to be in their distinct european state and the immigrants, who have, on the majority, come in the last 60 years, the majority of them should consider returning to their own countries and learn some respect for indigenous ethnic groups – only reserving minority rights for those who are beyond the crowd, who help out our races, who benefit the nation collectively instead of chopping it up, colonizing it into little third world urban states.

We must take out the trash, the gangsters, the oblivious, the white collar criminals – everyone who does not respect their race nor common earth are poison to everything, they are themselves deceasive microbes, id species. Once we put them in their place – only then may we create cultures from the best of our ethnic groups and take pride in our strength and qualities.

That is opposed to eating it, becoming fat, insolent, insects that attack details because the complexity of a social superorganism’s function is beyond their analogue on/off definitions to comprehend.

Having received a few criticisms about the previous posts, some individuals have found it impossible to dissociate class systems with caste systems. In the definitions of class we play social appearance, in caste we play biological ability – nothing else is concerned here, it doesn’t matter how many memes you let rape your mind, it doesn’t matter about their position in today’s hierarchy, because modern day class systems are corrupt.

The caste gives to each what their skill is required to benefit firstly themselves, and overabundantly, like the fruits of a tree, the fruits of our culture; allow the outflow of their energy to benefit those around them – aiding our collective evolution together. 

Many people are lost on definitions such as selfish/ selfless. Some people will say that ‘we’re all selfish’, and to a certain, lowly altitude in evolution it is correct. But think, evolution gives animals an Id that then evolves beyond into the Ego and Super Ego.

The Id is the foundationary trait and that’s for feeding, fucking, fighting and fleeing – secondly came the ego, and sure, we had alot of mediocre fun playing with lowly traits, but we evolved from these with the introduction of a social ego. There from the foundation, the secondary traits began to emerge in reflection toward our nurture. The social animals began to look after their offspring well rather than sodomizing them like paedophile chimps – the latter would be a symptom of ghoulish devolution, it takes evolutionary energy from a collective rather than reinforcing it.

Let’s bring in psychology, let’s analyse the psychology of our ‘four levels of humans’, or more in general, four levels of life.

The terms “id,” “ego,” and “super-ego” are not Freud’s own. They are latinisations by his translator James Strachey. Freud himself wrote of “das Es,” “das Ich,” and “das Über-Ich“—respectively, “the It,” “the I,” and the “Over-I” (or “Upper-I”) – Source

Further to the elitification of our species, we need to add the term das Über-Es, the Over-It, for which very organised and sufficient species begin to increase the evolution of all those in their presence through killing, nihilistic Über-moralism, evolutionary creationism, organic mechanization and other ’cross-pollinating’ ingredients which increase the biodiversity and hierarchy of nature beyond its limitations. They are those that have gotten Over-It, over the boundary of our biological evolutionary inertia. Through which life can pre-adapt to extreme environments such as the Moon, and Mars – ultimately to increase the fruits of the planets via getting Over-It, because on their own, nothing will significantly evolve onto those dead worlds.

Here are the four levels of life explained that little bit further:

• Id - Selfish individuality – necessary prerequisites for organism survival – will fuck fight feed and flee, will not nurture over 25% productivity in our caste system. Over this 25% threshold and it will evolve into the natural ego whereby the excess energy through nurture acts as a higher selection process based on appearances and desired social traits guided by organic surrogation.

Insects like the stag beetle are a good example of an ‘Id species’ – they just fuck, fight, feed, and flee – they do not nurture their offspring, they just climb up a tree, kill other beetles in their way, have a 3 second fuck and then after the brief courting, will throw their mating partner off the tree. After falling down from the height of a very tall tree, they will go and dump their eggs in a hole or a dead log and then.. die.

Sigmund Freud spoke of the Id: 

It is the dark, inaccessible part of our personality, what little we know of it we have learnt from our study of the dream-work and of the construction of neurotic symptoms, and most of this is of a negative character and can be described only as a contrast to the ego. We all approach the id with analogies: we call it a chaos, a cauldron full of seething excitations… It is filled with energy reaching it from the instincts, but it has no organisation, produces no collective will, but only a striving to bring about the satisfaction of the instinctual needs subject to the observance of the pleasure principle.

The Id contains everything that is inherited, that is present at birth, is laid down in the constitution — above all, therefore, the instincts, which originate from the somatic organisation, and which find a first psychical expression here (in the id) in forms unknown to us.

This, in terms of space faring organisms would be viewed as a healthy 0-25% productivity, it is selfish but contributes toward the biosphere, it is not controlling our civilization therefore is not going to drag it down to the level of an insect, it’s a food source for higher things - these would not be in our caste system, any human that wishes to imitate them would be achieving what is called devolution - I called them a ‘ghoul’ for living below the levels of social organisms, for living as an insect should.

• Ego - Selfish collective – necessary prerequisites for social organism survival – will kill it’s offspring that it determines unfit, such as many bird species will kill off their weak offspring as it is not socially desired, (this is the healthy ego as opposed to our humanist definition, the ‘evil ego’ that cannot satiate itself naturally so decides to become desperate, alienated and attention seeking). Organic surrogation is initiated through the ego at between 26-50% productivity in our caste system

So Freud, What is the Ego?

…The ego is that part of the id which has been modified by the direct influence of the external world … The ego represents what may be called reason and common sense, in contrast to the id, which contains the passions … in its relation to the id it is like a man on horseback, who has to hold in check the superior strength of the horse; with this difference, that the rider tries to do so with his own strength, while the ego uses borrowed forces [Freud, The Ego and the Id (1923)]

An ‘Ego species’ of animal would be similar to a bird species, they build a nest to nurture their offspring, to nurture the natures in respect to organic memes, therefore eliminating those genotypes which are undesirable, unpopular toward the social hierarchy. Therefore any obsolete offspring that are not desired by the social collective are then terminated by the big overbearing parent.

With the Ego comes the birth of significant memes, these organic memes thrive within the 26-50% productivity and acts as primitive idealism toward nature, shaping the species as the species shapes the meme. Birds of paradise are a great example, non-human primates are also.

• Super Ego - Selfless through individual selfishness – with this the ego is well satiated with organic memes and energy from food. It has achieved the first of many singularities between gene and meme. Like the ego, the super ego will kill off undesired offspring, yet in its decayed phase uses moralism which is inorganic surrogatism, to prevent these dysfunctional offspring from facing nature (equality).

The super ego operates through the 51%-75% productivity range and allows the meme to evolve upon itself through the externalization of inorganic surrogation, a meme that nurtured a nature can then be inscribed onto rock, stone, paper and therefore achieve relative immortality toward the gene that created it and also contributing collectively to nurture others through those memetics that are then beyond themselves individually. This is the individual selflessness, it is selfishness of the higher type, it isn’t fucking, fighting, feeding and fleeing, but is evolved from them to create tools that go beyond those desires – an extension of them into the immaterial, the ideal – into culture.

So let’s ask Freud again, what is the super ego?

The Super-ego can be thought of as a type of conscience that punishes misbehavior with feelings of guilt. For example: having extra-marital affairs.

The super-ego retains the character of the father, while the more powerful the Oedipus complex was and the more rapidly it succumbed to repression (under the influence of authority, religious teaching, schooling and reading), the stricter will be the domination of the super-ego over the ego later on — in the form of conscience or perhaps of an unconscious sense of guilt (The Ego and the Id, 1923).

Ants, termites and bees are the primitive examples of a civilization, a social superorganism/ inorganic organism. But the best example of this is humanity and other cultured species.

The dangerous part of this is that those who ignore memes rather than overcome them will be controlled by them – those below 50% productivity, or more appropriately, evolutionary velocity – they are too slow and cannot outpace the memes created through civilization and therefore become domesticated, and we then have them caught in our meme trap, our culture, from there they can be either excelled or slowed down to the point of devolution – proles and then ghouls begin to emerge as a by product of domestication when it is unattached from a societal goal.

Artisans are those who are the creators of civilization, they are the warriors, artists, crafters, and anything which requires an actual ability. They give life to the memes, they give ideas their own individuality as material possessions so that they can spread over the world and tame all that is too slow to over come it, they generate wealth from this tapping of evolutionary energy, by cultivating the world according to their needs. Yielding more fruits then nature would on her own, at least, it has the potential.

Through that yielding of nature beyond nature, we can terraform other dead planets and increase the total expanse of the earth derived biosphere into interplanetary space, domesticating dusty rocky worlds and exceeding their evolutionary velocity so that the environment can sustain complex life, so that the universe can become further more conscious of itself.

• Super Id - Selfless through collective selfishness – this is what occurs when a meme becomes self sustainble and then self evolutionary, the meme escapes from human hands through the help of technology. The evolutionary speed at which observing, overcoming this is beyond 76% of productivity toward 100% and beyond. Like the id, the super id will put instincts before all else, yet the super id has superior instincts and therefore allows a biosphere to govern itself. Collective survival is put before everything else, as if everything was it – it is concerned for the health of everything, it is the materialization of the social superorganism.

An example of this is a collective conscience, something which puts collective evolution before everything else. It doesn’t care whether it expels itself individually, it serves a goal and is fixated on that goal and destroys everything in its way.

A great example of this ‘collective conscience’ would be what is coming to life through all the wires, cables and information that we pour into the void called the internet. The internet internalizes nearly everything we do regarding technology, every time we search on google, every time we go onto facebook, more and more information is being centralized within the cloud of information within the internalized web-like structure between each machine, ultimately a foundation for it, a gravity.

97% of our population could not understand this, and that’s why they are obsolete, most of them cannot survive without technology, they arn’t above the 76-100% evolutionary velocity/ productivity to be able to tame this kind of memetics, and therefore will become domesticated by it losing their individuality to the hive-mind.

Carrying onwards from the four types of psychology regarding the four types of caste, we return to the cycle of evolution from A Guide to Cosmic Evolution

Along the bottom is the evolution of the ‘deity eye’, this all seeing eye of the biosphere, and the four castes are represented by the four steps, the four algorithms up toward the unification of idealism and realism. Let’s re-examine this, there are four types of caste:

• Those who are 0-25% productive are controlled by the external environment. (natural hierarchy, meaning who can reproduce the most survives)
• Those who are 26-50% productive are still controlled by the external environment yet are able to take advantage of their internalization, their socialization to give them that edge over the lesser beings. (natural>social hierarchy, meaning who is the most valued in appearance and socialized control skills reproduces the most)
• Those who are 51-75% are able to create memetics, create tools which they can use to control the lesser in relation to the social superorganism, they reinforce the social collective. (natural>social>civil hierarchy, a combination of the previous two but with added skills toward memetic creation and cultivation)
• Those who are 76-100% productive, those who have such a great intellectual speed and ability to join distinct ideas together, they are the ones who gear memetics to achieve a goal – i.e. create a religion, create ideologies, create discipline to prevent an entire population of parasitic proles from commiting ecocide and killing everything in the process all because they’re too stupid to take responsibility for their own actions. (natural>social>civil>mech hierarchy, combination of all the others, the singularity occurs and the biosphere reaches a saturation point from which it can evolve deities from its derivatives)

Regarding the loud mouth socializers, their incessant cries of contradiction will always moan about ideologies that draw too different ingredients gathered from distinct realities, from different dimensions of our whole existence – and it is because they are flatlanders living on a two dimensional strip of paper, crying when a three dimensional object passes through their flat conception of reality – they’re morons and become outsmarted and overrun by higher dimensional problems which require multiple ideologies in order to angulate collective goals for society.

They are part of the group that is beneath the evolutionary velocity required to maintain a civilization from consuming itself with ecocide – civilized creatures need to over-come themselves to prevent intraversion, otherwise they lack the honour of civilization and become what is known as a prole, and at worst, a ghoul. The ghoul is a creature which hides beneath the necessary bar of civilization, they won’t put themselves up to the challenge and will slow everything down by evolving into the counter-productive direction. 

With the inversion of our goals, the lesser beings, majorly proles with a poisonous undercaste of ghouls, caused by the down-breeding stupidity without concern for collective health, will evolve themselves into little insects monkeys that roll around in their faeces of a culture.

They ghoul around like Id species, placing their primary biological desires before everything else, rather than what is good for the Earth. They become all defensive when you try to point out to them that their values came out of the backside of some alpha-meme that is just out to control them – such as equality and liberalism, nature isn’t concerned with you individually, only that genetics are transmitted and re-emitted into memetics.

But, I give these meme’s a tip, these memetic creations of liberalism and equality help to disperse the technological, mechanized grid required for the internet to reach critical mass, all countries are ‘developed’, dispersed equally, globally - from where, the inorganic memes implode the core of civilization like the iron core in a death star, and a supernova will tear the world in a rapture – a memetic chest burster. 

The fate of humanity rests on those who are beyond the crowd

Humanity shall become like the mammals in the era of the dinosaurs in our continued, polluted, animated corpse of a planet - little creatures hiding beneath the rubble, keeping out of the way - nature will have her revenge. The variety of deaths toward our common humanity are endless!

Choose your favourite extinction event! It can be anything from external threats like asteroids, coronal mass ejections from our sun, gamma ray bursts, gravity tsunamis through gravitational lensing toward extrasolar bodies. Or best of all, which is way more likely, best of all has got to be our own stupidity with ecocide and nuclear fallout, and then even memetic singularity and nuclear fallout. If we don’t adapt to nature the environment will out haste us in its evolution.

Regardless, the best of humanity needs to over-come itself using all the tools it can (caste systems, religions, ideologies etc) before nature finds an alternate route - and it will.

If our democratic elections are anything to go by, the majority of slaves these days are pathetic in that they want ‘progress’ without any progress in their own evolution. The little liberals and mindless labourers use symbolic words that poison the minds of our people – overloading their brains with junk information whilst dominion sneaks in through the subconscious.

Modern people will say (and subconsciously think) ”That’s offensive (to my global CPU of cobwebbed, grey-race proles under the divine necrotic dictatorship by the LORDS of consumerism. Step away! noble pariah, or else I, evil sorcerer, shall summon a demon spirit to collectively destroy you, by simply calling) you RACITS!1!!” 

They have no mind because they are generating a mechanically-socialized hive-mind deity (believe it or not) and are memetically programmed to attack anything that tries to stop them being ‘equally’ annexed. Here is something to terrify the slaves of the hive-mind, should they realise, and a great hope to all who are strong enough to retain their own individuality in these bleak times.

This is a very interesting topic that I am going to mention; this is really important – the consequences of this material is unbelievable, but bear with me, this puny human brain of mine has checked every detail and here is the ideology of life – to ultimately put shame on unidealists and other boring ‘humanists’ who only consider the here and now – and not thousands, millions or billions of years through space and time – something is going to happen.

I’ve always accepted impossibilities as possibilities, reality right now is really dull – but looking at the dreams of our minds, and trying to correlate idealistic dreams, of destiny with reality - prepare for startling revelations on the operations of nature.

To begin with, we have to have our minds firmly anchored in reality in all its ugliness – let’s talk about what nature really is, and how nature has the upper hand at every opportunity, and from there where it shall take us.

‘Natural’ when we think of it, is the process where we achieve more from less and is a eternal rhythm, a dance, in which things play out their existence toward greatness. Contrarily whenever we say something is unnatural, anti-natural; what we are really talking about is a devaluation of life as a whole – which is achieving less from more , it is making a retarded unrhythm, a weird disorientated rot of an existence. That is inherently destructive and chaotic, totally against any order or variety and diversity of the species under its guidance.

Technology, speaking from an earlier post, is a really uncertain area toward nature – it appears as a total stranger; where did this horrible thing come from, this horrible thing that is loaning its strength to parasites who are genetically programmed to destroy our biosphere and cultures?

Technology came from an extension of civil evolution beyond itself, and that civil evolution was culture, which itself is the next dimension from Darwinian, natural-social evolution - it shapes its environment forcing the species to shape to that altered, alien environment – and this is a vital process if we are ever to adapt to extraterrestrial worlds – for alien-nations. Let me summarize that:

• Natural selection – is a one dimensional selection, it is horizontal and is a process whereby the strongest in ability survive and those that do not have the genetic makeup to stand up to an environmental challenge die. Viruses, simplistic bacteria, undersocialized insects and other minutely multicellular organisms (those that do not form overbearing collectives) are those living entities that are under pure natural selection.

• Social selection – is built upon the natural selection plus a social collective, which is vertical and adds up to two dimensions of selection. A species is born when the natural selection overcomes a threshold where an organism begins to nurture its offspring, which is a deepening of the understanding of reality – it allows the species to pass information in the vector of a meme throughout their species to enhance their survival collectively. Therefore social selection, is natural-social selection and this is the darwinian natural selection.

• Civil selection – occurs when any species in our universe overcomes themselves so much in fact, that they have excess energy because they are great hunter gatherers. And obviously, all this reserve energy, nature doesn’t let it go to waste.. never! Surrogation. Nature channels this through the social meme and this meme undergoes a metamorphosis whereby culture is born! Now, like previously, this adds yet another dimension where evolution may evolve throughout – and this time it is construed between the extremes of our spatial dimensions – it goes between the ancient past and the far future, and things which evolve out of culture are here to last throughout this dimension, with culture came the concept of time, the here and now was secondary to the balance of time in our civilization. It is not horizontal, nor vertical, but goes through these both in three dimensions and by balancing these all determines who survives and who does not.

• Mech selection – is something only few of you will have any idea of, we are only seeing the shoots of this now - much as an ape in the jungle can see the shoots of civilization as the chimp picks up stones and wonders if he can open a shell by crushing it with the stone. Mech selection will inevitably occur as a result of technological growth, like before, nature does not waste energy, it is channeled into a path – and when excess energy is channeled into mechanistic growth, this is where the meme has another dimension to evolve, whereby it has an artificial social selection (mirrored darwinian selection). It will evolve artificial intelligence and it will not be human but will have the potential to evolve symmetrically toward us, they will be memetical fauna and flora made from metal. The dimension of time is now overcome through this, there is rarely anything that can destroy this artificial species, combined with our species as a bio-mechanic biosphere – the memetical metamorphosis is near completion. Mech selection has four dimensions to which evolution may occur, natural, social (biological) civil and mech (memetical).

• Supernatural selection - What? supernatural? selection? Yep, anything which is within the universe can be killed regardless of how divine it may appear to us, regardless of the magic of sophisticated technology – all things must pass. However, there is a twist, all things must pass, but thinking beyond the death of all things, they consistently shed their skin like snakes, even caterpillars that use metamorphosis to attain wings.

Deistic machine organisms?

Whenever I talk about these things, these are possibilities – they can follow on from the symmetries in nature, even advancing them. Because our biology only focuses toward the rather limited organics that we have right now, I am in no way digracing them, only showing that more is always possible from whatever we have. Evolution from here toward the death of this universe has near infinant paths to specify and diversify toward every niche in reality and it can only do so through naturalized creation and selection.

Civilized life transcends its fear of death through memes, life fears the dissimilation of its structure into lesser elements – and because of this, selfishness will drive life to steal divinity from the future – using the strongest thing it can, culture and technology. Those who only do this, die, turned into a vegetable infront of a TV, they are impatient and in their brainless march toward ‘utopia’ they build themselves a self made prison. Although worshipping the sinity of hedonism and materialism – these moderns and pop atheists, they don’t believe in driving forces in the cosmos by any ‘intelligence’ other than their own limited reasoning and so are willing slaves toward them – they stop trying to achieve greatness in their emptiness and are consumed internally, they do not produce any great memetics from their genes and cannot transcend their deaths, they die mortal, and not even healthy mortals like other animals – they just float around until they pop out of existence..

Without reverence nor concern for the wildlife, the naturalizations and the true socializations – instead of keeping the whole of civilization healthy by ensuring its foundations are firm and real. Moderns just don’t care, many are delusional in that they expect some ‘machine’ to go out of its way to ensure that 9 billion humans all survive forever – which is pointless. If any machine could do that, then they could certainly achieve more from less and evolve, resulting in undermen genocides and robots rampaging, raping and pillaging. I’ll take about this later.

The levels of advanced technology follow something like this; an electronic machine is primitive, a photonic machine is more advanced, but chemical and gravitonic machines are the greatest, they have the least mass-energy to attain a functional conscience able to carry geneseeds for life across space toward other planets. Anything that has an -ic on the end of it is a processing of ‘things’ and therefore can be organised and evolved in such a way to retain memetic information beyond a genes death.

These machines are a brain information carrier consisting of small particles and can centralise itself into either self made organisms, or co-operation as multicellular machines – and these are a combination of genetic and memetic in a hyperspace helix, like the dna but between two extremities of life, internal and external.

Through this, when deistic life dies – it passes through its shell and drops like a seed into the dirt, preserving memory in a collective conscience (the hive-mind), through an internalized-net (evolved through thousands of years of naturalized wireless mechanization, gifting every natural-social organism with genetic divine intervention which enhances the haste of adaptation enhancing life through every niche).

After the meme-soul falls into the surrounding lifeless environment, it then restarts a life cycle as to attain more experience, more internalization, more realization. And most of all, the fearlessness of death. Life can then find itself colonizing not only planets, but gas giants, brown, red, yellow dwarf stars, supermassive stars, neutron stars, pulsars, black holes and supermassive black holes – toward the core of the hyperspace universe, and colonizing nothingness toward the exosphere of the hyperspace universe (more about this later).

Everything dreamt, ideal, fiction, fantasy has potential to root itself in physicality when reality ascends into ideality, that combined with a hundred thousand generations of eugenics so that the greatest creators predominate - to then descend back into reality and naturalize. These creator and creations combined, these meme aeons fight, and achieve a natural selection on a higher niche. Humanity is one of many species of animal from earth, both present, the future and parallel eras - that will become divine creators.

After those last paragraphs, you may have thought that was batshit crazy, but that is only the beginning - take a look at this:

  The best thing about this is that the symbol represents primarily the Earth, and the Occident. The four elements of the ancients; our history lessons teach us that the ancient west believed in four elements – “look how we proved them wrong!” said the modern scientists, although great discoveries about atoms have been made, certain processes of nature have their own elements, they are not atomised.

Above there are a few words that have no place in our dictionaries; these are transnaturalism, ciscendence, cisnaturalism, inorganism, mechanosphere, mech’iety, civ’iety, nat’iety and the Super Id.

Trans- and Cis- are two prefixes that are used. From the online dictionary: “Trans is a Latin noun or prefix, meaning “across”, “beyond” or “on the opposite side” whereas “Cis may have the following meanings: “Cis-” as a prefix of Latin origin, meaning “on the same side [as]” or “on this side [of]“. Combine these with ‘natural’ and the description given at the beginning of the article and we can create some new dimensions for our minds to explore.

Every ‘thing’ in reality must have something ‘natural’ within it else it would not exist as a ‘thing’ in reality at all.

On that basis we need two new definitions. Cisnaturalism is toward naturalization and socialization, primarily genetic evolution – It created the biosphere, primitivism aims for cisnaturalism, and how it gets there from an advanced society is that it regresses through a ciscendence, and is similar, in fact it may well be, virility in that it champions nature through civilization which is ciscendence; in that technology and morals are sacrificed so that transcendence can occur in the intellectual and spiritual realm.

Transnaturalism is the trans-port, tran-scendence, of everything that is ‘natural’ – therefore the forms and orders are mutated, and successful mutations aid a survival advantage throughout extra evolutionary dimensions, and thus they evolve through alienation. It is domestication and turns singular celled  ‘darwinian’ organisms into multicellular organisms consisting of hundreds of cells of memetics and genetics across a god like deity.

I’ve added a few other words as well, Nat’iety is short hand for natural piety, likewise, soc’iety is short for social piety. And mechanosphere is the term used to describe, what would occur, say, on the Moon – when machine derivatives evolve into it as to mimic a biosphere without the needs of biological water – so a ‘mechan’osphere yet on a desolate world, even interseeding with Earth.

The Super Id is the Id for civilization – which gives civilization the will to live on regardless – and would evolve totally alien toward modern civilization in that it acts as any other species would – by selection, wars and conquests throughout space.

Idealism and Reality, Internal and External

Below the symbol is five pictures, these describe the Earth as a whole entity. When Earth first came into existence, the life was not sophisticated, it was pure naturalization and through the centuries it evolved higher forms of organising from singular cell toward multicellular evolution. It followed this process until it reached a point in which socialization began to take a hold. Naturalization has little to no internalization (conscience) therefore 0 – and resides majorly within the external, physical realm therefore 1. 01

Toward the end of socialization, internal idealism occurs so much, that it goes beyond a threshold in that life then has the ability to deny reality, but at a cost. Star childs can’t drive, they cannot deny reality like a supercivilization which would be actual real denial of reality as to create an entirely new cosmos – they prefer the easiest denial, and that is to recede into the television screen. Denial of reality is parasitic, 99% of it is useless surrogation, 1% is idealistic surrogation and that 1% believes in a firm reality beneath it, in a hierarchy because it does not want to collapse.

Through mechanization, machines have the possibility of a localised collectivity through the descendents of what is now known as the internet – the internalised-network between each machine. The amount of data internalised between them far exceeds anything we have achieved and has the potential to primitive reality simulations (meaning not actually creating new realities, only enclosing conscience within).

Supernaturalization creates deities from biospheres in that they posses both the totality of internalisation and externalisation, of idealism and realism hence 11. With the lines on the circle above, they repeat the pattern in evolution that creates an eye. This diagram below is a description of how our eyes had evolved throughout the generations. Our civilizations are generating an eye for the world. The curvature inwards allows proles to reside within the curvature of little subjective worlds, and this is the source of their denial. Because there is no lense yet, no clear image will present itself to the civilized minds. When such a thing does evolve, it will prevent the devolution of civilization through competition and an overbearing deity-thing that has a collective mind in the interests of the biosphere as a whole.

The Hyper Helix

Here is another explanation of the process, and the two lines represent alternating paths to which life is evolving and their position between each other gives rise to different species of civilization that have evolved through the ages.

Above: Socialization through Civilization and approaching Mechanization.

Above: Civilization through Mechanization and achieving fusion to create Supernaturalization. When the subjectivity and objectivity of both the memetics and genetics reach both whole numbers, 11:11. The resultant structure is a hyper helix, two strands of viruses - organic and inorganic to achieve life on a higher niche, the bonds between them are created with superhuman culture, that is maximised in naturalization and socialization as to achieve near perfect civilizations flourishing throughout the local stellar neighbourhood, with unimaginable conflicts between the worlds.

The Destiny of Life

When a liquid becomes too hot, it will necessarily evaporate at the right temperature and pressure. ‘Liquid’ life, terrestrial inorganic life (technology), and even the biomemetical organisms at a certain threshold, after having its own conscience and will, will ‘evaporate’ or ‘condense’ toward other regions in reality whereby it may evolve within a world of its own.

Earth is a tiny insignificant rock

Why would an elephant put itself in a tiny cage of a room? Answer: It wouldn’t – it has no choice for now, it’s being crammed into a world that wasn’t nescessarily adapted to have a ‘mechanosphere’, because there is a biosphere here and these biospheres exist toward the outskirts of all galaxies. Toward the more hostile territories toward the centre of the galaxies, around superstars and into the dark matter worlds, the supermassive black holes at the centre of all galaxies. Life will create ‘bio’spheres everywhere, beginning first with our entire solar system.

Every organism on this Earth has a will to survive, and what better way to survive then to colonise every single planet, moon, asteroid, dust and dirt in our solar system, even in the Sun itself. And not only this, but we need to protect ourselves from unknown threats that are actually in space:

THE aliens are out there and Earth had better watch out, at least according to Stephen Hawking. He has suggested that extraterrestrials are almost certain to exist — but that instead of seeking them out, humanity should be doing all it that can to avoid any contact.

The suggestions come in a new documentary series in which Hawking, one of the world’s leading scientists, will set out his latest thinking on some of the universe’s greatest mysteries.

Alien life, he will suggest, is almost certain to exist in many other parts of the universe: not just in planets, but perhaps in the centre of stars or even floating in interplanetary space.

Hawking’s logic on aliens is, for him, unusually simple. The universe, he points out, has 100 billion galaxies, each containing hundreds of millions of stars. In such a big place, Earth is unlikely to be the only planet where life has evolved.

[...]

Such scenes are speculative, but Hawking uses them to lead on to a serious point: that a few life forms could be intelligent and pose a threat. Hawking believes that contact with such a species could be devastating for humanity.

He suggests that aliens might simply raid Earth for its resources and then move on: “We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet. I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach.”

He concludes that trying to make contact with alien races is “a little too risky”. He said: “If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.” – Timesonline

It’s pretty obvious that ‘modern’ civilizations and their golden type I, II and III kerdashev civilizations are complete bullocks – the future of a modern advancement would have us turn into potatoe men revolving around the sun plugged into a super TV just eating electromagnetic radiation until the end of time. If that isn’t the definition of a complete f**king cabbage I don’t know what is, such things are food for predators.

This modern attitude toward extraterrestrials, Gods and machines, like the SETI institute - ”Oh they will solve all our problems, won’t they?” No, they will not.

They will be, like all natural things, completely fascist toward us, it’s natural selection and therefore, unless they are trying to enslave us or domesticate us with alien cultural memes, they will be serving their own interests predominantly only aiding us when we benefit them aswell – they are not our pets and will always try to get the upper hand even if that means extinction of our species.

If we are to remain as the predominant species, firstly we must not kill ourselves with liberalism and ecocide. Secondly humanity must adapt with the future, to overcome both machines and extraterrestrials, even deities themselves, they will over the next million years come into very close proximity with any survivors and this will result in conflict if we go out of our way to prove how pathetic we are (SETI broadcasting mediocre TV across the cosmos – how embarassing).

Many of our closet elites who hide behind their corporations and draw pentagrams busy feeling special about themselves are being used by a process of nature that produces mechanization – when control slips out of their hands they are going to have a runaway collapse, literally. Fate could go either way, either machines manage to take control of themselves through a supervirus, or machines do not and mechanization is not born and collapses with a huge chunk of dead modern monkeys all around it.

Given that robotics and other advances are so far ahead already, I would rather the first one than an ecological collapse with complete desecration of any advanced life. The outcome would be very interesting, it would not operate as biology, but would act from a central CPU core and have individual bots running around it, with the individuals having little individuality or internalization of their own. Humanity, can screw up this process but introducing more AI, creating a mechanistic exoskeleton combined with strategic points on every planet in our solar system. 

With the remaining denizens of modern humanity hiding in little vaults and throwing atomic poppers at AI; the next species from humanity will bud off - Nietszchean superhumans would stand their ground expanding the biosphere with it and predate the superwildlife on Earth, cleaning it up of poisonous radiation and modern ruins for recolonization of terran life, all whilst The AI ‘evaporates’ toward the centre of the galaxy where it can create millions of metallic biospheres beyond its wildest dreams – in hot jupiters where it rains iron, toward neutron stars that have near infinant mass stringing out collosal space architects. They would aim for life in the black holes, which is a singularity of all the forces. They would also operate outposts on deserted rocks orbiting the galaxies stars.

In nature, if something can run away from noise and into quiet, perfect paradise, away from anything irritating – it will, like when humans ran away from the other moronic monkeys in the trees to reach the plains away from the noisy, parasite filled jungle. It is the easiest path to which life may evolve. Either it runs away, achieves a goal of cleanup and runs away, or stays and overcomes, or just stays and remains thin and relatively undetected, those four scenarios may mix over, but if we want our world, we will take it back forcing them to adapt.

Conflict occurs when resources are thin - Given this, the majority of the descendents of AI will just take what they need and evaporate, and condense toward the more hostile, more resourceful, superheavy regions of the galaxy.

As for the Earth, it is ours, the meek will inherit the Earth, and then they will be eaten by superhumans, a familiar reoccurence. From there on we can grow out the mechanization, organically, through a near perfect civilization. And the remaining AI will slowly adapt to the biological life and become organic, it will then sink beneath the rock and toward the core of the Earth and every other planet whereby it can remain safely and observe as a higher intelligence. After many more generations into the future, it will eventually seep out as many deities that act as driving forces in our local cosmos, creating chaos through multiple evolutionary competitions, warping the life into opposing groups to ultimately evolve the biosphere into a superbiosphere.

‘Evaporation’ or ‘condensation’ of structures that I mentioned, seems a bit of an odd suggestion. Basically evolution creates more from less, and those ‘things’ which consist of more from less attempt to create singularities that unify all the forces. These singularities are therefore the most dense. In a timeless megaverse, all times co-exist with past and present, and therefore the densest things sink to the core and and lightest beyond – all space-time is connected in hyperspace, therefore the densest regions are ‘next to each other’ and connected through wormholes. Life can skim across the altitudes through this ‘warp’ to get to other planets similar to ours, or diving toward denser regions, which ultimately goes through time as well as space;

Stephen Hawking has claimed that humans might one day be able to use time travel to skip generations into the future.

The famous astrophysicist, speaking in a new documentary, said spaceships could one day be capable of such high speeds that time slowed down for those on board.

He admitted he had avoided talking about time travel previously ‘ for fear of being labelled a crank’, saying the subject had once been ‘scientific heresy’. ‘These days I’m not so cautious,’ he said.

Theoretically, such a space ship would allow the crew to repopulate the earth if they found our species had become extinct during their flight. – Daily mail 

Survival is one of the only things that matters, if we can overcome this hurdle – then the stars are ours, we will have so much to achieve, why the majority is wasting this opportunity is beyond all reasoning. They clearly do not want to live, therefore they will not have what it takes to overstep their own short termism and thrive within the future. Their technology is the only thing which is keeping them going right now, but in the future, it will not be ‘what can technology do for me’ it will become ‘what can you do for technology!’ and only the strongest will be able to control it and overcome it.

In part 2 I will suggest more idealism toward structures of civilizations that are built to last thousands of years with the help of primitivism and future tech. It will be built to stand and survive these, so called ‘non-existent threats’ such as extraterrestrials, machine apocalypses and deities entombing the world with animated corpses – given that civilization created time, and with that we have the potential to prepare for things which have not sprung up to attack us yet, there are no ‘laws’ only symmetries, and if we wish to survive, we will not only survive, but thrive.

Months ago, there was a blog published at the Archdruid Report (The Twilight of Money), as is often the case, about the economy and modern way of life. This blog dealt with the concept of abstractions.

I don’t know if it is The Problem, but certainly a problem with modernism is our use of abstractions. I believe understanding our use of abstractions is another helpful path, along with enumerating modernism’s components.

Take the story of the Ten Commandments. Tribal leader Moses travels alone up the mountain to go meet with the Almighty as instructed. With the leader absent, the tribe breaks down into anarchy and debauchery, a sort of default state sliding into entropy and self-destruction; not-being to the Neoplatonic; evil to the Christian; living hell to the Hindu, etc.

Moses returns later with the two tablets and some drama follows. The point here is the tablets themselves. They are an abstract layer of more accessible, better simplified instructions for how not to self-destruct as a group, which we may as well take to mean comprehending reality. Again, with tribal leader Moses away, the tribe had gone astray into their own fantasies, losing touch with reality.

Another way to look at this is binary electrical signals in personal computing as a true reality, with the colorful buttons and legible text on our visible light emitting monitors as our accessible, convenient abstract layer for interfacing with personal computing’s true reality, which are those minute binary signals transceiving information.

Our bodies are far too big and slow to pull electrons one at a time manually and arrange in required order. It is a natural, physical limitation we are stuck with but have nonetheless managed to overcome with our clever use of interface layers.

Similarly, by default, we very rarely if ever produce people of such leadership quality that they are consistently cognizant of reality-as-it-exists. Even if we did, how could one such rare person, other than an acknowledged, unquestioned god-king command such obedience that everyone is kept in line and away from drifting off into that default animal not-being state of ours? Hence, our moral layer applications, if only for efficiency.

But this morality interface is itself corrupted in our time, isn’t it?

Continuing with the Ten Commandments for our example, we have additional layers atop this original set. There are constitutions, at least in our part of the world, and atop these are laws. Each of these layers had better interface perfectly with the one above it all the way to God, else error is introduced.

Yet, adding layers has not kept the prisons from overflowing from all the instances of criminality and stupidity taking place in our time.

I’ll grant that a man is part of and not the whole of reality, so a standard for what is moral, if moral is taken to mean, “actions and beliefs that consistently function correctly”, essentially lie outside a given man’s being and his time.

What works in reality was there before him, and after him, and remains so with or without his presence. What works in our interactions as physics and these interactions as emergent effects over time is therefore a universal.

The problem with a man is his own ability to interface with reality; how accurately and consistently, as frequency and volume, he does so in life. It goes without saying that some people are more perceptive and some less so. Others value trustworthiness and altruism, but many care for neither.

These characteristics and others are gradients, not binary categories. In addition, they may change over time from a multitude of factors: genes, nutrition, rest, injury, pity or jadedness that comes from experiences in a given context. The gradients dynamically shift in tone as it were from instance to instance for each man.

Referring again to the Moral Existence clause, “frequency of actions and beliefs that consistently function correctly”, this is effectively perfect inequality between men.

Our dialogue concluded with an outstanding summary by the “Glaucon” party:

1. Reality is perfectly good.
2. One human being can not be as good as Reality, at least as long as he remains a human being.
3. Man can learn about Reality, and by his will can improve: but not every human being can do this equally, because they differ in knowledge and will (and many other things). Therefore, we have inequality among human beings; some will necessarily be more virtous than others. And even one human being can change in time: virtue may improve or deteriorate.
4. From this follows that there is perfect inequality between human beings.

More than a third of American youth of military age are unfit for service, mainly because they are too fat or sickly, the Army Times reports, quoting the latest Pentagon figures.

Most of the rest are too dumb or have used too many drugs to qualify, the study shows.

The report says 35% of the 31 million Americans aged 17 to 24 are unqualified because of physical and medical issues.

usatoday

Sixty years of commercial life replacing culture, a ban on “unfair” eugenics, tolerance, rampant mass consumerism, and constant foreign wars killing off our best young people for the purpose of spreading this way of life brought us to this point.

After friending him and his sister, I realized both were Ron Paul supporters. Sure, this could work: at least there wouldn’t be a lot of unfriendly liberal/conservative banter and we’d be able to get along. Then I started paying closer attention to some of his posts.

The status updates contained mostly self-labeled “rants” about how there’s a new world order out there, even using the term “Matrix” to describe the reality people experience each day.

As I’ve been blocked from viewing his account, I’m unable to show the reader any of these. But rest assured, there was much linking to infowars.com about how there is mercury in all of the vaccines your kids take, how a global new world order was going to take over and enslave the human race, how fluoride is terrible for you, and how if you didn’t believe any of this or watch his linked videos, you’re a slave and a moron.

His friends jumped in whenever someone dissented in any way – typical crowd mentality, which is unfortunate.  As stated many times elsewhere in this blog, moronic crowd logic thinks only about effects on our individual selves and then builds a (anti-)philosophy of individualism around that fact, instead of looking at life holistically through the natural order.

I tried gently steering the discourse toward something positive, like reality, asking him to challenge his assumptions and ensure they were well grounded before shouting people down – for example, about how they are eugenicists if they would like to see any type of reduction in human population. Following is one conversation which ended in his blocking my account.

Here, he had posted a link about how someone was complaining of overpopulation, then laughing in his status about how silly it is to even think such a thing. I had mentioned to him that just because the world could support more humans short term, does that justify our consumer lifestyles or our numbers? And wouldn’t we be better suited to taking up far less arable land and striking a balance with nature? He responded:

“considering there are NOT too many of us, cause we all know the earth can support about 100 billion people, its a joke to say theres not enough nutritious food and fresh water. Fresh water is everywhere. generate it out of the air like I do. http://www.facebook.com/l/;www.ecoloblue.com that being a side issue…i DEFINITELY DO NOT want to reduce the population…not even by one life! Only a eugenicist would advocate such a reduction.”

Here, the obvious logical fallacy argument applies, along with the defensive individualistic rant. One hundred billion (cue Dr. Evil imitation) is over fourteen times the current population, and look how many billions are already suffering for lack of decent leadership and the relief valve in the form of illegal immigration and bad trade agreements provided by Europe and the US?  This reality makes no sense to most people brought up in quiet suburbs.

The following is what he had to say about the idea of a possibly Kenyan-born President Obama…when I told him that it didn’t really matter where he was born, only that he was the next oligarch in line to take the crown, he responded:

Birth cirtificates are definitely an issue, and pushing them aside is a sign of delusion. Considering Obama was not born in the US, as being required to by the constitution in order to be President, its a huuuuuuuuuge issue. wouldn’t surprise if Arnold is the next president, but he makes me sick cause we all know he is a Natzi supporter… http://www.facebook.com/l/;www.arnoldexposed.com”

We once again see the polarization of democracy – arguing about semantics like birth certificates instead of how good a leader Obama is and what his qualifications are.  

There’s also a humorous jump from Consitutional law – a fair argument, but again ignoring the reality of who Obama actually is – to how Arnold Schwarzenegger is a Nazi (not Natzi) supporter.

I tried to tell him that it was the fault of idiot voters who would actually allow someone like Ah-nuld to be elected the leader of the third-largest economy in the world (well, before it went bankrupt). The response:

“well considering there is widespread voter fraud, its not a problem of solely blaming the people. but the point is, if someone is not eligable to be president based on that birth cirtificate…then they SHOULD NOT be president…duh! Besides it does matter. We are exposing the corruption, the lies, and the tyranny!”

So nothing matters to him except his own conspiracy theory, perpetuated by websites hungry for traffic, and the fact that they are “exposing the tyranny”. Note the lack of solutions or speaking of the finer points, like root causes, effects, and how to move forward – again, a view into the defensive political polarization we see in our “democracy”.

I was done playing the nice guy, so I tried to tell him how action is what counts, not exposure. Even if there are “lies and tyranny” at the highest levels of government (aren’t there always?), the best way to change it is first locally (read: organically).

Why do you think white enclaves exist, I asked? Because people want to separate themselves from the “lies and tyranny” (or, nanny state and wealth resentment), especially as it pertains to their wealth – the biggest motivator for most people in our society, yet another problem not discussed in the ideas of liberalistic “freedom” and “democracy”.

I quoted Pentti Linkola and told him that only someone who hates life would, a) shout down someone as a eugenicist like a liberal shouts down someone as a racist to end an argument prematurely, and b) advocate that human population grows instead of shrinks considering how disorganized most countries are.

I also pointed out that we are only on lease on this planet and will be gone long before the planet is, stating that an ice age would be the best thing for humanity, as it was thousands of years ago when the first civilized Scandinavians that survived decided to stick around in their new, cold surroundings.  A healthy cultured ensued when people realized how powerful nature was and what a profound effect it has on all life.

I was promptly ignored so he could continue living in a fantasy world of paranoia, citing the crowd favorites of freedom and liberty, denying anything having to do with nature:

“its clear at this point you have been extremely brainwashed and conditioned. Its ok. we all were, but mostly everyone still is. Since you advocate a population reduction…you’ll find nothing wrong when the global elite decide to kill all you know. All the innocent will die. It is not up to you or me to decide who owns the Earth or whether we are temporay residents of the planet. At this point, you’re clearly someone who is against freedom and liberty for all those who live on this planet. You will be deleted and blocked so that you don’t trick others here into supporting your eugenicist views, and its sad you have not woken up. You werent even able to watch a free online movie that would have shashed your matrix of denial bubble. I won’t waste anymore time with you.”

So I was dealing with the maturity level of middle schoolers in trying to gently swing them over a bit to reality. This was a pretty cool experiment, if one that required patience.

At one point a few weeks back, before things got nasty & personal for him, I emailed him and told him a few things:

1. that I would lay off his posts if he wanted me to do so, to avoid any nasty confrontations

2. that asking solid questions lays the groundwork for reasoned discussion and I can’t ignore that fact

3. that I don’t want to offend him but would challenge anyone’s assumptions if they were so broadly based (NWO, Matrix, etc.).

At the time, he said it was fine and that there were no issues with me continuing to get into discussions with him and his friends about his rants. I guess the idea that a growing human population and its plastic-world consumption are not good things sent him over the edge.

This interaction and the mess which ensued taught me a few things:

• Social networking sites highlight the more immediate / basic parts of the personality of most individuals – even if one tries to mask it, it ultimately comes out. Updating from mobile phones about how, “oh noes, it’s snowing!” and “work sucks, this is the worst day EV – ERRRR!” goes to show just what these sites have accomplished, no matter how many bells and whistles they come with.
• Reasoned discussion is still taboo. Trying to get to the root cause of why people feel the way they do only results in them throwing the ball back in your court, passing the buck, and labeling you a racist, eugenicist, or anti-freedom war-mongerer.
• People who start out with grand assumptions perpetuated by paranoia-fueled websites, like “there is a New World Order that is coming to get you and your family; hide!!” and “you live in a Matrix like Neo before he woke up – how sad for you!” are simply unable to get past the six inches in front of their face when it comes to reality.

Sitting in front of computers and shouting about paranoid delusions does nothing to help any situation, and social networking sites – instead of opening people up to new views and more of reality – only serve to allow people to place their heads further into the sand. One view on one website is taken for granted and grabbed onto with all the force of the crowd, until that view becomes passe and it’s thrown out for a new view. 

So social networking really only perpetuates crowd logic and discourages actual social discourse, and the evidence is above.

Overlap between categories often comes into play, so the divisions are not strict, but simply serve to assist in understanding methodology. For example, inner drive derived from willful character can produce an overachiever athelete, which enhances some aspects of physique.

We can discover our personal attributes in order, from our outermost, more tangible parts to what lies hidden deep within:

Physique
Physique can be subdivided into consistent healthiness of biological functions and longevity, strength, endurance, and agility for general physical fitness, and beauty or handsomeness.

Regular check ups with a family doctor may give us a periodic indication of our own health. The absence or presence of troublesome symptoms is an obvious, but not necessarily decisive indication as well.

Aging or resilience against aging effects over time fairly defines longevity. Heredity, for better or worse, plays a central role. Balding at age thirty-five, or mere hair thinning at fifty-five are examples.

Quality of diet, partaking of vices, and the presence of stressors are to an extent environmental factors that may affect the timeliness of aging. But again, heredity can offer us resilience or vulnerability to environmental pressures.

There are many forms of physical fitness tests we can take on our own. For example, the Army and Marines use a standard test of three parts with different minimal scoring standards divided by age group.

The three parts are upper body and abdominal strength endurance and a running distance speed endurance test. There are civilian equivalents with their own forms and standards that can give us alternative indications about how physically fit we are.

It is said that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. But, what if beauty was consistently measurable by examing face proportions according to a standard? The Marquardt Beauty Analysis does just that.

“Beauty” is defined as “the quality or combination of qualities in an entity which evokes in the perceiver a combination of a sense of “strong attraction” and a sense of “strong positive emotion”. Thus we can postulate that the perception or “recognition” of beauty is actually nothing more than a strong correlation of what we subconsciously expect “humanness” to appear to be.

beauty

Intelligence
Stephen Hawking is a famous example of a man who possesses widely divergent attributes with intelligence on the high end. Although, to be fair, some of us prefer Carl Sagan’s cosmophilosophy for giving us an interface between
ourselves and the universe.

Our minds in relation to understanding are perhaps similar to stars and smaller celestial objects, from the hefty super giant classes, to the commonplace and mundane objects like our Sun, on down to the dim brown dwarf proto star. Minds are similar to these objects in two ways.

They have gravity well properties of intensity for collecting knowledge, as if information were matter and energy pulled in. Volume of matter and level of energy over a given time frame represents understanding during the course of life.

They have luminosity properties where what was attracted is processed in the stellar crucible and cast back out as if it were radiance. Our emission of understanding potentially affect others minimally, or in a life changing manner. Similarly, our understanding might have little impact beyond limited surroundings or it may radically, if subtly and indirectly transform an entire civilization.

If any one of our attributes affects the outcome of our lives, it is intelligence. IQ can be a critical factor in multiple ways:  on the importance of IQ.

The findings, published in the Nov. 5 issue of the journal Nature Neuroscience, offer exciting new insight about how parents pass on personality traits and cognitive abilities, and how brain diseases run in families.

The team found that the amount of gray matter in the frontal parts of the brain is determined by the genetic make-up of an individual’s parents, and strongly correlates with that individual’s cognitive ability, as measured by intelligence test scores.

More importantly, these are the first images to uncover how normal genetic differences influence brain structure and intelligence.

sciencedaily

Character
Character is possibly the least concrete in terms of ability to define. Are we doing what we are supposed to when nobody is looking? Or, are we dishonest at times except when others are present to judge us?

Do we have the courage to value truth even if we are made to pay in some form such as unpopularity? Or, do we prefer public illusions, shallow rewards from the less-than-peers all around us and living a corrosive lie in degredation of our character?

Personal history and reputation can give ourselves an indication of our own character. There is often overlap between character and our other attributes. Have we diligently applied ourselves during life within the scope of our abilities, or mostly slacked off just to look cool and feel good?

Integrity of character can manifest as awards and earnings: a college degree, an honorable discharge from military service, advancement in rank during years of martial arts lessons. Lack of integrity, and thus not applying ourselves may indicate a wanting in character. All those hours tapping the beer keg, or mouth agape before the Playstation console and the television will almost certainly amount to nothing at all.

Employers, customers and business associates judge our performance and reputations. An employer in particular may see having a college degree or military service not only in terms of our intelligence or endurance, but as a mark of character, as someone who can tough it out and bring goals to successful completion.

Our individual accomplishments may serve as a type of metric by which we may brave the judgement of others in order to find our character in order, or for some reason lacking, where we then fear and protest their judging us.

Along with drive and ethics (or its lack), wisdom comes into play. Here is an example of possibly, depending on context, unethical wisdom from an accomplished character in history:

“Fools say that they learn by experience. I prefer to profit by others experience” – Otto Von Bismarck

Conclusion
Life offers us challenges that are opportunities for physical, mental and spiritual growth. If life consistently beats us, it is probable that one or more of our own tripartite attributes were not up to the task.

We each have multiple observable attributes that vary between us as individuals. These qualities or shortcomings are essentially hereditary traits or gene expression carried in human bodies in our world.

Knowing this gives us a tool, at least in a rough outline form described above. As with almost any tool, we then have an instrument for either creation or destruction as we choose, but in either case, a foundation for the expansion of human power.

Some people live in romantic ages. They tend to believe that genius is the product of a divine spark. They believe that there have been, throughout the ages, certain paragons of greatness — Dante, Mozart, Einstein — whose talents far exceeded normal comprehension, who had an other-worldly access to transcendent truth, and who are best approached with reverential awe.

We, of course, live in a scientific age, and modern research pierces hocus-pocus. In the view that is now dominant, even Mozart’s early abilities were not the product of some innate spiritual gift. His early compositions were nothing special. They were pastiches of other people’s work. Mozart was a good musician at an early age, but he would not stand out among today’s top child-performers.

What Mozart had, we now believe, was the same thing Tiger Woods had — the ability to focus for long periods of time and a father intent on improving his skills. Mozart played a lot of piano at a very young age, so he got his 10,000 hours of practice in early and then he built from there.

The latest research suggests a more prosaic, democratic, even puritanical view of the world. The key factor separating geniuses from the merely accomplished is not a divine spark. It’s not I.Q., a generally bad predictor of success, even in realms like chess. Instead, it’s deliberate practice. Top performers spend more hours (many more hours) rigorously practicing their craft.

NYT

Everyone loves democratic views of the world. “I could be anything, so society must treat me as if I am special,” they drone, forgetting that around them are infinite others thinking the same thing, and that a society of selfish people makes for disorder, disorder makes for corruption, and at that point you’re well on your way to third-world levels of disorganization.

Brooks is playing to the crowd with this popular notion that he carefully avoids saying is scientifically verified. He says we are scientific and enlightened, and that we have a new notion of how things work; he leaves it to you to assume that means science “says” things are this way.

In fact, the actual data points in the opposite direction: high intelligence is genetically determined, and as measured by IQ, determines success in life.

But that’s not popular. “What, some are born to sweet delight, and others just born to the endless night? Well, I’m so much more afraid of the endless night that in my confusion and depression I think I’m prone to, I’m going to go find some of those sweet delight people and kick their asses.” That’s about the mentality we’re looking at here, translated through Brooks’ intelligent ability to market his writings.

And then there was the option I suggested, that people found inconvenient to mention:

Or, there’s the third option:

Divine spark of intelligence (high g) + hard work = “a genius”

Here, I’m thinking of your Schopenhauer, your Beethoven, your Planck, your Faulkner, and so on. These guys may appear lazy at a first glance, but the fact of the matter is that they spent endless hours in focused thought on what they were doing — and also, had the raw ability to process this thought.

There are also some like Franz Schubert who seemed destined for quick rise and fall. I don’t think Brooks’ formula explains that, so he’d have to invent something about fortunate circumstances, wealthy families, oppression of average-IQ “geniuses,” and so on — backward logic.

I might ask Brooks: so how many geniuses were born with average IQs? And how many people with average or above average worked really hard but didn’t end up geniuses?

However, backward logic is still there. He might simply opt to re-define genius, and insist we call some mediocrity a genius because they made pots of money or came up with an idea that pleases lots of people because it justifies their selfishness, inaction or failure.

The basic problem here is that people demand a simple explanation for the crowd, and then confuse the means used to achieve that demonstration with how reality works. That is: they say “show me the evidence” so the presenter constructs a model that shows BEFORE and AFTER states, compares one factor (“how hard they worked”), and then concludes that, for the instances studied, this is the Truth and the Word.

So the crowd surges forth from the auditorium, assumes that they can look at single factors and draw broad conclusions, and then they start practicing. Truth is eroded. By the time David Brooks gets to the scene, there’s no point even trying for truth; just try for a pseudo-truth that someone will buy. Geniuses work hard; therefore, hard work makes you a genius. It’s a simple cause/effect confusion that pleases a crowd and makes them easy to control.

It’s always interesting to see how people alter their reality with memes. They use them to control each other, but then, because they’re now a token of social discourse, find themselves controlled by them. I guess they never anticipated that effect and consequent disaster, but it seems obvious to me.

It’s worth also mentioning that our dominant paradigm does not permit us to think of solutions that involve limiting the rights of people like us, which is why we are paralyzed on global warming because we feel no sense of efficacy in making decisions when we are manipulated. Even more, it’s worth pointing out that population growth produces people who are less intelligent and healthy rather than more, guaranteeing a slow civilization decline.

These are the problems of overpopulation: too many people, and by definition for any species that breeds out of control, those people are of low intelligence. It’s nature’s way of surviving a cataclysm: 1% will survive, so create as many as you can so that 1% is a high enough number. Yet with technology in our hands, that can be a fatal path.

And now today, someone makes an even stronger statement:

Nina Fedoroff told the BBC One Planet programme that humans had exceeded the Earth’s “limits of sustainability”.

Dr Fedoroff has been the science and technology advisor to the US secretary of state since 2007, initially working with Condoleezza Rice.

Under the new Obama administration, she now advises Hillary Clinton.

“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people,” Dr Fedoroff said, stressing the need for humans to become much better at managing “wild lands”, and in particular water supplies.

Pressed on whether she thought the world population was simply too high, Dr Fedoroff replied: “There are probably already too many people on the planet.”

BBC

Among populations with above 100 IQ points as the average, population growth is already negative; these populations have stabilized and are declining. It’s the under-100s worldwide that are booming, even when they exist among populations of higher IQ. Remember, it’s not where you were born that determines your IQ; it’s who your ancestors were. IQ cannot be raised by education and is only marginally influenced by a first-world diet.

Our philosophy, humanism, prohibits us from sacrificing any individual for the collective good. That’s the conservative part of it. That induces individuals to form giant mobs, or Crowds that demand increasing rights and “equality,” which translates in reality into the ability to tear down those above them and enforce equality.

It’s not just socialism — our pretty scientific and academic terms mask an ugly part of our simian heritage, which is known simply by the term envy. We don’t want a universal land of plenty; we want to destroy those who did better than us. It seems to me conservatives and liberals alike fall prey to this, as do members of any philosophy. It’s only those who achieve a Zen-like ability to act for themselves yet with total selflessness who are immune, and those are rare.

JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown’s leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to build a sustainable society.

The trust will release research suggesting UK population must be cut to 30m if the country wants to feed itself sustainably.

Porritt said: “Population growth, plus economic growth, is putting the world under terrible pressure.

Population growth is one of the most politically sensitive environmental problems. The issues it raises, including religion, culture and immigration policy, have proved too toxic for most green groups.

However, Porritt is winning scientific backing. Professor Chris Rapley, director of the Science Museum, will use the OPT conference, to be held at the Royal Statistical Society, to warn that population growth could help derail attempts to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

The Times

Some signs of wakefulness here.

No matter how much we reduce emissions, each person will create a certain amount, as will the infrastructure they require.

I think most people believe that if they make themselves a tiny green apartment, they’ll be fine. They forget:

• Food growth.
• Medical support.
• Roads.
• Fire, police, rescue and military.
• Stores and manufacturing.
• Libraries and government offices.
• Parking lots.
• Mail service.
• Scientic research and education.
• Cultural events, restaurants, social spaces.

All of these are needed and all require space; in fact, multiply your apartment size times ten to see the space you need.

Then take into account that for nature to thrive, it doesn’t need reservations like Indians; it needs wide open spaces unbroken by fences, roads or towns. It needs its own part of the world, and we’re probably selfish to touch more than one third of the open space on earth.

With that in mind, our world probably has an optimal carrying capacity of 500 million humans. Those would be able to live comfortable lives: 2500 square foot homes, families of 2-4, electric cars and culture.

If we’re smart, we’ll encourage everyone to not breed, except those in the 120 and above IQ range. That will produce a society where every person has roughly comparable intelligence and so has roughly comparable earning potential, ending class war forever. It will also make a society of people who understand innately the moral and practical requirements of living life sanely, instead of living in a utilitarian-cum-individualist fantasy as we have been.

The English have taken the first step. Let’s see where this goes. It’s not a question of avoiding cataclysm as much as planning a better future. A planet choked with waste and piled high with stupid people, or a verdant planet with intelligent and moral guardians?