<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More American New Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/</link>
	<description>New Right, Conservationist, Traditionalist, Deep Ecology and Conservative Thought: Conservation Conservatism (Crunchy Paleoconservatism)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.A.G.</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>M.A.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>Sobriety and chastity are very important values.

Self-control, order, and mastery over oneself, are central values of every great society. Values that are therefore manifested in the diferent languages of the diferent religions. Think of the spartans, the medieval knights or the samurai. The superior man in the world of tradition is a man who is in control of himself, who is above fear, and above his animalistic passions. This is the real &quot;superman&quot;, or in more traditionalistic language &quot;the hero&quot;.

And a great civilization is the creation of great men. You are worried about &quot;whites&quot; quantity. I&#039;m more worried about white QUALITY. The vast majority of whites are not &quot;Aryans&quot; anymore. They don&#039;t represent a superior ideal anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sobriety and chastity are very important values.</p>
<p>Self-control, order, and mastery over oneself, are central values of every great society. Values that are therefore manifested in the diferent languages of the diferent religions. Think of the spartans, the medieval knights or the samurai. The superior man in the world of tradition is a man who is in control of himself, who is above fear, and above his animalistic passions. This is the real &#8220;superman&#8221;, or in more traditionalistic language &#8220;the hero&#8221;.</p>
<p>And a great civilization is the creation of great men. You are worried about &#8220;whites&#8221; quantity. I&#8217;m more worried about white QUALITY. The vast majority of whites are not &#8220;Aryans&#8221; anymore. They don&#8217;t represent a superior ideal anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.A.G.</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>M.A.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>First of all, excuse me for my poor english. This is not my first language.

Keef Nihilist, you are dead wrong. Every culture is a coherent totality, every value, every belief, and every custom is part of a &quot;weltanschaunng&quot;, a worldview. This worldview is meta-rational and cannot be explained or reduced to simple arguments. Belonging to a community is not only a way of think, but a way of feel, and, above all, a way of being. This Worldview is the very soul of a culture, and when its lost, then the whole culture beging his decline. Every civilization dies slowly when it loses its identity.

Because of that &quot;diversity&quot; in the multi-cultural sense, is pure poison. Multiculturalism weaken the core values of a civilization, and eventually destroy the whole soul of a civilization. When every value is questioned, the consecuence is a negative nihilism, that destroy every cultural value, and when that happens the only thing that stand are individual interest. In other words the catastrophe of modern society: a machine, in wich every human being is nothing more than a gear.

The alternative to this is Traditionalism, in the Evolian sense. A return to the core values of ALL the great civilizations of the world. The core values of Egypt, of the ancient Japan, of Rome, Greece, and the Inceans. We are not talking about the diferent cultures, but of the one TRADITION.

The Traditional values are perennial, because they are proved by EXPERIENCE. They are above the word games of simple &quot;rationality&quot;. That&#039;s why values like hierarchy, chaste, warrior values, cannot be questioned.

A Positive Nihilism is not the pursue of &quot;nothigness&quot;, but of the naked reality, beyond the fantasies of utopianism, and the sophistic arguments of modernity. Pure reality can only be found in EXPERIENCE. And experience can only be found in TRADITION.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, excuse me for my poor english. This is not my first language.</p>
<p>Keef Nihilist, you are dead wrong. Every culture is a coherent totality, every value, every belief, and every custom is part of a &#8220;weltanschaunng&#8221;, a worldview. This worldview is meta-rational and cannot be explained or reduced to simple arguments. Belonging to a community is not only a way of think, but a way of feel, and, above all, a way of being. This Worldview is the very soul of a culture, and when its lost, then the whole culture beging his decline. Every civilization dies slowly when it loses its identity.</p>
<p>Because of that &#8220;diversity&#8221; in the multi-cultural sense, is pure poison. Multiculturalism weaken the core values of a civilization, and eventually destroy the whole soul of a civilization. When every value is questioned, the consecuence is a negative nihilism, that destroy every cultural value, and when that happens the only thing that stand are individual interest. In other words the catastrophe of modern society: a machine, in wich every human being is nothing more than a gear.</p>
<p>The alternative to this is Traditionalism, in the Evolian sense. A return to the core values of ALL the great civilizations of the world. The core values of Egypt, of the ancient Japan, of Rome, Greece, and the Inceans. We are not talking about the diferent cultures, but of the one TRADITION.</p>
<p>The Traditional values are perennial, because they are proved by EXPERIENCE. They are above the word games of simple &#8220;rationality&#8221;. That&#8217;s why values like hierarchy, chaste, warrior values, cannot be questioned.</p>
<p>A Positive Nihilism is not the pursue of &#8220;nothigness&#8221;, but of the naked reality, beyond the fantasies of utopianism, and the sophistic arguments of modernity. Pure reality can only be found in EXPERIENCE. And experience can only be found in TRADITION.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkage is Good for You: New Years Throwback Edition &#124; In Mala Fide</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkage is Good for You: New Years Throwback Edition &#124; In Mala Fide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>[...] Stevens &#8211; &#8220;More American New Right&#8220;, &#8220;Collapse&#8220;, &#8220;Interview: Alex Birch of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stevens &#8211; &#8220;More American New Right&#8220;, &#8220;Collapse&#8220;, &#8220;Interview: Alex Birch of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M0T0K0</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>M0T0K0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Sanrabb.  

I would not mind voting &amp; putting in some community support for an American New Right party based upon Amerika.org - ANUS - Prozackian ideas (Pragmatism.us aside, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Sanrabb.  </p>
<p>I would not mind voting &amp; putting in some community support for an American New Right party based upon Amerika.org &#8211; ANUS &#8211; Prozackian ideas (Pragmatism.us aside, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanrabb</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanrabb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>I should also say that while I&#039;ve been rather critical, I think you&#039;ve really got something here.  If I didn&#039;t think it was worthwhile, overall, I wouldn&#039;t be saying anything about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also say that while I&#8217;ve been rather critical, I think you&#8217;ve really got something here.  If I didn&#8217;t think it was worthwhile, overall, I wouldn&#8217;t be saying anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanrabb</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanrabb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>Sobriety and chastity?  This is ridiculous-- we have far better things to do than attempt to involve ourselves in peoples&#039; sex lives, or tell them that they can&#039;t drink, or smoke a joint.

&quot;People who engage in casual sex devalue their ability to appreciate partners as more than bodies, and so damage society’s conception of family, leading to dysgenic breeding&quot;

You would need to demonstrate that any of these three statements are true.  

Casual sex is an absolutely natural process.  Further, do you really think that with a decreasing white population, it&#039;s a good idea to convince whites to have fewer children?

The problem isn&#039;t casual sex: whites aren&#039;t having ENOUGH sex. 

The problem is race mixing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sobriety and chastity?  This is ridiculous&#8211; we have far better things to do than attempt to involve ourselves in peoples&#8217; sex lives, or tell them that they can&#8217;t drink, or smoke a joint.</p>
<p>&#8220;People who engage in casual sex devalue their ability to appreciate partners as more than bodies, and so damage society’s conception of family, leading to dysgenic breeding&#8221;</p>
<p>You would need to demonstrate that any of these three statements are true.  </p>
<p>Casual sex is an absolutely natural process.  Further, do you really think that with a decreasing white population, it&#8217;s a good idea to convince whites to have fewer children?</p>
<p>The problem isn&#8217;t casual sex: whites aren&#8217;t having ENOUGH sex. </p>
<p>The problem is race mixing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CallistoRising</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>CallistoRising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>Perhaps, but the main downfall is that with diversity, whilst different perspectives are brought into the equation (reassessing our sense of infallibility), people trust eachother less as others are no longer beholden to the same general value-system or of the same temperament. The only value-system in the liberal west is tolerance for other value-systems, and little more. 

Ironically, the same people preaching diversity in the West for the most part wouldn&#039;t dare do it in other places where we could say that &#039;ignorance and bigotry&#039; were rife. They pussy-foot around Islamic strongholds in the Middle East and would cry foul (cultural insensitivity etcetera) if we tried to proselytize the virtues of industriousness in Africa, despite the fact that those are certainly not &#039;diverse&#039; places but tend to have a greater social cohesion for the very reason that they have a united value-system and clearer definition of what is and isn&#039;t acceptable in their culture.

Nobody necessarily thinks that their traditions and norms are &#039;some sort of universal gold standard&#039;. In the West at least we don&#039;t believe this as much we used to (in fact less so than in Africa or the Middle East) because we have the communication and transport technology (not just &#039;books&#039; as your argument to the extreme suggests) to observe and subsequently respect that other cultures have different value-systems. We know what is right for us, and what is right for them, bearing in mind of course that there is no &quot;absolute diversity vs no diversity whatsoever&quot; dichotomy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps, but the main downfall is that with diversity, whilst different perspectives are brought into the equation (reassessing our sense of infallibility), people trust eachother less as others are no longer beholden to the same general value-system or of the same temperament. The only value-system in the liberal west is tolerance for other value-systems, and little more. </p>
<p>Ironically, the same people preaching diversity in the West for the most part wouldn&#8217;t dare do it in other places where we could say that &#8216;ignorance and bigotry&#8217; were rife. They pussy-foot around Islamic strongholds in the Middle East and would cry foul (cultural insensitivity etcetera) if we tried to proselytize the virtues of industriousness in Africa, despite the fact that those are certainly not &#8216;diverse&#8217; places but tend to have a greater social cohesion for the very reason that they have a united value-system and clearer definition of what is and isn&#8217;t acceptable in their culture.</p>
<p>Nobody necessarily thinks that their traditions and norms are &#8216;some sort of universal gold standard&#8217;. In the West at least we don&#8217;t believe this as much we used to (in fact less so than in Africa or the Middle East) because we have the communication and transport technology (not just &#8216;books&#8217; as your argument to the extreme suggests) to observe and subsequently respect that other cultures have different value-systems. We know what is right for us, and what is right for them, bearing in mind of course that there is no &#8220;absolute diversity vs no diversity whatsoever&#8221; dichotomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keef Nihilist</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Keef Nihilist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>&quot;If we’re all equal, then diversity brings nothing new that cannot come from a study of other cultures.&quot;

This is completely incorrect. Diversity means having to interact with people from different backgrounds on a daily basis, which is far more instructive than simply studying other cultures. Diversity provides feedback, which you don&#039;t get from a book, and forces people to evaluate their own conceptions as they relate to those held by others. Without diversity in daily life, people can easily be led to believe that the traditions and norms they are used to are some sort of universal gold standard, which can lead to ignorance and bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If we’re all equal, then diversity brings nothing new that cannot come from a study of other cultures.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is completely incorrect. Diversity means having to interact with people from different backgrounds on a daily basis, which is far more instructive than simply studying other cultures. Diversity provides feedback, which you don&#8217;t get from a book, and forces people to evaluate their own conceptions as they relate to those held by others. Without diversity in daily life, people can easily be led to believe that the traditions and norms they are used to are some sort of universal gold standard, which can lead to ignorance and bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Von_Renke</title>
		<link>http://www.amerika.org/politics/more-american-new-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>Von_Renke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amerika.org/?p=4471#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>I think I may already know the answer to this question, but where would the American New Right stand on gun rights for citizens? 



Methods of taxation? 



Regards,


V.R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I may already know the answer to this question, but where would the American New Right stand on gun rights for citizens? </p>
<p>Methods of taxation? </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>V.R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

